Ceftriaxone Absorption Enhancement for Noninvasive Administration as an Alternative to Injectable Solutions.

Neonatal sepsis is a major cause of infant mortality in developing countries because of delayed injectable treatment, making it urgent to develop noninjectable formulations that can reduce treatment delays in resource-limited settings. Ceftriaxone, available only for injection, needs absorption enhancers to achieve adequate bioavailability via nonparenteral administration. This article presents all available data on the nonparenteral absorption of ceftriaxone in humans and animals, including unpublished work carried out by F. Hoffmann-La Roche (Roche) in the 1980s and new data from preclinical studies with rabbits, and discusses the importance of these data for the development of noninjectable formulations for noninvasive treatment. The combined results indicate that the rectal absorption of ceftriaxone is feasible and likely to lead to a bioavailable formulation that can reduce treatment delays in neonatal sepsis. A bile salt, chenodeoxycholate sodium salt (Na-CDC), used as an absorption enhancer at a 125-mg dose, together with a 500-mg dose of ceftriaxone provided 24% rectal absorption of ceftriaxone and a maximal plasma concentration of 21 µg/ml with good tolerance in human subjects. The rabbit model developed can also be used to screen for the bioavailability of other formulations before assessment in humans.

Effect of a modified saquinavir/ritonavir dosing regimen with lower dose lead-in phase on QTc interval, pharmacokinetics, antiviral activity and safety in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Saquinavir/ritonavir (1000/100 mg twice daily [BID]) is associated with dose- and exposure-dependent prolongation of the QT interval. The QT risk is considered higher during the first week of therapy, when saquinavir peak exposure has been observed. A modified regimen with a lower dose lead-in phase may reduce potential saquinavir-/ritonavir-induced QT prolongations. OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of the modified saquinavir/ritonavir regimen on QT interval, pharmacokinetics, antiviral activity, and safety in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients. METHODS: Twenty-three HIV-1-infected treatment-naïve patients received saquinavir/ritonavir 500/100 mg BID on days 1-7 and 1000/100 mg BID on days 8-14 in combination with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. The primary endpoint was mean maximum change from dense predose baseline in QT values corrected using Fridericia's formula (∆QTcFdense) across study days. Secondary endpoints included maximum change from time-matched baseline in QTcF, antiviral activity, pharmacokinetics, and safety over the 14 days. RESULTS: The mean maximum ∆QTcFdense was 3, 1, 7, 12, and 7 ms on days 3, 4, 7, 10, and 14, respectively. Across all study days, 2/21 patients had a maximum ∆QTcFdense ≥30 ms (on day 10); the highest mean ∆QTcFdense was <10 ms. During week 1, saquinavir exposure was highest on day 3 and lowest on day 7. All patients showed continuous declines in HIV-RNA; none experienced virologic breakthrough/rebound. The modified regimen was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Treatment initiation with the modified saquinavir/ritonavir regimen in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients reduced saquinavir exposure during week 1, potentially mitigating/reducing QT liability while suppressing HIV-RNA during the course of treatment.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of once-daily versus twice-daily dosing with enfuvirtide in HIV-infected subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics, safety/tolerability and antiviral activity of enfuvirtide administered once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID). DESIGN: An open-label, randomized, multiple dose, two-period crossover study comparing 180 mg enfuvirtide, two injections QD versus 90 mg enfuvirtide, two injections, BID. METHODS: Steady-state intensive pharmacokinetic samples were obtained on days 7 and 14. RESULTS: Thirty-seven subjects received at least one dose of enfuvirtide. Thirty-three subjects completed both dosing periods. The regimens were bioequivalent based on the ratio of geometric mean area under the curve (AUC)0-tau [112 +/- 6.2 microg x h/ml QD; 115 +/- 6.4 microg x h/ml 2 x BID; QD/BID 0.98; 90% confidence interval (CI) 0.89,1.07]. The maximum observed plasma concentration within a dosing interval (Cmax) was 49% higher for QD (9.5 +/- 2.7 microg/ml) versus BID (6.3 +/- 1.7 microg/ml) and the pre-dose plasma concentration (Ctrough) was 57% lower for QD (1.6 +/- 1.1 microg/ml) versus BID (3.8 +/- 1.3 microg/ml). The LSM decrease in viral load from baseline to day 7 was 1.0 +/- 0.14 log10 (n = 18) for QD and 1.4 +/- 0.2 log10 (n = 17) for BID (LSM difference 0.385; P = 0.07). Linear regression analysis suggested that decline in viral load up to day 7 was associated with Ctrough but not Cmax or AUC. There were no significant differences in adverse events between the two dosing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of enfuvirtide 180 mg QD results in bioequivalence compared with 90 mg BID based on AUC with a similar short-term safety profile, but a trend towards a weaker antiretroviral effect. Larger and longer-term studies are needed to determine if 180 mg once daily is an effective dosing alternative for enfuvirtide.

Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response relationship of enfuvirtide in treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to characterize population pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide, 90 mg twice daily injected subcutaneously, in treatment-experienced human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients, as well as the relationship between exposure and antiviral effect. METHODS: Plasma concentrations of enfuvirtide and HIV-1 ribonucleic acid were obtained from 628 patients in 2 phase III studies. NONMEM software was used for population pharmacokinetic analysis and to assess the effects of age, gender, body weight, anti-gp41 antibodies, and concomitant drugs. Enfuvirtide exposure (area under the plasma concentration-12-hour time curve or steady-state trough concentration) was calculated from individual parameter estimates derived from the model. The decline in HIV-1 ribonucleic acid from baseline at week 2 or 24 was regressed against estimates of enfuvirtide exposure by a maximum effect model. The exposure-response relationship was examined in functional monotherapy (phenotypic sensitivity score of 0) and combination therapy (phenotypic sensitivity score > or = 1). RESULTS: Enfuvirtide population pharmacokinetics was well described by a 1-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. Body weight and female gender were identified as affecting apparent clearance but not efficacy and safety. Concomitant medications had no significant effect on enfuvirtide pharmacokinetics. Antiviral response to enfuvirtide was independent of drug exposure, suggesting that the approved 90-mg twice-daily dose was in the plateau portion of the dose-response curve. For functional monotherapy (phenotypic sensitivity score of 0), approximately 66% of estimated maximal effect was achieved at week 2 and 73% at week 24, and for combination therapy, more than 92% was achieved at both weeks 2 and 24. CONCLUSIONS: Body weight and gender affected enfuvirtide clearance, but changes in exposure did not affect efficacy or safety. Efficacy reached a plateau at the 90-mg twice-daily dosage in the exposure-response curve.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and drug interaction potential of enfuvirtide.

Enfuvirtide, the first fusion inhibitor approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection, is a synthetic peptide that binds to HIV-1 glycoprotein 41, blocking the fusion of viral and cellular membranes. When administered subcutaneously at the recommended dose of 90 mg twice daily with optimised background antiretroviral therapy, enfuvirtide significantly reduces plasma HIV-1 RNA levels up to 48 weeks compared with optimised background therapy alone. Enfuvirtide exhibits a small volume of distribution (5.48 L), low systemic clearance (1.4 L/h) and high plasma protein binding (92%). Less than 17% of enfuvirtide is converted to a minimally active deaminated form of the parent drug. Both enfuvirtide and its metabolite are primarily eliminated via catabolism to amino acid residues. Following subcutaneous administration, enfuvirtide is almost completely absorbed, and exposure increases almost linearly with dose over the range 45-180 mg. When administered at the recommended dose in adults, subcutaneous absorption is slow and protracted, resulting in relatively flat steady-state plasma concentration-time profiles. Bioavailability is high (84.3%) and the elimination half-life (3.8 hours) supports twice-daily administration. Comparable absorption was observed from three different anatomical injection sites. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship indicates that the recommended dose, in combination with other active antiretrovirals, is optimal. Enfuvirtide clearance is influenced to a small extent by sex and bodyweight but this does not necessitate dosage adjustment. In vitro and in vivo studies indicate that enfuvirtide has a low potential to interact with concomitantly administered drugs. Enfuvirtide did not influence concentrations of drugs metabolised by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, CYP2D6 or N-acetyltransferase, and had only minimal effects on those metabolised by CYP1A2, CYP2E1 or CYP2C19. Coadministration of ritonavir, ritonavir-boosted saquinavir or rifampicin (rifampin) did not result in clinically significant changes in enfuvirtide pharmacokinetics. In HIV-1-infected paediatric patients, subcutaneous dosages based on bodyweight (2 mg/kg twice daily) produce pharmacokinetics broadly similar to those observed in adults administered 90 mg twice daily.

