A guide to interpreting systematic reviews and meta-analyses in neurosurgery and surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) are methods of data analysis used to synthesize information presented in multiple publications on the same topic. A thorough understanding of the steps involved in conducting this type of research and approaches to data analysis is critical for appropriate understanding, interpretation, and application of the findings of these reviews. METHODS: We reviewed reference texts in clinical neuroepidemiology, neurostatistics and research methods and other previously related articles on meta-analyses (MAs) in surgery. Based on existing theories and models and our cumulative years of expertise in conducting MAs, we have synthesized and presented a detailed pragmatic approach to interpreting MAs in Neurosurgery. RESULTS: Herein we have briefly defined SRs sand MAs and related terminologies, succinctly outlined the essential steps to conduct and critically appraise SRs and MAs. A practical approach to interpreting MAs for neurosurgeons is described in details. Based on summary outcome measures, we have used hypothetical examples to illustrate the Interpretation of the three commonest types of MAs in neurosurgery: MAs of Binary Outcome Measures (Pairwise MAs), MAs of proportions and MAs of Continuous Variables. Furthermore, we have elucidated on the concepts of heterogeneity, modeling, certainty, and bias essential for the robust and transparent interpretation of MAs. The basics for the Interpretation of Forest plots, the preferred graphical display of data in MAs are summarized. Additionally, a condensation of the assessment of the overall quality of methodology and reporting of MA and the applicability of evidence to patient care is presented. CONCLUSION: There is a paucity of pragmatic guides to appraise MAs for surgeons who are non-statisticians. This article serves as a detailed guide for the interpretation of systematic reviews and meta-analyses with examples of applications for clinical neurosurgeons.

Shaping the curve from the microscopic transsphenoidal to the endoscopic endonasal approach for the sellar region.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the limitations, barriers, and complications in the early transition from the microscopic transsphenoidal approach (MTA) to the endonasal endoscopic approach (EEA) to the skull base in our institution. METHODS: Technical challenges, as well as clinical features and complications, were compared between MTA, EEA, and mixed cases during the early surgical curve. RESULTS: The period from the early learning curve was 1 year until the EEA protocol was used routinely. A total of 34 patients registered a resection using a transsphenoidal approach. Eighteen patients underwent EEA, 11 underwent MTA, and five underwent a mixed endonasal and microscopic approach. Non-significant differences were found in endocrine outcomes between the three groups. Patients with unchanged or improved visual function were higher in the EEA group (p = 0.147). Non-significant differences were found in terms of the extent of resection (EOR) between groups (p = 0.369). Only 1 (2.9%) patient in the whole series developed a post-operative CSF leaking that resolved with medical management, belonging to the EEA group (5.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The early phase of the learning curve did not affect our series significantly in terms of the EOR, endocrine status, and visual outcomes.

OBJETIVO: Investigar las limitaciones, las barreras y las complicaciones en la transición del abordaje transesfenoidal microscópico (ATM) al abordaje endonasal endoscópico (AEE) para la base del cráneo en nuestra institución. MÉTODO: Se compararon las características clínicas y las complicaciones entre ATM, AEE y casos mixtos durante la curva quirúrgica temprana. RESULTADOS: El periodo desde la curva de aprendizaje inicial fue de 1 año hasta que se utilizó el protocolo AEE de forma sistemática. Un total de 34 pacientes tuvieron una resección por vía transesfenoidal. A 18 pacientes se les realizó AEE, a 11 ATM y a 5 abordaje mixto endonasal y microscópico. Se encontraron diferencias no significativas en los resultados endocrinos entre los tres grupos. Los pacientes con función visual sin cambios o mejorada fueron más en el grupo AEE (p = 0.147). No se encontraron diferencias significativas respecto a la extensión de la resección (p = 0.369). Solo 1 (2.9%) paciente desarrolló una fístula de líquido cefalorraquídeo que se resolvió con manejo médico, perteneciente al grupo AEE (5.5%). CONCLUSIONES: La fase inicial de la curva de aprendizaje no afectó significativamente a nuestra serie en términos de extensión de la resección, estado endocrino y resultados visuales.

