Development of a deep learning based image processing tool for enhanced organoid analysis.

Contrary to 2D cells, 3D organoid structures are composed of diverse cell types and exhibit morphologies of various sizes. Although researchers frequently monitor morphological changes, analyzing every structure with the naked eye is difficult. Given that deep learning (DL) has been used for 2D cell image segmentation, a trained DL model may assist researchers in organoid image recognition and analysis. In this study, we developed OrgaExtractor, an easy-to-use DL model based on multi-scale U-Net, to perform accurate segmentation of organoids of various sizes. OrgaExtractor achieved an average dice similarity coefficient of 0.853 from a post-processed output, which was finalized with noise removal. Correlation between CellTiter-Glo assay results and daily measured organoid images shows that OrgaExtractor can reflect the actual organoid culture conditions. The OrgaExtractor data can be used to determine the best time point for organoid subculture on the bench and to maintain organoids in the long term.

A machine learning model for predicting hepatocellular carcinoma risk in patients with chronic hepatitis B.

BACKGROUND: Machine learning (ML) algorithms can be used to overcome the prognostic performance limitations of conventional hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk models. We established and validated an ML-based HCC predictive model optimized for patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infections receiving antiviral therapy (AVT). METHODS: Treatment-naïve CHB patients who were started entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) were enrolled. We used a training cohort (n = 960) to develop a novel ML model that predicted HCC development within 5 years and validated the model using an independent external cohort (n = 1937). ML algorithms consider all potential interactions and do not use predefined hypotheses. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients in the training cohort was 48 years, and most patients (68.9%) were men. During the median 59.3 (interquartile range 45.8-72.3) months of follow-up, 69 (7.2%) patients developed HCC. Our ML-based HCC risk prediction model had an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.900, which was better than the AUCs of CAMD (0.778) and REAL B (0.772) (both p < .05). The better performance of our model was maintained (AUC = 0.872 vs. 0.788 for CAMD and 0.801 for REAL B) in the validation cohort. Using cut-off probabilities of 0.3 and 0.5, the cumulative incidence of HCC development differed significantly among the three risk groups (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our new ML model performed better than models in terms of predicting the risk of HCC development in CHB patients receiving AVT.