Mitochondrial Toxicogenomics for Antiretroviral Management: HIV Post-exposure Prophylaxis in Uninfected Patients.

Background: Mitochondrial genome has been used across multiple fields in research, diagnosis, and toxicogenomics. Several compounds damage mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), including biological and therapeutic agents like the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) but also its antiretroviral treatment, leading to adverse clinical manifestations. HIV-infected and treated patients may show impaired mitochondrial and metabolic profile, but specific contribution of viral or treatment toxicity remains elusive. The evaluation of HIV consequences without treatment interference has been performed in naïve (non-treated) patients, but assessment of treatment toxicity without viral interference is usually restricted to in vitro assays. Objective: The objective of the present study is to determine whether antiretroviral treatment without HIV interference can lead to mtDNA disturbances. We studied clinical, mitochondrial, and metabolic toxicity in non-infected healthy patients who received HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) to prevent further infection. We assessed two different PEP regimens according to their composition to ascertain if they were the cause of tolerability issues and derived toxicity. Methods: We analyzed reasons for PEP discontinuation and main secondary effects of treatment withdrawal, mtDNA content from peripheral blood mononuclear cells and metabolic profile, before and after 28 days of PEP, in 23 patients classified depending on PEP composition: one protease inhibitor (PI) plus Zidovudine/Lamivudine (PI plus AZT + 3TC; n = 9) or PI plus Tenofovir/Emtricitabine (PI plus TDF + FTC; n = 14). Results: Zidovudine-containing-regimens showed an increased risk for drug discontinuation (RR = 9.33; 95% CI = 1.34-65.23) due to adverse effects of medication related to gastrointestinal complications. In the absence of metabolic disturbances, 4-week PEP containing PI plus AZT + 3TC led to higher mitochondrial toxicity (-17.9 ± 25.8 decrease in mtDNA/nDNA levels) than PI plus TDF + FTC (which increased by 43.2 ± 24.3 units mtDNA/nDNA; p < 0.05 between groups). MtDNA changes showed a significant and negative correlation with baseline alanine transaminase levels (p < 0.05), suggesting that a proper hepatic function may protect from antiretroviral toxicity. Conclusions: In absence of HIV infection, preventive short antiretroviral treatment can cause secondary effects responsible for treatment discontinuation and subclinical mitochondrial damage, especially pyrimidine analogs such as AZT, which still rank as the alternative option and first choice in certain cohorts for PEP. Forthcoming efforts should be focused on launching new strategies with safer clinical and mitotoxic profile.

Renal safety of coformulated tenofovir/emtricitabine vs other nucleoside analogues in combination therapy in antiretroviral-naive patients aged 50 years or older in Spain: The TRIP study.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim is to describe the impact of emtricitabine (FTC)/tenofovir (TDF) versus other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTIs)-based regimens on renal function of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) naïve patients >50 years old who started combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). DESIGN: National, retrospective cohort analysis of patients >50 years old when they started cART (January 1, 2006-December 31, 2009). METHODS: We compared renal safety (changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] during the first year, and time to renal events during 4 years of follow-up) in FTC/TDF versus non-FTC/TDF users. Among FTC/TDF users, we compared protease inhibitors vs non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and Lopinavir/ritonavir vs Efavirenz. RESULTS: We included 103 patients: median age: 54.9 years, 84% males, median CD4 count 247 cells/µl, median viral load 4.7 log; median follow up 18 months (max: 48 months); 73 started with FTC/TDF and 30 with other NRTIs. Change in eGFR was significantly worse for ritonavir-boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) vs efavirenz (EFV) users in the FTC/TDF group (71.2 vs 98.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at month 12, P < 0.05). The risk of renal events (progression to an Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration value < 60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in subjects with baseline values >60) was comparable for FTC/TDF users and non users, but was higher and almost significant for LPV/r as compared to EFV users in the FTC/TDF group (adjusted hazard ratio 6.1, 95% CI 0.8-45.5). CONCLUSIONS: In our study with a population of HIV infected subjects ≥ 50 years old, renal safety was similar for FTC/TDF and other NRTI-based regimens, but worse for LPV/r as compared to other regimens.

