Topiramate Monotherapy for Civilian Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Controlled Pilot Study.

Objective: To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of topiramate for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in civilians.Methods: This 12-week double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study enrolled 72 outpatients (aged 19-64 years) with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of non-combat-related PTSD and a score ≥ 50 on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS). The primary efficacy endpoint, percent change in total CAPS score, and secondary efficacy measures were assessed by analysis of covariance. Safety assessments included monitoring of vital signs, physical examinations, clinical laboratory parameters, electrocardiograms, and adverse events (AEs). The study was conducted from October 2001 to March 2004.Results: The intent-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 68; mean age = 35 years; 87% women; 74% White) showed greater percent reduction in total CAPS scores with topiramate versus placebo (39.5% vs 29.5%), but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .31). Similarly, higher reductions with topiramate versus placebo were seen in the CAPS subscale scores for symptoms of reexperiencing (43.6% vs 34.8%), avoidance/numbing (38.3% vs 30.6%), and hyperarousal (36.6% vs 21.4%). However, these differences were not statistically significant. Six patients in the topiramate arm had a final CAPS score < 20, whereas only 2 in the placebo arm achieved the result (P = .075). The median final topiramate daily dose was 100 mg/d (range, 25-400 mg/d), and mean ± SD treatment duration was 55 ± 32 days, showing the tolerability of the medication. In topiramate-treated patients, treatment-emergent AEs included paresthesia, headache, fatigue, and insomnia; treatment-limiting AEs included influenza-like symptoms, agitation, cognitive problems not otherwise specified, and somnolence. However, a higher rate of AE-related discontinuation was seen in the placebo group than in the treatment group (26% vs 18%).Conclusions: In this 12-week civilian PTSD study, topiramate improved the primary and secondary outcome measures at a higher rate than did placebo, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Further adequately powered studies may be warranted.Trial Registration: Clinical Trials.gov identifier: NCT00208130.Prim Care Companion CNS Disord 2023;25(5):23m03555. Author affiliations are listed at the end of this article.

Methylphenidate for Apathy in Community-Dwelling Older Veterans With Mild Alzheimer's Disease: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: Apathy is a common behavioral problem in Alzheimer's disease. Apathy has profound consequences, such as functional impairment, higher service utilization, higher caregiver burden, and increased mortality. The authors' objective was to study the effects of methylphenidate on apathy in Alzheimer's disease. METHOD: A 12-week, prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (methylphenidate versus placebo) was conducted in community-dwelling veterans (N=60) with mild Alzheimer's disease. The primary outcome for apathy (Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinician) and secondary outcomes for cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination, Modified Mini-Mental State Examination), functional status (activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living), improvement and severity (Clinical Global Impressions Scale [CGI]), caregiver burden (Zarit Burden Scale), and depression (Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia) were measured at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Participants were all men (77 years old, SD=8). After adjusting for baseline, the methylphenidate group had significantly greater improvement in apathy than the placebo group at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. At 12 weeks, there was also greater improvement in cognition, functional status, caregiver burden, CGI scores, and depression in the methylphenidate group compared with the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Methylphenidate improved apathy in a group of community-dwelling veterans with mild Alzheimer's disease. Methylphenidate also improved cognition, functional status, caregiver burden, CGI scores, and depression.

Failed efficacy of ziprasidone in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder.

BACKGROUND: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a chronic anxiety disorder that is often difficult to treat. Patients suffering from PTSD often fail to respond to antidepressants and may have a high incidence of positive symptoms of psychosis, though antipsychotic medications have been minimally studied in this population. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the atypical antipsychotic ziprasidone (Geodon) on PTSD symptom clusters, as well as comorbid major depressive disorder. To our knowledge, this is the first completed randomized controlled trial investigating the potential efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone in patients with chronic PTSD. METHODS: We conducted a 9-week prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ziprasidone in 30 patients diagnosed with PTSD and comorbid depression. After screening and randomization, patients completed nine weekly study visits at which treatment safety and efficacy were evaluated. Primary measures of efficacy included total and subscale scores from the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), while the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and Treatment Outcome PTSD Scale (TOP-8) were implemented as secondary efficacy measures. RESULTS: We observed no significant effect of treatment on reduction of PTSD or depression symptoms from pre- to post-treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that ziprasidone treatment may not significantly improve symptoms of PTSD or comorbid depression, though further study is needed.

