Contributors to high left ventricular ejection fraction in women with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease: Results from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (WISE-CVD) Study.

BACKGROUND: There are sex differences in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) relevant to prognosis where women experience greater mortality at relatively higher LVEF compared to men, yet mechanistic understanding of this adverse prognosis is limited. Women with suspected ischemia with no obstructive coronary disease (INOCA) develop heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), yet contributors to LVEF remain largely unknown. METHODS: In 370 women with suspected ischemia with no obstructive coronary disease (INOCA) who prospectively underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI), we investigated the contributions of LV morphology, function, and myocardial perfusion reserve on LVEF using univariate and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: A majority 71% of participants had high LVEF (>65%), followed by 24% having normal LVEF (55%-65%), and only 5% having low EF (<55%). Baseline characteristics were comparable among the 3 groups, with the exception of age which was 6 years higher in the high LVEF group (P < .01). Women in the high LVEF group also had the lowest LV cavity volume, greatest LV mass-volume ratio, and highest LV end-systolic elastance (all P < .05, adjusted for age, BMI, diabetes, and blood pressure). Myocardial perfusion reserve index was low in all groups (mean MPRI < 2.1) but was not significantly different across the spectrum of LVEF (P = .458). CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these data demonstrate that the majority of women with suspected INOCA have elevated LVEF related to smaller, thicker ventricles with greater contractility. Future work is needed to better understand the specific mechanisms driving morphologic and functional changes in women with INOCA, and relations to longer-term HFpEF and mortality. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02582021.

Identifying Potential Factors Associated With Racial Disparities in COVID-19 Outcomes: Retrospective Cohort Study Using Machine Learning on Real-World Data.

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in COVID-19 incidence and outcomes have been widely reported. Non-Hispanic Black patients endured worse outcomes disproportionately compared with non-Hispanic White patients, but the epidemiological basis for these observations was complex and multifaceted. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the potential reasons behind the worse outcomes of COVID-19 experienced by non-Hispanic Black patients compared with non-Hispanic White patients and how these variables interact using an explainable machine learning approach. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we examined 28,943 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases from the OneFlorida Research Consortium's data trust of health care recipients in Florida through April 28, 2021. We assessed the prevalence of pre-existing comorbid conditions, geo-socioeconomic factors, and health outcomes in the structured electronic health records of COVID-19 cases. The primary outcome was a composite of hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, and mortality at index admission. We developed and validated a machine learning model using Extreme Gradient Boosting to evaluate predictors of worse outcomes of COVID-19 and rank them by importance. RESULTS: Compared to non-Hispanic White patients, non-Hispanic Blacks patients were younger, more likely to be uninsured, had a higher prevalence of emergency department and inpatient visits, and were in regions with higher area deprivation index rankings and pollutant concentrations. Non-Hispanic Black patients had the highest burden of comorbidities and rates of the primary outcome. Age was a key predictor in all models, ranking highest in non-Hispanic White patients. However, for non-Hispanic Black patients, congestive heart failure was a primary predictor. Other variables, such as food environment measures and air pollution indicators, also ranked high. By consolidating comorbidities into the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, this became the top predictor, providing a comprehensive risk measure. CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals that individual and geo-socioeconomic factors significantly influence the outcomes of COVID-19. It also highlights varying risk profiles among different racial groups. While these findings suggest potential disparities, further causal inference and statistical testing are needed to fully substantiate these observations. Recognizing these relationships is vital for creating effective, tailored interventions that reduce disparities and enhance health outcomes across all racial and socioeconomic groups.

Impact of epicardial fat on coronary vascular function, cardiac morphology, and cardiac function in women with suspected INOCA.

