Leucocytosis during induction therapy with all-trans-retinoic acid and arsenic trioxide in acute promyelocytic leukaemia predicts differentiation syndrome and treatment-related complications.

All-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) represent the standard of care for low-intermediate risk acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL). Leucocytosis during induction with ATRA-ATO represents a common complication with an incidence of up to 60%. To identify predictive factors for this complication, we studied a cohort of 65 low-intermediate risk APL patients treated with ATRA-ATO in three highly specialized Italian centres. Overall, 39/65 (60%) patients developed leucocytosis, with a peak in leucocyte count being most frequent in the second week from diagnosis. All cases were successfully managed with hydroxyurea. Predictive factors for leucocytosis in univariate analysis were lower platelet counts (odds ratio [OR] 0.98, 0.97-1.00, p = 0.018), lower fibrinogen levels (OR 0.36, 0.17-0.66, p = 0.003), higher bone marrow blast infiltration (OR 1.03, 1.01-1.07, p = 0.021) and CD117 expression by flow (OR 1.04, 1.01-1.08, p = 0.012). Multivariate analysis confirmed lower levels of fibrinogen at diagnosis as the strongest predictive factor for the development of leucocytosis (OR 0.36, 0.15-0.72, p = 0.009). Differentiation syndrome (DS) occurred only in patients developing leucocytosis showing a strict correlation with rising leucocytes counts (16/39 vs. 0/26, p < 0.001). In addition, other treatment-related complications including QTc prolongation, cardiac events, liver, and haematological toxicities were significantly more frequent in patients experiencing leucocytosis (22/39 vs. 3/26, p < 0.001). In conclusion, APL patients undergoing ATRA-ATO therapy with lower fibrinogen levels and platelet counts at diagnosis and with a massive bone marrow blast infiltrate should be carefully monitored for the development of leucocytosis during induction. DS and other treatment-related complications seem to occur almost exclusively in patients developing leucocytosis, who should necessarily receive DS prophylaxis and more intensive monitoring and supportive therapy to prevent treatment complications.

Evaluating Short-Term Outcomes of Tunneled and Non-Tunneled Central Venous Catheters in Hemodialysis.

Background: The necessity of using central venous catheters (CVCs) in hemodialysis, coupled with their associated complications, remains a critical concern in nephrology. This study aims to compare the short-term prognosis of tunneled (T-CVC) and non-tunneled (NT-CVC) CVCs in acute hemodialysis patients, specifically focusing on infection rates, malpositioning, and lumen thrombosis within the first three weeks post-insertion. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 176 CVCs placed between January and December 2023 at the Policlinico di Modena and the Ospedale Civile di Baggiovara. Patient demographics, CHA2DS2-VASc scores, and comorbid conditions were recorded at the time of catheter placement. Outcomes assessed included catheter-related infections, malpositioning, and lumen thrombosis. Statistical analyses, including Chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, were performed to evaluate differences between T-CVCs and NT-CVCs. Results: The sample comprised 43% females with a mean age of 69.3 years (SD 13.9) and a mean CHADS-VASC score of 3.72 (SD 1.4). Hypertension (90%) was the most prevalent comorbidity. Of the 176 CVCs, 127 were T-CVCs and 49 were NT-CVCs. Infection rates were 3.15% for T-CVCs and 8.16% for NT-CVCs (p = 0.07). Malpositioning occurred in 0.79% of T-CVCs and 4.08% of NT-CVCs (p = 0.47). There was one case of lumen thrombosis in the NT-CVC group. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated a significant divergence in infection-related catheter survival favoring T-CVCs after ten days (p = 0.034). Conclusions: While non-tunneled CVCs do not significantly alter short-term prognosis compared to tunneled CVCs, the latter show a better infection-related survival rate beyond ten days. Therefore, primary insertion of T-CVCs may be preferable when resources and clinical conditions permit, although NT-CVCs remain a viable option when immediate T-CVC insertion is challenging.

The impact of different FLT3-inhibitors on overall survival of de novo acute myeloid leukemia: A network meta-analysis.