An Open-Label Trial of Memantine for Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.

Background. Studies using standard neuropsychological instruments have demonstrated memory deficits in patients with PTSD. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist memantine in veterans with PTSD and cognitive impairment. Methods. Twenty-six veterans with PTSD and cognitive impairment received 16 weeks of memantine in an open-label fashion. Cognition was assessed using the Spatial Span, Logical Memory I, and Letter-Number Sequencing subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale III and the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS). RBANS measures attention, language, visuospatial skills, and immediate and delayed memories. The Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A), Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), and Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) were secondary outcome measures. Results. There was a significant improvement in RBANS, both total and subscale scores (P < 0.05), over time. There was a reduction in total CAPS scores, avoidance/numbing symptoms (CAPS-C) and hyperarousal symptoms (CAPS-D), HAM-D, Q-LES-Q, and SDS scores. However, there was no reduction in reexperiencing (CAPS-B) and HAM-A scores. Memantine was well tolerated. Conclusions. Memantine improved cognitive symptoms, PTSD symptoms, and mood in veterans with PTSD. Randomized double-blind studies are needed to validate these preliminary observations.

Differential effects of inescapable stress on locus coeruleus GRK3, alpha2-adrenoceptor and CRF1 receptor levels in learned helpless and non-helpless rats: a potential link to stress resilience.

Exposure of rats to unpredictable, inescapable stress results in two distinct behaviors during subsequent escape testing. One behavior, suggestive of lack of stress resilience, is prolonged escape latency compared to non-stressed rats and is labeled learned helplessness (LH). The other behavior suggestive of stress resilience is normal escape latency and is labeled non-helpless (NH). This study examines the effects of unpredictable, inescapable tail-shock stress (TSS) on alpha(2)-adrenoceptor (α(2A)-AR) and corticotropin-releasing factor 1 receptor (CRF(1)-R) regulation as well as protein levels of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 3 (GRK3), GRK2, tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) plus carbonylated protein levels in locus coeruleus (LC), amygdala (AMG), cortex (COR) and striatum (STR). In NH rats, α(2A)-AR and CRF(1)-R were significantly down-regulated in LC after TSS. No changes in these receptor levels were observed in the LC of LH rats. GRK3, which phosphorylates receptors and thereby contributes to α(2A)-AR and CRF(1)-R down-regulation, was reduced in the LC of LH but not NH rats. GRK2 levels were unchanged. In AMG, GRK3 but not GRK2 levels were reduced in LH but not NH rats, and receptor regulation was impaired in LH rats. In STR, no changes in GRK3 or GRK2 levels were observed. Finally, protein carbonylation, an index of oxidative stress, was increased in the LC and AMG of LH but not NH rats. We suggest that reduced stress resilience after TSS may be related to oxidative stress, depletion of GRK3 and impaired regulation of α(2A)-AR and CRF(1)-R in LC.

Methylphenidate for apathy and functional status in dementia of the Alzheimer type.

OBJECTIVE: Apathy is the most common behavioral problem in persons with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT). Treatment of apathy in DAT is not systematically studied. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the response of apathy to methylphenidate treatment and to examine whether functional status improved. METHODS: The authors conducted a 12-week open-labeled study with immediate release formulation of methylphenidate. Twenty-three patients with DAT scoring >40 on the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) were recruited. Repeated measures analysis of variance and correlation analysis were performed. RESULTS: None of the patients dropped out of the study because of adverse events. Significant improvement in apathy was noted during 12 weeks. Significant improvement was also noted in depression, Mini-Mental State Examination score, and functional status. There was no correlation between changes in the AES and depression scores. CONCLUSIONS: Methylphenidate was well tolerated in these patients with DAT. Apathy improved with the use of methylphenidate.

