Universal Credit receipt among working-age patients who are accessing specialist mental health services: results from a novel data linkage study.

BACKGROUND: In 2013, Universal Credit (UC) was introduced by the UK Government. Understanding of how UC provision is allocated among people with mental disorders, and its intersection with protected characteristics is limited. This study aimed to explore (1) how UC receipt, including UC conditionality regime, varied among users of specialist mental health services between 2013 and 2019 and (2) associations between sociodemographic and diagnostic patient characteristics and UC receipt. METHODS: Working-age individuals who had accessed specialist mental health services were included if they had their mental health record data successfully linked with administrative benefits data. Associations between sociodemographic, diagnostic patient characteristics and UC receipt were explored using logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of the 143 715 patients, 26.9% had received UC between 2013 and 2019. Four in five patients were allocated to the searching for work conditionality regime during their time on UC. Females were less likely to have received UC (adjusted OR (AOR) 0.87, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.89) than males, and UC receipt decreased with age. Black patients (AOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.44) and patients from mixed and multiple ethnic backgrounds (AOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.18 to 1.38) had a higher likelihood of UC receipt than White patients. UC receipt was lower among patients diagnosed with severe mental illness compared with other psychiatric diagnoses (AOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.77). CONCLUSION: One in four specialist mental health service users had received UC and a large majority were subject to conditionality. The temporality of UC conditionality and mental health service presentation needs further exploration.

Linking electronic mental healthcare and benefits records in South London: design, procedure and descriptive outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the process and outcomes of a data linkage between electronic secondary mental healthcare records from the South London and Maudsley (SLaM) NHS Foundation Trust with benefits records from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). We also describe the mental health and benefit profile of patients who were successfully linked. DESIGN: A deterministic linkage of routine records from health and welfare government service providers within a secure environment. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged≥18 years who were referred to or accessed treatment at SLaM services between January 2007 and June 2019, including those who were treated as part of Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services between January 2008 and June 2019 (n=448 404). Benefits data from the DWP from January 2005 to June 2020. OUTCOME MEASURES: The linkage rate and associated sociodemographic, diagnostic and treatment factors. Recorded primary psychiatric diagnosis based on International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 codes and type of benefit receipt. RESULTS: A linkage rate of 92.3% was achieved. Women, younger patients and those from ethnic minority groups were less likely to be successfully linked. Patients who had subsequently died, had a recorded primary psychiatric diagnosis, had also engaged with IAPT and had a higher number of historical postcodes available were more likely to be linked. Overall, 83% of patients received benefits at some point between 2005 and 2020. Benefit receipt across the psychiatric diagnosis spectrum was high, over 80% across most ICD-10 codes. CONCLUSIONS: This data linkage is the first of its kind in the UK demonstrating the use of routinely collected mental health and benefits data. Benefit receipt was high among patients accessing SLaM services and varied by psychiatric diagnosis. Future areas of research are discussed, including exploring the effectiveness of interventions for helping people into work and the impact of benefit reforms.

Mental Health, Help-Seeking Behaviour and Social Support in the UK Armed Forces by Gender.

Background: Little is known about gender differences in mental health, related help-seeking behavior and social support in UK military personnel. Methods: 1714 UK military serving personnel and ex-service veterans were randomly selected if, in a cohort study, they endorsed experiencing a subjective stress, emotional, alcohol or mental health problem in the previous three years. Following exclusions, the final sample size was 1448 (participation rate 84.5%; women n = 219). Structured telephone interviews assessed anxiety, depression, PTSD symptoms, alcohol use, help-seeking and social support occurring both currently and in the past three years. Outcomes were assessed using weighted unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses. Results: Mental health problems assessed at interview were broadly similar for men and women; for both genders, levels of social support were high. One-fifth of respondents screened positive for probable mental disorder or alcohol misuse; although rates of mental disorder symptoms did not differ by gender, women were significantly less likely than men to report alcohol misuse. Women were significantly more likely to have sought help from formal medical sources but significantly less likely to access informal support such as friends, family or unit welfare sources; reasons for seeking formal medical support were similar for men and women except for problem recognition and acting on advice from others, which were both significantly more common among women. Conclusion: For military personnel with a history of mental ill-health, women should make greater use of informal support networks while for men, engagement with formal medical help sources should be encouraged.

Suicidal Ideation, Suicidal Attempts, and Self-Harm in the UK Armed Forces.

INTRODUCTION: In the UK military, suicide is infrequent and studies of self-harm behavior in this population are rare. OBJECTIVES: To compare lifetime self-harm rates estimated on three occasions between 2004 and 2016 and to explore the associates of lifetime self-harm. METHOD: Three phases of a UK AF cohort study (n = 10,272, 9,990, and 8,581, respectively) provided data. Telephone interviews assessed associates of self-harm among cohort members who reported subjective mental health problems in the past 3 years (n = 1,448). Validated measures of mental health and related stigmatization, social support, and help-seeking were obtained. RESULTS: Lifetime self-harm increased significantly (p < .001) from 1.8% among serving personnel and 3.8% among veterans in 2004/06 to 1.9% and 4.5% in 2007/09 and to 4.2% and 6.6% in 2014/16 in the two groups, respectively. Veterans were consistently significantly more likely to report lifetime self-harm than serving personnel. Significant determinants of lifetime self-harm included current mental disorder symptoms, stigmatization, poor social support, suicidal ideation, and seeking help from formal medical sources. CONCLUSION: Self-harm has increased over time in the UK serving and veteran community. Suicide prevention should focus on ameliorating mental disorder by encouraging engagement with health care, reducing negative views of mental illness, and fostering social support.