Determining the Interrater Reliability of the SOFMER Activity Score (version 2) for Individuals in Rehabilitation Centers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the interrater reliability of the SOFMER Activity Score (SAS) (version 2 [v2], an 8-item [4 motor and 4 cognitive] and 5-level scale) and improve its scoring system before conducting further validation steps. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, prospective, observational, noninterventional, and multicentric study. SETTING: The study was conducted between November 2018 and September 2019 in 4 French rehabilitation centers (2 public university hospitals for adults and 2 private not-for-profit rehabilitation centers for children). PARTICIPANTS: The study included 101 participants (N=101; mean age, 44.5±25.4 years; 28.7% younger than 18 and 18.8% older than 65 years). The female/male sex ratio was 0.6. The causes for admission to the center were mainly neurologic (65%) or orthopedic (24%). INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Activity limitation was rated with the SAS the same day by 2 independent multidisciplinary teams. The interrater reliabilities of the score items were assessed using weighted kappa coefficients. RESULTS: All weighted kappa coefficients ranged between 0.83 and 0.92, indicating "good" to "excellent" interrater reliability. Interteam score disagreements occurred in 227 of 808 scores (28%). The reason for most disagreements was unnoticed human or material aid during the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the high interrater reliability of the SASv2 and allow carrying out further validation steps after minor changes to item scoring instructions and clearer definitions of some items that help improving scoring standardization. The SASv2 may then become a consistent measure of activity level for clinical research or burden of care investigations.

Undisturbed stance on a double seesaw: Interaction between asymmetries of the center-of-pressure patterns under each foot and weight-bearing.

Both center-of-pressure (CP) displacements under each foot and relative body-weight distribution intervene in the production of resultant CP movements. To better understand their respective involvement, a protocol was set up for young healthy individuals consisting in standing on a double seesaw, favoring pitch motions and laying on a dual-force platform. The postural control effects induced by two types of asymmetry, weight-bearing and the CP movement patterns, were investigated. These asymmetries were achieved by associating two seesaws with two different lengths for the radii of the ridges and by requiring specific body-weight distributions. The results indicate that the postural strategies, aimed at controlling anteroposterior sway, are related to the subjects' capacity to minimize the CP displacements under the less stable support, whatever load is applied. In contrast, the degree of involvement of the more stable support must be viewed as a complement used to secure the appropriate motor output, i.e., the resultant CP movements. Within this objective, both the applied load and the CP amplitudes under the more stable support are taken into account. These data provide additional insights into the compensatory mechanisms between the interactions between the two feet, which are used to produce the adequate resultant CP movements and therefore upright stance control. The specificity of the double seesaw that can induce asymmetric CP patterns and/or asymmetric body-weight distribution makes it a legitimate contender to be used as a rehabilitation device for patients with neurological and/or traumatic diseases.

European core curriculum in neurorehabilitation.

To date, medical education lacks Europe-wide standards on neurorehabilitation. To address this, the European Federation of NeuroRehabilitation Societies (EFNR) here proposes a postgraduate neurorehabilitation training scheme. In particular, the European medical core curriculum in neurorehabilitation should include a two-year residency in a neurorehabilitation setting where trainees can gain practical experience. Furthermore, it should comprise six modules of classroom training organized as weekend seminars or summer/winter schools. In conclusion, after defining the European medical core curriculum in neurorehabilitation, the next activities of the EFNR will be to try and reach the largest possible consensus on its content among all national societies across Europe in order to further validate it and try to extend it to the other, non-medical, professionals on the neurorehabilitation team in line with their core curricula defined by each professional association.

[Choosing a quality-of-life questionnaire]. / Choisir un questionnaire de qualité de vie.

UNLABELLED: Define the objective of the questionnaire: Discrimination: do you want a questionnaire to enable you to describe the quality of life of patients or to compare the quality of life between groups of patients, for example, to determine who has improved and who has gotten worse? ASSESSMENT: do you want a questionnaire to help you measure changes over time (improvement or aggravation) in your patients? Determine the properties of instruments necessary for this objective: If the objective is discrimination, analyze: construct validity, reliability. If the objective is assessment, analyze construct validity, sensitivity to changes. Choose the general category of questionnaire: generic questionnaire, specific questionnaire.

Neurolytic blockade of the obturator nerve for intractable spasticity of adductor thigh muscles.

Neurolytic blockade is one of the therapeutic possibilities to treat spasticity of various muscles. In patients with spasticity of the adductor thigh muscles, a percutaneous approach to the obturator nerve is often difficult. We describe a new approach to the obturator nerve and we examine its feasibility. The second objective was to assess the efficacy of obturator neurolysis for the management of adductor thigh muscle pain and spasticity associated with hemiplegia or paraplegia. Nerve blocks were performed via a combined approach using fluoroscopy and nerve stimulation to identify the obturator nerve. Neurolysis was performed by injection of 65% ethanol. We performed 27 blocks in 23 patients. Technical evaluation was achieved in terms of number of attempted needle insertions, time to accurate location of the nerve and success rate. The efficacy of the block was assessed using four scores: degree of alleviation of muscle spasm and triple flexion of the lower limb, improvement of gait and facilitation of hygienic care. Success rate of the technique was 100% with a time to accurate nerve location of 130+/-35 s. Compared with scores measured immediately before the block, all studied parameters were significantly improved. Efficiency was significant on adductor muscle spasticity (p<0.001 at 1 day and p<0.01 at 60 and 120 months). Triple flexion was also significantly improved (p<0.05 from 1 to 120 days), as well as gait (p<0.02) and hygiene (p<0.01) scores. No complications occurred. The combined approach of the obturator nerve represents a new technique which proved to be accurate, fast, simple, highly successful and reproducible. Obturator neurolysis was confirmed as an efficient and cost-effective technique to reduce adductor muscle spasm and related pain and to improve gait and hygienic care in patients with neurological sequelae of stroke, head trauma or any lesion of the motor neurone.