Lending a hand: The utility of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in diverticulitis with fistula.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend elective colectomy for the management of diverticulitis-associated fistulas. These cases present considerable operative challenges, and surgical approaches and fistula tract management vary widely. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery offers the benefits of minimally invasive surgery while maintaining the tactile advantages of open surgery. This study aims to evaluate outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery colectomy for diverticulitis-associated fistulas, fistula tract, and urinary catheter management. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with diverticulitis-associated fistula who underwent elective hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery colectomy between January 2, 2008, and September 8, 2022, was performed. Patients with Crohn disease or who underwent emergency surgery were excluded. RESULTS: Seventy patients were included; the mean patient age was 64.1 ± 14.8 years, and the mean body mass index was 30.9 ± 9.1 kg/m2. Colovesical fistulas were most common (n = 48; 68.6%), followed by colovaginal fistulas (n = 22; 31.4%). The median operative time was 186 minutes. Conversion to an open approach occurred in 4 cases (5.7%). The fistula tract remnant was left without intervention in 35 patients (50%), and omental coverage occurred in 23 cases (32.9%). The median duration of the urinary catheter was 3 days (range = 1-63). There were no postoperative urine leaks. Three patients (4.3%) were readmitted in ≤30 days. There were no 30-day mortalities. CONCLUSION: The challenges of colectomy for diverticulitis-associated fistulas can be mitigated using the hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery technique. We found a low conversion-to-open rate, falling below rates reported for laparoscopic colectomy. There were no cases of postoperative urine leak, suggesting that no intervention or omental coverage is a safe approach to fistula tract management.

Evaluation of the Rothman Index in Predicting Readmission after Colorectal Resection.

The Rothman Index (RI) is a real-time health indicator score that has been used to quantify readmission risk in several fields but has never been studied in gastrointestinal surgery. In this retrospective single-institution study, the association between RI scores and readmissions after unplanned colectomy or proctectomy was evaluated in 427 inpatients. Patient demographics and perioperative measures, including last RI, lowest RI, and increasing/decreasing RI score, were collected. In the selected cohort, 12.4% of patients were readmitted within 30 days of their initial discharge. Last RI, lowest RI, decreasing RI, and increasing RI scores remained significant after controlling for covariates in separate multivariate regression analyses. The last RI score at the time of discharge was found to be the most strongly associated with 30-day readmission risk following colorectal resection. These findings support the RI as a potential tool in the inpatient management of postoperative patients to identify those at high risk of readmission.

Anorectal Emergencies.

Anorectal emergencies are rare presentations of common anorectal disorders, and surgeons are often called on to assist in their diagnosis and management. Although most patients presenting with anorectal emergencies can be managed nonoperatively or with a bedside procedure, surgeons must also be able to identify surgical anorectal emergencies, such as gangrenous rectal prolapse. This article provides a review of pertinent anatomy; examination techniques; and workup, diagnosis, and management of common anorectal emergencies including thrombosed hemorrhoids, incarcerated hemorrhoids, anal fissure, anorectal abscess, rectal prolapse, and pilonidal abscess and unique situations including rectal foreign body and anorectal sexually transmitted infections.

Going for Broke: The Impact of Cost of Living on Surgery Resident Stipend Value.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide a direct comparison of first-year general surgery resident stipends across states and major cities, using the Cost-of-Living Index (COLI) to determine stipend value. BACKGROUND: Financial challenges are among residents' top sources of stress, and this may be exacerbated in areas with high costs of living. A 2021 survey found that the mean first-year medical resident stipend increased by 0.6%, or $358, from 2020 to 2021, and only 33% of institutions used cost-of-living to determine annual resident stipend adjustments. METHODS: An American Medical Association database was used to identify accredited general surgery residency programs. The 2021-2022 stipend data for first-year general surgery positions were obtained, then data were grouped by state and major city and averaged. Major cities were defined as cities with >4 programs.A direct comparison of stipends was performed using the COLI. RESULTS: Stipend data were available for 337 of 346 general surgery programs. The national average first-year residency stipend was $60,064±$4233. The average COLI-adjusted stipend was $57,090±$5742, with a value loss of -$3493, or 5%.For major cities, the average stipend was $63,383±$4524, and the average COLI-adjusted stipend was $46,929±$8383, with an average value loss of -$16,454, or 26%. CONCLUSIONS: The financial burdens that residents face cannot be overlooked, and the cost of living has a meaningful impact on resident stipend value. The current Graduate Medical Education compensation structure limits federal and institutional capacity to adjust for the cost of living and creates an insulated market in which residents are under-compensated.