Treatment with escitalopram but not desipramine decreases escape latency times in a learned helplessness model using juvenile rats.

RATIONALE: The pharmacological treatment of depression in children and adolescents is different from that of adults due to the lack of efficacy of certain antidepressants in the pediatric age group. Our current understanding of why these differences occur is very limited. OBJECTIVES: To develop more effective treatments, a juvenile animal model of depression was tested to validate it as a possible model to specifically study pediatric depression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Procedures for use with juvenile rats at postnatal day (PND) 21 and 28 were adapted from the adult learned helplessness model in which, 24 h after exposure to inescapable stress, animals are unable to remove themselves from an easily escapable stressor. Rats were treated for 7 days with either the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor escitalopram at 10 mg/kg or the tricyclic antidepressant desipramine at 3, 10, or 15 mg/kg to determine if treatment could decrease escape latency times. RESULTS: Escitalopram treatment was effective at decreasing escape latency times in all ages tested. Desipramine treatment did not decrease escape latency times for PND 21 rats, but did decrease times for PND 28 and adult animals. CONCLUSIONS: The learned helplessness model with PND 21 rats predicts the efficacy of escitalopram and the lack of efficacy of desipramine seen in the treatment of pediatric depression. These findings suggest that the use of PND 21 rats in a modified learned helplessness procedure may be a valuable model of human pediatric depression that can predict pediatric antidepressant efficacy and be used to study antidepressant mechanisms involved in pediatric depression.

Abnormal brain response to cholinergic challenge in chronic encephalopathy from the 1991 Gulf War.

Several case definitions of chronic illness in veterans of the 1991 Persian Gulf War have been linked epidemiologically with environmental exposure to cholinesterase-inhibiting chemicals, which cause chronic changes in cholinergic receptors in animal models. Twenty-one chronically ill Gulf War veterans (5 with symptom complex 1, 11 with complex 2, and 5 with complex 3) and 17 age-, sex- and education-matched controls, underwent an 99mTc-HMPAO-SPECT brain scan following infusion of saline and >48 h later a second scan following infusion of physostigmine in saline. From each SPECT image mean normalized regional cerebral blood flow (nrCBF) from 39 small blocks of correlated voxels were extracted with geostatistical spatial modeling from eight deep gray matter structures in each hemisphere. Baseline nrCBF in symptom complex 2 was lower than controls throughout deep structures. The change in nrCBF after physostigmine (challenge minus baseline) was negative in complexes 1 and 3 and controls but positive in complex 2 in some structures. Since effects were opposite in different groups, no finding typified the entire patient sample. A hold-out discriminant model of nrCBF from 17 deep brain blocks predicted membership in the clinical groups with sensitivity of 0.95 and specificity of 0.82. Gulf War-associated chronic encephalopathy in a subset of veterans may be due to neuronal dysfunction, including abnormal cholinergic response, in deep brain structures.

Cerebrospinal fluid GABA concentration: relationship with impulsivity and history of suicidal behavior, but not aggression, in human subjects.

The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between cerebrospinal fluid concentrations of the neurotransmitter gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and measures of impulsivity and related behaviors (aggression and suicidality) in healthy volunteer and personality disordered subjects. CSF GABA levels, and measures of impulsivity, aggression, and history of suicidal behavior were obtained by morning lumbar puncture in 57 healthy volunteer subjects and in subjects with personality disorder. CSF GABA levels were not found to correlate with measures of aggression but were found to correlate directly with measures of impulsivity; e.g., a composite measure of impulsivity in all subjects (r=0.35, df=46, P=0.015) and in personality disordered subjects examined separately (r=0.39, df=30, P=0.029). In the personality disorder group, CSF GABA levels were higher among subjects with a history of suicidal behavior compared with those without this history. These data suggest that central GABAergic function correlates directly with impulsiveness and history of suicidal behavior, but not aggressiveness, in personality disordered subjects. This may be consistent with observations that high doses of benzodiazepines can lead to "behavioral disinhibition" in human subjects. Further work assessing this and other aspects of the central GABA system in personality disordered subjects are warranted.

