Report of the international conference on manufacturing and testing of pluripotent stem cells.

Sessions included an overview of past cell therapy (CT) conferences sponsored by the International Alliance for Biological Standardization (IABS). The sessions highlighted challenges in the field of human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) and also addressed specific points on manufacturing, bioanalytics and comparability, tumorigenicity testing, storage, and shipping. Panel discussions complemented the presentations. The conference concluded that a range of new standardization groups is emerging that could help the field, but ways must be found to ensure that these efforts are coordinated. In addition, there are opportunities for regulatory convergence starting with a gap analysis of existing guidelines to determine what might be missing and what issues might be creating divergence. More specific global regulatory guidance, preferably from WHO, would be welcome. IABS and the California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM) will explore with stakeholders the development of a practical and innovative road map to support early CT product (CTP) developers.

Scientific considerations for the regulatory evaluation of cell therapy products.

Cell therapy involves the administration of a viable somatic cell preparation to a patient for the treatment of a disease or traumatic damage. Because cell therapies are complex and very different from traditional biological products, they present significant challenges for regulatory authorities, manufacturers, developers, health care providers, and patients involved in their application. Like other emerging areas of biomedical research and development, there are many issues where regulatory views and decisions among countries and regions may differ due to minimal scientific evidence to support safety and efficacy, and lack of experience with these novel treatments. A brief overview of the current regulatory landscape for cell-based therapies is presented, and the need for a global effort to develop a set of common principles that may serve to facilitate the regulatory evaluation and market availability of these products is identified. In addition, a number of elements that could form a core consensus package of requirements for evaluating human cell therapy products is presented in the supplemental material which should be read in conjunction with the manuscript.

Analysis of the in vivo proliferative capacity of a whole cell cancer vaccine.

A polyvalent therapeutic cancer cell vaccine containing three viable, irradiated, replication-incompetent melanoma cell lines (Canvaxin) was administered to over 2500 patients in various clinical studies. This study examines the fate of Canvaxin cells in 16 patients with Stage II, III or IV melanoma, with special attention on assessing the capacity of the vaccine cells to replicate. The survival time and the potential proliferative capacity of irradiated Canvaxin cells in humans was studied by histologic examination of biopsies of injection sites over a two-week period. The overall results show that the vaccine cell mitotic index in skin biopsies (0.12%) was approximately 6 times lower than the control value (0.71%). Similarly, there was an overall trend toward a decrease in mitotic figures during the two week observation periods. Also, there was a trend towards a decrease in the number of vaccine cells and mitotic figures with increasing cycles. The data indicate that Canvaxin cells do not proliferate after intra-dermal injection, and that cells typically associated with an immune response are present at the inoculation sites.

Report of the international conference on regulatory endeavors towards the sound development of human cell therapy products.

The regulation of human cell therapy products is a key factor in their development and use to treat human diseases. In that regard, there is a recognized need for a global effort to develop a set of common principles that may serve to facilitate a convergence of regulatory approaches to ensure the smooth and efficient evaluation of products. This conference, with experts from regulatory agencies, industry, and academia, contributed to the process of developing such a document. Elements that could form a minimum consensus package of requirements for evaluating human cell therapy products were the overall focus of the conference. The important regulatory considerations that are unique to human cell therapy products were highlighted. Sessions addressed specific points that are different from those of traditional biological/biotechnological protein products. Panel discussions complemented the presentations. The conference concluded that most of the current regulatory framework is appropriate for cell therapy, but there are some areas where the application of the requirements for traditional biologicals is inappropriate. In addition, it was agreed that there is a need for international consensus on core regulatory elements, and that one of the major international organizations should take the lead in formulating such a consensus document.

Adventitious agents in viral vaccines: lessons learned from 4 case studies.

Since the earliest days of biological product manufacture, there have been a number of instances where laboratory studies provided evidence for the presence of adventitious agents in a marketed product. Lessons learned from such events can be used to strengthen regulatory preparedness for the future. We have therefore selected four instances where an adventitious agent, or a signal suggesting the presence of an agent, was found in a viral vaccine, and have developed a case study for each. The four cases are: a) SV40 in polio vaccines; b) bacteriophage in measles and polio vaccines; c) reverse transcriptase in measles and mumps vaccines; and d) porcine circovirus and porcine circovirus DNA sequences in rotavirus vaccines. The lessons learned from each event are discussed. Based in part on those experiences, certain scientific principles have been identified by WHO that should be considered in regulatory risk evaluation if an adventitious agent is found in a marketed vaccine in the future.

The WHO network of collaborating centres on standardization and regulatory evaluation of vaccines.