FLT3 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy are the standard of care for newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, no head-to-head studies have established the superiority of one FLT3 inhibitor over another. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to evaluate overall survival (OS) among different FLT3 inhibitors. Three relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs), involving 1.358 patients treated with midostaurin, quizartinib, and sorafenib, were included in our analysis. The hazard ratios (HRs) revealed no significant differences in OS between midostaurin and quizartinib (HR, 1.00; 95 % CI, 0.73-1.36), midostaurin and sorafenib (HR, 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.52-1.84), or quizartinib and sorafenib (HR, 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.51-1.85). This NMA, the first to explore this issue, found no OS differences among the different FLT3 inhibitors. In the absence of direct comparison trials, our findings provide practical insights for clinical decision-making.

["Green" Hemodialysis: The Centralized Acidic Concentrate from the Dialysis Center of Policlinico of Modena].

Introduction and aim of the study. The centralized preparation and distribution system of acidic concentrate represents a true innovation in hemodialysis, when compared to acid bags, in terms of convenience and eco-sustainability. The aim of this study is to compare the use of traditional acid bags with the centralized distribution system of acidic concentrate, with particular attention to differences in terms of eco-sustainability and convenience. Methods. At the Nephrology Dialysis and Renal Transplantation Unit of the University Hospital of Modena was installed the Granumix system® (Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homburg, Germany). Data collected before the introduction of the Granumix® system (including the used acid bags, boxes and pallets used for their packaging, liters of acid solution used and kilograms of waste generated from wood, plastic, cardboard and residual acid solution) were compared with those collected after the implementation of the Granumix® system. Factors such as material consumption, volume of waste generated, unused and wasted products, time required for dialysis session preparation and nurses' satisfaction were analyzed to document which system was more environmentally sustainable. Results. Data collected in 2019 at our Dialysis Center showed a consumption of 30,000 acid bags, which generated over 20,000 kg of waste from wood, plastic and cardboard, and approximately 12,000 liters of residual acid solution to be disposed of, with a handling weight by operators reaching nearly 160,000 kg. The use of the centralized distribution system of acidic concentrate resulted in a significant reduction in waste generated (2,642 kg vs 13,617 kg), residual acid solution to be disposed of (2,351 liters vs 12,100 liters) and weights handled by operators (71,522 kg vs 158,117 kg). Conclusions. The acidic concentrate appears to be better suited to the sustainability challenge that dialysis must faces today, particularly due to the significant increase in the number of patients, which leads to a higher number of treatments and, therefore, a growing demand for eco-sustainable products.

A Multicentric Castleman Disease Associated with Mixed Warm and Cold Antibody-Mediated AHA Responsive to Siltuximab.

Castleman disease is non-clonal lymphoproliferative disorders defined by hypertrophy of lymph nodes. The multicentric form (MCD), in which multiple lymph node stations are involved, is not associated with HHV8 infection, but considered idiopathic, although IL-6 appears to play a central role in its pathogenesis. Here, we report the case of a patient who presented with mixed autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) and adenopathy that was very challenging to diagnose due to very low values of hemoglobin and refractoriness of obtaining any improvement of AIHA with standard first and second lines of therapy (steroids, rituximab, immunoglobulin, erythropoietin, and cyclosporine). When we safely proceeded to lymph node biopsy, a diagnosis of MCD was established. This permitted the treatment with siltuximab, an anti-IL-6 monoclonal antibody. After only 1 week, hemoglobin raised and he was discharged. After 1 year, he was still in remission. This case underlines the challenges in diagnosis of MCD, and the first case of response to siltuximab after the failure of rituximab to relieve mixed AIHA.

Immunotherapy with Monoclonal Antibodies for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Work in Progress.

In the last few years, molecularly targeted agents and immune-based treatments (ITs) have significantly changed the landscape of anti-cancer therapy. Indeed, ITs have been proven to be very effective when used against metastatic solid tumors, for which outcomes are extremely poor when using standard approaches. Such a scenario has only been partially reproduced in hematologic malignancies. In the context of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), as innovative drugs are eagerly awaited in the relapsed/refractory setting, different ITs have been explored, but the results are still unsatisfactory. In this work, we will discuss the most important clinical studies to date that adopt ITs in AML, providing the basis to understand how this approach, although still in its infancy, may represent a promising therapeutic tool for the future treatment of AML patients.

