Single-molecule tracking reveals dual front door/back door inhibition of Cel7A cellulase by its product cellobiose.

Degrading cellulose is a key step in the processing of lignocellulosic biomass into bioethanol. Cellobiose, the disaccharide product of cellulose degradation, has been shown to inhibit cellulase activity, but the mechanisms underlying product inhibition are not clear. We combined single-molecule imaging and biochemical investigations with the goal of revealing the mechanism by which cellobiose inhibits the activity of Trichoderma reesei Cel7A, a well-characterized exo-cellulase. We find that cellobiose slows the processive velocity of Cel7A and shortens the distance moved per encounter; effects that can be explained by cellobiose binding to the product release site of the enzyme. Cellobiose also strongly inhibits the binding of Cel7A to immobilized cellulose, with a Ki of 2.1 mM. The isolated catalytic domain (CD) of Cel7A was also inhibited to a similar degree by cellobiose, and binding of an isolated carbohydrate-binding module to cellulose was not inhibited by cellobiose, suggesting that cellobiose acts on the CD alone. Finally, cellopentaose inhibited Cel7A binding at micromolar concentrations without affecting the enzyme's velocity of movement along cellulose. Together, these results suggest that cellobiose inhibits Cel7A activity both by binding to the "back door" product release site to slow activity and to the "front door" substrate-binding tunnel to inhibit interaction with cellulose. These findings point to strategies for engineering cellulases to reduce product inhibition and enhance cellulose degradation, supporting the growth of a sustainable bioeconomy.

Detecting the orientation of newly-deposited crystalline cellulose with fluorescent CBM3.

Cellulose microfibril patterning influences many of the mechanical attributes of plant cell walls. We developed a simple, fluorescence microscopy-based method to detect the orientation of newly-synthesized cellulose microfibrils in epidermal peels of onion and Arabidopsis. It is based on Alexa Fluor 488-tagged carbohydrate binding module 3a (CBM3a) from Clostridium thermocellum which displayed a nearly 4-fold greater binding to cell walls at pH 5.5 compared with pH 8. Binding to isolated cellulose did not display this pH dependence. At pH 7.5 fibrillar patterns at the surface of the epidermal peels were visible, corresponding to the directionality of surface cellulose microfibrils, as verified by atomic force microscopy. The fibrillar pattern was not visible as the labeling intensity increased at lower pH. The pH of greatest cell wall labeling corresponds to the isoelectric point of CBM3a, suggesting that electrostatic forces limit CBM3a penetration into the wall. Consistent with this, digestion of the wall with pectate lyase to remove homogalacturonan increased labeling intensity. We conclude that electrostatic interactions strongly influence labeling of cell walls with CBM3 and potentially other proteins, holding implications for any work that relies on penetration of protein probes such as CBMs, antibodies, or enzymes into charged polymeric substrates.