ICU environmental surfaces are a reservoir of fungi: species distribution in northern Italy.

BACKGROUND: Preventing and reducing nosocomial infections is a public health goal. Concern about healthcare-associated fungal infections has increased in recent years due to the emergence and spread of new pathogens, increasing antifungal resistance and outbreaks in hospital settings. AIM: To investigate the presence of medically relevant fungal species on environmental surfaces in 12 intensive care units of eight hospitals in Milan, Italy. METHODS: Environmental samplings, using contact plates on surfaces near bed stations and medical workstations, were conducted between November 2019 and January 2020. Fungi isolated were identified, and some were tested in vitro for antifungal susceptibility. FINDINGS: In total, 401 environmental samples were collected from 61 bed stations and 17 medical workstations. Positive samples were found in all hospitals except one, with positivity rates ranging from 4% to 24.2%. Filamentous fungi were found mainly on infusion pumps (23.2%) and patient tables (21.2%), whereas yeasts were found mainly on computers (25%) and floors (10.9%). Fungi were isolated from 12% of total samples. Filamentous fungi, mainly Aspergillus fumigatus, grew in 70.8% of positive samples, and yeasts grew in 27.1%, mainly Candida parapsilosis (42.8%) and Candida glabrata (28.6%). Fungi were detected near patients' beds and on surfaces at workstations, indicating potential for environment-to-patient, patient-to-patient and healthcare worker-to-patient transmission. CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance in hospital settings through environmental sampling may be an important component of fungal infection prevention.

The use of carbon marking after stereotactic large-core-needle breast biopsy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the use of activated charcoal to mark the biopsy site and needle track after large-core-needle breast biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred seventy-six consecutive patients (with 383 lesions) were referred for stereotactic breast biopsy. Two hundred forty-seven lesions were carbon marked when the need for surgery was likely. Patients who underwent marking were followed up for the results of surgery or mammography performed at our institution. Specimen sizes obtained by using the carbon mark were compared with sizes of consecutive biopsy specimens obtained after hook-wire localization. RESULTS: Carbon marking was well tolerated in all cases. All 132 surgeries performed at the authors' institution were successful in removing the marked target. Specimen sizes compared favorably with sizes of comparison hook-wire localization specimens. All 68 lesions followed mammographically revealed no changes that were attributable to the use of carbon. Two minor complications were observed. Two small cancers were completely removed at needle biopsy. CONCLUSION: Carbon marking is safe and effective for marking the biopsy site and needle track created by stereotactic large-core-needle biopsy of the breast. Marking eliminates the need for postprocedural needle localization. It remains effective when small lesions have been completely removed. This technique should be considered in properly selected cases by those performing large-core-needle biopsy of the breast.