Sub-multiplicative interaction between polygenic risk score and household coal use in relation to lung adenocarcinoma among never-smoking women in Asia.

We previously identified 10 lung adenocarcinoma susceptibility loci in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) conducted in the Female Lung Cancer Consortium in Asia (FLCCA), the largest genomic study of lung cancer among never-smoking women to date. Furthermore, household coal use for cooking and heating has been linked to lung cancer in Asia, especially in Xuanwei, China. We investigated the potential interaction between genetic susceptibility and coal use in FLCCA. We analyzed GWAS-data from Taiwan, Shanghai, and Shenyang (1472 cases; 1497 controls), as well as a separate study conducted in Xuanwei (152 cases; 522 controls) for additional analyses. We summarized genetic susceptibility using a polygenic risk score (PRS), which was the weighted sum of the risk-alleles from the 10 previously identified loci. We estimated associations between a PRS, coal use (ever/never), and lung adenocarcinoma with multivariable logistic regression models, and evaluated potential gene-environment interactions using likelihood ratio tests. There was a strong association between continuous PRS and lung adenocarcinoma among never coal users (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.69 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.53, 1.87), p=1 × 10-26). This effect was attenuated among ever coal users (OR = 1.24 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.50), p = 0.02, p-interaction = 6 × 10-3). We observed similar attenuation among coal users from Xuanwei. Our study provides evidence that genetic susceptibility to lung adenocarcinoma among never-smoking Asian women is weaker among coal users. These results suggest that lung cancer pathogenesis may differ, at least partially, depending on exposure to coal combustion products. Notably, these novel findings are among the few instances of sub-multiplicative gene-environment interactions in the cancer literature.

A prospective study of the use of circulating markers as predictors for epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment in pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The use of liquid tissue, such as circulating cells, to predict treatment response is attracting more attention. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate association between circulating markers and treatment response. METHODS: One hundred and twelve advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients who were going to receive epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) were included. Tumor tissue and plasma specimens were collected before treatment and analyzed for EGFR mutation and plasma IL-6 and IL-8. Pre-treatment peripheral blood CD146+/CD3- cells (as circulating endothelial cells, CECs), CD34+/CD45- cells (as endothelial progenitor cells, EPCs), and CD133+ cells (as cancer stem cells, CSCs) were measured with flow cytometry. RESULTS: The progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in patients with low CEC, low EPC, and low CSC counts than in those with high cell counts (p < 0.001, 0.041, and 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that mutant plasma EGFR (pEGFR) was a poor prognostic factor in EGFR-mutated patients (p = 0.048), and there was a tendency for EGFR mutation-negative patients with high IL-6 level to have worse overall survival (p = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: CECs, EPCs, CSCs, and mutant pEGFR are useful predictive biomarkers of EGFR-TKI treatment efficacy. IL-6 may predict prognosis in advanced lung cancer.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment and Salvage Chemotherapy in EGFR-Mutated Elderly Pulmonary Adenocarcinoma Patients.