Juvenile rats in the forced-swim test model the human response to antidepressant treatment for pediatric depression.

RATIONALE: Currently, there are limited treatment options for major depressive disorder in children and adolescents compared to the options available for adults. Many effective treatments used for adult depression, such as the tricyclic antidepressants, lack efficacy when given to children and adolescents. OBJECTIVE: To more quickly identify compounds that could be effective for treating childhood and adolescent depression, a reliable preclinical animal behavioral test of antidepressant efficacy for pediatric depression is needed. The forced-swim test (FST) with juvenile rats was assessed to determine its reliability as a predictive model for pediatric depression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We adapted procedures from the adult FST to test 21-day-old juvenile rats. The 21-day-old animals were treated with three classes of antidepressant drugs before being assessed in the FST: the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors escitalopram or fluoxetine; the tricyclic antidepressants desipramine or imipramine; and the monoamine oxidase inhibitor tranylcypromine. RESULTS: The 21-day-old rats showed dose-dependent changes in behaviors similar to those seen in adults when treated with escitalopram or fluoxetine. Tranylcypromine also decreased immobility in 21-day-old rats. Treatment with desipramine or imipramine, however, was not effective at reducing immobility in the 21-day-old rats. CONCLUSIONS: The juvenile FST accurately predicts the efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the lack of efficacy of tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of depression in children and adolescents. This suggests that the FST using 21-day-old rats may help to develop better treatments for childhood and adolescent depression.

Divalproex in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in a veteran population.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of divalproex for the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) hyperarousal symptom cluster. METHOD: Under double-blind conditions, 85 US military veterans with PTSD were randomized to treatment with divalproex or placebo for 8 weeks. All patients who received at least 1 dose of medication and 1 postbaseline assessment (n = 82) were included in the efficacy population. The primary outcome measure was the hyperarousal subscale of the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale. RESULT: There were no significant intergroup differences in primary or secondary end points. The final mean (SD) divalproex dose and serum valproic acid level were 2309 +/- 507 mg/d and 82 +/- 30 mg/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Divalproex monotherapy was not effective in the treatment of chronic PTSD in predominantly older male combat veterans. Further study is needed to determine the efficacy of divalproex in the management of PTSD in women or civilians or in combination with antidepressants.

The impact of apathy on glycemic control in diabetes: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: Diabetes mellitus is a major public health problem with a prevalence of 6-7%. Self-care behaviors play a major role in the control of diabetes. Apathy is characterized by loss of initiative and motivation. Apathy may interfere with self-care behavior and glycemic control. The primary objective was to determine the prevalence of apathy in patients with diabetes. The secondary objective was to determine if there was an association between clinically significant apathy and factors that affect glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 100 patients with diabetes who were assessed with the Apathy Evaluation Scale-Clinician version (AES-C), the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D), and the Self-Care Inventory (SCI). For this study we defined clinically significant apathy as AES-C score of >30. We excluded patients with a HAM-D score of >14 (n=19) to avoid confounding from depression. T-tests were used to compare clinical characteristics between subjects with and without apathy. Multiple linear regression modeling was used to investigate the association between clinically significant apathy and factors that affect glycemic control. RESULTS: Fifty (61.7% of 81) patients had clinically significant apathy. Compared to the non-apathetic patients, those with apathy had a higher mean BMI (30.5 kg/m(2) versus 34.1 kg/m(2) (p=0.03)) and were less likely to adhere to an exercise plan (p=0.01) or insulin regimen (p=0.003). After adjustment for age, BMI, cholesterol, mild depression and the average Self-Care Index score, the mean HbA1C level was 0.66% greater for apathetic compared to non-apathetic subjects (P=0.08). CONCLUSION: Apathy is highly prevalent in patients with diabetes without depression. Apathy may have a negative impact on self-care behaviors and diabetes control.

Treatment of apathy with methylphenidate.

Apathy is a common condition that transcends psychiatric diagnoses. Its treatment is not well studied. The authors present four cases of apathy treated with a regimen of methylphenidate. Significant improvement in apathy and its sub-domains (motivation, novelty, and persistence) were noted.