AIMS: Epicardial fat is a metabolically active adipose tissue depot situated between the myocardium and visceral pericardium that covers ∼80% of the heart surface. While epicardial fat has been associated with the development of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, less is known about the relationship between epicardial fat and coronary vascular function. Moreover, the relations between excess epicardial fat and cardiac morphology and function remain incompletely understood. METHODS AND RESULTS: To address these knowledge gaps, we retrospectively analysed data from 294 individuals from our database of women with suspected ischaemia with no obstructive coronary disease (INOCA) who underwent both invasive coronary function testing and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Epicardial fat area, biventricular morphology, and function, as well as left atrial function, were assessed from cine images, per established protocols. The major novel findings were two-fold: first, epicardial fat area was not associated with coronary vascular dysfunction. Secondly, epicardial fat was associated with increased left ventricular concentricity (ß = 0.15, P = 0.01), increased septal thickness (ß = 0.17, P = 0.002), and reduced left atrial conduit fraction (ß = -0.15, P = 0.02), even after accounting for age, BMI, and history of hypertension. CONCLUSION: Taken together, these data do not support a measurable relationship between epicardial fat and coronary vascular dysfunction but do suggest that epicardial fat may be related to concentric remodelling and diastolic dysfunction in women with suspected INOCA. Prospective studies are needed to elucidate the long-term impact of epicardial fat in this patient population.

Myocardial ischaemic syndromes: a new nomenclature to harmonize evolving international clinical practice guidelines.

Since the 1960s, cardiologists have adopted several binary classification systems for acute myocardial infarction (MI) that facilitated improved patient management. Conversely, for chronic stable manifestations of myocardial ischaemia, various classifications have emerged over time, often with conflicting terminology-e.g. 'stable coronary artery disease' (CAD), 'stable ischaemic heart disease', and 'chronic coronary syndromes' (CCS). While the 2019 European guidelines introduced CCS to impart symmetry with 'acute coronary syndromes' (ACS), the 2023 American guidelines endorsed the alternative term 'chronic coronary disease'. An unintended consequence of these competing classifications is perpetuation of the restrictive terms 'coronary' and 'disease', often connoting only a singular obstructive CAD mechanism. It is now important to advance a more broadly inclusive terminology for both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of angina and myocardial ischaemia that fosters conceptual clarity and unifies dyssynchronous nomenclatures across guidelines. We, therefore, propose a new binary classification of 'acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes' and 'non-acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes', which comprises both obstructive epicardial and non-obstructive pathogenetic mechanisms, including microvascular dysfunction, vasospastic disorders, and non-coronary causes. We herein retain accepted categories of ACS, ST-segment elevation MI, and non-ST-segment elevation MI, as important subsets for which revascularization is of proven clinical benefit, as well as new terms like ischaemia and MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Overall, such a more encompassing nomenclature better aligns, unifies, and harmonizes different pathophysiologic causes of myocardial ischaemia and should result in more refined diagnostic and therapeutic approaches targeted to the multiple pathobiological precipitants of angina pectoris, ischaemia and infarction.

Hospitalization after hydroxychloroquine initiation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and autoimmune disease.

BACKGROUND: Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) reduces cardiovascular events among patients with autoimmune disorders and is being evaluated as a therapeutic option for populations with high-risk cardiovascular disease. However, recent studies have raised concerns about HCQ use and cardiovascular events. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of HCQ initiation with heart failure-related and all-cause hospitalizations among patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). METHODS: We conducted a cohort study of patients aged ≥18 years with diagnosed HFpEF and autoimmune disease using MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental databases (2007-2019). Patients were required to initiate HCQ after their first HFpEF diagnosis (HCQ users) or not (HCQ nonusers). For the patients in the HCQ users group, the first HCQ prescription date was assigned as the index date. Index date for the HCQ nonuser group was assigned by prescription-time distribution matching HCQ users, by utilizing the number of days from HFpEF diagnosis to the first HCQ prescription. After 1:≥3 propensity score (PS) matching, Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compare HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations between users and nonusers. RESULTS: After PS matching, 2229 patients (592 HCQ users and 1637 HCQ nonusers) were included. After controlling for covariates, patients who received HCQ had lower risks of HF-related hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.82) and all-cause hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.57-0.83) compared with patients not using HCQ. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with HFpEF and autoimmune disease, initiation of HCQ use was associated with a decreased risk of HF-related and all-cause hospitalizations.

