A Comparative Study of Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia Versus Spinal Anesthesia in Major Lower Limb Orthopedic Surgeries.

Background Neuraxial blockade includes epidural and spinal anesthesia (SA) that have gained wide acceptance for major lower limb orthopedic surgery. Both techniques are competent in rendering surgical anesthesia and pain relief, with specific advantages and disadvantages. SA has the merits of rapid onset and adequate anesthesia with a small volume of the drug but has significant hypotension and unpredictable duration. Epidural anesthesia allows for finer control over analgesia and the duration of anesthesia but requires more substantial volumes of drugs and is slower in onset. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) combines the rapid commencement of action of SA with flexibility in epidural anesthesia, thus optimizing the management of the intraoperative and postoperative phases. This study aims to evaluate hemodynamic changes, compare the severity and duration of sensory and motor block, and track any problems related to CSEA and SA in major lower limb orthopedic procedures. Additionally, this study contrasts the hemodynamic, motor, and sensory changes in the two groups. Methodology A total of 30 individuals were randomized to one of two groups in this prospective comparative trial, which included 60 patients receiving major lower limb orthopedic surgery and meeting the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-II criteria. Group A received CSEA, and Group B received SA. The degree and duration of sensory and motor blockade, hemodynamic changes, and complications were all recorded. A p-value of less than 0.05 was used to evaluate statistical significance using Student's t-test and chi-square test. Results The onset of sensory block in our study was earlier in Group B compared to Group A. In both groups, hemodynamic stability was maintained throughout the study. We recorded the onset/duration of sensory and motor block and hemodynamic changes and took mean values to find any significant difference. Postoperative complications and rescue analgesic requirements were monitored and managed and were a part of our study. Conclusions This study compared CSEA and SA regarding the severity and duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic stability, and associated complications in major lower limb orthopedic surgeries. The results shed light on the advantages and shortcomings of each anesthesia technique and, therefore, will help choose the correct method of anesthesia in a given surgery.

Post-dural Puncture Headache: A Comparative Study Using 25 G Quincke's Needle in Midline and Paramedian Approaches in Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section.

Background and objectives Spinal anesthesia (SA) has become a preferred anesthetic technique for elective cesarean sections due to its rapid onset, profound sensory and motor blockade, and minimal impact on the newborn. It lowers the risk of development of thrombus in the veins and pulmonary vessels and permits early ambulation. The most popular technique used to reach the subarachnoid space is the midline technique, though it can be challenging to use in some cases, including those involving elderly patients with degenerative abnormalities in the vertebral column, patients who are unable to flex the vertebral column, noncooperative patients, and hyperesthetic patients. The paramedian technique resolves the challenges posed by the midline technique. It is also relatively easy to carry out. Based on the midline technique's inadequacies, we hypothesized that the paramedian method of SA would be less complicated than the midline approach, with a relatively low occurrence of post-dural puncture headaches (PDPH). Methodology Using the midline and paramedian approaches during cesarean surgeries, we performed an observational descriptive longitudinal study to assess the occurrence and magnitude of PDPH. During an elective cesarean delivery, the seated patient received 2.0-2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine using the midline or paramedian approaches and a 25 G Quincke's needle at the L3-L4 level. Eighty-four pregnant females with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status II, aged 18 to 35 (n = 42 in each group), were included in this research. The occurrence and severity of PDPH were compared among the groups during a period of five days. Result In comparison to the paramedian group (7.1%), the midline group had a higher incidence of PDPH (14.3%). There was a significant correlation between the technique and the occurrence of PDPH (p = 0.041). The visual analogue scale (VAS) was employed to quantify pain five days after surgery. Pain levels in Group B (paramedian) were consistently less than those in Group A (midline). On day 1, Group B had a mean score of 0.49 ± 1.16 (p = 0.030) compared to Group A's mean VAS score of 1.27 ± 1.95. Day 5 (p = 0.032): Because this tendency persisted through day 5, the p-values for days 2, 3, 4, and 5 remained significant. These findings suggest that the midline technique is linked to a higher occurrence and magnitude of PDPH than the paramedian approach. Conclusion Employing a paramedian technique has been associated with a noteworthy decline in the frequency of PDPH and a decrease in the need for additional analgesics, which could lead to a less severe case of PDPH. The paramedian approach needed fewer attempts and needle passes, which leads to a lower incidence of headache, backache, and injection site pain and better patient satisfaction.

Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Interventional Study.

Background A common knee joint disorder is injury to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), which often requires surgery. Proper pain control after the surgery facilitates fast recovery and prevents chronic pain. To provide analgesia for knee procedures, the use of opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, and regional techniques are commonly employed. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of adductor canal block (ACB) and femoral nerve block (FNB) for postoperative pain management after anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs). Methodology This prospective interventional study included 30 participants scheduled for patellar graft ACLR. They were assigned into groups, i.e., ACB and FNB, with 15 patients each. The evaluation occurred one day before the operation, and all surgical procedures were performed using spinal anesthesia. During the postoperative period, a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) was utilized to quantify pain intensity at the end of the surgery and at various intervals after the surgery. Patients with a VAS score greater than 4 received either FNB or ACB using bupivacaine 0.125%. Duration of analgesia time, power of quadriceps muscle, and neurologic complications were documented. Results No statistically significant value was observed in the mean duration of analgesia between the patients in ACB (348.33 minutes) and the patients in FNB (363.06 minutes). No motor block was observed in 12 patients who received ACB, while only four patients had a motor-sparing effect among those who received FNB. No neurological adverse effects were observed in the study participants. Conclusions ACB provides an equal duration of analgesia similar to FNB, and ACB significantly spares motor strength and maintains higher quadriceps power than FNB.

Interventional Strategies for Alleviating Severe Abdominal Pain in Chronic Pancreatitis and Abdominal Cancer: A Case Report on the Use of Splanchnic Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation and Erector Spinae Plane Block.

A cancer diagnosis marks the beginning of a difficult path filled with a profound battle against the excruciating pain associated with the illness. Cancer-related pain, which is complex and emotionally distressing, presents unique challenges in terms of treatment. Abdominal cancers and metastases frequently result in severe and unmanageable pain that does not respond well to traditional medications. In such situations, interventions like neurolysis and radiofrequency ablation of the splanchnic nerves and celiac plexus have emerged as effective strategies, providing enhanced pain relief and reducing the need for narcotic painkillers. In this case report, we describe a case of a 38-year-old man with a longstanding history of chronic pancreatitis with a polypoid growth close to the ampulla in the duodenal bulb. The patient was given pain medications to alleviate the pain, but the severe stomach pain, vomiting, and fever persisted. Imaging tests supported the diagnosis and showed chronic pancreatitis, a continuing inflammatory process, and a periampullary adenocarcinoma. The patient had significant pain while being positioned prone for the diagnostic block, hence an erector spinae plane block was done before the radiofrequency ablation. The patient received radiofrequency ablation at the T11 and T12 levels after receiving a diagnostic splanchnic nerve block, significantly reducing pain. The effectiveness of these interventional procedures in enhancing the patient's quality of life and decreasing their dependence on narcotic drugs was highlighted by follow-up visits at two, four, and six months that revealed little to no discomfort. This instance emphasizes the importance of considering neurolysis and radiofrequency ablation as essential alternatives for treating severe abdominal pain brought on by chronic pancreatitis and abdominal cancer.

Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis in a Three-Year-Old Female: Anaesthesia, Airway Management, and Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis.

Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) ankylosis is generally characterised by a complex aetiology, with several contributing causes, including infections, autoimmune diseases, trauma, and congenital anomalies. This case report describes a three-year-old female suffering from traumatic temporomandibular ankylosis with retrognathia, severe mouth-opening restriction, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The present case highlights the difficulties with TMJ ankylosis, especially when access to healthcare is sought out late and delayed diagnosis is prevalent. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis and awake fiberoptic intubation were used in the surgical and anaesthetic management of this case, with the otorhinolaryngology team on standby to perform a tracheostomy if required, highlighting the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach in such cases. Patients with TMJ ankylosis have significant life-altering changes, including psychological stress, chewing difficulty, speech difficulties, facial distortion, and speech impediment. When OSA progresses, it also presents more health risks. For the purpose of treating TMJ ankylosis, avoiding serious problems, and enhancing patient well-being, prompt diagnosis and therapy are crucial. In order to optimise patient results, this case study highlights the need for knowledge and research in the treatment of TMJ ankylosis as well as the requirement of medical professionals working together in a synergistic way.

Cervical Epidural Anesthesia in the Management of a Patient With Breast Cancer With Cardiac Dysfunction: A Case Report.