Gilteritinib and the risk of intracranial hemorrhage: a case series of a possible, under-reported side effect.

Gilteritinib is currently approved for patients with relapsed/refractory AML with FLT3 mutations, based on the positive results of the pivotal ADMIRAL study. In ADMIRAL trial, no increased risk of bleeding was reported, but in the previous dose finding study, a single event of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) was registered after exposure to subtherapeutic doses of gilteritinib. Here, we report the first case series on five ICHs diagnosed in patients with FLT3-mutated AML, occurred within the first month of exposure to gilteritinib. Our cohort included 24 patients treated in three Italian centers. Most of these ICH cases were non-severe and self-limiting, while one was fatal. This link with ICHs remains in any case uncertain for the presence of active AML. We further reported that an analysis of the post-marketing surveillance data (EudraVigilance) retrieved other 11 cases of ICHs present in the database after gilteritinib treatment. A causality assessment was performed according to the Dx3 method to evaluate the possibility that ICHs might be an actual side effect of gilteritinib. In conclusion, further research is needed to elucidate the potential role of gilteritinib in the pathogenesis of ICHs.

How acute myeloid leukemia (AML) escapes from FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitors? Still an overrated complication?

FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations, present in about 25%-30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, constitute one of the most frequently detected mutations in these patients. The binding of FLT3L to FLT3 activates the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) and RAS pathways, producing increased cell proliferation and the inhibition of apoptosis. Two types of FLT3 mutations exist: FLT3-ITD and FLT3-TKD (point mutations in D835 and I836 or deletion of codon I836). A class of drugs, tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKI), targeting mutated FLT3, is already available with 1st and 2nd generation molecules, but only midostaurin and gilteritinib are currently approved. However, the emergence of resistance or the selection of clones not responding to FLT3 inhibitors has become an important clinical dilemma, as the duration of clinical responses is generally limited to a few months. This review analyzes the insights into mechanisms of resistance to TKI and poses a particular view on the clinical relevance of this phenomenon. Has resistance been overlooked? Indeed, FLT3 inhibitors have significantly contributed to reducing the negative impact of FLT3 mutations on the prognosis of AML patients who are no longer considered at high risk by the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022. Finally, several ongoing efforts to overcome resistance to FLT3-inhibitors will be presented: new generation FLT3 inhibitors in monotherapy or combined with standard chemotherapy, hypomethylating drugs, or IDH1/2 inhibitors, Bcl2 inhibitors; novel anti-human FLT3 monoclonal antibodies (e.g., FLT3/CD3 bispecific antibodies); FLT3-CAR T-cells; CDK4/6 kinase inhibitor (e.g., palbociclib).

Posaconazole and midostaurin in patients with FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia: Pharmacokinetic interactions and clinical facts in a real life study.

Midostaurin is used in combination with chemotherapy to treat patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutated acute myeloid leukemia. Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia exposes these patients to a significant risk of invasive fungal infections (IFIs). International guidelines recommend primary antifungal prophylaxis with posaconazole (PCZ) but nested analysis of a phase III trial showed that strong PCZ inhibition of CYP3A4 diminished midostaurin metabolism and increased midostaurin plasma levels; however, midostaurin-related adverse events (AEs) were only moderately exacerbated. We conducted a prospective multicenter real-life study to evaluate (i) how often concerns around PCZ-midostaurin interactions made the hematologist prescribe antifungals other than PCZ, (ii) how remarkably PCZ increased midostaurin plasma levels, and (iii) how significantly PCZ-midostaurin interactions influenced hematologic and safety outcomes of induction therapy. Although the hematologists were blinded to pharmacokinetic findings, as many as 16 of 35 evaluable patients were prescribed antifungal prophylaxis with micafungin, weak CYP3A4 inhibitor, in place of PCZ (p < 0.001 for deviation from guidelines). In the 19 patients managed as per guidelines, PCZ-midostaurin interactions were more remarkable than previously characterized, such that at the end of induction therapy midostaurin minimum plasma concentration (Cmin ) was greater than three times higher than reported; moreover, midostaurin Cmin , maximum plasma concentration, and area under the curve were more than or equal to four times higher with PCZ than micafungin. Hematologic outcomes (complete remission and duration of severe neutropenia) and safety outcomes (midostaurin-related any grade or grade ≥3 AEs) were nonetheless similar for patients exposed to PCZ or micafungin, as was the number of breakthrough IFIs. In waiting for randomized phase III trials of new prophylaxis regimens, these findings show that PCZ should remain the antifungal of choice for the midostaurin-treated patient.

