RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Cricothyrotomy is an intervention performed to salvage "can't intubate, can't ventilate" situations. Studies have shown poor accuracy with landmarking the cricothyroid membrane, particularly in female patients by surgeons and anesthesiologists. This study examines the perceived versus actual success rate of landmarking the cricothyroid membrane by resident and staff emergency physicians using obese and non-obese models. METHODS: Five male and female volunteers were models. Each model was placed supine, and a point-of-care ultrasound expert landmarked the borders of each cricothyroid membrane; 20 residents and 15 staff emergency physicians were given one attempt to landmark five models. Overall accuracy and accuracy stratified by sex and obesity status were calculated. RESULTS: Overall landmarking accuracy amongst all participants was 58% (SD 18%). A difference in accuracy was found for obese males (88%) versus obese females (40%) (difference = 48%, 95% CI = 30-65%, p < 0.0001), and non-obese males (77%) versus non-obese females (46%) (difference = 31%, 95% CI = 12-51%, p = 0.004). There was no association between perceived difficulty and success (correlation = 0.07, 95% CI = -0.081-0.214, p = 0.37). Confidence levels overall were higher amongst staff physicians (3.0) than residents (2.7) (difference = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.1-0.6, p = 0.02), but there was no correlation between confidence in an attempt and its success (p = 0.33). CONCLUSION: We found that physicians demonstrate significantly lower accuracy when landmarking cricothyroid membranes of females. Emergency physicians were unable to predict their own accuracy while landmarking, which can potentially lead to increased failed attempts and a longer time to secure the airway. Improved training techniques may reduce failed attempts and improve the time to secure the airway.
Asunto(s)
Medicina de Emergencia , Médicos , Competencia Clínica , Cartílago Cricoides/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Although procedural sedation for cardioversion is a common event in emergency departments (EDs), there is limited evidence surrounding medication choices. We sought to evaluate geographic and temporal variation in sedative choice at multiple Canadian sites, and to estimate the risk of adverse events due to sedative choice. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of one health records review, the Recent Onset Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter-0 (RAFF-0 [n=420, 2008]) and one prospective cohort study, the Recent Onset Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter-1 (RAFF-1 [n=565, 2010 - 2012]) at eight and six Canadian EDs, respectively. Sedative choices within and among EDs were quantified, and the risk of adverse events was examined with adjusted and unadjusted comparisons of sedative regimes. RESULTS: In RAFF-0 and RAFF-1, the combination of propofol and fentanyl was most popular (63.8% and 52.7%) followed by propofol alone (27.9% and 37.3%). There were substantially more adverse events in the RAFF-0 data set (13.5%) versus RAFF-1 (3.3%). In both data sets, the combination of propofol/fentanyl was not associated with increased adverse event risk compared to propofol alone. CONCLUSION: There is marked variability in procedural sedation medication choice for a direct current cardioversion in Canadian EDs, with increased use of propofol alone as a sedation agent over time. The risk of adverse events from procedural sedation during cardioversion is low but not insignificant. We did not identify an increased risk of adverse events with the addition of fentanyl as an adjunctive analgesic to propofol.
Asunto(s)
Antiarrítmicos/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Aleteo Atrial/terapia , Sedación Consciente/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/métodos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Geriatría/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosAsunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Liderazgo , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Canadá , Medicina de Emergencia/métodos , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/administración & dosificación , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/mortalidad , Masculino , Seguridad del Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Medición de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/diagnóstico , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Canadá , Diagnóstico Precoz , Intervención Médica Temprana , Humanos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To derive a simple clinical prediction rule identifying patients at high risk of developing new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after cardiac surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis on prospectively collected observational data. SETTING: A university-affiliated cardiac hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and/or valve surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Observation for the occurrence of new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Details on 28 preoperative variables from 999 patients were collected and significant predictors (p<0.2) were inserted into multivariable logistic regression and reconfirmed with recursive partitioning. A total of 305 (30.5%) patients developed new-onset POAF. Eleven variables were associated significantly with atrial fibrillation. A multivariable logistic regression model included left atrial dilatation, mitral valve disease, and age. Coefficients from the model were converted into a simple 7-point predictive score. The risk of POAF per score is: 15.0%, if 0; 20%, if 1; 27%, if 2; 35%, if 3; 44%, if 4; 53%, if 5; 62%, if 6; and 70%, if 7. A score of 4 has a sensitivity of 44% and a specificity of 82% for POAF. A score of 6 has a sensitivity of 11% and a specificity of 97%. Bootstrapping with 5,000 samples confirmed the final model provided consistent predictions. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposed a simple predictive score incorporating three risk variables to identify cardiac surgical patients at high risk of developing new-onset POAF. Preventive treatment should target patients ≥ 65 years with left atrial dilatation and mitral valve disease.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Temperature is known to affect bacterial growth, but current safety recommendations for enteral formula are based on studies conducted in thermoneutral environments, which are not representative of select burn intensive care units (ICUs) that are kept therapeutically hyperthermal. This project evaluated microbial growth in 3 enteral feeding systems: closed, open, and open with modular additives (modular tube feeding [MTF]) exposed to 2 different environments. PROCEDURES: Product for each of the 3 systems was prepared and hung in both a thermoneutral (23.3°C) and a hyperthermal (32.5°C) ICU room. At baseline, 4 hours, and 8 hours, samples were plated and incubated overnight and the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) counted. FINDINGS: In the thermoneutral and hyperthermal environments, there was no evidence of microbial growth in the open or closed feeding systems at any time point. The MTF exhibited baseline contamination with a median of 10 CFUs (95% CI, 8-16) and significant growth over time to 54 CFUs (95% CI, 20-230) by 8 hours in the thermoneutral setting. In the hyperthermal environment, the MTF showed baseline contamination of 390 CFUs (95% CI, 40-1600) and significant growth over time, with 30% of samples exhibiting contamination levels exceeding Food and Drug Administration standards by 4 hours and CFUs being too numerous to count by 8 hours. CONCLUSION: CFUs in enteral formula did not differ between open and closed feeding systems in either environment for up to 8 hours; however, the addition of modulars to open systems may result in an unacceptable risk of contamination in hyperthermal environments.
Asunto(s)
Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Contaminación de Alimentos/análisis , Alimentos Formulados/microbiología , Temperatura , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Evaluación como Asunto , Contaminación de Alimentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess sex differences in clinical presentation, management and outcome in emergency department (ED) patients with chest pain, and to measure the association between female sex and coronary angiography within 30 days. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study in an urban academic ED between Jul. 1, 2007, and Apr. 1, 2008. We enrolled patients over 24 years of age with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome (ACS). RESULTS: Among the 970 included patients, 386 (39.8%) were female. Compared with men, women had a lower prevalence of known coronary artery disease (21.0% v. 34.2%, p < 0.001) and a lower frequency of typical pain (37.1% v. 45.7%, p = 0.01). Clinicians classified a greater proportion of women as having a low (< 10%) pretest probability for ACS (85.0% v. 76.4%, p = 0.001). Despite similar rates of electrocardiography, troponin T and stress testing between sexes, there was a lower rate of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (4.7% v. 8.4%, p = 0.03) and positive stress test results (4.4% v. 7.9%, p = 0.03) in women. Women were less frequently referred for coronary angiography (9.3% v. 18.9%, p < 0.001). The adjusted association between female sex and coronary angiography was not significant (odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.37-1.10). CONCLUSION: Women had a lower rate of AMI and a lower rate of positive stress test results despite similar rates of testing between sexes. Although women were less frequently referred for coronary angiography, these data suggest that sex differences in management were likely appropriate for the probability of disease.