Survival and prognostic factors in pediatric patients with medulloblastoma treated at a national pediatric hospital in Peru: a retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of this study were to determine the overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) rates of patients with medulloblastoma treated in a national pediatric hospital in Peru, as well as to identify demographic, clinical, imaging, postoperative, and histopathological characteristics and prognostic factors associated with OS and EFS. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective study analyzing information from the medical records of children with a diagnosis of medulloblastoma who underwent surgical treatment at the Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño-San Borja, a public hospital in Lima, Peru, from 2015 to 2020. Clinical-epidemiological variables, degree of disease extension, risk stratification, extent of resection, postoperative complications, status of oncological treatment received, histological subtype, and neurological sequelae were taken into account. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used to estimate OS, EFS, and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Of the 57 children evaluated with complete medical records, only 22 children (38.6%) underwent complete oncological treatment. OS was 37% (95% CI 0.25-0.55) at 48 months. EFS was 44% (95% CI 0.31-0.61) at 23 months. High-risk stratification-meaning patients with ≥ 1.5 cm2 of residual postoperative tumor, those younger than 3 years, those with disseminated disease (HR 9.69, 95% CI 1.40-67.0, p = 0.02), and those who underwent subtotal resection (HR 3.78, 95% CI 1.09-13.2, p = 0.04)-was negatively associated with OS. Failure to receive complete oncological treatment was negatively associated with OS (HR 20.0, 95% CI 4.84-82.6, p < 0.001) and EFS (HR 7.82, 95% CI 2.47-24.7, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: OS and EFS of patients with medulloblastoma in the author's milieu are below those reported in developed countries. Incomplete treatment and treatment abandonment in the authors' cohort were also high compared with high-income country statistics. Failure to complete oncological treatment was the most important factor associated with poor prognosis, both in terms of OS and EFS. High-risk patients and subtotal resection were negatively associated with OS. Interventions are needed to promote the completion of adjuvant oncological therapy for medulloblastoma in the disadvantaged Peruvian population.

Needs, Roles, and Challenges of Young Asian Neurosurgeons.

BACKGROUND: Asia has a marked shortage of neurosurgical care, with approximately 2.5 million critical cases left untreated. The Young Neurosurgeons Forum of the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies surveyed Asian neurosurgeons to identify research, education, and practice. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using a pilot-tested e-survey was circulated to the Asian neurosurgical community from April to November 2018. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize variables pertaining to demographics and neurosurgical practices. The chi-square test was used to explore the relationship between World Bank income level and variables on neurosurgical practices. RESULTS: A total of 242 responses were analyzed. Respondents were mostly from the low- and middle-income countries (70%). Most represented institutions were teaching hospitals (53%). More than 50% of the hospitals had between 25and 50 neurosurgical beds. Access to an operating microscope (P = 0.038) or image guidance system (P = 0.001) appeared to increase in correlation to a higher World Bank income level. Limited opportunities for conducting research (56%) and hands-on operating opportunities (45%) were leading challenges in daily academic practice. The leading challenges were limited numbers of intensive care unit beds (51%), inadequate or absent insurance coverage (45%), and lack of organized perihospital care (43%). Inadequate insurance coverage decreased with increasing World Bank income levels (P < 0.001). Organized perihospital care (P = 0.001), regular magnetic resonance imaging access (P = 0.032), and equipment necessary for microsurgery (P = 0.007) increased with higher World Bank income levels. CONCLUSIONS: Improving neurosurgical care hinges on regional and international collaboration and national policies to ensure universal access to essential neurosurgical care.

Authorship Disparities in International Neurosurgical Research Collaborations: A Bibliometric Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Research is pivotal to neurosurgical training and practice. The objectives of this study were to quantify neurosurgical research output by authors from low-income countries (LICs), using author affiliation as a proxy, and to understand the patterns of collaboration between LIC authors and their international partners. METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched for neurosurgical literature published by authors from the 27 World Bank LICs from 2010 to 2020. These articles were screened for relevance. Information about publication type, study design, and author demographics was then extracted from included articles. Scopus was subsequently used to determine the H-indices of the authors. RESULTS: The rate at which LIC authors have been publishing neurosurgical research has increased significantly from 2010 to 2020. Overall, 19 of the 27 LICs were represented. The LICs with the most research output includes Uganda, Ethiopia, and Rwanda. When LIC authors collaborated with authors from middle-or-high-income countries, these LIC researchers were solely listed in a middle authorship position more than 70% of the time. On average, the H-index of LIC authors was 4.9, compared with average H-indices of 8.7 and 16.8 for their MIC and HIC collaborators, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The positioning of LIC researchers as middle author contributors revealed significant authorship disparities in international neurosurgical research collaborations. The average H-indices of authors from middle-or-high-income countries were more than 3 times greater than those of LIC authors. Quantifying this issue allows neurosurgical organizations to understand the current landscape and to set concrete goals for research capacity building in LICs.

