In vitro activities of omadacycline, eravacycline, cefiderocol, apramycin, and comparator antibiotics against Acinetobacter baumannii causing bloodstream infections in Greece, 2020-2021: a multicenter study.

Resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii to multiple clinically important antimicrobials has increased to very high rates in Greece, rendering most of them obsolete. The aim of this study was to determine the molecular epidemiology and susceptibilities of A. baumannii isolates collected from different hospitals across Greece. Single-patient A. baumannii strains isolated from blood cultures (n = 271), from 19 hospitals, in a 6-month period (November 2020-April 2021) were subjected to minimum inhibitory concentration determination and molecular testing for carbapenemase, 16S rRNA methyltransferase and mcr gene detection and epidemiological evaluation. 98.9% of all isolates produced carbapenemase OXA-23. The vast majority (91.8%) of OXA-23 producers harbored the armA and were assigned mainly (94.3%) to sequence group G1, corresponding to IC II. Apramycin (EBL-1003) was the most active agent inhibiting 100% of the isolates at ≤16 mg/L, followed by cefiderocol which was active against at least 86% of them. Minocycline, colistin and ampicillin-sulbactam exhibited only sparse activity (S <19%), while eravacycline was 8- and 2-fold more active than minocycline and tigecycline respectively, by comparison of their MIC50/90 values. OXA-23-ArmA producing A. baumannii of international clone II appears to be the prevailing epidemiological type of this organism in Greece. Cefiderocol could provide a useful alternative for difficult to treat Gram-negative infections, while apramycin (EBL-1003), the structurally unique aminoglycoside currently in clinical development, may represent a highly promising agent against multi-drug resistant A. baumanni infections, due to its high susceptibility rates and low toxicity.

Carbapenemase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: implication on future therapeutic strategies.

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of carbapenemase resistant Gram-negative is designated as an 'urgent' priority of public health. Carbapenemase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP) is linked with significant mortality. Conventionally used antibiotics (polymyxins, tigecycline, aminoglycosides, etc.) are associated with poor efficacy and toxicity profiles are quite worrisome. AREAS COVERED: This article reviews mechanism of resistance and evidence regarding novel treatments of infections caused by CPKP, focusing mainly on currently approved new therapies and implications on future therapeutic strategies. A review of novel ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitors (BLI) recently approved and in clinical development as well as cefiderocol, eravacycline and apramycin are discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Newly approved and forthcoming antimicrobial agents are promising to combat infections caused by CPKP. Ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam are novel agents with favorable outcome and associated with improved mortality in KPC-producing K. pneumoniae infections. However, are inactive against metallo-ß-lactamases (MBL). Novel BLI in later stage of development, i.e. aztreonam-avibactam, cefepime-zidebactam, cefepime-taniborbactam, and meropenem-nacubactam as well as cefiderocol are active in vitro against both KPC and MBL. Potential expectations of future therapeutic strategies are improved potency against CPKP, more tolerable safety profile, and capability of overcoming current resistance mechanism of multidrug-resistant K. pneumoniae.

Emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance through distinct genomic adaptations in KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae of sequence type 39 during treatment.

Three ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strains of ST39 were isolated in Greece, from rectal swabs of three patients after 10-15 days of treatment. The patients were treated with ceftazidime-avibactam as monotherapy or in combination with colistin. Two of these strains harbored a D179Y or a D179V substitution in the Ω loop of KPC-2, corresponding to KPC-33, or to the novel KPC-57, respectively. The third strain had a 15 amino acid insertion after position 259 in the KPC-2, corresponding to KPC-44.

In vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam alone and in combination with amikacin against MDR/XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Greece.

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparator agents against MDR non-MBL Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates collected from nine Greek hospitals and we assessed the potential synergistic interaction between ceftolozane/tazobactam and amikacin. METHODS: A total of 160 non-MBL P. aeruginosa isolates collected in 2016 were tested for susceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam and seven comparator agents including ceftazidime/avibactam. Time-kill assays were performed for synergy testing using ceftolozane/tazobactam 60 or 7.5 mg/L, corresponding to the peak and trough concentrations of a 1.5 g q8h dose, respectively, in combination with 69 mg/L amikacin, corresponding to the free peak plasma concentration. Synergy was defined as a ≥2 log10 cfu/mL reduction compared with the most active agent. RESULTS: Overall, ceftolozane/tazobactam inhibited 64.4% of the P. aeruginosa strains at ≤4 mg/L. Colistin was the most active agent (MIC50/90, 0.5/2 mg/L; 96.3% susceptible) followed by ceftazidime/avibactam (MIC50/90, 4/16 mg/L; 80.6% susceptible). GES-type enzymes were predominantly responsible for ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance; 81.6% of the non-producers were susceptible. MICs for the P. aeruginosa isolates selected for synergy testing were 2-32 mg/L ceftolozane/tazobactam and 2-128 mg/L amikacin. The combination of ceftolozane/tazobactam with amikacin was synergistic against 85.0% of all the isolates tested and against 75.0% of the GES producers. No antagonistic interactions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Ceftolozane/tazobactam demonstrated good in vitro activity against MDR/XDR P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, including strains with co-resistance to other antipseudomonal drugs. In combination with amikacin, a synergistic interaction at 24 h was observed against 85.0% of P. aeruginosa strains tested, including isolates with ceftolozane/tazobactam MICs of 32 mg/L or GES producers.

Outbreak of KPC-2-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae endowed with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance mediated through a VEB-1-mutant (VEB-25), Greece, September to October 2019.

From September to October 2019, seven patients colonised or infected with a ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA)-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-2-producing K. pneumoniae were detected in two intensive care units of a Greek general hospital. The outbreak strain was sequence type (ST)147 and co-produced KPC-2 and the novel plasmid-borne Vietnamese extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (VEB)-25 harbouring a K234R substitution associated with CZA resistance. Epidemiological investigations revealed that the resistance was probably acquired by horizontal transmission independently from previous CZA exposure.

Evaluation of in vitro methods for testing tigecycline combinations against carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment of infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CPKP) frequently involves combination therapy with various antimicrobial agents in the hope of achieving synergistic effects. Routine laboratory antimicrobial synergy testing is a service that is currently unavailable owing to the laborious nature of the reference time-kill assay (TKA) as well as the widely used chequerboard method. In this study, we explored whether easier methods, based on the Etest technique, might offer a suitable alternative. METHODS: In vitro interactions of tigecycline combination with colistin, gentamicin, fosfomycin or meropenem against 26 CPKP isolates were evaluated employing the TKA, chequerboard method and three Etest methodologies (the MIC/MIC ratio, the cross formation and the agar/Etest method). Rates of consequent synergy and concordance of the studied methods were determined. RESULTS: All antimicrobial combinations demonstrated some degree of synergy against the CPKP isolates tested. No antagonism was observed for any of the combinations. All methods showed poor synergy concordance with the TKA, producing non-significant kappa (κ) results. Etest methods (MIC/MIC ratio and agar/Etest) exhibited fair agreement (κ=0.29 and 0.38, respectively) with the chequerboard method. CONCLUSION: There is a poor correlation between synergy testing methods of tigecycline combinations, which may be associated with their different endpoints. To elucidate method comparability and reliability, their correlation with clinical outcomes appears important.