Gilteritinib: The Story of a Proceeding Success into Hard-to-Treat FLT3-Mutated AML Patients.

The traditionally dismal outcome of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients carrying the FMS-related tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) mutations has been mitigated by the recent introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) into clinics, such as midostaurin and gilteritinib. The present work summarizes the clinical data that led to the use of gilteritinib in clinical practice. Gilteritinib is a second-generation TKI with deeper single-agent activity than first-generation drugs against both FLT3-ITD and TKD mutations in human studies. Moreover, the phase I/II dose-escalation, dose-expansion Chrysalis trial showed an acceptable safety profile of gilteritinib (diarrhea, elevated aspartate aminotransferase, febrile neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, sepsis, and pneumonia) and a 49% overall response rate (ORR) in 191 FLT3-mutated relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML patients. In 2019, the pivotal ADMIRAL trial showed that the median overall survival was significantly longer in patients treated with gilteritinib than among those receiving chemotherapy (9.3 vs. 5.6 months, respectively) and the ORR to gilteritinib was 67.6%, outperforming the 25.8% for chemotherapy arm and leading to the license for its clinical use by the US Food and Drug Administration. Since then, several real-world experiences have confirmed the positive results in the R/R AML setting. Finally, gilteritinib-based combinations currently under investigation, with several compounds (venetoclax, azacitidine, conventional chemotherapy, etc.) and some practical tips (maintenance after allogeneic transplantation, interaction with antifungal drugs, extramedullary disease, and onset of resistance), will be analyzed in detail in this review.

Novel Drugs and Radiotherapy in Relapsed Lymphomas: Abscopal Response and Beyond.

Combined modality has represented a mainstay of treatment across many lymphoma histologies, given their sensitivity to both multi-agent chemotherapy and intermediate-dose radiotherapy. More recently, several new agents, including immunotherapies, have reshaped the therapeutic panorama of some lymphomas. In parallel, radiotherapy techniques have witnessed substantial improvement, accompanied by a growing understanding that radiation itself comes with an immune-mediated effect. Six decades after a metastatic lesion regression outside the irradiated field was first described, there is increasing evidence that a combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy could boost an abscopal effect. This review focuses on the mechanisms underlying this interaction in the setting of lymphomas, and on the results of pivotal prospective studies. Furthermore, the available evidence on the concomitant use of radiotherapy and small molecules (i.e., lenalidomide, venetoclax, and ibrutinib), as well as brentuximab vedotin, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, is summarized. Currently, combining radiotherapy with new agents in patients who are affected by lymphomas appears feasible, particularly as a bridge to anti-CD19 autologous CAR T-cell infusion. However, more studies are required to assess these combinations, and preliminary data suggest only a synergistic rather than a curative effect.

Impact of gemtuzumab ozogamicin consolidation on hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) mobilization in AML: analysis of 20 patients.

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), is an anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody, approved for AML CD33 + , those patients with low and intermediate-risk who obtain a complete response may also be candidated for consolidation with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, there are scant data on the mobilization of hemopoietic stem cells (HSC) after fractionated GO. We retrospectively studied data from five Italian centers and identified 20 patients (median age 54 years, range 29-69, 15 female, 15 NPM1mutated) that attempted HSC mobilization after fractionated doses of GO + "7 + 3" regimen and 1-2 cycles of consolidation (GO + HDAC + daunorubicin). After chemotherapy and standard G-CSF, 11/20 patients (55%) reached the threshold of 20 CD34 + /µL, and HSC were successfully harvested, while 9 patients (45%) failed. The median day of apheresis was Day + 26 from the start of chemotherapy (range 22-39 days). In good mobilizer patients, the median circulating CD34 + cells were 35.9 cells/µL and the median CD34 + harvested were 4.65 × 106/kg of patients' body weight. With a median follow-up of 12.7 months, at 24 months from the first diagnosis, 93.3% of all 20 patients were alive and the median overall survival was 25 months. The 2-year RFS rate from the timepoint of the first CR was 72.6%, while the median RFS was not reached. However, only five patients underwent ASCT and achieved full engraftment.In conclusion, in our cohort of patients, the addition of GO reduced HSC mobilization and harvesting, which was reached in about 55% of patients. Nevertheless, further studies are warranted to evaluate the effects of fractionated doses of GO on HSC mobilization and ASCT outcomes.

