Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Infect Dis ; 146: 107160, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38969330

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of MF59-adjuvanted trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (aTIV) vs high-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-TIV) for prevention of test-confirmed influenza emergency department visits and/or inpatient admissions ("ED/IP") and for IP admissions alone pooled across the 2017-2020 influenza seasons. Exploratory individual season analyses were also performed. METHODS: This retrospective test-negative design study included United States (US) adults age ≥65 years vaccinated with aTIV or HD-TIV who presented to an ED or IP setting with acute respiratory or febrile illness during the 2017-2020 influenza seasons. Test-positive cases and test-negative controls were grouped by vaccine received. The rVE of aTIV vs HD-TIV was evaluated using a combination of inverse probability of treatment weighting and logistic regression to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: Pooled analyses over the three seasons found no significant differences in the rVE of aTIV vs HD-TIV for prevention of test-confirmed influenza ED/IP (-2.5% [-19.6, 12.2]) visits and admissions or IP admissions alone (-1.6% [-22.5, 15.7]). The exploratory individual season analyses also showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence from the 2017-2020 influenza seasons indicates aTIV and HD-TIV are comparable for prevention of test-confirmed influenza ED/IP visits in US adults age ≥65 years.


Asunto(s)
Adyuvantes Inmunológicos , Hospitalización , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Polisorbatos , Estaciones del Año , Escualeno , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/diagnóstico , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Polisorbatos/administración & dosificación , Escualeno/administración & dosificación , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/administración & dosificación , Vacunas de Productos Inactivados/inmunología , Vacunación
2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2351675, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38835218

RESUMEN

Seasonal influenza significantly affects both health and economic costs in children and adults. This narrative review summarizes published cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) of cell-based influenza vaccines in children and adults <65 years of age, critically assesses the assumptions and approaches used in these analyses, and considers the role of cell-based influenza vaccines for children and adults. CEAs from multiple countries demonstrated the cost-effectiveness of cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVc) compared with egg-based trivalent/quadrivalent influenza vaccines (TIVe/QIVe). CEA findings were consistent across models relying on different relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) estimate inputs, with the rVE of QIVc versus QIVe ranging from 8.1% to 36.2% in favor of QIVc. Across multiple scenarios and types of analyses, QIVc was consistently cost-effective compared with QIVe, including in children and adults across different regions of the world.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Humanos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/economía , Vacunas contra la Influenza/inmunología , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/economía , Gripe Humana/inmunología , Niño , Adulto , Eficacia de las Vacunas , Preescolar , Adolescente , Persona de Mediana Edad
3.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0302400, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787847

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In 2012, Botswana introduced 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV-13) to its childhood immunization program in a 3+0 schedule, achieving coverage rates of above 90% by 2014. In other settings, PCV introduction has been followed by an increase in carriage or disease caused by non-vaccine serotypes, including some serotypes with a high prevalence of antibiotic resistance. METHODS: We characterized the serotype epidemiology and antibiotic resistance of pneumococcal isolates cultured from nasopharyngeal samples collected from infants (≤12 months) in southeastern Botswana between 2016 and 2019. Capsular serotyping was performed using the Quellung reaction. E-tests were used to determine minimum inhibitory concentrations for common antibiotics. RESULTS: We cultured 264 pneumococcal isolates from samples collected from 150 infants. At the time of sample collection, 81% of infants had received at least one dose of PCV-13 and 53% had completed the three-dose series. PCV-13 serotypes accounted for 27% of isolates, with the most prevalent vaccine serotypes being 19F (n = 20, 8%), 19A (n = 16, 6%), and 6A (n = 10, 4%). The most frequently identified non-vaccine serotypes were 23B (n = 29, 11%), 21 (n = 12, 5%), and 16F (n = 11, 4%). Only three (1%) pneumococcal isolates were resistant to amoxicillin; however, we observed an increasing prevalence of penicillin resistance using the meningitis breakpoint (2016: 41%, 2019: 71%; Cochran-Armitage test for trend, p = 0.0003) and non-susceptibility to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (2016: 55%, 2019: 79%; p = 0.04). Three (1%) isolates were multi-drug resistant. CONCLUSIONS: PCV-13 serotypes accounted for a substantial proportion of isolates colonizing infants in Botswana during a four-year period starting four years after vaccine introduction. A low prevalence of amoxicillin resistance supports its continued use as the first-line agent for non-meningeal pneumococcal infections. The observed increase in penicillin resistance at the meningitis breakpoint and the low prevalence of resistance to ceftriaxone supports use of third-generation cephalosporins for empirical treatment of suspected bacterial meningitis.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Infecciones Neumocócicas , Vacunas Neumococicas , Serogrupo , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Humanos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/efectos de los fármacos , Streptococcus pneumoniae/aislamiento & purificación , Streptococcus pneumoniae/clasificación , Botswana/epidemiología , Lactante , Infecciones Neumocócicas/microbiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Infecciones Neumocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Vacunas Neumococicas/inmunología , Femenino , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Masculino , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Serotipificación , Nasofaringe/microbiología , Prevalencia
4.
Expert Rev Vaccines ; 23(1): 82-87, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38093415

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cell-based quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVc) can increase effectiveness against seasonal influenza by avoiding mismatch from egg adaption of vaccine viruses. This study evaluates the population-level cost-effectiveness and impacts on health outcomes of QIVc versus an egg-based vaccine (QIVe) in children aged 6 months to 17 years in the US. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A dynamic age-structured susceptible-exposed-infected-recovered model was used to simulate influenza transmission in low and high incidence seasons for two scenarios: 1. QIVe for 6 months-17 year-olds, QIVc for 18-64 year-olds, and adjuvanted QIV (aQIV) for ≥ 65 year-olds, and 2. QIVc for 6 months-64 year-olds, and aQIV for ≥ 65 year-olds. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to account for uncertainty in parameter estimates. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). RESULTS: Extension of QIVc to children resulted in 3-4% reductions in cases (1,656,271), hospitalizations (16,688), and deaths (2,126) at a population level in a high incidence season, and 65% reductions (cases: 2,856,384; hospitalizations: 31667; deaths: 4,163) in a low incidence season. Use of QIVc would be cost-saving, with ICERs of -$16,427/QALY and -$8,100/QALY from a payer perspective and -$22,669/QALY and -$15,015/QALY from a societal perspective, for low and high incidence seasons respectively. Cost savings were estimated at approximately $468 million and $1.366 billion for high and low incidence seasons, respectively. CONCLUSION: Use of QIVc instead of QIVe in children > 6 months of age in the US would reduce the disease burden and be cost-saving from both a payer and societal perspective.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Niño , Humanos , Adolescente , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Hospitalización , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...