Predicting Neoadjuvant Treatment Response in Rectal Cancer Using Machine Learning: Evaluation of MRI-Based Radiomic and Clinical Models.

BACKGROUND: Radiomics is an approach to medical imaging that quantifies the features normally translated into visual display. While both radiomic and clinical markers have shown promise in predicting response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT) for rectal cancer, the interrelationship is not yet clear. METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution study of patients treated with nCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer was performed. Clinical and radiomic features were extracted from electronic medical record and pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging, respectively. Machine learning models were created and assessed for complete response and positive treatment effect using the area under the receiver operating curves. RESULTS: Of 131 rectal cancer patients evaluated, 68 (51.9%) were identified to have a positive treatment effect and 35 (26.7%) had a complete response. On univariate analysis, clinical T-stage (OR 0.46, p = 0.02), lymphovascular/perineural invasion (OR 0.11, p = 0.03), and statin use (OR 2.45, p = 0.049) were associated with a complete response. Clinical T-stage (OR 0.37, p = 0.01), lymphovascular/perineural invasion (OR 0.16, p = 0.001), and abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen level (OR 0.28, p = 0.002) were significantly associated with a positive treatment effect. The clinical model was the strongest individual predictor of both positive treatment effect (AUC = 0.64) and complete response (AUC = 0.69). The predictive ability of a positive treatment effect increased by adding tumor and mesorectal radiomic features to the clinical model (AUC = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a combined model with both clinical and radiomic features resulted in the strongest predictive capability. With the eventual goal of tailoring treatment to the individual, both clinical and radiologic markers offer insight into identifying patients likely to respond favorably to nCRT.

Saddle block anesthetic technique for benign outpatient anorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Current American Society of Colorectal Surgery Clinical Practice Guidelines for Ambulatory Anorectal Surgery endorse use of monitored anesthesia care, general anesthesia, or spinal anesthesia based on physician and patient preference. Although several studies support the use of monitored anesthesia care over general anesthesia, the literature regarding spinal anesthesia is limited and heterogenous due to small sample sizes and disparate spinal anesthesia techniques. Saddle block anesthesia is a form of spinal anesthesia that localizes to the lowermost sacral spinal segments allowing for preservation of lower extremity motor function and faster recovery. We accrued one of the largest reported cohort of anorectal procedures using saddle block anesthesia, as such, we sought to evaluate our institutional 12-year experience. METHODS: Patients who underwent a benign anorectal procedure at our outpatient surgery center between July 2008-2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, surgical factors, perioperative times, and adverse events were collected from the electronic medical records. Saddle block anesthesia was generally performed in the preoperative area using a spinal needle (25-27 gauge) and a single injection technique of a 1:1 ratio local anesthetic mixed with 10% dextrose solution. Between 2.5-5 mg of hyperbaric anesthetic was injected intrathecally in the sitting position and the patient remained upright for 3-10 minutes. This technique of saddle block anesthesia provides analgesia for approximately 1-3 hours. RESULTS: In the study, 859 saddle block anesthesia patients were identified, with a mean age of 44.6 years and American Society of Anesthesia score of 1.9; 609 (70.9%) were male. Surgical indications included lesion removal (27.1%), anal fistula (25.8%), hemorrhoidectomy (24.7%), pilonidal disease (6.3%), anal fissure (5.8%), and a combination of prior (10.2%). Prone jackknife positioning was used in 91.6% of procedures. Saddle block anesthesia most often was performed with bupivacaine (48.9%) or ropivacaine (41.7%). The median procedural saddle block anesthesia time was 11 minutes, surgery time was 17 minutes, anesthesia time was 42 minutes, and recovery time was 91 minutes. Patients spent a median of 3 hours and 53 minutes in the facility. Adverse events included urinary retention (1.9%), conversion to general anesthesia (1.8%), spinal headache (1.5%), hemodynamic instability (0.9%), and injection site reaction (0.3%). CONCLUSION: Demonstrated using the largest known cohort of anorectal patients with saddle block anesthesia, saddle block anesthesia provides an effective method of analgesia to avoid general anesthesia with a low rate of adverse events.