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is frequently a disease of elderly patients. However, these patients are often treated less actively owing to a higher comorbidity rate and poor performance status. The efficacy of different treatments in elderly patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung cancer is still unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of our pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients treated between 2010 and 2013. Data on patient age, type of tumor EGFR mutation, response to first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment, type of salvage chemotherapy, and efficacy of EGFR-TKI and salvage chemotherapy were collected. RESULTS: In all, 473 of 1,230 stage IV adenocarcinoma patients had an EGFR mutation, and 330 of them received first-line TKI treatment. Of the 330 patients, 160 were ≥70 years old (elderly group) and 170 were <70 years old (younger group). The response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line TKI treatment were not significantly different. The elderly group had shorter median survival. A total of 107 patients received salvage chemotherapy after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment: 45 in the elderly group and 62 in the younger group. Their response rate and PFS were not significantly different; however, the younger group had longer median survival. Additional subgroup analysis showed that younger patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy or combination chemotherapy had better median survival than did the elderly patients. The PFS was longer among younger patients receiving a platinum-based regimen than that among the elderly patients. CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with disease progression after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment can receive chemotherapy and have a response rate similar to that of younger patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of first-line epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment in elderly patients and the outcomes of subsequent salvage chemotherapy after disease progression. The most important finding was that elderly patients with disease progression after first-line EGFR-TKI treatment can receive salvage chemotherapy and have a response rate similar to that of younger patients who received salvage chemotherapy.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment Response in Advanced Lung Adenocarcinomas with G719X/L861Q/S768I Mutations.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) is the standard therapy for advanced lung adenocarcinomas with common EGFR mutations. Preclinical studies have suggested that uncommon G719X, L861Q, and S768I mutations are also sensitive to EGFR-TKIs. However, the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in patients with these uncommon mutations remains unclear. METHODS: A nationwide survey was performed to collect data from gefitinib and erlotinib treatment outcomes of patients with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma bearing EGFR G719X/L861Q/S768I mutations. The results were compared with those regarding patients with exon 19 deletions or L858R mutations. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-one patients with uncommon EGFR mutations were enrolled from 18 institutes throughout Taiwan. Mutations of G719X, L861Q, S768I, G719X + L861Q, and G719X + S768I were observed in 78, 57, 7, 9, and 10 patients, respectively. After receiving EGFR-TKI treatment, patients with uncommon mutations exhibited a significantly inferior tumor response rate (41.6% vs. 66.5%; p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (median, 7.7 vs. 11.4 months; p < 0.001) than patients with common mutations. Among the patients who used EGFR-TKIs as first-line treatment, there was a significant difference in overall survival between these two groups of patients (median, 24.0 vs. 29.7 months; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Gefitinib and erlotinib are active in patients with G719X/L861Q/S768I mutations; however, less effective than in those with common mutations.

Interactions between household air pollution and GWAS-identified lung cancer susceptibility markers in the Female Lung Cancer Consortium in Asia (FLCCA).

We previously carried out a multi-stage genome-wide association study (GWAS) on lung cancer among never smokers in the Female Lung Cancer Consortium in Asia (FLCCA) (6,609 cases, 7,457 controls) that identified novel susceptibility loci at 10q25.2, 6q22.2, and 6p21.32, and confirmed two previously identified loci at 5p15.33 and 3q28. Household air pollution (HAP) attributed to solid fuel burning for heating and cooking, is the leading cause of the overall disease burden in Southeast Asia, and is known to contain lung carcinogens. To evaluate the gene-HAP interactions associated with lung cancer in loci independent of smoking, we analyzed data from studies participating in FLCCA with fuel use information available (n = 3; 1,731 cases; 1,349 controls). Coal use was associated with a 30% increased risk of lung cancer (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.6). Among the five a priori SNPs identified by our GWAS, two showed a significant interaction with coal use (HLA Class II rs2395185, p = 0.02; TP63 rs4488809 (rs4600802), p = 0.04). The risk of lung cancer associated with coal exposure varied with the respective alleles for these two SNPs. Our observations provide evidence that genetic variation in HLA Class II and TP63 may modify the association between HAP and lung cancer risk. The roles played in the cell cycle and inflammation pathways by the proteins encoded by these two genes provide biological plausibility for these interactions; however, additional replication studies are needed in other non-smoking populations.

The association between tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and multiple primary malignancies in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lungs.

OBJECTIVES: An increased incidence of multiple primary malignancies has been found in recent decades. However, the nature of the association between the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and multiple primary malignancies in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lungs is not clearly understood at this time. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data of our patients with adenocarcinoma of the lungs, and evaluated the association between the tumor EGFR mutation status and multiple primary malignancies. RESULTS: From December 2008 to November 2011, 655 pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients with tumor EGFR mutation data were available for analysis. Of them, 359 had EGFR mutations (including 336 classic EGFR mutations), 63 had double primary malignancies, and 7 had triple primary malignancies. Patients with classic EGFR mutations had a higher incidence of multiple primary malignancies than those without (P=0.042). Multiple primary malignancies occurred more frequently in patients with exon 19 mutations (including insertions, point mutations, or deletions) or exon 19 deletions than in patients without (P=0.037 and 0.032, respectively). Patients with any EGFR mutations or classic EGFR mutations survived longer than those who did not (P<0.001 and <0.001, respectively). Patients with multiple primary malignancies survived for a longer period than those without (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple primary malignancies occurred more frequently in patients with classic EGFR mutations, especially those with exon 19 deletions.

