Plain Language Summaries of Clinical Trial Results: A Preliminary Study to Assess Availability of Easy-to-Understand Summaries and Approaches to Improving Public Engagement.

BACKGROUND: Easy-to-understand, stand-alone factual summaries of clinical trial results have the potential to improve public understanding of and engagement with pharmaceutical research. The European Clinical Trial Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014 is a major regulatory initiative that will result in a large number of such plain language summaries (PLSs) posted in the public domain. Today, however, little is known about the extent to which PLSs are written and are available to the general public. OBJECTIVES: This preliminary study assessed (i) 20 top pharmaceutical companies' positions on improving transparency and commitment to disclosing trial result summaries in an easy-to-understand format and (ii) the availability of such summaries in the public domain and the ease of locating them via general web searches. METHODS: The availability of PLSs in the public domain was estimated based on the number of EudraCT technical result summaries in four disease areas: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, meningitis, and influenza. The likelihood of PLSs being easy to find through internet search engine queries by members of the public was assessed using Google. RESULTS: All 20 sponsors had committed to improve clinical trial transparency, 17 committed to sharing PLSs with trial participants, and 14 had at least one PLS available in the public domain. A total of 99 clinical studies in these four disease areas had technical summaries posted on EudraCT between 1 January 2017 and 30 June 2020. Of these 99, 14 studies had PLSs in the public domain. A total of 12 of 14 PLSs were directly captured by search engine. However, the sponsor trial identifier or EudraCT number had to be included in the search term to locate them. Generic search terms resulted in large volumes of non-relevant results. CONCLUSION: Despite the progressive movement towards clinical trial transparency, easily accessible PLSs on clinical trials are currently scarce. The provision of a European mandate and framework for non-technical result summaries by Regulation (EU) 536/2014 will be a major step to bring about positive change.

More patient and public involvement in healthcare research will help to speed the process of making new medicines. This is known by both the regulators and the healthcare industry. The healthcare industry wants to make more information on human research studies available to patients and the public. One way to help achieve this is to write simple summaries of clinical study results. Here, we use the term plain language summary (PLS) to describe them. The PLS allows people to understand human research studies more clearly. A new law will soon make it necessary to write a PLS for every clinical study done in Europe. But, today, is the PLS being used to inform the public about clinical research studies? And what is its potential? We found only  a few researchers have already begun to write PLSs. PLSs on most studies are not available to the public. Even those PLSs on public websites are very hard to find through a Google search. To better understand the potential of PLSs we are doing more research. This research will look at what the public wants to know about these studies and how they will retrieve this information.

The candidate tuberculosis vaccine Mtb72F/AS02A: Tolerability and immunogenicity in humans.

Tuberculosis (TB) remains uncontrolled in many parts of the world and the development of an effective vaccine against TB represents a high priority unmet medical need. Healthy PPD (tuberculin purified protein derivative)-negative adult volunteers, aged 18-40 years received three doses of the candidate Mtb72F/AS02A vaccine according to a 0-1-2 months schedule in an open-label Phase I study (NCT00730795). Solicited, unsolicited and serious adverse events (AEs), hematological and biochemical laboratory parameters were assessed. Mtb72F-specific humoral responses were assessed by ELISA and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) and short-term ELISPOT assays. CMI responses to the component peptides (Mtb39a and the Mtb32a C- and N-terminal antigen domains, Mtb32C and Mtb32N) were also assessed by ICS. The Mtb72F/AS02A vaccine appeared to be mainly locally reactogenic but this was considered acceptable, since these AEs were usually transient and resolved within 1-2 days. Most AEs reported were mild in intensity, no serious AEs occurred, no medically significant biochemical or hematological abnormalities related to vaccination were measured and all AEs resolved without sequelae. The vaccine induced statistically significant changes in humoral and CMI response measures. The Mtb72F antigen induced good production of IL-2 and IFNgamma in the ELISPOT assay and CD4(+) T cells expressing at least two activation markers (mainly CD40-L and IL-2) were observed with ICS. A similar CMI profile was observed with Mtb39a and Mtb32N. The induced CMI responses persisted for at least 6 months post-vaccination. All subjects were seropositive for anti-Mtb72F antibodies one month post-dose 2 and 6 months post-dose 3. This first trial in humans found Mtb72F/AS02A to have an acceptable tolerability, to be immunogenic in healthy adults and warrants further development of the vaccine.