Impact of Auricular Neurostimulation in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery with an Enhanced Recovery Protocol: A Pilot Randomized, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Narcotics are the cornerstone of postoperative pain control, but the opioid epidemic and the negative physiological and psychological effects of narcotics implore physicians to utilize nonpharmacological methods of pain control. OBJECTIVE: This pilot study investigated a novel neurostimulation device for postoperative analgesia. We hypothesized that active neurostimulation would decrease postoperative narcotic requirements. DESIGN: This was a placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial. SETTINGS: This trial was conducted at an academic medical center and a Veterans Affairs hospital. PATIENTS: This trial included adult patients who underwent elective bowel resection between December 2016 and April 2018. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive an active or inactive (sham) device, which was applied to the right ear before surgery and continued for 5 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was total opioid consumption. The secondary outcomes included pain, nausea, anxiety, return of bowel function, complications, 30-day readmissions, and opioid consumption at 2 weeks and 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients participated and 5 withdrew; 52 patients were included in the analysis. Twenty-eight patients received an active device and 24 received an inactive device. There was no difference in total narcotic consumption between active and inactive devices (90.79 ± 54.93 vs 90.30 ± 43.03 oral morphine equivalents/day). Subgroup analyses demonstrated a benefit for patients after open surgery (p = 0.0278). When patients were stratified by decade, those aged 60 to 70 and >70 years derived a benefit from active devices in comparison with those aged 30 to 40, 40 to 50, and 50 to 60 years old (p = 0.01092). No serious adverse events were related to this study. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by the small sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in opioid use was found with auricular neurostimulation. However, this pilot study suggests that older patients and those with larger abdominal incisions may benefit from auricular neurostimulation. Further investigation in these high-risk patients is warranted. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B452.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02892513. IMPACTO DE LA NEUROESTIMULACIN AURICULAR EN PACIENTES SOMETIDOS A CIRUGA COLORRECTAL CON UN PROTOCOLO DE RECUPERACIN MEJORADA UN ENSAYO PILOTO ALEATORIZADO Y CONTROLADO: ANTECEDENTES:Los narcóticos son la piedra angular del control del dolor postoperatorio, pero la epidemia de opioides y los efectos fisiológicos y psicológicos negativos de los narcóticos incentivan a los médicos a que utilicen métodos no farmacológicos de control del dolor.OBJETIVO:Este estudio piloto investigó un nuevo dispositivo de neuroestimulación para analgesia postoperatoria. Hipotetizamos que la neuroestimulación activa disminuiría los requerimientos narcóticos postoperatorios.DISEÑO:Este fue un ensayo doble ciego controlado con placebo.ESCENARIO:Esto se llevó a cabo en un centro médico académico y en un hospital de Asuntos de Veteranos (Veterans Affairs hospital).PACIENTES:Este ensayo incluyó pacientes adultos que se sometieron a resección intestinal electiva entre diciembre de 2016 y abril de 2018.INTERVENCIONES:Los pacientes fueron asignados al azar para recibir un dispositivo activo o inactivo (falso), que se aplicó al oído derecho antes de la cirugía y se mantuvo durante 5 días.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado primario fue el consumo total de opioides; los resultados secundarios incluyeron dolor, náusea, ansiedad, retorno de la función intestinal, complicaciones, reingresos a 30 días y consumo de opioides a 2 semanas y a 30 días.RESULTADOS:Participaron un total de 57 pacientes y 5 se retiraron; Se incluyeron 52 pacientes en el análisis. Veintiocho pacientes recibieron un dispositivo activo y 24 recibieron un dispositivo inactivo. No hubo diferencias en el consumo total de narcóticos entre los dispositivos activos e inactivos (90.79 ± 54.93 vs 90.30 ± 43.03 equivalentes de morfina oral [OME] / día). Los análisis de subgrupos demostraron un beneficio para los pacientes después de cirugía abierta (p = 0.0278). Cuando los pacientes se estratificaron por década, aquellos de 60-70 y > 70 años obtuvieron un beneficio de los dispositivos activos en comparación con los de 30-40, 40-50 y 50-60 años (p = 0.01092). No hubo eventos adversos graves relacionados con este estudio.LIMITACIONES:Este estudio estuvo limitado por los pequeños tamaños de muestra.CONCLUSIONES:No se encontró diferencia en el uso de opioides con la neuroestimulación auricular. Sin embargo, este estudio piloto sugiere que los pacientes mayores y aquellos con incisiones abdominales más grandes pueden beneficiarse de la neuroestimulación auricular. Está justificada la investigación adicional en estos pacientes de alto riesgo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B452. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco).

Early stage colon cancer: Current treatment standards, evolving paradigms, and future directions.

Colon cancer continues to be one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity throughout the world despite the availability of reliable screening tools and effective therapies. The majority of patients with colon cancer are diagnosed at an early stage (stages I to III), which provides an opportunity for cure. The current treatment paradigm of early stage colon cancer consists of surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in a select group of patients, which is directed at the eradication of minimal residual disease to achieve a cure. Surgery alone is curative for the vast majority of colon cancer patients. Currently, surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy can achieve long term survival in about two-thirds of colon cancer patients with nodal involvement. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended for all patients with stage III colon cancer, while the benefit in stage II patients is not unequivocally established despite several large clinical trials. Contemporary research in early stage colon cancer is focused on minimally invasive surgical techniques, strategies to limit treatment-related toxicities, precise patient selection for adjuvant therapy, utilization of molecular and clinicopathologic information to personalize therapy and exploration of new therapies exploiting the evolving knowledge of tumor biology. In this review, we will discuss the current standard treatment, evolving treatment paradigms, and the emerging biomarkers, that will likely help improve patient selection and personalization of therapy leading to superior outcomes.

Racial and Ethnic Variation Associated With Human Papillomavirus Genotype in Anal Dysplasia.

BACKGROUND: Human Papillomavirus (HPV) is known to cause dysplasia and cancer. In cervical disease, there are documented differences in prevalence of HPV genotypes among racial/ethnic groups. Little is known about prevalence of HPV genotypes in anal dysplasia. This study aimed to evaluate association between HPV genotypes and race/ethnicity in a racially heterogenous population with anal dysplasia. METHODS: This was a single-institution retrospective review of patients treated for anal dysplasia between 2008 and 2019. HPV genotype, obtained via anal swab testing, was recorded as HPV 16, HPV 18, or other non-16/18 high-risk (HR) HPV genotypes. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between patient factors and HPV genotype. RESULTS: Of 517 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 46.8% identified as White, 37.1% as Black, 13.2% as Hispanic, and 2.9% as other/unknown. Race/ethnicity (P = 0.016) and sex (P < 0.001) were significantly associated with differences in prevalence of HPV genotypes. Black (odds ratio 1.56, 95% confidence interval 1.00-2.44) and male (odds ratio 2.35, 95% confidence interval 1.42-3.92) patients were significantly more likely to have non-16/18 HR HPV genotypes. CONCLUSIONS: In a racially and socioeconomically diverse cohort of patients with anal dysplasia, Black race and male sex were associated with increased likelihood of infection with a non-16/18 HR HPV genotype. Many of these genotypes are not covered by currently available vaccines. Further study is warranted to evaluate anal HPV genotypes in a larger cohort, as this may have important implications in HPV vaccination and anal dysplasia screening efforts.

Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Proctectomy Outcomes: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The robotic platform is increasingly used in colorectal surgery. Recent upgrades in the robotic platform and introduction of proctectomy-specific reports from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) warrant updated evaluation of minimally invasive proctectomy outcomes. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes in robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy using ACS-NSQIP data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ACS-NSQIP data set was used to identify adult patients undergoing elective robotic and laparoscopic proctectomy in 2016 and 2017. Demographics, preoperative and intraoperative data, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Propensity-weighted analysis was used to estimate the effect of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery on outcomes. RESULTS: Of 3845 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 2681 (70%) underwent a laparoscopic approach and 1164 (30%) underwent a robotic approach. Patients undergoing a robotic procedure were more likely to be older, have higher American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, low rectal tumors, and have undergone chemotherapy or radiation before surgery. After propensity adjustment, a robotic approach was associated with a decrease in conversion to open operation (estimated mean difference, -6.7%; P < 0.01), length of stay (-0.6 d; P = 0.01), occurrence of postoperative ileus (-3.7%; P = 0.01), and an increase in operative time (20.3 min; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Using data from a national cohort, we found that compared with laparoscopy, robotic proctectomy is associated with decreased conversion to open operation, longer operation time, decreased length of stay, and decreased postoperative ileus. Our study identified several advantages to a robotic approach; however, further work is needed to assess cost-effectiveness in conjunction with clinical outcomes.

Retroileal anastomosis in hand-assisted laparoscopic left colectomy: experience at a single institution.