As one of the most common cancers in the world, breast cancer management is fraught with difficulties. Modified radical mastectomy (MRM) is one of the surgical procedures that is essential to the treatment of breast cancer. Cardiovascular issues, especially a reduced ejection fraction (EF), make these procedures more complex. Due to their increased vulnerability to adverse cardiac events during surgery, it is imperative to preserve hemodynamic stability and reduce physiological stress responses in these patients. A promising option in this changing field of anesthetic techniques is cervical epidural anesthesia (CEA). It effectively reduces hemodynamic fluctuations frequently linked to general anesthesia while providing analgesia. We report the case of an elderly patient with decreased EF and breast cancer scheduled for an MRM. To ensure the best possible outcomes in complex cases, the case report covers preoperative assessment, anesthesia technique, intraoperative management, and postoperative outcomes. This highlights the critical significance of customizing anesthesia and surgical procedures, informed consent, and meticulous postoperative pain management, and ultimately advocates for the broader implementation of CEA in such settings.

Anaesthetic Management for Mastectomy in a Male With Unilateral Gynecomastia: The Utilization of Thoracic Segmental Spinal Anaesthesia and Erector Spinae Plane Block.

Males are frequently affected by gynecomastia, a benign proliferative glandular tissue condition of the breast. Gynecomastia is usually treated with surgery to remove breast tissue. Using erector spinae plane block and thoracic segmental spinal anaesthesia in place of typical general anaesthesia during breast procedures has become more common in recent years. This case report presents the management of a 24-year-old male with long-standing left breast gynecomastia. Using a combination of erector spinae plane block and thoracic segmental spinal anaesthesia, the patient had the breast tissue excised. The regulation of the neuroendocrine stress response, lower need for analgesics after surgery, and decreased postoperative nausea and vomiting are among the many benefits of the anaesthetic methods. With better patient outcomes, fewer surgical complications, and efficient postoperative pain management, these methods offer a compelling substitute for general anaesthesia. The range of surgical scenarios in which these techniques can be applied could be expanded by additional research and clinical experience.

Comparison of Dexamethasone Versus Methylprednisolone With Bupivacaine in Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Attenuation of Chronic Postoperative Abdominal Pain.

Background  Opioids, which have well-known adverse effects such as drowsiness paralytic ileus and respiratory depression, were mostly utilised to treat postoperative pain in the past. The increased incidence of side effects has led to a rise in interest in pain management techniques that spare opioids. Persistent abdominal pain following surgery has a major detrimental effect on patients' quality of life. While epidural analgesia is widely regarded as the gold standard to combat the pain that is present post abdominal surgeries, it is not devoid of drawbacks. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has developed as a potentially effective treatment for severe abdominal pain. The TAP block acts on the neuro-fascial plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles, which is innervated by spinal nerves from T6 to L1. Studies reveal that the addition of corticosteroids to bupivacaine in TAP blocks provides pain relief and improves the quality of life of the patient. Aims and objectives  In this study, the effects of bupivacaine and corticosteroids, particularly dexamethasone and methylprednisolone, on chronic abdominal pain following surgery are examined. Assessing the quality of pain relief is the primary objective. Methodology  Thirty patients who had undergone abdominal surgery and had been having persistent abdominal pain for six to eight months thereafter and had attempted unsuccessfully to treat the pain with alternative pain relief methods participated in the study. They were divided into two groups at random. Dexamethasone and bupivacaine were given to patients in Group D while methylprednisolone and bupivacaine were given to patients in Group M for ultrasonography (USG)-guided bilateral TAP blocks. At various intervals up to 12 weeks after injection, the patient's pain levels were measured using the visual analogue score (VAS), and their quality of life was assessed using the quality-of-life score. Results  Patients in Group M experienced significantly less pain than those in Group D at the fourth, sixth, and 12th weeks of treatment. Furthermore, in the fourth, sixth, and 12th weeks, patients in Group M reported a superior quality of life in comparison to those in Group D. Conclusion  Patients with persistent postoperative abdominal pain receiving bupivacaine and methylprednisolone in an ultrasonography-guided TAP block experience more effective and long-lasting pain relief than those who receive bupivacaine and dexamethasone. The quality of life for patients may be enhanced by using corticosteroids to optimise postoperative pain management strategies and lessen the need for opioids, as this study highlights.