Number of liver metastatic nodules affects treatment options for pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients with liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: In patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the development of liver metastasis (LM) is a poor prognostic factor. Whether systemic treatment combined with local treatment for LM has benefit for NSCLC patients with LM is unknown. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed the clinical data and tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status of 673 pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients, including 85 patients who developed LM at any time point in the course of the disease. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with real-time ultrasonographic guidance was used for local treatment of LM in these patients, if appropriate. RESULTS: Patients with an EGFR mutation were more prone to having synchronous LM than patients with EGFR wild-type (50.0% vs. 23.5%, P=0.019). Fifty-six patients (65.9%) had ≦5 LM nodules. The median overall survival (OS) of patients with ≦5 LM nodules was 7.6 months compared with 2.9 months for those with multiple nodules (P<0.001). The independent prognostic factors after LM were performance status, EGFR mutation, synchronous LM and LM numbers. The independent prognostic factors for patients with ≦5 LM nodules were performance status, EGFR mutation, LM concomitant with adrenal metastasis and having received RFA. Patients who received RFA treatment (n=6) had longer OS after LM than those without RFA treatment (n=42) (23.1 vs. 7.9 months, P=0.035). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that patients with a better performance status and ≦5 LM nodules be considered for systemic treatment combined with RFA when LM develops.

Circulating free mitochondrial DNA concentration and its association with erlotinib treatment in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung.

Changes in circulating free DNA concentrations have been correlated with chemotherapeutic effects in solid tumors. The present study was designed to determine and compare the changes in circulating free mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) concentrations prior to and following erlotinib treatment, as well as the potential prognostic value of plasma mtDNA. Patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung who were to receive erlotinib treatment were enrolled in the present study once informed consent had been obtained. Patient plasma samples were collected immediately prior to starting erlotinib treatment, on days 15 and 29 following the initiation of erlotinib treatment and also when the patient's disease had progressed. The most common erlotinib treatment response was a partial response (PR), achieved in 26 (49.1%) of the 53 enrolled patients, followed by stable disease (SD) in 13 patients (24.5%) and progressive disease (PD) in 14 patients (26.4%). Plasma mtDNA concentrations were significantly decreased on day 15 compared with day 0 in the patients with PD (P=0.028) or in those patients without a response to erlotinib treatment (SD and PD; P=0.007). Plasma mtDNA concentrations were similar or elevated on day 15 compared with day 0 in the patients with a PR (P=0.808). The concentration of plasma mtDNA did not correlate with progression-free survival (PFS). Tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status (activating mutations in 16 patients and wild-type in 14 patients) did not correlate with the concentration of plasma mtDNA (P=0.951). Plasma mtDNA levels did not correlate with the PFS of the patients when they received erlotinib treatment. The plasma mtDNA levels were decreased on day 15 in those patients who had disease progression following erlotinib treatment. These results demonstrate that plasma mtDNA is of weak clinical utility as a screening, diagnostic or prognostic tool in lung cancer patients.

The epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor era has changed the causes of death of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are effective against tumor EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with the tumor EGFR-activating mutation (EGFRmu) had superior survival, compared to patients with EGFR wild-type tumors (EGFRwt). Many patients with the EGFRmu have had disease progression with EGFR-TKI treatment because of central nervous system (CNS) metastases. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the causes of death in patients with a known tumor EGFR mutation status who had been treated with EGFR-TKIs. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the chart records of our patients with advanced NSCLC who had received diagnosis, treatment, and supportive and hospice care in our hospital between July 2005 and June 2010. The tumor EGFR mutation status was analyzed by using a DNA sequence method. All enrolled patients had a documented cause of death. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients had documented tumor EGFR data, had received EGFR-TKI treatment (either erlotinib or gefitinib), and were with or without previous or salvage systemic chemotherapy. Of the 94 patients, 36 patients had EGFRwt and 58 patients had EGFRmu. The overall patient survival after starting EGFR-TKI treatment was significantly longer in the EGFRmu patients (median 17.2 months) than in the EGFRwt patients (median 11.6 months; p = 0.0058). Twenty-nine patients died of CNS metastases and 65 died of organ failure (other than the CNS). Patients who died of CNS metastases had undergone EGFR-TKI treatment significantly longer than patients who died of other organ failure (median, 8 months vs. 1.9 months; p = 0.0003) with a hazard ratio of 2.308 [95% confidence interval (C.I.), 1.452-3.668; p = 0.0004]. A significantly higher proportion of EGFRmu patients (26 of 58 patients; 44.8%) than EGFRwt patients (3 of 36 patients; 8.3%) (p < 0.001) died of CNS metastases. CONCLUSION: The EGFRmu NSCLC patients survived longer and had a significantly higher probability of mortality due to CNS metastases, compared to the EGFRwt patients. This change in the causes of death was noted after the era of EGFR-TKI treatment, and will have an important impact on the strategies and management of supportive and hospice care for patients.