BACKGROUND: Left hemicolectomy and complicated sigmoid colectomy require an anastomosis between the transverse colon and rectum. Generous mobilization will typically allow the colon to reach to the rectum. However, despite full mobilization of the splenic flexure and extensive work on the mesentery, there are cases in which reach to the pelvis is still an issue. Retroileal routing of the colon is one technique for overcoming such a reach problem and achieving a tension-free anastomosis. Performing retroileal routing using laparoscopic techniques has been reported rarely, and to date, there are no data on this technique when performed in a hand-assisted laparoscopic fashion. This study aimed to describe the feasibility of doing a retroileal routing using a hand-assisted laparoscopic technique. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent a colon or rectal resection, either open or laparoscopic, with a pelvic anastomosis, by a single colorectal surgeon at an academic institution between 2008 and 2015 with a focus on the immediate and long-term postoperative complications, estimated blood loss, and operating room time for patients having an operation that included retroileal routing for construction of a colorectal anastomosis. RESULTS: A total of 340 patients fit inclusion criteria and of these, 13 underwent hand-assisted laparoscopic procedures with retroileal routing of the proximal colon to the colorectal anastomosis. Postoperative morbidity included intubation for CO2 retention in one patient and a RLL effusion in another patient; there were no anastomotic leaks. Long-term morbidities included two ventral hernias at 2 years postoperatively. Mean operating room time was 208 min. There were no 30- or 90-day mortalities. CONCLUSIONS: Hand-assisted laparoscopic retroileal routing is a feasible and safe technique in accomplishing a tension-free colorectal anastomosis when proximal colon length makes standard routing of the colon to the rectum an issue.

Use of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Current treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer includes neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. With neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NC), both chemoradiation and chemotherapy are given in the neoadjuvant setting. This study aims to assess patterns of NC utilization and differences in treatment response compared with standard treatment at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients treated for stage II-III rectal cancer at our institution between 2008 and 2018, examining patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and treatment modality. The primary outcome of interest was complete response (CR) to treatment, including both pathologic and clinical CR. RESULTS: Of 184 patients, 134 (72.8%) received standard therapy, and 50 (27.2%) received NC. In the standard treatment group, 70.1% were node positive, and 9.0% had T4-disease, compared with 92.0% and 26.0% in the NC group, respectively (both P < 0.01). NC utilization increased over time, with 3.4% of patients receiving NC between 2008 and 2012, compared with 48.5% in 2013-2018 (P < 0.01). CR was achieved in 19.4% versus 34.0% (P < 0.01) of patients in standard versus NC groups. With multivariate analysis, NC (odds ratio = 3.02 [95% confidence interval 1.37-6.67], P = 0.01) was associated with increased likelihood of achieving CR, whereas higher T-stage was associated with decreased likelihood of CR (for cT4, odds ratio = 0.06 [95% confidence interval 0.01-0.56], P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Use of NC was increasingly used at our institution from 2008 to 2018. Patients who received NC achieved higher rates of CR compared with those undergoing standard therapy, despite having more advanced disease. These data support trends from other institutions and provides rationale for further study regarding use of NC for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Alvimopan is associated with decreased length of stay for both open and laparoscopic segmental colectomy.

BACKGROUND: Alvimopan has been shown to reduce length of stay after bowel resection. Use remains variable among institutions due to cost and efficacy concerns in laparoscopic surgery. Additionally, alvimopan's effects have not been isolated from other medications within enhanced recovery protocols. The aim of this study was to distinguish the relationship between alvimopan use, length of stay, and cost in both open and laparoscopic segmental colectomies. METHODS: The Vizient dataset was queried to identify patients undergoing open and laparoscopic colectomies from 2015 to 2017. Patient demographics and treatment details were collected. Primary outcomes of interest included duration of stay and total direct costs. RESULTS: In the study, 12,727 patients met inclusion criteria and 3,358 (26.4%) received alvimopan. For both open and laparoscopic groups, alvimopan was associated with decreased length of stay in unadjusted (4.0 vs 6.0 days, P < .01 and 3.0 vs 4.0 days, P < .01, respectively) and adjusted analysis (effect ratio 0.79, P < .01 and 0.85, P < .01, respectively). Alvimopan was associated with a 7% decrease in direct cost after adjustment (effect ratio 0.93, P = .04), with no cost difference in laparoscopic procedures (effect ratio 0.99, P = .71). CONCLUSION: Alvimopan use is associated with decreased length of stay for both open and laparoscopic colon resections, decreased cost in open procedures, and no cost difference for laparoscopic procedures.