Venetoclax: A Game Changer in the Treatment of Younger AML Patients?

The combination approach based on venetoclax (VEN) with azacytidine (AZA) has significantly improved outcomes for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). This innovative approach has led to higher rates of overall response, measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative remissions, and overall survival compared with AZA monotherapy. As a result, this combination has emerged as the gold-standard treatment for elderly or unfit patients with AML who are not eligible for intensive therapy. In younger, fit patients with AML, intensive induction and consolidation chemotherapy is commonly used as a first-line approach; however, relapse continues to be the main reason for treatment failure in approximately 30-40% of patients. Efforts to improve MRD-negative response rates and to facilitate the transition to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, particularly in high-risk AML, have inspired trials exploring the combination of intensive chemotherapy with targeted agents. VEN, a first-in-class anti-BCL2 agent, combined with intensive chemotherapy regimens has shown deep MRD-negative remissions, producing prolonged event-free survival and enhancing the transition to allogeneic transplant in first-complete-remission patients. These benefits support the incremental advantages of adding VEN to intensive chemotherapy approaches across ELN risk subcategories, and provides a robust benchmark to design future trials. In this review, we will discuss current studies assessing the efficacy of frontline regimens integrating VEN into intensive chemotherapy in younger patients with AML and specific molecularly defined subgroups.

Identification of Predictive Factors for Overall Survival and Response during Hypomethylating Treatment in Very Elderly (≥75 Years) Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Multicenter Real-Life Experience.

Elderly patients represent the most challenging and hard-to-treat patient population due to dismal characteristics of the disease, such as secondary-acute myeloid leukemia (AML), enrichment of unfavorable molecular genes (TP53) and comorbidities. We conducted a multicentric retrospective study to evaluate activity and safety in a real-life setting of hypomethylating drugs (HMAs) in patients older than 75 years with AML. Between September 2010 and December 2021, 220 patients were treated, 164 (74.5%) received AZAcitidine and 56 DECitabine; most patients (57.8%), received more than four cycles of HMAs. The best response obtained was CR in 51 patients (23.2%), PR in 23 (10.5%) and SD in 45 (20.5%); overall transfusion independence was obtained in 47 patients (34%), after a median of 3.5 months. The median OS (mOs) was 8 months (95% CI 5.9-10.2), with 1- and 2-years OS of 39.4% (95% CI 32.7-46) and 17.4% (95% CI 11.7-23.1), respectively; similar mOS was observed according to HMA treatment (AZA 8.3 vs. DEC 7.8 months, p = 0.810). A subset of 57 long survivors (44 in AZA group and 13 in DEC group) received at least 12 cycles of HMAs, their mOS was 24.3 months. In multivariate analysis, age (≥80), Charlson comorbidity index (≥3), creatinine clearance and the type of best response (≥PR) during treatment maintained independent significance in predicting survival. Infectious complications, most frequently pneumonia (35) and septic shock (12), were lethal in 49 patients (22.2%). Our data show that HMAs have similar efficacy compared to pivotal trials and are well tolerated in a setting of very elderly patients with several co-comorbidities.

Molecular targets for the treatment of AML in the forthcoming 5th World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours.

