RESUMEN
AIM: To provide practice guidelines about fertility preservation (FP) in oncology. METHODS: We selected 400 articles after a PubMed review of the literature (1987-2019). RECOMMENDATIONS: Any child, adolescent and adult of reproductive age should be informed about the risk of treatment gonadotoxicity. In women, systematically proposed FP counselling between 15 and 38 years of age in case of treatment including bifunctional alkylating agents, above 6 g/m2 cyclophosphamide equivalent dose (CED), and for radiation doses on the ovaries ≥3 Gy. For postmenarchal patients, oocyte cryopreservation after ovarian stimulation is the first-line FP technique. Ovarian tissue cryopreservation should be discussed as a first-line approach in case of treatment with a high gonadotoxic risk, when chemotherapy has already started and in urgent cases. Ovarian transposition is to be discussed prior to pelvic radiotherapy involving a high risk of premature ovarian failure. For prepubertal girls, ovarian tissue cryopreservation should be proposed in the case of treatment with a high gonadotoxic risk. In pubertal males, sperm cryopreservation must be systematically offered to any male who is to undergo cancer treatment, regardless of toxicity. Testicular tissue cryopreservation must be proposed in males unable to cryopreserve sperm who are to undergo a treatment with intermediate or severe risk of gonadotoxicity. In prepubertal boys, testicular tissue preservation is: - recommended for chemotherapy with a CED ≥7500 mg/m2 or radiotherapy ≥3 Gy on both testicles. - proposed for chemotherapy with a CED ≥5.000 mg/m2 or radiotherapy ≥2 Gy. If several possible strategies, the ultimate choice is made by the patient.
Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad , Neoplasias , Criopreservación/métodos , Femenino , Preservación de la Fertilidad/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Ovario , SemenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In 2011, 11% of all cancers were diagnosed in people over 85 years old. With the current aging of the French population associated with health progress, we will be confronted more and more frequently with the treatment of very old patients, and this until the horizon 2050, when the population over 75 years old will represent approximately 15% of the total French population (compared to 9.1% in 2015). METHODS: To understand the management methods for patients over 85 years old with cancer, we carried out an observational study, based on data collected in the OncoPACA-Corse network, with the objective to describe the demographic data of very elderly patients, the characteristics of their pathology and to analyze the therapeutic strategies proposed by oncologists to patients in this population. RESULTS: One thousand three hundred and fifty five cases were analyzed. The mean age of the patients was 88.9 years with 3% of patients over 95 years old and only one was over 100 years old. 51.6% were women. Digestive tumors were the most represented (23.4%), followed by breast tumors (17.7%) and prostate tumors (10.5%), with a diagnosis made at a metastatic stage in 20% of cases. We note that treatment was offered for nearly 85% of patients with a wide range of options, exclusive palliative care was offered in 15% of cases; and whena treatment considered to be not very aggressive, such as hormone therapy, was offered, it seems to be preferred as monotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Transición de la Salud , Neoplasias/terapia , Distribución por Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Comorbilidad , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/terapia , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Distribución por SexoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine the use of a new specialized E-Meeting for Complex Cases in Oncofertility by fertility preservation specialists (FPSs) MATERIAL AND METHODS: We present 3 years of activity of the E-Meeting for Complex Cases in Oncofertility, a new tool created in September 2016 which allows national oncofertility experts to share viewpoints about challenging cases for which they do not have experience or sufficient data in order to provide them an emergency advice within 48 h. Second, a survey was conducted to evaluate the use of this e-meeting for participating FPSs. RESULTS: One hundred and four experts have joined the e-meeting since its set-up, and 109 challenging cases have been submitted. The mean age of the patients was 22.4 ± 8.9 years, and 87.0% were female. Each submitted case received on average of 1.8 ± 1.1 different strategies for FP and the opinions of 7.1 ± 3.4 experts. Among the FPSs who submitted cases, seeking opinions from other FPSs allowed them to confirm their care plan (N = 49, 84.4%), to offer different options to their patients (N = 34, 58.6%), and to compare their practices with those of other specialists (N = 23, 39.6%). All respondents reported a self-perceived improvement in their practice of oncologic FP (n = 80, 100.0%). CONCLUSION: Specific attention should be paid to challenging cases for which the experiences of only a few individuals exist. Enhancing communication between FPSs through oncofertility networks, pooling experiences, and collecting the most complex cases is required to improve the management of these patients.