Race Is Associated With Burden of Anal Condyloma and Need for Operative Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus is a common sexually transmitted infection that may affect the oropharynx, genitalia, or anus. Some strains of this virus may cause bulky growths around the anus known as giant anal condylomas. These can become large, disfiguring, and may cause bleeding, as well as difficulty with defecation and hygiene. Surgical management is usually necessary for large condylomas, whereas office-based procedures are common for smaller lesions. It is unclear why some develop large anal margin tumors, whereas others develop limited disease. The aim of the present study was to evaluate for risk factors that may play a role in the development of extensive disease warranting operative management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients seen within the Anal Dysplasia Clinic at the Medical College of Wisconsin was undertaken. Clinic encounters for patients with anogenital condyloma were abstracted for demographic information, operative interventions, Human Immunodeficiency Virus status, and smoking history to determine risk factors that predicted operative intervention for giant anal condylomas. RESULTS: A total of 239 patients met inclusion criteria; 211 (88.3%) were male and 28 (11.7%) were female. Racial makeup of the cohort included 49% Caucasian, 38.9% African-American, 9.2% Hispanic, and 2.9% were identified as another ethnicity. One hundred forty-three patients (60.1%) were current or past smokers. One hundred ninety-eight (82.8%) patients tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), whereas 41 (17.2%) were negative. Multiple linear regression identified only African-American race as predictive of greater disease burden. CONCLUSIONS: African-American race was associated with increased size of anal condyloma. As the size of anal condylomas increase, management shifts from topical treatments to operative intervention. This is the first study to correlate race with burden of disease in the general population.

The impact of intravenous acetaminophen on pain after abdominal surgery: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pain after surgery is commonly controlled with opioid pain medications. A multi-modal pain strategy that involves acetaminophen may help minimize the negative consequences of opioids, such as ileus, respiratory depression, and addictive potential. There are limited data on the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen in comparison with other nonopioid pain medications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four databases were queried for the keywords "acetaminophen," "intravenous," and "postoperative". Prospective studies of adult patients receiving at least 24 h of IV acetaminophen after intraabdominal surgery were analyzed for 12- and 24-h pain scores and 24-h narcotic consumption. A random effects model was performed using mean differences and 95% confidence intervals to assess the effect of IV acetaminophen on outcomes. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ2 and the I2 statistics. RESULTS: Seventeen articles were identified that complied with inclusion and exclusion criteria. There was no significant difference in 24-h pain scores between IV acetaminophen and any other comparator, or in secondary endpoints of 12-h pain scores and 24-h narcotic consumption. Subgroup analysis demonstrated significant benefit for IV acetaminophen in open surgeries for decreased 24-h narcotic consumption. When analyzing individual medications, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs demonstrated the largest reduction in 24-h narcotic consumption. Data were of moderate quality and demonstrated significant heterogeneity between studies. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of significant differences in primary endpoints may be explained by the heterogeneous, moderate-quality data. However, subgroup analyses suggested IV acetaminophen may be advantageous in open surgeries, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may lower the 24-h narcotic requirement.

Elevated Venous Thromboembolism Risk Following Colectomy for IBD Is Equal to Those for Colorectal Cancer for Ninety Days After Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism is high in patients with colon cancer and IBD. Although The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons suggests posthospital prophylaxis after surgery in patients with colon cancer, there are no such recommendations for patients with IBD. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to analyze the incidence and risk factors for postoperative venous thromboembolism. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review using the Explorys platform. SETTINGS: Aggregated electronic medical records from 26 major health care systems across the United States from 1999 to 2017 were used for this study. PATIENTS: Patients who underwent colon surgery were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients were followed up to 90 days postoperatively for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: A total of 75,620 patients underwent colon resections, including 32,020 patients with colon cancer, 9850 patients with IBD, and 33,750 patients with diverticulitis. The 30-day incidence of venous thromboembolism was higher in patients with cancer and IBD than in patients with diverticulitis (2.9%, 3.1%, and 2.4%, p < 0.001 for both comparisons). The 30-day incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with ulcerative colitis is greater than in patients with Crohn's disease (4.1% vs 2.1%, p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism increased from 1.2% at 7 days after surgery to 4.3% at 90 days after surgery in patients with cancer, and from 1.3% to 4.3% in patients with IBD. In multivariable analysis, increase in the risk of venous thromboembolism was associated with cancer diagnosis, IBD diagnosis, age ≥60, smoking, and obesity. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective nature and by the use of the aggregated electronic database, which is based on charted codes and contains only limited collateral clinical data. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the elevated and sustained risk of postoperative thromboembolism, patients with IBD, especially ulcerative colitis, might benefit from extended thromboembolism prophylaxis similar to that of patients with colon cancer. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A544.