Executive summary of the consensus document on metabolic disorders and cardiovascular risk in patients with HIV infection.

The importance of the metabolic disorders and their impact on patients with HIV infection requires an individualized study and continuous updating. HIV patients have the same cardiovascular risk factors as the general population. The HIV infection per se increases the cardiovascular risk, and metabolic disorders caused by some antiretroviral drugs are added risk factors. For this reason, the choice of drugs with a good metabolic profile is essential. The most common metabolic disorders of HIV infected-patients (insulin resistance, diabetes, hyperlipidemia or osteopenia), as well as other factors of cardiovascular risk, such as hypertension, should also be dealt with according to guidelines similar to the general population, as well as insisting on steps to healthier lifestyles. The aim of this document is to provide a query tool for all professionals who treat HIV-patients and who may present or display any metabolic disorders listed in this document.

[Consensus statement on metabolic disorders and cardiovascular risks in patients with human immunodeficiency virus]. / Documento de consenso sobre alteraciones metabólicas y riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con infección por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana.

OBJECTIVE: This consensus document is an update of metabolic disorders and cardiovascular risk (CVR) guidelines for HIV-infected patients. METHODS: This document has been approved by an expert panel of GEAM, SPNS and GESIDA after reviewing the results of efficacy and safety of clinical trials, cohort and pharmacokinetic studies published in biomedical journals (PubMed and Embase) or presented in medical scientific meetings. Recommendation strength and the evidence in which they are supported are based on the GRADE system. RESULTS: A healthy lifestyle is recommended, no smoking and at least 30min of aerobic exercise daily. In diabetic patients the same treatment as non-HIV infected patients is recommended. HIV patients with dyslipidemia should be considered as high CVR, thus its therapeutic objective is an LDL less than 100mg/dL. The antihypertensive of ACE inhibitors and ARAII families are better tolerated and have a lower risk of interactions. In HIV-patients with diabetes or metabolic syndrome and elevated transaminases with no defined etiology, the recommended is to rule out a hepatic steatosis Recommendations for action in hormone alterations are also updated. CONCLUSIONS: These new guidelines update previous recommendations regarding all those metabolic disorders involved in CVR. Hormone changes and their management and the impact of metabolic disorders on the liver are also included.

[Reasons for antiretroviral treatment change in HIV+ patients in Spain in 2010-2011. SWITCH AUDIT Study]. / Causas que justifican el cambio del tratamiento antirretroviral en personas con infección por el VIH en España (años 2010-2011). Estudio SWITCH AUDIT.

Survey in 349 HIV infected subjects in 19 Spanish Hospitals in 2010-2011, to assess the reasons for antiretroviral treatment change. Simplification was the most frequent reason for change (37%), followed by toxicity (30%) and treatment failure (21%). There were statistically significant differences according to treatment line and transmission category. In conclusion, in many patients treatment is changed in order to obtain the benefits of a regimen easier to follow.

Safety, efficacy, and persistence of emtricitabine/tenofovir versus other nucleoside analogues in naive subjects aged 50 years or older in Spain: the TRIP study.