Needs, Roles, and Challenges of Young Latin American and Caribbean Neurosurgeons.

BACKGROUND: Barriers to neurosurgery training and practice in Latin American and Caribbean countries (LACs) have been scarcely documented. The World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies Young Neurosurgeons Forum survey sought to identify young neurosurgeons' needs, roles, and challenges. We present the results focused on Latin America and the Caribbean. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed the Young Neurosurgeons Forum survey responses from LACs, following online survey dissemination through personal contacts, social media, and neurosurgical societies' e-mailing lists between April and November 2018. Data analysis was performed using Jamovi version 2.0 and STATA version 16. RESULTS: There were 91 respondents from LACs. Three (3.3%) respondents practiced in high-income countries, 77 (84.6%) in upper middle-income countries, 10 (11%) in lower middle-income countries, and 1 (1.1%) in an unclassified country. The majority (77, or 84.6%) of respondents were male, and 71 (90.2%) were younger than 40. Access to basic imaging modalities was high, with access to computed tomography scan universal among the survey respondents. However, only 25 (27.5%) of respondents reported having access to imaging guidance systems (navigation), and 73 (80.2%) reported having access to high-speed drills. A high GDP per capita was associated with increased availability of high-speed drills and more time dedicated to educational endeavors in neurosurgery, such as didactic teaching and topic presentation (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This survey found that neurosurgery trainees and practitioners of Latin America and the Caribbean face many barriers to practice. These include inadequate state-of-the-art neurosurgical equipment, a lack of standardized training curricula, few research opportunities, and long working hours.

Pandemic impact on aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in Peru's high COVID-19 lethality setting: A public institutional experience.

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 profoundly impacted healthcare worldwide, and Peru was particularly affected, experiencing the highest COVID-19 case fatality rate globally. Methods: We conducted a retrospective comparative study of patients presenting with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) at a public Peruvian national referral center specializing in cerebrovascular diseases. Two study periods were considered, one during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and a second identical period in 2019. Variables included patient demographics, comorbidities, COVID-19 infection status, clinical presentation, treatment approaches, and hospital outcomes. Results: We analyzed 114 patients with aneurysmal SAH, 65 (57.0%) treated in 2019 and 49 (43.0%) in 2020. The mean time from emergency admission to the day of definitive treatment during 2019 and 2020 was 2.72 and 1.93 days, respectively. Likewise, the mean time from symptom onset to the date of definitive treatment was 6.71 and 7.70 days, respectively. We identified significant associations between complications such as sepsis, respiratory failure, acute kidney failure, and hospital mortality. The proportion of fatalities was significantly higher in 2020 compared to 2019 (36.7% vs. 15.4%, respectively). Interestingly, there was no statistically significant association between COVID-19 infection status and mortality during the 2020 period. Conclusion: Patients with aneurysmal SAH treated during the pandemic had a higher proportion of sepsis, respiratory failure, acute kidney failure, and mortality compared to the pre-pandemic period. Reallocating healthcare resources to prioritize COVID-19 patients may have inadvertently neglected or delayed care for patients with other emergency conditions, such as aneurysmal SAH. This highlights the importance of maintaining adequate care for non-infectious emergencies during a pandemic.

Alteraciones neuropsiquiátricas en menores de 18 años expuestos a opioides en el periodo prenatal: Revisión Narrativa

El consumo de opioides ha venido incrementando en los últimos años, generando una crisis de salud pública que afecta a todo tipo de población. El uso de sustancias opiáceas ilegales en embarazadas también está en incremento, por lo que, en la práctica clínica se evidencian con mayor frecuencia resultados neonatales adversos como el síndrome de abstinencia neonatal (NAS). Adicionalmente, los niños expuestos prenatalmente a estas sustancias pueden sufrir alteraciones cognitivas, motoras o psiquiátricas durante el transcurso de su vida. Este artículo tiene como objetivo proporcionar una revisión de la literatura actualizada acerca del uso de opioides durante el embarazo y las consecuencias para los niños expuestos a estas sustancias.

Opioid consumption has increased greatly in recent years, creating a public health crisis that affects all types of population. The use of illegal opiates amongst pregnant women has also risen, causing a surge in the frequency in which adverse neonatal outcomes, such as Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS), are seen in clinical practice. Furthermore, children exposed prenatally to these substances have cognitive, motor and psychiatric adverse outcomes throughout their lifetime. This article's objective is to provide an updated literature review about opioid use during pregnancy and its consequences on children exposed in-utero.