Erlotinib has better efficacy than gefitinib in adenocarcinoma patients without EGFR-activating mutations, but similar efficacy in patients with EGFR-activating mutations.

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are an effective treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. The objective of the present study was to compare the efficacy of gefitinib and erlotinib in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma, whose tumor EGFR mutation status was known. Pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients who began receiving gefitinib or erlotinib treatment from January 2005 to December 2010, and whose tumor EGFR mutation status had been determined, were included. Clinical data, type of treatment response and survival time data were collected. Of the 224 patients enrolled, 124 received gefitinib treatment and 100 received erlotinib treatment. Of these patients, 146 individuals had tumors with EGFR-activating mutations (exon 19 deletions and/point mutation of L858R in exon 21) and 78 did not. There was no difference in treatment response whether or not the patients had tumors with EGFR-activating mutations at the time they received gefitinib or erlotinib treatment. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of the gefitinib and erlotinib groups was 7.6 and 7.9 months, respectively (p=0.4731). PFS was significantly longer for patients without EGFR-activating mutations who received erlotinib treatment (n=48; median, 4.5 months) than for those who received gefitinib treatment (n=30; median, 2.3 months), with a hazard ratio of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.35-0.96; p=0.0339). Patients whose tumors had EGFR-activating mutations displayed no difference in PFS with either gefitinib (n=94; median, 10.5 months) or erlotinib treatment (n=52; median, 10.4 months). In conclusion, PFS showed no difference with either agent in patients whose tumors had EGFR-activating mutations, but was significantly longer in patients whose tumors did not have EGFR-activating mutations when receiving erlotinib treatment.

Plasma epidermal growth factor receptor mutation analysis and possible clinical applications in pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients treated with erlotinib.

Tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation analysis is significant for making treatment decisions for metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma. However, less than half of patients have adequate tumor samples for mutation analysis. Patients with adenocarcinoma of the lungs who were due to receive erlotinib treatment were included in the present study. Tumor EGFR mutation status was analyzed using DNA sequencing. Plasma specimens from the patients were collected prior to erlotinib treatment. The plasma-free DNA EGFR mutation status was analyzed using the PCR clamp method. A total of 54 consecutive patients were included in the study. The plasma-free DNA EGFR mutation status of the 54 patients was analyzed. Only 30 patients had adequate tumor samples for EGFR analysis, including 15 with activating mutations (exon 19 deletions or L858R). EGFR-activating mutations were detected in the plasma-free DNA in 25 of 54 patients. The response rate was 86.7 and 33.3% in patients with and without tumor activating mutations, respectively (p=0.002). The response rate was 68 and 31% based on the patients' plasma-free DNA EGFR mutation status, respectively (p=0.013). No significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was observed between patients with and without EGFR-activating mutations, according to data from tumor tissue or plasma-free DNA analysis, although the median PFS time was longer for those patients with EGFR-activating mutations in plasma samples. Plasma EGFR mutation analysis is useful for adenocarcinoma patients who have no or inadequate tumor samples available for EGFR examination. Patients with plasma EGFR-activating mutations had an improved response rate and a statistically insignificant longer PFS.

Vandetanib Versus placebo in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after prior therapy with an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor: a randomized, double-blind phase III trial (ZEPHYR).

PURPOSE: Vandetanib is a once-daily oral inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and RET signaling. This placebo-controlled trial assessed whether vandetanib conferred an overall survival benefit in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after prior treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor and one or two chemotherapy regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive vandetanib 300 mg/d or placebo until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was to compare the outcomes between the two arms with respect to overall survival. RESULTS: Overall, 924 patients received vandetanib (n = 617) or placebo (n = 307). No significant increase in overall survival was detected in the vandetanib cohort compared with placebo (hazard ratio = 0.95; 95.2% CI, 0.81 to 1.11; P = .527); median overall survival was 8.5 months versus 7.8 months for vandetanib and placebo patients, respectively. Statistically significant advantages favoring vandetanib were observed for progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.63; P < .001) and objective response rate (2.6% v 0.7%; P = .028). Postprogression therapy was balanced across the cohorts in both number and type. Adverse events were generally consistent with previous NSCLC studies of vandetanib 300 mg; common events occurring with a greater frequency in the vandetanib arm versus placebo included diarrhea (46% v 11%), rash (42% v 11%), and hypertension (26% v 3%). CONCLUSION: The study did not demonstrate an overall survival benefit for vandetanib versus placebo. There was a higher incidence of some adverse events with vandetanib.