OBJECTIVES: Current antiretroviral guidelines state that being older than 50 to 55 years of age is an indication to start antiretroviral therapy (ART), regardless of CD4 status. However, no references to the preferred combination ART (cART) for these patients have been described. Our study compares emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (FTC/TDF) versus other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) regimens in HIV ART-naïve patients who are ≥50 years. DESIGN: National, retrospective cohort analysis of patients who were ≥50 years old when they began the first cART (January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2009). METHODS: We compared safety, effectiveness, and persistence of treatment in FTC/TDF versus non-FTC/TDF users. Among FTC/TDF users, we compared protease inhibitor (PI) versus NNRTI users and lopinavir/r versus efavirenz users. RESULTS: We included 161 patients: median age was 54.6 years, 83% were men, median CD4 count was 191 cells/µL, median viral load was 4.7 log, and median follow-up was 19 months (maximum, 48 months). Of these participants, 112 started with FTC/TDF and 49 with other nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). During follow-up, 21.9% of subjects developed at least one laboratory event ≥grade 3, 5.6% interrupted cART due to adverse events,19.3% had virologic failure, and 49.1% modified cART. There were no statistically significant differences between FTC/TDF and non-FTC/TDF users for any output except for persistence: The proportion of subjects who changed cART was 71.4% for non-FTC/TDF users and 38.6% for FTC/TDF users (log rank 0.001; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.34-3.29). CONCLUSIONS: In a population of HIV-infected subjects who were ≥50 years old, our study suggests that the use of FTC/TDF is generally safe and effective, with a longer persistence as compared to other regimens.

[Reasons for the introduction of darunavir in the antirretroviral treatment in HIV-infected patients]. / Motivos de introducción de darunavir en un régimen antirretroviral en pacientes infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia adquirida.

INTRODUCTION: In 2009 a deep change in ARV treatment took place in Spain with the introduction of new ARV drugs. The principal objective of the study was to determine the clinical situation of the patients in which DRV/r was introduced in the ARV therapy. METHODS: Observational, cross sectional and multicentre study in which 91 reference hospitals participated. Patient's enrollment was carried out between 2008 and 2009. Data were collected retrospectively considering standard clinical practice. RESULTS: 719 medical records were reviewed. Patients had a different clinical situation compared to nowadays with predominance of multiresistant virus which leaded to virologic failure. The principal reason for introducing DRV/r in the ARV regimen was the virologic failure (54.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Considering this situation, DRV/r became a therapeutic option which represented a change in the ARV paradigm in that period.

Evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of nevirapine plus coformulated tenofovir/emtricitabine as first-line therapy in routine clinical practice.

Despite having demonstrated noninferior efficacy against atazanavir/ritonavir plus coformulated tenofovir/emtricitabine (cTDF/FTC), the combination of nevirapine plus cTDF/FTC is not included among preferred regimens in some international guidelines. This combination is frequently used in Spain. We analyzed its effectiveness and safety as first-line therapy in a routine clinical practice. A retrospective, multicenter study was performed in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected subjects who started nevirapine plus cTDF/FTC as first-line therapy according to the nevirapine CD4(+) cell count threshold. The primary endpoint was the proportion of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/ml at week 48. We included 123 subjects starting the regimen from 2005 to 2008. The median age was 41.0 years, the median baseline CD4(+) cell count was 215 cells/µl, the median plasma viral load (VL) was 4.83 log(10) copies/ml, and 22% had hepatitis C coinfection. At week 48, 96 subjects (78%; 95% CI: 69.9-84.4) had a VL <50 copies/ml in an ITT analysis, and the median rise in the CD4(+) cell count was 118 cells/µl. Virological failure was observed in 6.5% (8/123) of subjects, all them before week 24 and related to poor adherence. There was no relationship between virological failure and baseline CD4(+) cell count or VL. Ten percent (13/123) of the subjects discontinued the treatment due to adverse events. There was a significant decrease in total/HDL-cholesterol ratio (p=0.03) with an increase in HDL-cholesterol (p=0.01) over 48 weeks. The combination of nevirapine plus cTDF/FTC showed a high virological efficacy without unexpected toxicities as a first-line treatment in a routine clinical practice.

Dyslipidaemia in HIV-infected women on antiretroviral therapy. Analysis of 922 patients from the Spanish VACH cohort.