INTRODUCTION: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a genetically heterogeneous disease for which the treatment armamentarium has been historically restricted to chemotherapy. However, genomic and epigenomic alterations that contribute to AML initiation, maintenance, and relapse have disclosed new insights to the 5th update in WHO Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours. AREAS COVERED: After four decades of intensive chemotherapy as a 'one-size-fits-all' concept, several targeted agents have been approved for the treatment of AML. Several compounds, directed against regulators of apoptotic, epigenetic, or micro-environmental pathways, and immune-system modulators, are currently in development and investigation in clinical trials. We review advances in target-based therapy for AML focusing on their mechanism of action, examining the intracellular events and pathways, and the results from published clinical trials. EXPERT OPINION: To improve patient clinical outcomes, find new biomarkers for therapeutic response, and pinpoint patients who might benefit from novel targeted medicines, next-generation sequencing is being used to evaluate AML-associated mutations. In fact, the new 5th edition of WHO classification has reaffirmed the importance of genetically defined entities that have a prognostic impact, but not all have a specific treatment available. New class of target drugs are in clinical development and could be beneficial to improve the therapeutic armamentarium available.

Daratumumab triplet therapies in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: A "real world" experience.

We report our retrospective analysis on 34 relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients treated with daratumumab based triplets. Twenty patients were females and 14 males. Median age was 73.2. Daratumumab was associated to lenalidomide in and dexamethasone (DRd) in 30 (88,3%) and to bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVd) in 4 cases (11,7%). The ORR was 88%. CR occurred in 12% of cases, VGPR in 44% and PR in 32%. The 12 months PFS and OS rates were 78% and 86,5%, respectively. Present data confirm those recently reported in the literature and further reinforce the early use of daratumumab-based triplets for RRMM patients.

CPX-351: An Old Scheme with a New Formulation in the Treatment of High-Risk AML.

Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) and acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) represent aggressive diseases characterized by a dismal prognosis if compared with de novo acute myeloid leukemia, especially in older patients. In these AML subsets, standard chemotherapy regimens produce poor response rates and unsatisfactory outcomes. Historically, conventional approaches consisted of an anthracycline combined with continuous infusion of cytarabine for 7 days, the "3+7" regimen. Several attempts have been conducted to ameliorate this combination regimen but inconsistent improvements in response rates and no significant changes in overall survival have been observed, until the recent introduction of targeted molecules. A liposomal formulation of traditional chemotherapy agents cytarabine and daunorubicin, termed CPX-351, enhances pharmacodynamics and synergistic effects through the maintenance of the optimal 5:1 molar ratio, which extends the treatment's half-life and increases the bone marrow tropism of the drug. The use of CPX-351 in newly diagnosed AML-MRC and t-AML patients aged 60-75 years has demonstrated superior remission rates compared to conventional chemotherapy and improvements in event-free and overall survival. Recently, published data from a 5-year follow-up highlighted evidence that CPX-351 has the ability to produce and contribute to long-term remission and survival in older patients with newly diagnosed high-risk/secondary AML. Future perspectives include evaluation of dose intensification with CPX-351 in high-risk settings, combining this agent with targeted therapies, and better understanding the mechanism of improved responses in t-AML and AML-MRC. In this review, we will examine the role of CPX-351 inside the new AML therapeutic scenario and how its employment could potentially modify the treatment algorithm of high-risk and elderly patients with AML.

Management of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma in patients ineligible for CAR-T cell therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) therapy has revolutionized the treatment of relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). However, patients who are excluded or have no access to CAR-T represent a challenge for clinicians and have generally a dismal outcome. The landscape for this category of patients is constantly evolving: new agents have been approved in the last 2-3 years, alone or in combination, and novel treatment modalities are under investigation. AREAS COVERED: Thereafter, we reviewed the currently available therapeutic strategies: conventional chemotherapy, antibody-drug conjugate ADC (mainly polatuzumab and loncastuxumab), bispecific antibodies (CD19/CD3 and focus on novel CD20/CD3 Abs), immunomodulatory drugs (covering tafasitamab and lenalidomide, checkpoint inhibitors mainly in PMBL), small molecules (selinexor, BTK, and PI3K inhibitors), and the role of radiotherapy. EXPERT OPINION: Navigating this scenario will uncover new challenges, including identifying an ideal sequence for these therapies, the most effective combinations, and search for consistent predictive factors to help selecting the appropriate population of LBCL patients. At present, supporting clinical research for CAR-T ineligible patients, a new and challenging group, must remain a major focus that is complementary to advances in CAR T-cell therapy.