Phase II randomized trial of erlotinib or vinorelbine in chemonaive, advanced, non-small cell lung cancer patients aged 70 years or older.

INTRODUCTION: The primary objective of this study was to compare the response rates of elderly, chemonaive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with daily oral erlotinib versus oral vinorelbine. METHODS: Chemonaive Taiwanese patients aged 70 years or older who had advanced NSCLC were randomized to receive either oral erlotinib 150 mg (E) daily or oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m (V) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. RESULTS: From February 2007 to July 2008, 116 patients were enrolled and 113 were included in the intent-to-treat population: 57 patients in the E group and 56 patients in the V group. Objective response rates were 22.8% (13 of 57) in E and 8.9% (5 of 56) in V (p = 0.0388). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.57 months in E and 2.53 months in V (p = 0.0287), with an 80.6% increase in median PFS for E compared with V. Median survival time was 11.67 months in E and 9.3 months in V (p = 0.6975). Toxicities were generally mild in both groups. Median PFS was longest for epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR)-mutated patients in the E group, followed by EGFR-mutated patients in V, EGFR wild type in E, and EGFR wild type in V (p = 0.0034). Overall survival was longer for EGFR-mutated patients than for EGFR wild-type patients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Erlotinib is highly effective compared with oral vinorelbine in elderly, chemonaive, Taiwanese patients with NSCLC. EGFR-mutated patients had better survival than those with EGFR wild-type disease, regardless of the treatment received.

Association between tumor epidermal growth factor receptor mutation and pulmonary tuberculosis in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lungs.

BACKGROUND: The possible association between pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) and lung cancer development has been studied for several decades. However, the association between epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status and pulmonary TB in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lungs is unknown. METHODS: We reviewed the data of our patients with adenocarcinoma of the lungs who had a clinical history of pulmonary TB or old TB lesions shown on chest computed tomography scan and evaluated the association between tumor EGFR mutation status and pulmonary TB. RESULTS: From June 1999 to January 2011, there were 275 patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma with tumor EGFR mutation data available for analysis. Of them, 191 patients had EGFR mutations, 17 had a clinical history of pulmonary TB infection, 72 had old TB lesions on chest computed tomography scans, and 14 had scar cancer. Patients with old TB lesions had a higher incidence of EGFR mutation than those without (p = 0.018). Exon 19 deletions occurred more frequently in patients with old TB lesions than in patients without (p < 0.001). Those patients with old TB lesions who had EGFR mutations or exon 19 mutations survived longer than those who did not (p = 0.014 and 0.001, respectively). Patients with exon 19 deletions and old TB lesions showed no survival difference compared with those with exon 19 deletions and without old TB lesions (p = 0.271). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma who had scar cancer or had old TB lesions had a higher probability of having EGFR mutations, especially exon 19 deletions.

IV delivery of induced pluripotent stem cells attenuates endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in mice.

BACKGROUND: Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells are novel stem cell populations, but the role of iPS cells in acute lung injury (ALI) is not currently known. We investigated the effect of iPS cells in modifying the pathophysiology of endotoxin-induced ALI. METHODS: Male C57BL/6 8- to 12-week-old mice were enrolled in this study. Mouse iPS cells were delivered through the tail veins of mice 4 h after intratracheal instillation of endotoxin. Lung histopathologic findings, the pulmonary levels of cytokines, and functional parameters were analyzed after either 24 h or 48 h. RESULTS: More iPS cells integrated into the lungs of mice with ALI than those of the control mice, as demonstrated by in vivo radionuclide imaging and in vitro Hoechst-labeled fluorescent staining. iPS cells significantly diminished the histopathologic changes of ALI and the lung injury score. There was also a significant reduction in the activity of nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and neutrophil accumulation in the lung, confirmed by immunostaining, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and the decrease of myeloperoxidase activity, in the iPS-cell-treated mice with ALI. These protective effects were not replicated by the control cell therapy with fibroblasts. iPS cells mediated a downregulation of the proinflammatory response to endotoxin (reducing tumor necrosis factor-α, IL-6, and macrophage inflammatory peptide-2). In addition, iPS cells rescued the hypoxemia and pulmonary function of ALI. Treatment with a conditioned medium of iPS cells showed effects similar to those of iPS cells, which may suggest the therapeutic benefits of iPS mediated by paracrine factors. CONCLUSIONS: IV delivery of iPS cells provides a beneficial effect to attenuate the severity of endotoxin-induced ALI and improve physiologic impairment, which is partly mediated by a reduction in NF-κB activity and neutrophils accumulation. The conditioned medium of iPS cells demonstrated effects equal to those of iPS cells.