BACKGROUND: Information concerning lipid disturbances in HIV-infected women on antiretroviral therapy (ART) is scarce. The objective of the study is to describe the lipid profile in a large cohort of HIV-infected women on contemporary ART and analyse differences between regimes and patient's characteristics. METHODS: Observational, multicentre, cross-sectional study from the Spanish VACH Cohort. 922 women on stable ART without lipid-lowering treatment were included. RESULTS: Median age was 42 years, median CD4 lymphocyte count was 544 cells/mm3, and 85.6% presented undetectable HIV-1 viral load. Median total cholesterol (TC) was 189 mg/dL (interquartile range, IQR, 165-221), HDL cholesterol 53 mg/dL (IQR, 44-64), LDL cholesterol 108 mg/dL (IQR, 86-134), and triglycerides 116 mg/dL (IQR, 85-163). Mean accumulated time on ART was 116 months; 47.4% were on NNRTI-based regimes, 44.7% on PI, and 6.7% on only-NRTI therapy. 43.8% were also hepatitis C (HCV) coinfected. Patients on PI treatment presented higher TC/HDL ratio than those on NNRTI (p < 0.001). Significantly higher HDL values were observed in NNRTI-treated patients. HCV-coinfected patients presented lower TC/HDL ratio than the non HCV-coinfected. In multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with TC/HDL ratio were age, triglyceride levels and HCV co-infection. PI treatment presented a non-significant association with higher TC/HDL ratio. CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-infected women, the NNRTI-based ART is associated with a better lipid profile than the PI-based. Factors unrelated to ART selection may also exert an independent, significant influence on lipids; in particular, age, and triglyceride levels are associated with an increased TC/HDL ratio while HCV co-infection is associated with a reduced TC/HDL ratio.

Effect of TNF-alpha genetic variants and CCR5 Delta 32 on the vulnerability to HIV-1 infection and disease progression in Caucasian Spaniards.

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) is thought to be involved in the various immunogenetic events that influence HIV-1 infection. METHODS: We aimed to determine whether carriage of the TNF-alpha-238G>A, -308G>A and -863 C>A gene promoter single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and the CCR5 Delta 32 variant allele influence the risk of HIV-1 infection and disease progression in Caucasian Spaniards. The study group consisted of 423 individuals. Of these, 239 were uninfected (36 heavily exposed but uninfected [EU] and 203 healthy controls [HC]) and 184 were HIV-1-infected (109 typical progressors [TP] and 75 long-term nonprogressors [LTNP] of over 16 years' duration). TNF-alpha SNP and the CCR5 Delta 32 allele were assessed using PCR-RFLP and automatic sequencing analysis methods on white blood cell DNA. Genotype and allele frequencies were compared using the chi 2 test and the Fisher exact test. Haplotypes were compared by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The distribution of TNF-alpha-238G>A, -308G>A and -863 C>A genetic variants was non-significantly different in HIV-1-infected patients compared with uninfected individuals: -238G>A, p = 0.7 and p = 0.3; -308G>A, p = 0.05 and p = 0.07; -863 C>A, p = 0.7 and p = 0.4, for genotype and allele comparisons, respectively. Haplotype analyses, however, indicated that carriers of the haplotype H3 were significantly more common among uninfected subjects (p = 0.04). Among the infected patients, the distribution of the three TNF-alpha genetic variants assessed was non-significantly different between TP and LTNP: -238G>A, p = 0.35 and p = 0.7; -308G>A, p = 0.7 and p = 0.6: -863 C>A, p = 0.2 and p = 0.2, for genotype and allele comparisons, respectively. Haplotype analyses also indicated non-significant associations. Subanalyses in the LTNP subset indicated that the TNF-alpha-238A variant allele was significantly overrepresented in patients who spontaneously controlled plasma viremia compared with those who had a detectable plasma viral load (genotype comparisons, p = 0.02; allele comparisons, p = 0.03). The CCR5 Delta 32 distribution was non-significantly different in HIV-1-infected patients with respect to the uninfected population (p = 0.15 and p = 0.2 for genotype and allele comparisons, respectively) and in LTNP vs TP (p = 0.4 and p = 0.5 for genotype and allele comparisons, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of Caucasian Spaniards, TNF-alpha genetic variants could be involved in the vulnerability to HIV-1 infection. TNF-alpha genetic variants were unrelated to disease progression in infected subjects. The -238G>A SNP may modulate the control of viremia in LTNP. Carriage of the CCR5 Delta 32 variant allele had no effect on the risk of infection and disease progression.