Assessment of drug-drug interaction potential of enfuvirtide in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients.

INTRODUCTION: Enfuvirtide is the first drug to block human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) glycoprotein 41-mediated viral fusion to host cells. This study investigated whether enfuvirtide can influence the activities of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in HIV-1-infected patients. METHODS: An open-label, 1-sequence crossover study was conducted in 12 HIV-1-infected adults, by use of a 5-drug cocktail consisting of caffeine, chlorzoxazone, dapsone, debrisoquin (INN, debrisoquine), and mephenytoin to assess the activities of CYP1A2, CYP2E1, CYP3A4, CYP2D6, and CYP2C19, respectively. Dapsone was used to assess N-acetyltransferase activity. Patients received a single dose of the cocktail alone on day -15 and another together with enfuvirtide on day 6. Enfuvirtide (90 mg subcutaneously) was administered twice daily on days 1 to 7. Phenotypic index parameters were estimated and analyzed by ANOVA with factors subject and day (-15 and 6). RESULTS: The phenotypic index parameters, with and without enfuvirtide, for CYP3A4 (0.33 versus 0.34; 90% confidence interval [CI] for ratio of least squares means, 0.88-1.09), CYP2D6 (0.72 versus 0.71; 90% CI, 0.97-1.06), and N-acetyltransferase (0.35 versus 0.39; 90% CI, 0.82-0.98) were bioequivalent. The phenotypic index parameters, with and without enfuvirtide, for CYP1A2 (0.76 versus 0.81; 90% CI, 0.71-1.17), CYP2E1 (1.3 versus 1.2; 90% CI, 0.87-1.29), and CYP2C19 (93 versus 81.8; 90% CI, 0.98-1.28) were not bioequivalent but were not substantially different. CONCLUSIONS: Enfuvirtide had no clinically important effect on the metabolism of probe drugs mediated by CYP3A4, CYP2D6, or N-acetyltransferase and had little effect on the metabolism of drugs mediated by CYP1A2, CYP2E1, or CYP2C19. The potential for interactions between enfuvirtide and concomitantly administered drugs metabolized by the CYP enzymes tested in this study is low.

Lack of interaction between enfuvirtide and ritonavir or ritonavir-boosted saquinavir in HIV-1-infected patients.