Myocardial Ischemic Syndromes: A New Nomenclature to Harmonize Evolving International Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Since the 1960s, cardiologists have adopted several binary classification systems for acute myocardial infarction (MI) that facilitated improved patient management. Conversely, for chronic stable manifestations of myocardial ischemia, various classifications have emerged over time, often with conflicting terminology-eg, "stable coronary artery disease" (CAD), "stable ischemic heart disease," and "chronic coronary syndromes" (CCS). While the 2019 European guidelines introduced CCS to impart symmetry with "acute coronary syndromes" (ACS), the 2023 American guidelines endorsed the alternative term "chronic coronary disease." An unintended consequence of these competing classifications is perpetuation of the restrictive terms "coronary" and 'disease', often connoting only a singular obstructive CAD mechanism. It is now important to advance a more broadly inclusive terminology for both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of angina and myocardial ischemia that fosters conceptual clarity and unifies dyssynchronous nomenclatures across guidelines. We, therefore, propose a new binary classification of "acute myocardial ischemic syndromes" and "non-acute myocardial ischemic syndromes," which comprises both obstructive epicardial and non-obstructive pathogenetic mechanisms, including microvascular dysfunction, vasospastic disorders, and non-coronary causes. We herein retain accepted categories of ACS, ST-segment elevation MI, and non-ST segment elevation MI, as important subsets for which revascularization is of proven clinical benefit, as well as new terms like ischemia and MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Overall, such a more encompassing nomenclature better aligns, unifies, and harmonizes different pathophysiologic causes of myocardial ischemia and should result in more refined diagnostic and therapeutic approaches targeted to the multiple pathobiological precipitants of angina pectoris, ischemia, and infarction.

Evaluation of coronary microvascular dysfunction using magnetocardiography: A new application to an old technology.

Background: In patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA), diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) remains an unmet need. Magnetocardiography (MCG), is a rest-based, non-invasive scan that can detect weak electrophysiological changes that occur at the early phase of ischemia. Objective: This study assessed the ability of MCG to detect CMD in ANOCA patients as compared to reference standard, invasive coronary flow reserve (CFR). Methods: Patients with ANOCA and invasive coronary physiologic assessment using intracoronary flow measurements with Doppler and thermodilution methods were enrolled. CMD was defined dichotomously as an invasive CFR < 2.0 by Doppler or thermodilution assessment. Noninvasive 36-channel 90-s MCG scan was performed and quantitative assessment of four distinct MCG features was completed. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of 2 or more abnormal MCG features to detect CMD in the overall cohort and performed a subgroup analysis in the subset of patients with Doppler CFR assessment. Results: Among 79 ANOCA patients, 25 were CMD positive and 54 patients were CMD negative by CFR. Using invasive CFR as reference, MCG had an ROC AUC of 0.66 with a sensitivity of 68 % and specificity of 65 % for the detection of CMD. In the subgroup with Doppler CFR assessment, MCG had an ROC AUC of 0.76 with a sensitivity of 75 % and specificity of 77 %. Conclusions: In ANOCA patients, MCG demonstrates the ability to detect CMD using a 90-second non-invasive scan without the need for an intravenous stressor or ionizing radiation. Further investigations are needed to validate an MCG-based diagnostic pathway for CMD.

Recipe for Heart Health: A Randomized Crossover Trial on Cardiometabolic Effects of Extra Virgin Olive Oil Within a Whole-Food Plant-Based Vegan Diet.