Characteristics and outcome of HIV infection in gypsies in the Spanish VACH Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: To study the characteristics of HIV infection in the gypsy (Roma) population in Spain, as compared with those of the Caucasian, non-gypsy majority. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, historical cohort study from the Spanish VACH Cohort. METHODS: Patients attending VACH clinics between 1 June 2004 and 30 November 2004 were classified according to their racial and ethnic origin as "gypsies", Caucasian non-gypsy Spanish natives (CNGN), and "other" (the last being excluded from this study). Their sociodemographic and clinico-epidemiological characteristics were compared, as well as the Kaplan-Meier curves of time to AIDS, or death, or disease progression (either of the 2 outcomes). RESULTS: 4819 (48%) of 10,032 cases included in the VACH database were eligible: 210 (4.2%) were gypsies and 4252 (84.8%) were CNGN. Differences were observed in age, household, academic, inmate, marital, and employment history. Injecting drug use had been the most frequent mechanism of transmission in both groups, but to a greater extent among gypsies (72% versus 50%; P<0.000). Sex distribution, CD4 cell counts, and viral loads at the first visit were similar in the 2 groups, as was the percentage of patients with previous AIDS, percentage receiving antiretrovirals, and percentage subsequently starting antiretroviral therapy. Up to 1 April 2005, 416 new AIDS cases and 85 deaths were recorded. The percentage of these outcomes did not differ between groups, but log-rank test showed a shorter time to AIDS and disease progression among gypsies. CONCLUSIONS: The sociodemographic characteristics of gypsies, the largest minority in the VACH Cohort, show differences relative to those of CNGN. HIV-related outcomes suggest that gypsies have a poorer prognosis.

Genetic and functional mitochondrial assessment of HIV-infected patients developing HAART-related hyperlactatemia.

BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial damage of HIV and antiretrovirals, especially nucleoside-analogue interference on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) replication, is reported to underlay highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART)-related hyperlactatemia, but scarce approaches have been performed to correlate clinical manifestations and mitochondrial abnormalities. METHODS: We obtained lymphocytes and monocytes of 26 HIV-infected and treated patients who developed hyperlactatemia and after recovery, 28 nonhyperlactatemic HIV subjects on HAART, 31 naive individuals, and 20 uninfected controls. Mitochondrial replication and transcription analysis were performed by quantitative real-time PCR, mitochondrial translation quantification by western blot and mitochondrial enzymatic activities by spectrophotometry. RESULTS: Mitochondrial parameters decreased during hyperlactatemia and improved at recovery. Mitochondrial replication and transcription species were reduced (P = 0.16 and P = 0.71), but the most significant decay was observed on mitochondrial protein content (P < 0.05) and mitochondrial complexes III and IV activities (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001). During hyperlactatemia lactate level correlated complexes III and IV function (P < 0.05). After recovery mitochondrial parameters achieved values of nonhyperlactatemic HIV individuals, which were lower than ranges of naive subjects and uninfected controls. CONCLUSIONS: HIV and HAART-related hyperlactatemia is associated with a general mitochondrial impairment which reverts after recovery. Mitochondrial biochemistry show a better correlation with lactate levels than mitochondrial genetics suggesting that mitochondrial function could be a better marker of hyperlactatemia development than mtDNA content.

