RESUMEN
(1) Background: Dislocations of the trapeziometacarpal joint (TMC) are uncommon in children and adolescents. Only a few isolated cases are reported in the literature. Therapeutic guidance is minimal and inconclusive. (2) Methods: The authors present four patients treated for this unusual lesion. We evaluated the evolution according to treatment, age, patient activity, and quickDASH. Despite the clear limitation of the small number of patients, it is relevant to try to better understand this lesion and its evolution. A systematic review of the literature was also conducted. (3) Results: This is the largest published series of TMC dislocations in children and adolescents. Patients included a 12-year-old girl treated conservatively with a poor quickDASH; a 9-year-old girl treated surgically with the Eaton-Littler technique for a new dislocation with a partially modified quickDASH; a 13-year-old boy with two necessary closed reductions for a new dislocation and a very good final quickDASH; and a 12-year-old boy treated with closed reduction and percutaneous fixation with excellent final results with quickDASH. (4) Conclusions: In the absence of scientific evidence, conservative treatment and ligament reconstruction did not provide good functionality. In contrast, closed reduction with percutaneous fixation provided excellent results. Therefore, the authors would recommend closed reduction and percutaneous needle fixation as an elective method to treat TMC dislocations in pediatric and adolescent patients.
RESUMEN
Subacute or late-presenting unstable osseous mallet finger might be hard to reduce and, therefore, remain subluxed when using the traditional Ishiguro technique. In such cases, we suggest it is best to prioritize correction of joint subluxation over step-by-step adherence to the traditional Ishiguro technique. Specifically, we contend that carrying out the procedure in reverse order typically results in an easier and more stable reduction of both joint and fracture.
RESUMEN
The radio-humeral joint has traditionally been believed to support most of the loads transmitted through the elbow. Load transfer through the elbow has been a controversial issue since the publication of the first biomechanical studies on the subject, most of which were based on extrinsic forces acting on the extended joint. The present study analyzes load distribution across the six different compartments in the elbow while the joint is flexed, as well as the intrinsic forces generated in the epicondylar and epitrochlear muscles. Ten cadaveric elbows were positioned at 90° of flexion, forearm in a neutral position and wrist at 0°. Tekscan sensors were used for measuring intraarticular pressures. Forces generated by epitrochlear muscles results in a series of loads that affect mainly the anteromedial facet (40%), followed by the posterolateral facet (34%) of the ulnohumeral joint, with the flexor carpi ulnaris generating the heaviest loads (43% on the anteromedial and 38% on the posterolateral facets). Conversely, the forces generated by the epicondylar muscles, similar in behavior but with an opposite direction, convey heavier loads to the elbow's anterolateral facet (45%), followed by the radiohumeral joint (26%) with the extensor carpi ulnaris generating the heaviest loads (54% on the anterolateral facet and 17% on the radiohumeral joint). Our results indicate that the elbow joint exhibits a characteristic load distribution pattern that depends on the muscles, as intrinsic forces are generated by the epicondylar and epitrochlear muscles. The anterior portion of the ulnohumeral joint is the area bearing the heaviest loads.
Asunto(s)
Articulación del Codo , Humanos , MúsculosRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to describe pressure originating in the six elbow articular compartments after muscular contractions. Ten cryopreserved cadaveric arms were dissected and the insertional tendons and capsuloligamentous tissues were preserved. The specimens were placed in a custom-made device. Elbow position was established at 90° flexion with the forearm in a neutral position and the wrist extended at 0°. Tekscan sensors sere used for measuring intraarticular pressures. Without loading the elbow, the humeroradial joint received the lowest pressure, and, among the humeroulnar joints, the highest pressure was found in the anterolateral compartment. After loading the epitrochlear muscles to the maximum (5.0â¯kg), the pressure increased in the anteromedial joint (0.6â¯kg to 3.3â¯kg) and decreased in the posteromedial and anterolateral joints (4.2â¯kg to 0.3â¯kg and 4.2â¯kg to 0.9â¯kg, respectively). After the same loading in the epicondylar muscles, the pressure increased in the anterolateral and humeroradial joints (4.2â¯kg to 8.2â¯kg and 0.2â¯kg to 1.0â¯kg respectively), but decreased in the posterolateral joint (3.4â¯kg to 1.0â¯kg). The pressure distribution patterns among the humeroulnar compartments depend on the muscle geometries and their origins. Understanding these patterns can be useful in applying physiotherapeutic treatments for reinforcement of different muscular groups in order to decrease pressure in certain articular compartments.