A Biomechanical Comparison of All-Inside Versus Transtibial Meniscus Root Repair Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Meniscus root tears are associated with chondral injury, early degenerative change, and a high conversion rate to total knee arthroplasty. It is well-established that meniscus root tears lead to decreased femorotibial contact area, increased peak contact pressures, and increased stress on the articular cartilage. PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of the all-inside meniscus root repair procedure and compare it with the previously described transtibial technique. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Nine paired cadaveric knees were prepared by removing skin, subcutaneous tissues, quadriceps muscles, patella, and patellar tendon, while leaving the capsule in place. Pressure-mapping sensors were inserted, and specimens underwent compressive loading to obtain peak pressures, mean pressures, and femorotibial contact area in the medial and lateral compartments. Tests were performed as static compression tests with the knee locked at 0° of flexion. Compression testing was performed in 3 states: meniscus intact, meniscus root cut, and after meniscus root repair with an all-inside repair technique. Additionally, testing was completed on 9 pairs of cadaveric knees to compare stiffness and maximal load to failure between the all-inside and transtibial meniscus root repair techniques. RESULTS: In the medial compartment, there were significant increases in median peak pressures and median mean pressures in the root cut state as compared with the intact state (+636 kPA [95% CI, 246 to 1026] and +190 kPA [95% CI, 49 to 330], respectively). All-inside meniscus root repair restored median peak pressures and median mean pressures to approach those of the intact meniscus (+311 kPA [95% CI, -79 to 701] and +137 kPA [95% CI, -3 to 277]). In the lateral compartment, there were also significant increases in median peak pressures and median mean pressures in the root cut state as compared with the intact state (+718 kPA [95% CI, 246 to 1191] and +203 kPA [95% CI, 51 to 355]). All-inside meniscus root repair restored median peak pressures and median mean pressures such that they were not significantly different from the intact state (+322 kPA [95% CI, -150 to 795] and +18 kPA [95% CI, -134 to 171]). There was no difference between repair techniques regarding load to failure (P = .896). Transtibial meniscus root repair had significantly more stiffness (mean ± SD, 24.8 ± 9.3 N/mm) as compared with the all-inside meniscus root repair technique (13.6 ± 3.8 N/mm, P = .015). CONCLUSION: All-inside meniscus root repair reduced median peak and mean pressures to those of the native intact meniscus with the knee in extension in the cadaveric model. When compared with a transtibial meniscus root repair technique, all-inside repair demonstrated decreased stiffness and a similar load to failure. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: All-inside meniscus root repair restored mean and peak femorotibial pressures to those of the intact meniscus. Additionally, it offers a technically easier technique for management of meniscus root tears.

Rate of Conversion to Matrix-Induced Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation After a Biopsy: A Multisurgeon Study.

Background: Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) are performed to treat focal chondral defects (FCDs); both are 2-step procedures involving a biopsy, followed by transplantation. There is little published research evaluating ACI/MACI in patients who undergo a biopsy alone. Purpose: To determine (1) the value of ACI/MACI cartilage biopsies and concomitant procedures in patients with FCDs of the knee and (2) the conversion rate to cartilage transplantation as well as the rate of reoperation. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of 46 patients (63% female) who underwent a MACI (or ACI) biopsy between January 2013 and January 2018. Preoperative data, intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes were assessed at a minimum of 2 years after the biopsy. The conversion rate from a biopsy to transplantation and the reoperation rate were calculated and analyzed. Results: Among the 46 patients included, 17 (37.0%) underwent subsequent surgery, with only 12 undergoing cartilage restoration surgery, for an overall transplantation rate of 26.1%. Of these 12 patients, 9 underwent MACI/ACI, 2 underwent osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA), and 1 underwent particulated juvenile articular cartilage implantation at 7.2 ± 7.5 months after the biopsy. The reoperation rate was 16.7% (1 patient after MACI/ACI and 1 patient after OCA) at 13.5 ± 2.3 months after transplantation. Conclusion: Arthroscopic surgery with debridement, chondroplasty, loose body removal, meniscectomy/meniscal repair, and other treatment approaches of knee compartment abnormalities at the time of a biopsy appeared to be sufficient in improving function and reducing pain in patients with knee FCDs.

