Transvesical Percutaneous Access Allows for Epidural Anesthesia Without Mechanical Ventilation in Single-Port Robotic Radical and Simple Prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the feasibility of epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing transvesical single-port (SP) robotic simple and radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing transvesical SP robotic radical or simple prostatectomy were selected. Exclusions were underlying obstructive sleep apnea, pulmonary disease, prior lumbar spinal surgery, or BMI >35. Low thoracic or high lumbar epidural catheters were placed in the preoperative unit prior to operating room transport. Demographic information, intraoperative variables, and perioperative outcomes were collected in an IRB-approved database. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: A total of 12 patients underwent epidural placement prior to transvesical SP radical (N = 7) and simple (N = 5) prostatectomy. All cases were completed without extra ports, open conversion, or conversion to general anesthesia. No surgical interruptions were noted in 9 of 12 cases and all movement-related interruptions were brief and transient. No anesthetic complications were noted. The one postoperative complication noted was unrelated to anesthesia. Intraoperative opioids were avoided in 5 patients. No patients required opioid medications after discharge and all patients with outpatient encounters were same-day discharges. One patient was a pre-planned admission. Limitations include small number of patients and a single surgeon experience. CONCLUSION: Epidural anesthesia without mechanical ventilation is a safe and feasible technique in selected patients undergoing transvesical SP robotic radical and simple prostatectomy. This approach was not associated with any anesthesia-related complications or compromise in perioperative outcomes.

Triple-low Alerts Do Not Reduce Mortality: A Real-time Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: Triple-low events (mean arterial pressure less than 75 mmHg, Bispectral Index less than 45, and minimum alveolar fraction less than 0.8) are associated with mortality but may not be causal. This study tested the hypothesis that providing triple-low alerts to clinicians reduces 90-day mortality. METHODS: Adults having noncardiac surgery with volatile anesthesia and Bispectral Index monitoring were electronically screened for triple-low events. Patients having triple-low events were randomized in real time, with clinicians either receiving an alert, "consider hemodynamic support," or not. Patients were blinded to treatment. Helpful responses to triple-low events were defined by administration of a vasopressor within 5 min or a 20% reduction in end-tidal volatile anesthetic concentration within 15 min. RESULTS: Of the qualifying patients, 7,569 of 36,670 (20%) had triple-low events and were randomized. All 7,569 were included in the primary analysis. Ninety-day mortality was 8.3% in the alert group and 7.3% in the nonalert group. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for alert versus nonalert was 1.14 (0.96, 1.35); P = 0.12, crossing a prespecified futility boundary. Clinical responses were helpful in about half the patients in each group, with 51% of alert patients and 47% of nonalert patients receiving vasopressors or having anesthetics lowered after start of triple low (P < 0.001). There was no relationship between the response to triple-low events and adjusted 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time alerts to triple-low events did not lead to a reduction in 90-day mortality, and there were fewer responses to alerts than expected. However, similar mortality with and without responses suggests that there is no strong relationship between responses to triple-low events and mortality.

Use of the CTrach Laryngeal Mask Airway in adult patients: a retrospective review of 126 cases.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the CTrach Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) when used electively. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Operating room of an academic hospital. MEASUREMENTS: Data from 126 patients who were electively intubated with the CTrach LMA over a 16-month period were reviewed. Each patient's weight, height, ASA physical status classification, Mallampati score, thyromental distance, and cervical spine range of motion were recorded. MAIN RESULTS: Successful ventilation was achieved in 100% of patients, while successful intubation was achieved in 89.7% of patients. The most common reason for failure to intubate was poor airway visualization and the inability to appropriately position the device anterior to the vocal cords. CONCLUSIONS: The major advantage of the CTrach LMA is that it is the only device that allows airway visualization during patient ventilation; however, it does not have 100% success with intubation.

Cone beam computed tomography: an innovative tool for airway assessment.

Improvements in airway imaging technology provide the potential for an improved understanding of airway pathology and upper airway mechanics. We present here a preliminary report on the applicability of cone beam computed tomography technology in conjunction with multidimensional digital analysis for the purposes of clinical airway management. The use of this technology for airway imaging in anesthesiology has not been reported. Traditional skeletal and soft tissue images as well as distance and volume measurements were obtained without difficulty. Three-dimensional image reconstructions as well as "virtual laryngoscopy" were achieved with resulting excellent image quality, suggesting a broad range of possibilities for upper airway examination and analysis. A modified Muller test with volumetric rendering of the airway passages under baseline and negative pressure conditions was also performed, made possible as a result of the system's short (9 s) scanning times. We believe that cone beam computed tomography technology offers an additional dimension to airway evaluation that has considerable potential.