Are medical students assigning proper global assessment of functioning scores?

OBJECTIVE: This article seeks to determine whether medical students can estimate the appropriate score for the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) compared with psychiatry residents and staff psychiatrists. The authors hypothesized that medical students' estimations of GAF scores for patients in clinical vignettes would differ from those assessed by the psychiatry residents and staff psychiatrists. METHOD: The authors designed a cross-sectional confidential survey of medical students, psychiatry residents, and staff psychiatrists. Consenting participants were asked to provide demographic information and then complete the accompanying questionnaire after reading two vignettes. One of the vignettes described a depressed patient and the other a psychotic patient. The subjects were asked to estimate the GAF scores for the patients in both vignettes. Then the subjects were given the GAF scoring guide to review and were asked to re-assess their initial GAF scores for the patients in the vignettes. RESULTS: Medical students assigned much higher GAF scores for the patient in the vignette with less severe symptoms than the psychiatry residents and staff psychiatrists. The GAF scores of all three groups for the patient in the vignette with more severe symptoms were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of medical students to assign proper GAF scores needs to be studied further. Our study suggests that current 1-month rotations in psychiatry, without specific training on assigning GAF scores, may not provide medical students with enough information to assess GAF scores accurately. This might need to be addressed in psychiatry clerkships.

Long-term adjunctive quetiapine may reduce substance use--a preliminary retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety disorders often coexist with substance use and complicate treatment by causing non-adherence and relapse. Optimal treatment generally involves the treatment of anxiety along with the treatment of substance abuse. Substance-abuse treatment generally involves individual and group therapy, sobriety maintenance interventions, structured living, and attending self-help groups such as Alcoholics Anonymous. Pharmacotherapy options for treating substance abuse are limited, but atypical antipsychotic medications have reportedly reduced substance abuse when used in patients with alcohol and drug problems. However, there are no reports of long-term benefits of these medications. OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term effects of adjunctive quetiapine on substance abuse in patients treated with quetiapine for severe anxiety symptoms. METHOD: In a previous paper, we reported that adjunctive treatment with quetiapine reduced symptoms of anxiety and cravings for alcohol and drugs when used in patients with anxiety disorders or with anxiety due to alcohol/drug dependence/abuse. In this study, we followed up with these patients one year later to assess their current symptoms, cravings and use of alcohol/drugs, and compared these to results of random breathalyzer and urine drug screening tests conducted as part of routine outpatient treatment of their substance abuse. RESULTS: Six of nine patients continued to take adjunctive quetiapine over the previous 12-month period and reported complete sobriety (substantiated by their random breathalyzer and urine drug screens) and significant reduction in anxiety, depression, and cravings for alcohol and drugs. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive quetiapine used for treatment of anxiety symptoms that may occur as part of different psychiatric disorders in patients with alcohol and drug problems might reduce cravings and substance use.

Risperidone monotherapy for post-traumatic stress disorder related to sexual assault and domestic abuse in women.

Post-traumatic stress disorder is a common, chronic, and often disabling mental illness. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are the usual first-line treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder, but many patients fail to respond adequately. Thus, other treatment options, including the atypical antipsychotics such as risperidone, need to be tested. Women between the ages of 19 and 64 years with post-traumatic stress disorder were enrolled. Symptom severity was rated at baseline using the Treatment Outcomes Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Scale-8, Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, and Clinician Administered Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Scale. After washout from other psychotropic medications, 20 participants were randomized to either risperidone or placebo. Total score on the Treatment Outcomes Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Scale-8 served as the primary outcome measure. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was followed by Newman-Keuls tests. A significant main effect exists for visits using the Treatment Outcomes Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Scale-8 raw score. For the treatment group, the difference between baseline Treatment Outcomes Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Scale-8 scores and treatment visit scores was significant beginning at visit 6 and continued through visit 11. No significant difference observed between baseline and any treatment visit for the placebo group. The Clinician Administered Post-traumatic Stress Disorder Scale, Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression data revealed a similar pattern. In this small pilot study, risperidone monotherapy was more effective than placebo in the treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder.