Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Radiol ; 27(8): 3217-3225, 2017 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28108837

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate the effects of adding adjunct mechanical imaging to mammography breast screening. We hypothesized that mechanical imaging could detect increased local pressure caused by both malignant and benign breast lesions and that a pressure threshold for malignancy could be established. The impact of this on breast screening was investigated with regard to reductions in recall and biopsy rates. METHODS: 155 women recalled from breast screening were included in the study, which was approved by the regional ethical review board (dnr 2013/620). Mechanical imaging readings were acquired of the symptomatic breast. The relative mean pressure on the suspicious area (RMPA) was defined and a threshold for malignancy was established. RESULTS: Biopsy-proven invasive cancers had a median RMPA of 3.0 (interquartile range (IQR) = 3.7), significantly different from biopsy-proven benign at 1.3 (IQR = 1.0) and non-biopsied cases at 1.0 (IQR = 1.3) (P < 0.001). The lowest RMPA for invasive cancer was 1.4, with 23 biopsy-proven benign and 33 non-biopsied cases being below this limit. Had these women not been recalled, recall rates would have been reduced by 36% and biopsy rates by 32%. CONCLUSIONS: If implemented in a screening situation, this may substantially lower the number of false positives. KEY POINTS: • Mechanical imaging is used as an adjunct to mammography in breast screening. • A threshold pressure can be established for malignant breast cancer. • Recalls and biopsies can be substantially reduced.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad/métodos , Mamografía/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Presión , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Umbral Sensorial
2.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 169(1-4): 386-91, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26842713

RESUMEN

In order to achieve optimal diagnostic performance in breast tomosynthesis (BT) imaging, the parameters of the imaging chain should be evaluated. For the purpose of such evaluations, a simulation procedure based on the Monte Carlo code system Penelope and the geometry of a Siemens BT system has been developed to generate BT projection images. In this work, the simulation procedure is validated by comparing contrast and sharpness in simulated images with contrast and sharpness in real images acquired with the BT system. The results of the study showed a good agreement of sharpness in real and simulated reconstructed image planes, but the contrast was shown to be higher in the simulated compared with the real projection images. The developed simulation procedure could be used to generate BT images, but it is of interest to further investigate how the procedure could be modified to generate more realistic image noise and contrast.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Mamografía/métodos , Modelos Estadísticos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Simulación por Computador , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Biológicos , Método de Montecarlo , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...