Weight Loss and Glycemic Control After Bariatric Surgery in Adolescents With Severe Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: Bariatric surgery is regarded as a valuable treatment option for adolescents with severe obesity. However, high-quality evidence of its superiority over prolonged conservative treatment with multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention (MLI) is limited. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of bariatric surgery in adolescents without sufficient weight loss after MLI for severe obesity. METHODS: A two-group randomized controlled trial was designed to assess one-year health effects of bariatric surgery in adolescents with severe obesity. The participants were referred by pediatricians after completing MLI without sufficient effects. Eligible for participation were adolescents aged 14-16 years with severe obesity (age- and sex-adjusted body mass index (BMI) using the International Obesity Task Force cutoffs: BMI ≥40 kg/m2, or ≥35 kg/m2 in combination with comorbidity). Participants were assigned to MLI combined with laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (n = 29) versus only MLI (n = 30). Participants were included from 2011 to 2019. Main outcomes were weight change and sex- and age-specific BMI loss. Additionaly, glucose metabolism, blood pressure and lipid profile were analysed. RESULTS: 53 patients completed the 12-months follow-up (89.8%). Mean (±standard deviation [SD]) weight loss in the surgery group was 11.2 ± 7.8% after 12 months, compared to a weight gain of 1.7 ± 8.1% in the control group. The fasting insulin, insulin resistance score and lipid profile improved significantly in the surgery group. DISCUSSION: Bariatric surgery was associated with substantial weight loss and improvements in glucose and lipid metabolism after 12 months compared to conservative treatment in adolescents with severe obesity.

Left Ventricular Geometrical Changes in Severely Obese Adolescents: Prevalence, Determinants, and Clinical Implications.

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is independently associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in adults. Adiposity is a risk factor for LVH, independent of blood pressure. Potential causes of this nonhemodynamic pathogenesis identified in adults include adverse body fat distribution, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA). In severely obese adolescents, the determinants of obesity-induced changes in left ventricular structure are poorly characterized. Cardiac ultrasonographic, demographic, anthropometric, and comorbidity-related data were prospectively collected in adolescents with severe obesity refractory to conservative treatment who presented for surgical therapy. Differences between adolescents with LVH and without LVH were evaluated using independent samples t, chi-square, or Fisher's exact test. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate associations with left ventricular structural changes, corrected for body mass index (BMI) z score. Forty-three patients entered analysis, of whom 24 (55.8%) showed LVH. The most common geometrical change was eccentric LVH (eLVH), occurring in 21 subjects (48.8%). Demographic and anthropometric variables did not differ between patients with and without LVH. Independent of BMI z score, left ventricular mass index was significantly associated with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) (regression parameter B = 0.8; 95% CI 0.3 to 1.2). Interventricular septum thickness (IVST) was significantly associated with HOMA-IR values (B = 0.1; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.2), HDL-cholesterol (B = - 1.2; 95% CI - 2.2 to 0.1), and triglyceride levels (B = 0.5; 95% CI 0.001 to 0.9). LVH, especially eLVH, is highly prevalent amongst severely obese adolescents. Adverse changes in cardiac structure, increased IVST in particular, are independently associated with several nonhemodynamic comorbidities that are common in this population, namely OSA, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia.

Preliminary evidence that endoscopic gastroplication reduces food reward.

Morbidly obese patients are most successfully treated with bariatric surgery. Although restrictive gastric surgery physically limits food intake, it is also suggested that eating behavior and food-reward mechanisms are affected. Therefore, eating behavior and food-reward were assessed in ten patients that underwent gastric volume reduction by endoscopic gastroplication. Patients participated in test days before and one, three and twelve months after the procedure. Weight loss, food intake, appetite, gastric emptying rate, food-reward (i.e. liking and wanting) and eating behavior were assessed. Body mass index decreased from 38.3 (37.6-42.6) to 33.9 (31.0-35.9) kg/m2 after one year. Ad libitum food intake decreased significantly after one month, but not after one year. Gastric emptying rate did not change. AUC of VAS scores for desire to eat, quantity, fullness, hunger, snacking and satiety changed after one month, but not all remained significantly changed after one year. Thirst did not change. Liking scores of food items decreased significantly in the fasted as well as the satiated state after the procedure. Wanting scores did not change. Uncontrolled eating decreased significantly after three and twelve months; emotional eating was only significantly decreased after three months. The results show that food intake decreases, while VAS scores for appetite and eating behavior change accordingly. Liking, but not wanting of food items changed to benefit the weight losing patient. The effects were stronger at one-month follow-up than at 12 months, which may be a risk of relapse after initial successful weight loss. The effects of new bariatric procedures on food-reward should be studied in future randomized trials to further elucidate their impact. REGISTERED AT CLINICALTRIALS. GOV: NCT02381340.