BACKGROUND: Whole-food, plant-based vegan diets, low in oils, and Mediterranean diets, rich in extra virgin olive oil (EVOO), reduce cardiovascular disease risk factors. Optimal quantity of dietary fat, particularly EVOO, is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a randomized crossover trial with weekly cooking classes, adults with ≥5% cardiovascular disease risk followed a high (4 tablespoons/day) to low (<1 teaspoon/day) or low to high EVOO whole-food, plant-based diet for 4 weeks each, separated by a 1-week washout. The primary outcome was difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline. Secondary measures were changes in additional cardiometabolic markers. Linear mixed models assessed changes from baseline between phases, with age, sex, and body weight change as covariates. In 40 participants, fat intake comprised 48% and 32% of energy during high and low EVOO phases, respectively. Both diets resulted in comparable reductions in LDL-C, total cholesterol, apolipoprotein B, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, glucose, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (all P<0.05). With diet-sequence interactions for LDL-C, differences were detected between diets by diet order (mean±SEM high to low: Δ-12.7[5.9] mg/dL, P=0.04 versus low to high: Δ+15.8[6.8] mg/dL, P=0.02). Similarly, low to high order led to increased glucose, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (all P<0.05). Over period 1, LDL-C reductions were -25.5(5.1) post-low versus -16.7(4.2) mg/dL post-high EVOO, P=0.162, which diminished over period 2. CONCLUSIONS: Both plant-based diet patterns improved cardiometabolic risk profiles compared with baseline diets, with more pronounced decreases in LDL-C after the low EVOO diet. Addition of EVOO after following a low intake pattern may impede further lipid reductions. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04828447.

Endogenous androgens, coronary atheroma and remodeling in women with suspected ischemic heart disease: A report from the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study.

Background: Women have smaller coronary size than men independent of body surface area. Female to male heart transplantation demonstrates coronary lumen enlargement. Purpose: To investigate relationships between endogenous androgens and coronary luminal size in women with suspected ischemic heart disease (IHD). Methods: We analyzed 69 women with available androgen levels. Results: Group mean age was 54 ± 10 years with 64 % post-menopausal. Lumen cross-sectional area (CSA) and external elastic membrane (EEM) CSA positively correlated with free testosterone (FT) (r = 0.29, p = 0.049; r = 0.29, p = 0.01), respectively, and negatively correlated with SHBG (r = -0.26, p = 0.03; r = -0.29, p = 0.02), respectively. Atheroma CSA positively correlated with FT (r = 0.24. p = 0.05). These correlations became non-significant after adjusting for waist circumference. Conclusions: In women with suspected ischemic heart disease, endogenous androgens, coronary atheroma and luminal size are related, and may be moderated by waist circumference.

Angiogenic Gene Therapy for Refractory Angina: Results of the EXACT Phase 2 Trial.

BACKGROUND: XC001 is a novel adenoviral-5 vector designed to express multiple isoforms of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) and more safely and potently induce angiogenesis. The EXACT trial (Epicardial Delivery of XC001 Gene Therapy for Refractory Angina Coronary Treatment) assessed the safety and preliminary efficacy of XC001 in patients with no option refractory angina. METHODS: In this single-arm, multicenter, open-label trial, 32 patients with no option refractory angina received a single treatment of XC001 (1×1011 viral particles) via transepicardial delivery. RESULTS: There were no severe adverse events attributed to the study drug. Twenty expected severe adverse events in 13 patients were related to the surgical procedure. Total exercise duration increased from a mean±SD of 359.9±105.55 seconds at baseline to 448.2±168.45 (3 months), 449.2±175.9 (6 months), and 477.6±174.7 (12 months; +88.3 [95% CI, 37.1-139.5], +84.5 [95% CI, 34.1-134.9], and +115.5 [95% CI, 59.1-171.9]). Total myocardial perfusion deficit on positron emission tomography imaging decreased by 10.2% (95% CI, -3.1% to 23.5%), 14.3% (95% CI, 2.8%-25.7%), and 10.2% (95% CI, -0.8% to -21.2%). Angina frequency decreased from a mean±SD 12.2±12.5 episodes to 5.2±7.2 (3 months), 5.1±7.8 (6 months), and 2.7±4.8 (12 months), with an average decrease of 7.7 (95% CI, 4.1-11.3), 6.6 (95% CI, 3.5-9.7), and 8.8 (4.6-13.0) episodes at 3, 6, and 12 months. Angina class improved in 81% of participants at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: XC001 administered via transepicardial delivery is safe and generally well tolerated. Exploratory improvements in total exercise duration, ischemic burden, and subjective measures support a biologic effect sustained to 12 months, warranting further investigation. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04125732.