WHO Collaborating Centres (CCs) form part of an international collaborative network set up by WHO in support of its mandated programme at the country, intercountry, regional, interregional and global levels, as appropriate. As part of its mandate in the area of biologicals, WHO has broadened the scope of its work and has expanded the range of activities devoted to the establishment of international standards for vaccines. In line with global immunization goals, the need for standards for evaluation of quality, safety and efficacy of new vaccines, as well as those that have been in use for a long time, has significantly increased. Furthermore, complex issues related to new production methodologies, more sophisticated techniques for characterization and laboratory testing, and for nonclinical and clinical evaluation of vaccines have raised a number of regulatory challenges for WHO when requested to assist its Member States. In this context, CCs in the area of standardization of vaccines and biotherapeutics (excluding blood products) have provided technical assistance and have broadened the scope of their work over time. In the area of standardization and regulatory evaluation of vaccines, WHO currently has six CCs as well as one candidate centre for which the designation process has been initiated and a further three candidate centres with great potential. The purpose of the meeting held on 24-26 April 2012 was to improve understanding of WHO's priorities in setting standards, to facilitate their implementation, and to increase transparency of the roles and responsibilities of CCs. The meeting was also an excellent opportunity to explore possibilities for improving collaboration between WHO and CCs, as well as among CCs themselves by working as a CC network. All CCs expressed a wish for increased interaction, information-sharing, collaboration and other ways of working together that may lead to cross-fertilization between the CCs. Synergy was recognized as a significant mechanism for leveraging existing resources in responding to global public health challenges and in addressing WHO's priorities. Agreement was reached for operating as a network of CCs.

Adventitious agents, new technology, and risk assessment, 19-20 May 2011, Baltimore, MD.

In May 2011, the International Alliance for Biological Standardization, with the cooperation of WHO, FDA, and NIAID, organized a conference on adventitious agents that might be found in biological products using new technology (http://www.iabs.org/index.php/past-conference-reports/116-baltimore-2011-slides). The implications of such findings on risk assessment also were considered. Topics that were addressed included: a) current routine testing--what are we doing now?; b) recent advances in testing--what tests are being explored/applied?; c) examples of finding agents with "new" techniques; and d) risk assessment, including recent WHO activities. A draft algorithm for risk assessment was discussed in terms of its applicability to a variety of potential new agents and the possibilities for improving it.

Animal cell substrates: back to the future.

The acceptability of animal cell substrates for the manufacture of biological products, especially vaccines, has been an issue in one form or another since the development of cell cultures in the 1950s. Here the major cell substrate events of the past 50 years are briefly reviewed, and recent progress in resolving longstanding issues is highlighted.

An overview of animal cell substrates for biological products.

The issue of which cells to use as substrates for the production of biological products, and especially vaccines, has been with us in one form or another ever since the development of cell cultures in the 1950s. The major cell substrate events that occurred over the past 50 years are reviewed briefly. Although numerous conferences were held during that period, incomplete resolution of some cell substrate issues has remained. Specifically, the potential oncogenicity of cellular DNA derived from continuous cell lines, and the tests that are used to rule out the presence of adventitious agents have been recognized as areas that could benefit greatly from studies using state-of-the-art techniques. A collaborative effort involving WHO, NIAID, and IABS resulted from consensus recommendations of a 2004 conference, and the prospects for revised guidance in the near future on the characterization and use of animal cell substrates are bright.

Potency assays for therapeutic live whole cell cancer vaccines.

Therapeutic cancer vaccines are under development with the goal of enhancing the body's immune response to cancer cells sufficient to arrest cancer cell growth. Among the various approaches being used are those based on whole tumor cells. Developing a suitable measure of the potency of such vaccines presents a significant challenge because neither cellular associated markers nor in vivo biological responses that are correlated with efficacy have been identified; nevertheless, manufacturers and regulatory agencies will need to develop methods to evaluate these products. At this moment, the challenge for manufacturers who are developing whole cell vaccines is to demonstrate batch-to-batch consistency for the vaccine used in clinical studies and to show that comparable vaccine batches have the same capacity to achieve an acceptable level of biological activity that may be related to efficacy. This is particularly challenging in that animal models to test that activity do not exist and direct serological or immunological correlates of clinical protection are not available because protection has not yet been established in clinical trials. In the absence of well-defined biological markers and tests for manufacturing consistency, manufacturers and regulators will need to rely heavily on a highly reproducible manufacturing process--the consistency of the process therefore becomes critical. In developing regulatory approaches to whole cell cancer vaccines, the experience from the field of infectious disease vaccines should be examined for general guidance. A framework that draws heavily on the field of infectious disease vaccines is presented and suggests that at this point in the development of this new class of products, it is reasonable to develop data on quantitative antigen expression as a measure of potency with the expectation that when clinical efficacy has been established it will confirm the appropriateness of this approach. But because this will not be known until the end of a pivotal trial, a bioassay should be considered and run in parallel. Several examples of bioassays are presented along with their advantages and disadvantages. The final selection of a potency assay for use in lot release of a commercializable therapeutic whole cell vaccine ultimately will depend on the totality of the data available at the time of approval by regulatory agencies. Based on information currently available, it is likely that quantitative antigen expression or a bioassay could be used to measure potency. If both are determined to be acceptable, the use of quantitative antigen expression could be considered for routine lot release, while the bioassay could be reserved for use as one of the elements in establishing comparability when manufacturing changes are being considered after approval.