A scoping review of postoperative return to sport criteria and protocols for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

PURPOSE: To identify the objective criteria and guidelines utilized to determine if patients diagnosed with FAIS can safely return to sport following hip arthroscopy. METHODS: The electronic databases MEDLINE Ovid, EMBASE Ovid, and CINAHL were searched to identify eligible studies. Details of study design, sample size, primary diagnosis, and return to sport protocol, duration, and rate were collected by two reviewers, independently. RESULTS: Sixty-two studies were selected for full text review of which 14 were included in the final analysis. Of these, nine were clinical commentaries and five were retrospective cohort studies. Three types of rehabilitation guidelines are currently utilized postoperatively: 4-phase, 5-phase, and 6-phase protocols. Although all 14 studies recommend using various types of outcome measures to evaluate a patient's ability to return to sport, only eleven outlined the specific outcome criteria they must achieve to do so. The most utilized outcome measures are the hip outcome score, active and passive range of motion tests, gait analysis, single- and double-leg squat tests, and the Vail hip sports test. Criteria across all three types of protocols was variable, but they all evaluated the same international classification of disability and function constructs described by the World Health Organization: body function, body structure limitations, and activity capacity limitations. CONCLUSIONS: There is no consensus on the optimal methods of evaluating a patient's readiness to return to sport after undergoing hip arthroscopy, with most criteria focused on expert opinion. Performance-based return to sport outcome criteria is not clearly defined, and validated outcome measures are not being used for FAIS patients post hip arthroscopy. Lastly, well-conducted prospective cohort studies using validated outcome measures and objective definitions of return to sport are needed to consistently identify signs that are prognostic of safe return to sport.

Cost and safety of inpatient versus outpatient open reduction internal fixation of isolated ankle fractures.

BACKGROUND: As health care shifts to value-based models, one strategy within orthopedics has been to transition appropriate cases to outpatient or ambulatory settings to reduce costs; however, there are limited data on the efficacy and safety of this practice for isolated ankle fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the cost and safety associated with inpatient versus outpatient ankle open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: All patients who underwent ORIF of isolated closed ankle fractures at 2 affiliated hospitals between April 2016 and March 2017 were identified retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, including age, gender, comorbidities and injuryspecific variables, were collected. We grouped patients based on whether they underwent ankle ORIF as an inpatient or outpatient. We determined case costing for all patients and analyzed it using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients (125 inpatient, 71 outpatient) were included for analysis. Inpatients had a significantly longer mean length of stay than outpatients (54.3 h [standard deviation (SD) 36.3 h] v. 7.5 h [SD 1.7 h], p < 0.001). The average cost was significantly higher for the inpatient cohort than the outpatient cohort ($4137 [SD $2285] v. $1834 [SD $421], p < 0.001). There were more unimalleolar ankle fractures in the outpatient group than in the inpatient group (42 [59.2%] v. 41 [32.8%], p < 0.001). Outpatients waited longer for surgery than inpatients (9.6 d [SD 5.6 d] v. 2.0 d [SD 3.3 d], p < 0.001). Fourteen patients (11.2%) in the inpatient group presented to the emergency department or were readmitted to hospital within 30 days of discharge, compared to 5 (7.0%) in the outpatient group (p = 0.3). CONCLUSION: In the treatment of isolated closed ankle fractures, outpatient surgery was associated with a significant reduction in length of hospital stay and overall case cost compared to inpatient surgery, with no significant difference in readmission or reoperation rates. In medically appropriate patients, isolated ankle ORIF can be performed safely in an ambulatory setting and is associated with significant cost savings.

A Biomechanical Comparison of 2 Hip Capsular Reconstruction Techniques: Iliotibial Band Autograft Versus Achilles Tendon Allograft.

BACKGROUND: Several techniques for hip capsular reconstruction have been described to address gross instability or microinstability due to capsular deficiency. However, objective biomechanical data to support their use are lacking. PURPOSE: To compare the kinematic effect of 2 capsular reconstruction techniques (iliotibial band [ITB] graft and Achilles tendon graft). Kinematic effect encompassed rotational range of motion (ROM) as well as joint translation in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: 8 paired, fresh-frozen hemi-pelvises (16 hips) were tested on a custom-designed joint motion simulator in the intact state and after capsulectomy. Pairs were randomly allocated to either ITB or Achilles reconstruction and retested. Testing was performed at 0°, 45°, and 90° of flexion. Internal-external rotation (IR-ER) torques and abduction-adduction torques of 3 N·m were applied to the femur via a load cell at each position, and rotational ROM and joint translation in the coronal, sagittal, and axial planes were recorded. RESULTS: At 45° and 90°, there was a significant effect of the condition of the hip on the total IR-ER (P = .004, effect size [ES] = 0.305; and P < .001, ES = 0.497; respectively). At 45°, mean ± SD total rotation was significantly greater for the capsulectomy (59.7°± 15.9°) state compared with intact (53.3°± 13.2°; P = .007). At 90°, reconstruction significantly decreased total rotation to 49.0°± 18.9° compared with a mean total rotation of 52.8°± 18.7° after capsulectomy (P = .02). No difference was seen in the total abduction-adduction of the hip between conditions. Comparisons of the 2 different reconstruction techniques showed no significant differences in total IR-ER or abduction-adduction ROM or joint translation in the coronal, sagittal, or axial planes. For translation, at both 0° and 45° there was a statistically significant effect of the condition on the medial-lateral translation (P = .033; ES = 0.204). Reconstruction, independent of technique, was successful in significantly decreasing (P = .030; P = .014) the mean medial-lateral translation at 0° and 45° of hip flexion from 5.2 ± 3.8 mm and 5.6 ± 4.0 mm to 2.8 ± 1.9 mm and 3.9 ± 3.2 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION: The integrity of the native hip capsule played a significant role in rotational stability, where capsulectomy significantly increased rotational ROM. Both ITB and Achilles reconstruction techniques restored normal rotational ROM of the hip at 90° of flexion as well as coronal plane stability at 0° and 45° of hip flexion. No differences were seen between ITB and Achilles reconstruction techniques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Both capsular reconstruction techniques provide comparable joint kinematics, restoring rotation and translation to normal values with the exception of rotational ROM at 45°, which remained significantly greater than the intact state. The most significant results were the rotational stability at 90° of hip flexion and coronal plane stability at 0° and 45° of hip flexion, which were significantly improved compared with the capsulectomy state.

Practice patterns for the treatment of acute proximal hamstring ruptures.

Objective: Proximal ischial hamstring avulsion injuries are relatively uncommon. As such, the management of these injuries is often highly variable. Consensus agreement is lacking for the indications for repair, along with the operative technique, and post-operative rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to survey surgeons who treat proximal hamstring avulsion injuries to identify current trends in the management of this injury.Methods: After IRB approval, a 46-question cross-sectional survey was distributed using a secure electronic survey portal. The survey sought to determine surgeon experience, diagnostic preferences, treatment patterns, surgical indications/technique, perceived patient outcomes, surgical complications, as well as post-operative management and rehab protocols. Surveys were completed electronically and anonymously, with invitations distributed to members of the American Orthopedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM) and Arthroscopy Association of Canada (AAC).Results: A total of 108 surgeons who manage proximal hamstring injuries completed the survey. Most respondents (77%) treat one to five of these injuries per year. MRI was the preferred imaging modality to confirm diagnosis. Despite 98% of respondents indicating that there was a role for surgical management of proximal hamstring avulsions, operative treatment was reportedly undertaken in only 50% of cases seen by each respondent. The top three reported surgical indications were: number of tendons involved (most important factor = 42%, second most = 26%, third most = 13%), amount of tendon retraction (28%, 41%, 16%), and patient activity level (16%, 18%, 24%).Conclusion: Based on the practice patterns of the surgeons who completed the survey, there is continued disparity in the management of proximal hamstring avulsions. A lack of agreement exists with regards to surgical indications, operative technique, and post-operative protocols. Most striking is the rate of non-operative treatment and perceived rate of poor outcomes within this cohort. Future research should focus on objective evaluation of non-operative management, and additional variables involved in surgical treatment and post-operative rehabilitation.

Optimizing outpatient total hip arthroplasty: perspectives of key stakeholders.

