Individualised positive end-expiratory pressure titrated intra-operatively by electrical impedance tomography optimises pulmonary mechanics and reduces postoperative atelectasis: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A protective intra-operative lung ventilation strategy has been widely recommended for laparoscopic surgery. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and its effects during pneumoperitoneum. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) has recently been introduced as a bedside tool to monitor lung ventilation in real-time. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesised that individually titrated EIT-PEEP adjusted to the surgical intervention would improve respiratory mechanics during and after surgery. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: First Medical Centre of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing. PATIENTS: Seventy-five patients undergoing robotic-assisted laparoscopic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery under general anaesthesia. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned 2 : 1 to individualised EIT-titrated PEEP (PEEPEIT; n = 50) or traditional PEEP 5 cmH2O (PEEP5 cmH2O; n = 25). The PEEPEIT group received individually titrated EIT-PEEP during pneumoperitoneum. The PEEP5 cmH2O group received PEEP of 5 cmH2O during pneumoperitoneum. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was respiratory system compliance during laparoscopic surgery. Secondary outcomes were individualised PEEP levels, oxygenation, respiratory and haemodynamic status, and occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) within 7 days. RESULTS: Compared with PEEP5 cmH2O, patients who received PEEPEIT had higher respiratory system compliance (mean values during surgery of 44.3 ±â€Š11.3 vs. 31.9 ±â€Š6.6, ml cmH2O-1; P < 0.001), lower driving pressure (11.5 ±â€Š2.1 vs. 14.0 ±â€Š2.4 cmH2O; P < 0.001), better oxygenation (mean PaO2/FiO2 427.5 ±â€Š28.6 vs. 366.8 ±â€Š36.4; P = 0.003), and less postoperative atelectasis (19.4 ±â€Š1.6 vs. 46.3 ±â€Š14.8 g of lung tissue mass; P = 0.003). Haemodynamic values did not differ significantly between the groups. No adverse effects were observed during surgery. CONCLUSION: Individualised PEEP by EIT may improve intra-operative pulmonary mechanics and oxygenation without impairing haemodynamic stability, and decrease postoperative atelectasis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn) identifier: ChiCTR2100045166.

Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and oxygen concentration on non-hypoxemic apnea time during face mask ventilation of anesthesia induction: A randomized controlled trial.

Background: The optimal ventilatory strategy for the face mask ventilation during anesthesia induction is still unknow. Methods: We evaluated the effect of two positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels (0 cmH2O and 6 cmH2O) and two oxygen concentration levels (1.0 and .6) on non-hypoxemic apnea time during face mask ventilation of anesthesia induction. Sixty adult patients scheduled for elective surgery were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomized to receive anesthesia induction with four different ventilation strategy under volume-controlled ventilation. Patients assigned to the LOZP group received low fraction of inspiration O2 (FiO2 = .6) and 0 PEEP. Patients assigned to the LOHP group received low fraction of inspiration O2 (FiO2 = .6) and 6 cmH2O PEEP. Patients assigned to the HOZP group received high fraction of inspiration O2 (FiO2 = 1.0) and 0 PEEP. Patients assigned to the HOHP group received high fraction of inspiration O2 (FiO2 = 1.0) and 6cmH2O PEEP. After 3 min of ventilation, the patient was intubated but disconnected from the breathing circuit. Ventilation was not initiated until the pulse oximetry dropped to 90%. The primary outcome was non-hypoxemic apnea time defined as the time from cessation of ventilation to a pulse oximeter reading of 90%. The secondary outcome was the PaO2/FiO2 ratio immediately after ventilation. Results: The non-hypoxemic apnea time was significantly longer in the group of HOHP when compared to the other three groups (192 s ± 70 s, 221 s ± 74 s, 284 s ± 101 s, and 353 s ± 85 s in the LOZP, LOHP, HOZP, and HOHP group, respectively). The PaO2/FiO2 ratio immediately after ventilation was significantly higher in the group of LOHP when compared to the other three groups (LOZP 393 ± 130, LOHP 496 ± 97, HOZP 335 ± 58, HOHP 391 ± 50). When compared the PaO2/FiO2 ratio immediately after ventilation to its value before administration of anesthesia, the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in the group of LOHP was improved, the group LOZP and HOHP remained the same, while the group HOZP significantly decreased. Conclusion: Application of PEEP and 100% of oxygen during face mask ventilation of induction could maximize the non-hypoxemic apnea time. However, the use of PEEP and 60% of oxygen during preoxygenation resulted in improved PaO2/FiO2 ratio.