Efficacy and safety of switching from boosted lopinavir to boosted atazanavir in patients with virological suppression receiving a LPV/r-containing HAART: the ATAZIP study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of switching from boosted lopinavir (LPV/r) to boosted atazanavir (ATV/r) in virologically suppressed HIV-1-infected patients versus continuing LPV/r. METHODS: Forty-eight weeks analysis of a randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial including patients with virological suppression (< or = 200 copies/mL for > or = 6 months) on LPV/r-containing triple highly active antiretroviral therapy. Patients (n = 248) were randomized 1:1 either to continue LPV/r twice a day (n = 127) or to switch to ATV/r every day (ATV/r; n = 121), with no change in nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone. Those known to have >4 protease inhibitor (PI)-associated mutations and/or who had failed >2 PI-containing regimens were excluded. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were balanced. 30% harboured > or = 1 PI-associated mutation (10% harboured > or = 1 major mutation). Treatment failure at 48 weeks (primary end point) occurred in 20% (25 of 127) of the LPV/r arm and in 17% (21 of 121) of the ATV/r arm (difference -2.3%; 95% confidence interval: -12.0 to 8.0; P = 0.0018). Virological failure occurred in 7% (9 of 127) of the LPV/r arm and in 5% (6 of 121) of the ATV/r arm (difference -2.1%; 95% confidence interval: -8.7% to 4.2%, P < 0.0001 for noninferiorating). CD4 changes from baseline were similar in each arm (approximately 40 cells/mm). Adverse event rate leading to study drug discontinuation was 5% in both arms. Median fasting triglycerides and total cholesterol decreased significantly in the ATV/r arm (-53 and -19 mg/dL, respectively versus -4 and -4 mg/dL in the LPV/r arm; P < 0.001 in both comparisons). Alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase hepatic abnormalities were similar in the 2 arms. CONCLUSIONS: Switching to ATV/r in virologically suppressed patients who were receiving a LPV/r-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy provided comparable (noninferior) efficacy and a safety profile with improved lipid parameters [ISRCTN24813210].

Saquinavir exposure in HIV-infected patients with chronic viral hepatitis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the influence of hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus co-infection and the extent of liver fibrosis on saquinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected subjects without liver function impairment. METHODS: A cross-sectional, comparative study enrolling HIV-infected adults receiving saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice daily or 1500/100 mg once daily was conducted. Patients with chronic viral hepatitis (HEP+) were grouped as having advanced liver fibrosis (HEP+/FIB+) or not (HEP+/FIB-) based on the FIB-4 index. Saquinavir and ritonavir trough concentrations (C(trough)) in plasma were determined by HPLC. The geometric mean ratio (GMR) was used to compare saquinavir and ritonavir C(trough) between HEP- and HEP+ patients, and the influence of the extent of liver fibrosis on saquinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics was explored using analysis of variance. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight patients on twice-daily saquinavir/ritonavir (67 HEP-, 71 HEP+) and 36 patients on once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir (12 HEP-, 24 HEP+) were included. Saquinavir C(trough) was comparable between HEP- and HEP+ patients receiving either saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice daily [GMR 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-1.37; P = 0.655] or 1500/100 mg once daily (GMR 0.88, 95% CI 0.39-1.97; P = 0.752). Similarly, ritonavir C(trough) was also comparable between HEP- and HEP+ patients. The extent of liver fibrosis was not significantly related to saquinavir or ritonavir C(trough) in patients receiving either of the two studied doses. CONCLUSIONS: Saquinavir C(trough) was not increased in HIV-infected patients with chronic viral hepatitis in the absence of liver function impairment. These results confirm that no specific dose modification of saquinavir/ritonavir should be recommended in this setting.

Safety of Switching Nevirapine Twice Daily to Nevirapine Once Daily in Virologically Suppressed Patients.

BACKGROUND: The strategy of switching nevirapine (NVP) twice daily to once daily was evaluated. METHODS: Forty-eight-week randomized, open, multicenter trial. Stable HIV-infected patients on NVP twice daily for >12-18 weeks with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) <2.5, the upper normal limit were randomized to continue their regimen or switch to NVP 400 mg once daily. Primary end point was the proportion of ALT/aspartate transaminase (AST) > or =grade 3. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-nine patients were included, mean CD4 620 cells per microliter. Noninferiority was demonstrated in the per protocol analysis, with 97.9% (once daily) and 99.3% (twice daily) of patients event free (difference, 1.4%; 95% confidence interval, -1.95% to 5.4%), whereas 81.8% vs. 93.8% were event free by intent-to-treat switch = toxicity analysis (difference, 12%; 95% confidence interval, 4.6% to 19.4%). Only 4 patients (3 once daily, 1 twice daily) had NVP-related grade 3/4 ALT/AST increases, but in 2 of them (once daily), transaminases decreased despite continuation with NVP. Two other once daily patients presented grade 3/4 ALT/AST increase due to well-documented acute hepatitis A virus or hepatitis C virus infection. Grade 2 ALT/AST increases occurred in 11.2% (once daily) vs. 10.3% (twice daily) of patients (P = 0.80). A larger number of once daily patients were lost to follow-up/violated protocol (15% vs. 5%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients on standard twice daily NVP-containing regimens for at least 12-18 weeks, per protocol analysis showed that switching to once daily NVP was not inferior to continued twice daily NVP in terms of the predefined noninferiority margin of 10% for hepatotoxicity.

