RESUMEN
Gastric wall abscess is a rare condition characterized by a purulent inflammatory process resulting in the formation of a pocket of pus in the stomach. As the mucosa is usually intact, it requires various tools such as endoscopic ultrasonography or computed tomography for the differential diagnosis to rule out more common subepithelial tumors. Even after the diagnosis, the treatment for gastric wall abscess was previously restricted to surgical resection in combination with antibiotics. Currently, in order to avoid unnecessary surgery, the alternative method of initial treatment with an endoscopic approach is recommended. It also helps to choose appropriate antibiotics with confirmation of the pathogen by drainage. There are few reports that describe the detailed processing of the endoscopic drainage, and there is no consensus on the treatment. The pathogens that cause gastric wall abscess are usually Streptococci, Staphylococci, and Escherichia coli. There is only one case reported to be caused by Candida albicans. This is the first report of Elizabethkingia anopheles as the pathogen of the gastric wall abscess. Here, we report a case of gastric wall abscess in a 75-year-old man, safely treated by endoscopic drainage and antibiotics, confirmed by isolating the contents of the abscess.
Asunto(s)
Absceso , Enfermedades Raras , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Absceso/diagnóstico , Absceso/cirugía , Enfermedades Raras/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Raras/patología , Estómago/cirugía , Drenaje/métodos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Metformin may reduce cancer risk and mortality and improve radiotherapy responses in several malignancies. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare tumor responses and prognoses of metformin and nonmetformin groups of diabetic patients receiving neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study. SETTING: This study was conducted at a single institution in the Republic of Korea. PATIENTS: Between January 2000 and November 2017, 104 patients with rectal cancer who were taking diabetes medication and treated with neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by radical surgery were reviewed. Patients were divided into those taking (n = 62) and not taking metformin (n = 42). Tumor responses, survival, and other outcomes were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Tumor response, rectal cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival rates were measured. RESULTS: Tumor regression grade (p = 0.002), pathological complete response (p = 0.037), and N downstaging (p < 0.001) after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy were significantly higher in the metformin group than in the nonmetformin group. In analysis of cancer-specific mortality, metformin use, differentiation (well, moderate vs poor), pathological Union for International Cancer Control stage (3 vs 1-2), ypN stage (1-2 vs 0), and N downstaging (HR, 0.256 (95% CI, 0.082-0.794), p = 0.018; HR, 0.147 (95% CI, 0.031-0.697), p = 0.016; HR, 3.693 (95% CI, 1.283-10.635), p = 0.015; HR, 3.181 (95% CI, 1.155-8.759), p = 0.025, and HR, 0.175 (95% CI, 0.040-0.769), p = 0.021) were significant factors related to mortality in diabetic patients with rectal cancer. In addition, in the multivariate analysis of cancer recurrence, the interaction between metformin use and lymph node downstaging was a significant predictive factor (HR, 0.222 (95% CI, 0.077-0.639); p = 0.005). LIMITATIONS: This was a small retrospective study conducted at a single institution. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin use was associated with better tumor responses and cancer-specific survival, as well as a lower risk of cancer recurrence, in patients with diabetes mellitus who had lymph node downstaging after neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B185. BENEFICIO EN SUPERVIVENCIA CON METFORMINA A TRAVÉS DE UNA MEJOR RESPUESTA TUMORAL CON QUIMIORRADIOTERAPIA CONCURRENTE NEOADYUVANTE EN CÁNCER RECTAL: La metformina puede reducir el riesgo de cáncer y la mortalidad y mejorar las respuestas a la radioterapia en varios tumores malignos.Comparar las respuestas tumorales y los pronósticos de los grupos con metformina y sin metformina de pacientes diabéticos que reciben quimiorradioterapia concurrente neoadyuvante para cáncer de recto.Estudio retrospectivo.Institución única en la República de Corea.Se revisaron 104 pacientes entre enero de 2000 y noviembre de 2017, con cáncer rectal que tomaban medicamentos para diabetes y que fueron tratados con quimiorradioterapia concurrente neoadyuvante seguida de cirugía radical. Los pacientes se dividieron en aquellos que tomaban (n = 62) y los que no tomaban metformina (n = 42). Se analizaron las respuestas tumorales, la supervivencia y otros resultados.Se midieron las tasas de la respuesta tumoral, la supervivencia