Third-line or fourth-line chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with relatively good performance status.

BACKGROUND: Our aim here was to explore treatment efficacy of pemetrexed and docetaxel in non-small-cell lung cancer patients who had failed previous chemotherapy and epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data of our non-small-cell lung cancer patients who received third- or fourth-line chemotherapy with pemetrexed or docetaxel in our institution from January 2006 to December 2009. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three patients received treatment, including 85 patients with pemetrexed treatment and 38 patients with docetaxel treatment. There was no difference in tumor response rate and toxicity profiles when using pemetrexed as third- or fourth-line treatment, neither was there difference in docetaxel treatment of third- versus fourth-line treatment. There was also no difference between docetaxel and pemetrexed in response rate and control rate when they were used as fourth-line treatment. However, docetaxel used in fourth-line treatment had higher incidence of neutropenia and more frequent need of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support compared with pemetrexed in fourth-line treatment. Median progression-free survivals (PFSs) were 2.6 months and 3.8 months when using pemetrexed as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively (p = 0.417). Median PFSs were 3.8 months and 4.8 months when using docetaxel as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively (p = 0.882). There was also no difference in PFS between pemetrexed and docetaxel, both in third- and fourth-line treatment. Median survivals were 13.4, 12.2, 13.2, and 13 months for pemetrexed in third-line, fourth-line, and docetaxel in third-line and fourth-line treatment, respectively. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study of pemetrexed and docetaxel showed relatively safe toxicity profile, reasonable response rate, and long survival when used as third- and fourth-line chemotherapy. Thus, it is reasonable to give good performance status patients third- and fourth-line chemotherapy. A phase III randomized trial is needed for better clarification of these issues.

A phase II randomized trial of gefitinib alone or with tegafur/uracil treatment in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma who had failed previous chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Tegafur/uracil (UFT) is suitable for metronomic chemotherapy because of its underlying antiangiogenesis mechanism. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of adding daily oral UFT to gefitinib treatment in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma who had failed previous chemotherapy. METHODS: Taiwanese patients who had adenocarcinoma of the lung and failed previous chemotherapy were randomized into gefitinib 250 mg daily alone (G) or plus daily oral UFT (GU). From November 2005 to August 2009, 115 patients were enrolled. RESULTS: There were 58 patients in the G arm and 57 in the GU arm. One-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 18% in the G arm and 36.7% in the GU arm (p = 0.03). Fifty-four patients had tissue samples available for tumor epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) sequence analysis: 16 classical mutations and 8 wild types in the G arm, and 20 classical mutations and 10 wild-types in the GU arm. The addition of UFT significantly improved PFS in patients with EGFR mutations (14.4 versus 7.6 months, p = 0.0061). Forty-three patients underwent tumor tissue microvessel density measurement, and a trend favoring the addition of UFT to gefitinib treatment was found in those with low microvessel density (median PFS: 11.8 versus 2.8 months, p = 0.0536). The median survival time was 18.3 months in the G arm and 23.6 months in the GU arm (p = 0.381). CONCLUSION: Gefitinib plus UFT treatment had better PFS than gefitinib alone treatment. Gefitinib is effective in patients with EGFR mutations, and the addition of UFT treatment produced better PFS in these patients with mutations.