BACKGROUND: Advances in surgical techniques combined with multimodal analgesia and early rehabilitation have potentiated early mobilization in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA). Given an increasing push from patients to accelerate recovery and health care budgetary limitations, there has been growing interest in the implementation of outpatient THA in selected patients. Understanding the patient and primary caregiver experience of outpatient THA is important to optimize care. We aimed to gain insight into patient and caregiver perspectives regarding the perceived advantages and disadvantages of same-day discharge to identify areas of care that can be improved. METHOD: Using a qualitative descriptive approach, we conducted in-depth semistructured interviews with patient-primary caregiver dyads who experienced same-day discharge or standard care after primary THA with the direct anterior approach in 2016-2017. Two members of the research team coded the data independently, implementing a thematic and content analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-eight participants (16 same-day discharge, 12 standard care) were included. Both groups experienced high levels of satisfaction with their care pathway. Concerns and challenges identified in both groups pertained to mobility, pain, self-care and caregiver support. Challenges and concerns unique to same-day discharge were identified regarding expectations for recovery, medications and their impact on mobility, the timing of postoperative education and the availability of formal care. CONCLUSION: Outpatient THA can be implemented with high patient and caregiver satisfaction. Preoperative education, clarification of recovery processes and expectations, and proactively addressing concerns related to caregiving are important.

CONTEXTE: Les progrès des techniques chirurgicales, alliés à l'analgésie multimodale et à la réadaptation hâtive, ont potentialisé la mobilisation précoce des patients soumis à une intervention pour prothèse totale de la hanche (PTH). Compte tenu de la pression croissante venant des patients pour accélérer leur rétablissement et des contraintes budgétaires en santé, on s'intéresse de plus en plus à la PTH effectuée en externe chez certains patients. Pour optimiser les soins, il est important de comprendre l'expérience des patients et de leurs proches aidants relativement à la PTH effectuée en externe. Nous avons voulu cerner les points de vue des patients et des proches aidants au sujet des avantages et inconvénients perçus du congé le jour même, afin de déterminer quels éléments des soins gagneraient à être améliorés. MÉTHODES: À l'aide d'une approche qualitative descriptive, nous avons procédé à des entrevues semi-structurées approfondies avec des paires patients-proches aidants à qui on a offert soit le congé le jour même, soit les soins standards après une PTH primaire par approche antérieure directe en 2016-2017. Deux membres de l'équipe de recherche ont codé les données indépendamment, en procédant à une analyse par thèmes et par contenu. RÉSULTATS: Vingt-huit participants (16 ayant reçu leur congé le jour même et 12 soumis aux soins standards) ont été inclus. Les 2 groupes ont exprimé un degré élevé de satisfaction à l'endroit du déroulement de leurs soins. Les problèmes et les difficultés identifiés dans les 2 groupes concernaient la mobilité, la douleur, les soins personnels et le soutien aux proches aidants. Les difficultés ou problèmes particuliers aux cas de congé le jour même ont été associés aux attentes concernant le rétablissement, les médicaments et leur impact sur la mobilité, le moment de l'enseignement postopératoire et la disponibilité des soins standards. CONCLUSION: La PTH en externe peut être offerte et générer beaucoup de satisfaction chez les patients et leurs aidants. Il est important d'offrir un enseignement préopératoire, de clarifier le processus de rétablissement et les attentes et de répondre de manière proactive aux préoccupations exprimées relativement aux soins.

When is a meta-analysis conclusive? A guide to Trial Sequential Analysis with an example of remote ischemic preconditioning for renoprotection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Regardless of whether a randomized trial finds a statistically significant effect for an intervention or not, readers often wonder if the trial was large enough to be conclusive. To answer this question, we can estimate the required sample size for a trial by considering how commonly the outcome occurs, the smallest effect of clinical importance and the acceptable risk of falsely detecting or rejecting that effect. But when is a meta-analysis conclusive? We explain and illustrate the interpretation of Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA), a method increasingly used to answer this question. We conducted a conventional meta-analysis which suggested that, in adults undergoing cardiac surgery, remote ischemic preconditioning does not provide a statistically significant reduction in acute kidney injury (AKI) [12 trials, 4230 patients; relative risk 0.87 (95% confidence interval 0.74-1.02); P = 0.08; I2= 35%] or the risk of receiving acute dialysis [5 trials, 2111 patients; relative risk 1.15 (95% confidence interval 0.42-3.19); P = 0.78; I2 = 59%]. TSA demonstrates that as little as a 20% relative risk reduction in AKI is unlikely. Reliably finding effects on acute dialysis and smaller effects on AKI would require much more evidence. Notably, conventional meta-analyses conducted at one of the two earlier time points may have prematurely declared a statistically significant reduction in AKI, even though at no point in the TSA was there sufficient evidence to support such an effect. With this and other examples, we demonstrate that the TSA can prevent premature conclusions from meta-analyses.