específica de cáncer rectal y de la supervivencia libre de enfermedad.El grado de regresión tumoral (p = 0.002), la remisión patológica completa (p = 0.037) y la reducción de la etapa N (p < 0.001) después de la quimiorradioterapia concurrente neoadyuvante fueron significativamente mayores en el grupo de metformina que en el grupo sin metformina. En el análisis de la mortalidad específica por cáncer, el uso de metformina, la diferenciación (bien, moderada vs pobre), el estadio patológico UICC (3 vs 1-2), el estadio ypN (1-2 vs 0) y la disminución de la etapa N (hazard ratios [intervalos de confianza 95%]: 0.256 [0.082-0.794], p = 0.018; 0.147 [0.031-0.697], p = 0.016; 3.693 [1.283-10.635], p = 0.015; 3.181 [1.155-8.759], p = 0.025 y 0.175 [0.040-0.769], p = 0.021, respectivamente) fueron factores significativos relacionados con la mortalidad en pacientes diabéticos con cáncer rectal. Adicionalmente, en el análisis multivariado de la recurrencia del cáncer, la interacción entre el uso de metformina y la disminución de la etapa ganglionar (N) fue un factor predictivo significativo (hazard ratios [intervalos de confianza del 95%]: 0.222 [0.077-0.639]; p = 0.005).Este fue un estudio retrospectivo pequeño realizado en un solo instituto.El uso de metformina se asoció con mejores respuestas tumorales y supervivencia específica de cáncer, así como un menor riesgo de recurrencia del cáncer, en pacientes con disminución de la etapa ganglionar (N) después de quimiorradioterapia concurrente neoadyuvante en pacientes con cáncer rectal y diabetes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B185. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco).
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/farmacología , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Ganglios Linfáticos/efectos de los fármacos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Masculino , Metformina/farmacología , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias/estadística & datos numéricos , Pronóstico , Neoplasias del Recto/radioterapia , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
AIM: To assess factors associated with the higher effect of metformin on mortality in diabetic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, since the factors related to the effectiveness of metformin have not been identified yet. METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2010, 413 patients diagnosed with both stage 3/4 CRC and diabetes mellitus were identified. Patients' demographics and clinical characteristics were analyzed. The effect of metformin on CRC-specific mortality and the interactions between metformin and each adjusted factor were evaluated. RESULTS: Total follow-up duration was median 50 mo (range: 1-218 mo). There were 85 deaths (45.9%) and 72 CRC-specific deaths (38.9%) among 185 patients who used metformin, compared to 130 total deaths (57.0%) and 107 CRC-specific deaths (46.9%) among 228 patients who did not use metformin. In multivariate analysis, survival benefit associated with metformin administration was identified (HR = 0.985, 95%CI: 0.974-0.997, P = 0.012). Interaction test between metformin and sex after adjustment for relevant factors revealed that female CRC patients taking metformin exhibited a significantly lower CRC-specific mortality rate than male CRC patients taking metformin (HR = 0.369, 95%CI: 0.155-0.881, P = 0.025). Furthermore, subgroup analysis revealed significant differences in CRC-specific mortality between the metformin and non-metformin groups in female patients (HR = 0.501, 95%CI: 0.286-0.879, P = 0.013) but not male patients (HR = 0.848, 95%CI: 0.594-1.211, P = 0.365). There were no significant interactions between metformin and other adjusted factors on CRC-specific mortality. CONCLUSION: We showed a strong sex-dependent difference in the effect of metformin on CRC-specific mortality in advanced stage CRC patients with diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Metformina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/mortalidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
With the development of specialized nutrition therapy and the need for interdisciplinary approach, nutrition support teams (NSTs) were created to optimize effectiveness and safety of nutritional therapy. NSTs are interdisciplinary support teams with specialty training in nutrition that are typically comprised of physicians, dietitians, nurses, pharmacists, and others. Their role includes nutrition screening, assessment, determination of nutrition needs, recommendations for appropriate nutrition therapy, management of nutrition support therapy, and monitoring. Studies have demonstrated significant improvements in patient nutrition status and improved clinical outcomes as well as reductions in costs when patients were appropriately managed by NSTs. Organization and the role of NSTs are discussed in this review.