Asunto(s)
Preservación de la Fertilidad/normas , Personal de Salud/psicología , Infertilidad/terapia , Neoplasias/fisiopatología , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Infertilidad/epidemiología , Infertilidad/patología , Masculino , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
HIV testing is recommended at time of cancer diagnosis, HBV and HCV screening because of the risk of reactivation with certain anticancer drugs.This is a cross-sectional study. The objectives were to assess the screening practices in cancer patients and the satisfaction of professionals in the event of use of the CancerHIV network. A questionnaire drafted by the CancerHIV expert and the OncoPaca-Corse Regional Cancer Network (RCN) was distributed in the region at the end of 2018 (part 1: V1) before being extended to the national level via the CancerHIV network (part 2: V2). Participation reached 160 and 130 respondents (V1 and V2, respectively). At the initial cancer assessment, 23% of respondents declared that they systematically screened for HIV at V1 (V2: 17%), 25% for HBV (V2: 20%) and 24% for HCV (V2: 19%). Before immunotherapy, the rates were 54% for HIV in V1 (V2: 52%), 57% for HBV (V2: 60%) and 55% for HCV (V2: 57%). Among the respondents, satisfaction when requesting a regional or national remedy was high (almost 100%). Screening for HIV, HBV and HCV allows supervised prescription of immunosuppressive or cytotoxic treatment to a potentially immunosuppressed patient. This study, resulting of an original collaboration between a RCN and a national expert network, underlines the lack of screening at the 2 examined stages of patient care, and the need for raising practitioners' awareness to recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Hepatitis B/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , VIH/fisiología , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Hepacivirus/fisiología , Hepatitis B/complicaciones , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Virus de la Hepatitis B/fisiología , Hepatitis C/complicaciones , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/efectos adversos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Activación Viral/efectos de los fármacos , Activación Viral/inmunologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular toxicity has become a challenging issue during cancer therapy. Nonetheless, there is a lack of consensual guidelines for their management. We aimed to determine the current practices of oncologists regarding cardiovascular toxicity related to anthracyclines, trastuzumab and angiogenic inhibitors and to gather their opinions on the development of cardio-oncology programs. METHODS: A cross-sectional declarative study was submitted to French oncologists in the form of an individual, structured questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 303 oncologists responded to the survey. Ninety-nine percent of oncologists prescribed cardiotoxic therapies, including anthracyclines (83%), trastuzumab (51%) and other angiogenic inhibitors (64%). The method adopted for managing cardiovascular toxicity was based on guidelines from expert oncology societies for only 35% of oncologists. None was aware of recommendations from expert cardiology societies. Prescription of pre-, peri- and post-therapy cardiovascular assessment was inconsistent and significantly less frequent for all classes of angiogenic inhibitors than for anthracyclines and trastuzumab (P<0.0001). Relative to pre-therapy assessment, post-therapy assessment was prescribed significantly less often for all cancer therapies (P<0.0001). Attitudes regarding the onset of left ventricular dysfunction were much more inconsistent when angiogenic inhibitors were involved. Additionally, the management of hypertension and QT prolongation was also inconsistent. Finally, 88% of oncologists supported projects of cardio-oncology programs development. CONCLUSIONS: Practices of oncologists are disparate in the field of cardiovascular toxicity. This finding underlines the complexity of managing many different situations and the need for distribution of formal guidelines from oncology and cardiology expert societies. The development of personalized cardio-oncology programs seems essential.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Cardiólogos , Cardiotoxinas/efectos adversos , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cardiólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Neoplasias/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Socialisation, education, first jobs and autonomy are key steps to teenagers and young adults (TYA) integration into the society. The occurrence of a cancer in this population increases the difficulties. Although, suffering of cancer do affect TYA life journey at social, scholar and professional levels, from diagnosis to the after-cancer live and sometime forever, few studies exist in France. A national study on TYA with cancer (TYAC) social, scholar and professional pathways is on-going (ESPOIR-AJA). A national survey of the existing TYAC insertion support in 2013 by the "Insertion group" of groupe onco-hématologie adolescents et jeunes adultes (GO-AJA) revealed structured and ancient support at scholar level based on national governmental or associative structures, but insufficient and non-specific scholar help in secondary school and professional help. Specific initiatives have emerged since 2012 with the "Plan cancer 2". All these helps remain unequal across the country. A referential on TYAC social, scholar and professional insertion has been prepared by GO-AJA in collaboration with the association francophone des soins oncologiques de support (AFSOS). The impact of the action 9 of the nation "plan cancer 3" is awaited.
Asunto(s)
Educación , Empleo , Neoplasias/rehabilitación , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Autonomía Personal , Socialización , Absentismo , Adolescente , Francia , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias/psicología , Grupo Paritario , Grupos de Autoayuda , Aislamiento Social , Participación Social , Apoyo Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estudiantes/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Lung cancer is still actually a leading cause of death in industrial countries, while the major etiologic agent, the tobacco smoke, is clearly identified. Primary or secondary prevention's strategies are frequently unsuccessful. The main survival chance is an early diagnosis of the disease. Efforts in the lung cancer screening have to be continued. Therapeutic strategies improved but progress in terms of survey are disappointing. Hopes relies on new drugs development coming from fundamental research, for whom first clinical trials are ongoing.