Long-Term Follow-Up Is Essential to Assess Outcome of Gastric Banding in Morbidly Obese Adolescents: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent obesity is rapidly becoming more prevalent and is associated with chronic health conditions and psychosocial morbidity. Lifestyle intervention is often ineffective in morbidly obese adolescents, and bariatric surgery is gradually becoming an accepted treatment. However, little is known about long-term results. METHODS: Hospital charts of patients who had undergone gastric banding more than 5 years ago at an age of 18 years or younger, were retrospectively analyzed. Weight loss, complications, reoperations, and comorbidity reduction were assessed as well as health status, food behavior, and personality. RESULTS: BMI loss in 10 adolescents was 10.7 kg/m2 (-0.9 to 12.9 kg/m2) after a median follow-up of 64 months (52-84 months); the major part of weight loss occurred after the first year. In 4 patients the gastric band was removed after 3.5-5.5 years. Two out of 3 patients effectively lost weight after conversion to a bypass type procedure. One patient is maintaining a stable healthy weight after band removal. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding in morbidly obese adolescents had a failure rate of 40%, but was a successful therapy in the other 60% without major adverse events. Follow-up longer than 36 months was crucial for optimal evaluation of weight loss and reoperation rate.

Bariatric surgery in morbidly obese adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically reviewed for available evidence on bariatric surgery in adolescents. Thirty-seven included studies evaluated the effect of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients ≤18 years old. Fifteen of 37 studies were prospective, including one RCT. Mean body mass index (BMI) loss after LAGB was 11.6 kg/m(2) (95% CI 9.8-13.4), versus 16.6 kg/m(2) (95% CI 13.4-19.8) after RYGB and 14.1 kg/m(2) (95% CI 10.8-17.5) after LSG. Two unrelated deaths were reported after 495 RYGB procedures. All three bariatric procedures result in substantial weight loss and improvement of comorbidity with an acceptable complication rate, indicating that surgical intervention is applicable in appropriately selected morbidly obese adolescents.

Endoscopic gastric volume reduction with a novel articulating plication device is safe and effective in the treatment of obesity (with video).

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic volume reduction of the stomach may provide a minimally invasive alternative for surgical procedures in the treatment of obesity. OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and preliminary effectiveness in the first human application of a novel endoscopic stapling technique. DESIGN: Prospective, observational, phase 1 study. SETTING: Two university hospitals in The Netherlands. PATIENTS: Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 40 to 45 kg/m(2) or 30 to 39.9 kg/m(2) with obesity-related comorbidity. INTERVENTIONS: Gastric volume reduction with an endoscopic stapler. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome measure was the prevalence of serious or mild adverse events. Reduction of excess body weight after 12 months was assessed as a secondary outcome measure for effectiveness of the procedure. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with a median BMI of 40.2 kg/m(2) (interquartile range [IQR] 37.6-42.8) underwent an endoscopic stapling procedure. Median procedure time was 123 minutes (IQR 95-129). No serious adverse events occurred. Adverse events were gastric pain (n = 7, range 1-3 days), sore throat (n = 4, 2-3 days), diarrhea (n = 4, 2-15 days), nausea (n = 3, 2-4 days), constipation (n = 4, 3-14 days), and vomiting (n = 3, 1-4 days). All adverse events were mild and resolved with conservative treatment within 15 days after surgery. The median percentage excess weight loss in the first year was 34.9% (IQR 17.8-46.6). LIMITATIONS: Limited number of patients. CONCLUSION: This first human application of this endoscopic stapler demonstrates that the procedure is technically feasible and safe. One hundred sixty plications were created in 17 patients without significant problems. Weight loss after 1 year is promising, but long-term follow-up and randomized, controlled studies should evaluate whether this procedure is an effective and durable minimally invasive endoscopic treatment for obesity. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01429194.).