Enfuvirtide (Fuzeon) is an HIV fusion inhibitor, the first drug in a new class of antiretrovirals. The HIV protease inhibitors ritonavir and saquinavir both inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoenzymes, and low-dose ritonavir is often used to boost pharmacokinetic exposure to full-dose protease inhibitors. These two studies were designed to assess whether ritonavir and ritonavir-boosted saquinavir influence the steady-state pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide. Both studies were single-center, open-label, one-sequence crossover clinical pharmacology studies in 12 HIV-1-infected patients each. Patients received enfuvirtide (90 mg twice daily [bid], subcutaneous injection) for 7 days and either ritonavir (200 mg bid, ritonavir study, orally) or saquinavir/ritonavir (1000/100 mg bid, saquinavir/ritonavir study, orally) for 4 days on days 4 to 7. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the morning dose of enfuvirtide on days 3 and 7. Plasma concentrations for enfuvirtide, enfuvirtide metabolite, saquinavir, and ritonavir were measured using validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry methods. Efficacy and safety were also monitored. Bioequivalence criteria require the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the least squares means (LSM) of C(max) and AUC(12h) to be between 80% and 125%. In the present studies, analysis of variance showed that when coadministered with ritonavir, the ratio of LSM for enfuvirtide was 124% for C(max) (90% confidence interval [CI]: 109%-141%), 122% for AUC(12h) (90% CI: 108%-137%), and 114% for C(trough) (90% CI: 102%-128%). Although the bioequivalence criteria were not met, the increase in enfuvirtide exposure was small (< 25%) and not clinically relevant. When administered with ritonavir-boosted saquinavir, the ratio of LSM for enfuvirtide was 107% for C(max) (90% CI: 94.3%-121%) and 114% for AUC(12h) (90% CI: 105%-124%), which therefore met bioequivalence criteria, and 126% for C(trough) (90% CI: 117%-135%). The pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide are affected to a small extent when coadministered with ritonavir at a dose of 200 mg bid but not when coadministered with a saquinavir-ritonavir combination (1000/100 mg bid). However, previous clinical studies have shown that such increases in enfuvirtide exposure are not clinically relevant. Thus, no dosage adjustments are warranted when enfuvirtide is coadministered with low-dose ritonavir or saquinavir boosted with a low dose of ritonavir.

Lack of enzyme-inducing effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide.

The primary objective was to determine whether rifampicin influences the pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide in HIV-1-infected patients. In a single-center, open-label, one-sequence crossover, clinical pharmacology study, 12 HIV-1-infected adults received enfuvirtide (90 mg, twice daily) on days 1 to 3 and days 11 to 13 (morning dose only on days 3 and 13) and rifampicin (600 mg, once daily) from days 4 to 13. Plasma concentrations were measured for enfuvirtide and its metabolite (days 3 and 13) and rifampicin (day 13 only). The ratios of least squares means (LSM) and 90% confidence intervals for enfuvirtide and enfuvirtide metabolite pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC12h, Cmax, Ctrough) were estimated in the presence and absence of rifampicin. Treatments were compared using an analysis of variance for natural log-transformed variables, with factors patient and treatment. Efficacy and safety were also monitored. Steady-state rifampicin had no appreciable effect on any of the pharmacokinetic parameters assessed for either enfuvirtide or its metabolite. The ratio of LSM for AUC12h, Cmax, and Ctrough for enfuvirtide was 97.5%, 103%, and 84.9%, respectively, and 108%, 112%, and 92.9%, for the enfuvirtide metabolite. Rifampicin did not affect the t1/2 of enfuvirtide or its metabolite. There were no unexpected effects of rifampicin on the short-term antiviral effect or safety of the administered antiretroviral treatment. The pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide are not induced by a 10-day pretreatment with rifampicin.

Influence of subcutaneous injection site on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide (T-20) in HIV-1-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Enfuvirtide is the first in a new class of antiretrovirals (ARVs), the fusion inhibitors, and the first ARV to be administered by subcutaneous (s.c.) injection. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine the steady-state pharmacokinetics and relative bioavailability of enfuvirtide following sc injection at three separate anatomical sites: abdomen (A), thigh (B) and arm (C). STUDY DESIGN: A single-center, open-label, multiple-dose, three-way randomized, crossover study. Twelve HIV-1-infected adults were recruited from three ongoing Phase II enfuvirtide clinical trials and randomized into three groups. Each group continued to receive s.c. injection of enfuvirtide, at a dose of 90 mg twice daily (bid), according to one of three treatment sequences: ABC, BCA or CAB; over three consecutive periods of approximately 7 days each. Plasma concentrations of enfuvirtide and its metabolite (Ro 50-6343) were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. RESULTS: The relative bioavailability of enfuvirtide, based on AUC12h and abdomen as a reference site, was 101% for thigh and 117% for arm. The AUC12h of Ro 50-6343 ranged from 14 to 16% of that for enfuvirtide. Although injection site reactions (ISRs) were common, the overall grading (based on pain or discomfort) of all reported ISRs was Grade 1 (mild). The incidence of ISRs varied according to the site of injection, as did the signs and symptoms associated with them. No patient required treatment for an ISR. CONCLUSIONS: Comparability among the three injection sites, in terms of both absorption and the ISR profile, allows HIV-1-infected patients the freedom to choose and to rotate, if necessary, the site of enfuvirtide injection among the three anatomical sites.