A Comparative Evaluation of Intra-articular Bupivacaine vs Bupivacaine and Dexmedetomidine for Postoperative Analgesia in Arthroscopic Knee Surgeries.

Background The study was done to determine the duration of postoperative analgesia brought on by incorporating intra-articular Bupivacaine with Dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant following knee arthroscopies. Methods A prospective randomized control study was conducted on 60 patients of ASA classes I and II, between the ages of 20 and 60 years, undergoing arthroscopic surgeries of the knee under spinal anaesthesia. The patients were divided into group B and group D, each containing 30 patients. The participants in group B were administered Inj. Bupivacaine 0.5% 19 mL + 1 mL of normal saline intra-articularly and the participants in group D were administered Inj. Bupivacaine 0.5% 19 mL, Inj. Dexmedetomidine 1 µg/kg and normal saline post-surgery. The number of analgesics used in the first 24 hours, pain levels using the visual analogue scale and the timing of administration of the first analgesic dose between the two study groups were evaluated. Results In comparison to the Bupivacaine group, the Dexmedetomidine group required fewer rescue analgesics. The visual analogue visual scale score in group B at four hours and six hours was 2.7 ± 1.39 and 2.9 ± 1.03, respectively, and in group D at four hours and six hours was 1.9 ± 1.09 and 1.83 ± 0.91. The visual analogue scale scores at these times were statistically significant. The visual analogue scale scores at 12 hours and 24 hours were statistically not significant. Conclusion Dexmedetomidine added to Intra-articular Bupivacaine provides an increased duration of postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing arthroscopic surgeries of the knee. The combination offers improved analgesia and reduces the overall dosage of rescue analgesics needed without causing substantial side effects.

Neuromuscular Monitoring and Wake-Up Test During Scoliosis Surgery.

A typical spine is straight and symmetrical, with all of the vertebrae facing forward when viewed from the posterior. Scoliosis is a term used to describe a lateral deviation of the spine's normal vertical line that is greater than 10° on an X-ray. More severe curves are sometimes accompanied by medical issues such as increased back discomfort and cardiorespiratory difficulties along with the cosmetic components of the deformity. The test for spinal cord integrity prior to the widespread adoption of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IOM) was the wake-up test. In this article, we review the challenges faced by anesthesiologists and surgeons during intraoperative monitoring and the importance of clinical assessment of surgical outcomes.

Ultrasound-Guided Neuraxial Anaesthesia for Vaginal Hysterectomy in a Patient With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Rheumatoid arthritis is a type of chronic inflammatory arthritis affecting about 1% of the population. Females are more frequently affected than males. The aetiology of the disease is uncertain. Immunological, genetic and environmental factors play a role in the manifestations. The condition is characterised by a combination of articular symptoms and multi-organ involvement. These pose a wide array of difficulties in administering anaesthesia for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. These patients are prone to have a problem in airway management due to arthritic changes in the cervical spine and temporomandibular joint and in the administration of neuraxial anaesthesia owing to changes occurring in the vertebral column. We present a case of a 45-year-old female with rheumatoid arthritis posted for a vaginal hysterectomy. The patient had narrowed intervertebral spaces and was managed successfully by the use of ultrasonography to place an epidural catheter and for the administration of subarachnoid block for the conduct of the procedure.

Fluoroscopy-Guided Splanchnic Nerve Block for Cancer-Associated Pain.

Pain associated with abdominal malignancies or metastasis can be very severe and can be intractable and resistant to conventional pharmacologic therapies. Typically, narcotics and non-narcotics are used in combination to alleviate the cancer pain, but these are often unsuccessful. Neurolysis and radio-frequency ablation of the celiac plexus and splanchnic nerves is being used with great success for management of the pain associated with abdominal malignancies with added advantages of improving quality of life, pain relief and decreased narcotic consumption. The tumor or associated lymphadenopathy may result in distortion of the celiac plexus anatomy, thus making it hard to reach the celiac plexus. In such cases, splanchnic nerve block can be employed with relative ease as compared to celiac plexus block. Given the nature of the debilitating pain associated with these conditions and inadequate pain relief with narcotics, these blocks are a boon in disguise to such patients with altered anatomy. Post administration of the splanchnic block, the functioning and quality of life of patients with abdominal malignancies improve. Hence, these blocks can be used to decrease the morbidity associated with abdominal malignancies.