Plasma soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 levels predict outcomes of pneumonia-related septic shock patients: a prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Despite recent advances in the management of septic shock, mortality rates are still unacceptably high. Early identification of the high-mortality risk group for early intervention remains an issue under exploration. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1 (sVEGFR1) and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) have diverse effects in the pathogenesis of sepsis, which involve pro-inflammation, anti-inflammation, endothelial cell repair, and vascular permeability change. Their roles in predicting mortality and organ dysfunction remain to be clarified. METHODS: Pneumonia-related septic shock patients from medical intensive care units were enrolled for this prospective observational study. We also included 20 patients with pneumonia without organ dysfunction for comparison. Plasma levels of VEGF and sVEGFR1 and uPA activity within 24 hours of shock onset were measured. We compared plasma levels of these biomarkers with APACHE II scores between subgroups of patients, and evaluated their predictive value for 28-day mortality and organ dysfunction. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients, including 81 with pneumonia-related septic shock and 20 with pneumonia without organ dysfunction, were enrolled. Non-survivors of septic shock had significantly higher plasma sVEGFR1 levels (659.3 ± 1022.8 vs. 221.1 ± 268.9 pg/mL, respectively, P < 0.001) and uPA activity (47.2 ± 40.6 vs. 27.6 ± 17.2 units, respectively, P = 0.001) when compared with those of the survivors. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated significantly higher mortality in patients with higher levels of sVEGFR1 (P < 0.001) and uPA activity (P = 0.031). In Cox regression analysis, plasma sVEGFR1 level was independently associated with, and best predicted, the 28-day mortality of septic shock (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.05-2.30). Plasma sVEGFR1 level and uPA activity had good correlation with renal dysfunction, metabolic acidosis, and hematologic dysfunction; their levels significantly increased when the number of organ dysfunctions increased. In multivariate analysis, plasma sVEGFR1 level (HR: 2.82, 95% CI: 1.17-6.81) and uPA activity (HR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.06-7.13) were independent predictors of the presence of concomitant multi-organ dysfunction. The predictive value of VEGF for mortality and organ dysfunction was limited in pneumonia-related septic shock patients. CONCLUSIONS: High plasma sVEGFR1 level in the early stage of pneumonia-related septic shock independently predicted 28-day mortality and multi-organ dysfunction.

Different efficacies of erlotinib and gefitinib in taiwanese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective multicenter study.

INTRODUCTION: Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors are used as effective first-line and salvage therapy in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in East Asia. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of gefitinib and erlotinib in Taiwanese patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Clinical data of NSCLC patients treated with gefitinib or erlotinib from January 2004 to December 2008 were collected retrospectively. Five tertiary referral centers in Taiwan participated in the study. RESULTS: Of the 1122 patients enrolled, 506 (45%) were female, 594 (53%) were never smokers or former light smokers, and 867 (77%) were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors were prescribed as first-line treatment in 465 (41%) patients and as second-line or salvage therapy in 657 patients (59%). The objective response rate was similar between the gefitinib and erlotinib treatment groups, while disease control rate was 58.9 and 65.8% (p = 0.025), respectively. Median progression-free survival of gefitinib and erlotinib groups was 3.6 and 4.6 months, respectively (p = 0.027). Median overall survival of gefitinib and erlotinib groups was 9.6 and 10.7 months, respectively (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Taiwanese patients with advanced NSCLC treated with erlotinib reported higher disease control rate, longer progression-free survival, and overall survival compared with patients treated with gefitinib.

Efficacy and safety of erlotinib in 1242 East/South-East Asian patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Erlotinib is an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that significantly increases survival for patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been reported to be particularly effective in Asian patients and may have a distinct safety profile in this population compared with non-Asian patients. We report safety and efficacy data from a subpopulation of East/South-East (E/SE) Asian patients enrolled in a global, open-label, phase IV trial of erlotinib (Tarceva Lung Cancer Survival Treatment study). METHODS: Patients who had previously failed on chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or were unsuitable for these treatments, were treated with oral erlotinib (150 mg/d) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Best response data were available for 1118 E/SE Asian and 4276 non-E/SE Asian patients. The overall response rates were 27% versus 10%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The disease control rates were 78% versus 66%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Survival data were available for 1242 E/SE Asian and 5338 non-E/SE Asian patients. The median progression-free survival times were 5.78 months versus 2.92 months, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.66, p < 0.0001). The median overall survival times were 14.7 months versus 6.8 months, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.57, p < 0.0001). One-year survival rates were 58.3% and 32.7%, respectively. Safety data were available for 1242 E/SE Asian patients. Seventeen percent of these patients experienced one or more erlotinib-related adverse event (AE) (other than the most frequently occurring AEs prespecified in the protocol) and 2% experienced an erlotinib-related serious AE. Dose reductions were reported for 171 (14%) patients. CONCLUSION: Erlotinib is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for Asian patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.