Pharmacokinetics of daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine and steroids in renal transplantation.

Daclizumab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) decrease the incidence of acute allograft rejection. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was performed primarily to assess the pharmacokinetics of MMF in an immunosuppressive regimen incorporating daclizumab. At five centers, 75 renal transplant recipients were randomized 2:1 to receive either daclizumab 1 mg/kg or placebo pre-transplantation and every other week, for a total of five doses. All patients received cyclosporine, steroids, and MMF. Levels of mycophenolic acid (MPA), its glucuronide metabolite, and daclizumab were measured after dosing on days 28 and 56. Safety parameters evaluated included: adverse events, laboratory abnormalities, infections, patient/graft survival, incidence of lymphoproliferative disorders, and incidence of acute rejection at 12 months. The concomitant administration of daclizumab and MMF had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of MPA: AUC(0-8) values (microg h/mL +/- SD) on day 28 were 30.1 +/- 13.3 for daclizumab-treat patients vs. 31.1 +/- 12.4 for placebo and on day 56, 37.7 +/- 18.2 for daclizumab-treated patients vs. 35.7 +/- 14.0 for placebo. Adverse events were similar between the two groups. Acute rejection at 12 months occurred in 14% of patients receiving daclizumab and 20% of patients receiving placebo. The coadministration of daclizumab did not result in a pharmacokinetic interaction with MPA, the active metabolite of MMF.

Pharmacokinetics of plasma enfuvirtide after subcutaneous administration to patients with human immunodeficiency virus: Inverse Gaussian density absorption and 2-compartment disposition.

OBJECTIVE: Enfuvirtide (T-20) is the first of a novel class of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drugs that block gp41-mediated viral fusion to host cells. The objectives of this study were to develop a structural pharmacokinetic model that would adequately characterize the absorption and disposition of enfuvirtide pharmacokinetics after both intravenous and subcutaneous administration and to evaluate the dose proportionality of enfuvirtide pharmacokinetic parameters at a subcutaneous dose higher than that currently used in phase III studies. METHODS: Twelve patients with HIV infection received 4 single doses of enfuvirtide separated by a 1-week washout period in an open-label, randomized, 4-way crossover fashion. The doses studied were 90 mg (intravenous) and 45 mg, 90 mg, and 180 mg (subcutaneous). Serial blood samples were collected up to 48 hours after each dose. Plasma enfuvirtide concentrations were measured with use of a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. RESULTS: Enfuvirtide plasma concentration-time data after subcutaneous administration were well described by an inverse Gaussian density function-input model linked to a 2-compartment open distribution model with first-order elimination from the central compartment. The model-derived mean pharmacokinetic parameters (+/-SD) were volume of distribution of the central compartment (3.8 +/- 0.8 L), volume of distribution of the peripheral compartment (1.7 +/- 0.6 L), total clearance (1.44 +/- 0.30 L/h), intercompartmental distribution (2.3 +/- 1.1 L/h), bioavailability (89% +/- 11%), and mean absorption time (7.26 hours, 8.65 hours, and 9.79 hours for the 45-mg, 90-mg, and 180-mg dose groups, respectively). The terminal half-life increased from 3.46 to 4.35 hours for the subcutaneous dose range from 45 to 180 mg. CONCLUSIONS: An inverse Gaussian density function-input model linked to a 2-compartment open distribution model with first-order elimination from the central compartment was appropriate to describe complex absorption and disposition kinetics of enfuvirtide plasma concentration-time data after subcutaneous administration to patients with HIV infection. Enfuvirtide was nearly completely absorbed from subcutaneous depot, and pharmacokinetic parameters were linear up to a dose of 180 mg in this study.