[Cardiovascular risk assessment and intervention in HIV-infected patients]. / Evaluación del riesgo cardiovascular e intervención en los pacientes con VIH.

Because of the increased cardiovascular risk (CVR) in HIV-positive patients, preventive measures are essential, requiring algorithms for risk estimation, such as the Framingham risk equation, the Prospective Cardiovascular Munster Study (PROCAM) algorithm and the Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) chart. Classical cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) are closely related to CVR in HIV-infected patients but whether this risk is comparable to that in the general population is unknown. Therefore, these algorithms probably underestimate the risk in these patients. Currently, application of the same strategies as those used in the general population is recommended, without forgetting the specific characteristics of HIV positive patients or the importance of their inflammatory status, which can accelerate the development of arteriosclerosis and lead to an increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Therefore, in addition to traditional CVRF, biological markers of inflammation could help to identify the patients most at risk of a cardiovascular event. These markers, as well as the diverse techniques for assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis that could help in the early identification of at-risk patients, are reviewed in the present study. Lifestyle changes (healthy diet, smoking cessation, maintaining a healthy weight and daily physical exercise) reduce the probability of a coronary event by up to 80% in the general population. Traditional therapeutic measures (dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus) and those specific to HIV infection (viral suppression, discontinuous treatment, etc.) are reviewed.

Effectiveness and safety of didanosine, lamivudine and efavirenz versus zidovudine, lamivudine and efavirenz for the initial treatment of HIV-infected patients from the Spanish VACH cohort.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest that a once-daily combination of lamivudine, didanosine and efavirenz is an effective alternative regimen for antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients. However, data from randomized trials comparing this combination versus standard first-line regimens are not available yet. In an observational study, we analyse the efficacy and tolerability of didanosine plus lamivudine and efavirenz versus zidovudine plus lamivudine and efavirenz in a cohort of therapy naive patients. METHODS: We performed an observational study on prospectively collected data from patients participating in a multicentre Spanish treatment-naive cohort (VACH cohort). Efficacy was assessed comparing time to therapeutic failure and CD4 cell recovery. Safety was analysed comparing the proportion of patients who discontinued therapy for toxicity or any other reason. RESULTS: Overall, 219 patients treated with once-daily didanosine/lamivudine/efavirenz and 409 patients receiving twice-daily zidovudine/lamivudine (Combivir) plus efavirenz were evaluated. By intent-to treat analysis (non-completers and therapeutic change=failure), time to treatment failure was similar in both groups of treatment: 40.0 months (95% CI 23.3-56.8 months) among patients on didanosine/lamivudine/efavirenz and 33.3 months (95% CI 25.6-41.1 months) in patients treated with zidovudine/lamivudine/efavirenz (P=0.253). The risk of failure due to treatment change was almost double among patients treated with zidovudine/lamivudine/efavirenz compared with those who received didanosine/lamivudine/efavirenz. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that didanosine/lamivudine/efavirenz is a combination with an efficacy comparable to zidovudine/lamivudine/efavirenz as first-line therapy for HIV infection. The risk of treatment change was significantly higher among patients treated with zidovudine/lamivudine/efavirenz than in those starting therapy with didanosine/lamivudine/efavirenz.