2020 update of the Austrian Society of Cardiology (ÖKG) and the Austrian Society of Cardiac Surgery (ÖGHTG) on the position statement of the ÖKG and ÖGHTG for transcatheter aortic valve implantation 2011.

This position statement is an update to the 2011 consensus statement of the Austrian Society of Cardiology (ÖKG) and the Austrian Society of Cardiac Surgery (ÖGTHG) for transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Due to a number of recently published studies, broadening of indications and recommendations of medical societies and our own national developments, the ÖKG and the ÖGHTG wish to combine the 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease with a national position paper and to focus on certain details for the application in Austria. Thus, this position statement serves as a supplement and further interpretation of the international guidelines.

Impact of On-Site Cardiac Surgery on Clinical Outcomes After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the outcome of high-risk and inoperable patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in hospitals with (iOSCS) versus without institutional on-site cardiac surgery (no-iOSCS). BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the use of TAVR only in institutions with a department for cardiac surgery on site. METHODS: In this analysis of the prospective multicenter Austrian TAVI registry, 1,822 consecutive high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVR were evaluated. A total of 290 (15.9%) underwent TAVR at no-iOSCS centers (no-iOSCS group), whereas the remaining 1,532 patients (84.1%) were treated in iOSCS centers (iOSCS group). RESULTS: Patients of the no-iOSCS group had a higher perioperative risk defined by the logistic EuroSCORE (20.9% vs. 14.2%; p < 0.001) compared with patients treated in hospitals with iOSCS. Procedural survival was 96.9% in no-iOSCS centers and 98.6% in iOSCS centers (p = 0.034), whereas 30-day survival was 93.1% versus 96.0% (p = 0.039) and 1-year survival was 80.9% versus 86.1% (p = 0.017), respectively. After propensity score matching for confounders procedural survival was 96.9% versus 98.6% (p = 0.162), 93.1% versus 93.8% (p = 0.719) at 30 days, and 80.9% versus 83.4% (p = 0.402) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR in hospitals without iOSCS had a significantly higher baseline risk profile. After propensity score matching short- and long-term mortality was similar between centers with and without iOSCS.

[Use of ECMO in adult patients with cardiogenic shock: a position paper of the Austrian Society of Cardiology]. / Positionspapier der Österreichischen Kardiologischen Gesellschaft zum Einsatz der extrakorporalen Membranoxygenation (ECMO) bei Erwachsenen kardiologischen Patienten.

The use of ECMO to stabilize critically ill patients with severely depressed cardiac function and hemodynamics increased in the last years due to broader availability, better performance and easier implantation of the devices. The present guidelines of the Austrian Society of Cardiology focus on the use of ECMO in adult non-operated patients with cardiac diseases. Not only indications and contraindications are highlighted, but also the equally important issues of monitoring, complication management, measures during implantation and operation, and weaning of the devices are treated in detail. Thereby the present guidelines aim to optimize the use of ECMO in the individual centers, and aim to help current non-ECMO centers in developing a local ECMO-program or to contact ECMO-centers for discussion of individual patients.

[Use of ECMO in adult patients with cardiogenic shock: a position paper of the Austrian Society of Cardiology]. / Positionspapier der Österreichischen Kardiologischen Gesellschaft zum Einsatz der extrakorporalen Membranoxygenation (ECMO) bei Erwachsenen kardiologischen Patienten.

The use of ECMO to stabilize critically ill patients with severely depressed cardiac function and hemodynamics increased in the last years due to broader availability, better performance and easier implantation of the devices. The present guidelines of the Austrian Society of Cardiology focus on the use of ECMO in adult non-operated patients with cardiac diseases. Not only indications and contraindications are highlighted, but also the equally important issues of monitoring, complication management, measures during implantation and operation, and weaning of the devices are treated in detail. Thereby the present guidelines aim to optimize the use of ECMO in the individual centers, and aim to help current non-ECMO centers in developing a local ECMO-program or to contact ECMO-centers for discussion of individual patients.

Ivabradine versus metoprolol for heart rate reduction before coronary computed tomography angiography.

Several studies have demonstrated the correlation of heart rate (HR) and image quality in coronary computed tomography angiography. Beta-blocker administration is critical because of its negative inotropic effect. Ivabradine is a selective HR-lowering agent that exclusively inhibits the I(f) current in sinoatrial node cells without having any effect on cardiac contractility or atrioventricular conduction. A total of 120 patients were randomized to oral premedication with ivabradine 15 mg or metoprolol 50 mg. HR and blood pressure (BP) were measured before the administration of premedication and immediately before coronary computed tomographic angiography. The mean time between premedication administration and follow-up was 108 ± 21.5 minutes for ivabradine and 110 ± 22.2 minutes for metoprolol (p = NS). When comparing groups, there were no significant differences in reduction of HR (-11.83 ± 8.6 vs -13.20 ± 7.8 beats/min, p = NS) and diastolic BP (-5.05 ± 14.2 mm Hg vs -4.08 ± 10.8 mm Hg, p = NS), whereas the decrease of systolic BP was significantly lower in patients who received ivabradine compared to those in the metoprolol group (-3.95 ± 13.6 vs -13.65 ± 17.3 mm Hg, p <0.001). In the subgroup of patients who were receiving long-term ß-blocker therapy, significantly stronger HR reduction was achieved with ivabradine (-13.19 ± 5.4 vs -10.04 ± 6.0 beats/min, p <0.05), while the decrease in systolic BP was less (-2.00 ± 13.6 vs -15.04 ± 20.8 mm Hg, p <0.05) compared to metoprolol. In conclusion, ivabradine decreases HR before coronary computed tomographic angiography sufficiently, with significantly less depression of systolic BP compared to metoprolol.

Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in heart transplant patients: three-year follow-up of deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from transthoracic echocardiography.

AIMS: Non-invasive diagnosis of allograft dysfunction is a major objective in the management of heart transplant (HTX) recipients. Speckle tracking echocardiography (STE) permits comprehensive assessment of myocardial function. It is well established that deformation indices are reduced in HTXs when compared with control subjects. However, it is unclear if the reduction in strain is a chronic progressive phenomenon in HTX patients. Method and results Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed 3 years after initial TTE in 20 'healthy' HTX patients (13.2 years post-transplantation at time of follow-up) with normal ejection fraction and angiographically ruled out allograft vasculopathy. Grey-scale apical views were recorded and stored for automated offline speckle tracking (EchoPAC 7.0, GE) of the 16 segments of the left ventricle. Strain analysis was performed in 320 segments 34.3 ± 3.7 months after initial assessment. Automated tracking of myocardial deformation for determination of longitudinal systolic strain was not possible in 24 (7.5%) segments at baseline and in 32 (10.0%) segments at follow-up (P = ns). The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 61.9 ± 8.1% at the initial examination vs. 62.8 ± 5.8% 3 years afterwards (P = ns). Global longitudinal peak systolic strain was -14.0 ± 4.0 vs. -14.4 ± 2.8%, respectively (P = ns). CONCLUSION: This is the first study describing follow-up deformation parameters in HTX patients undergoing STE. 'Healthy' HTX patients with normal coronary arteries and normal ejection fractions showed no deterioration of longitudinal strain values 3 years after the initial assessment. Apparently, deformation values remain stable over the years as long as the LVEF is preserved.

Two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain echocardiography in long-term heart transplant patients: a study comparing deformation parameters and ejection fraction derived from echocardiography and multislice computed tomography.

AIMS: Longitudinal strain determined by speckle tracking is a sensitive parameter to detect systolic left ventricular dysfunction. In this study, we assessed regional and global longitudinal strain values in long-term heart transplants and compared deformation indices with ejection fraction as determined by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography (MSCTA). METHODS AND RESULTS: TTE and MSCTA were prospectively performed in 31 transplant patients (10.6 years post-transplantation) and in 42 control subjects. Grey-scale apical views were recorded for speckle tracking (EchoPAC 7.0, GE) of the 16 segments of the left ventricle. The presence of coronary artery disease (CAD) was assessed by MSCTA. Strain analysis was performed in 1168 segments [496 in transplant patients (42.5%), 672 in control subjects (57.7%)]. Global longitudinal peak systolic strain was significantly lower in the transplant recipients than in the healthy population (-13.9 ± 4.2 vs. -17.4 ± 5.8%, P< 0.01). This was still the case after exclusion of the nine transplant patients with CAD (-14.1 ± 4.4 vs. -17.4 ± 5.8%, P=0.03). Transplant patients exhibited significantly lower regional strain values in 9 of the 16 segments. Left ventricular ejection fraction (%) (MSCTA/Simpsons method) was 60.7 ± 10.1%/60.2 ± 6.7% in transplant recipients vs. 64.7 ± 6.4%/63.0 ± 6.2% in the healthy population, P=ns. CONCLUSION: Even though 'healthy' heart transplants without CAD exhibit normal ejection fraction, deformation indices are reduced in this population when compared with control subjects. Our findings suggests that strain analysis is more sensitive than assessment of ejection fraction for the detection of abnormalities of systolic function.

Detection of high-grade stenoses with multislice computed tomography in heart transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Post-transplant follow-up of heart transplant patients consists of repeated coronary angiography, which is associated with high costs, discomfort and risk. We sought to determine whether multislice computed tomography (MSCT) permits the exclusion or progression of coronary artery disease in heart transplant patients. METHODS: MSCT scanning (Philips CT MX 8000 IDT) and invasive coronary angiography were performed on 66 consecutive heart transplant patients. One hundred milliliters of non-ionic iodinated contrast medium was applied for CT angiography. For MSCT analysis, coronary arteries and side branches with a diameter > or =1.5 mm were assessed for the presence of luminal narrowing of >70%. MSCT results were compared with those of quantitative coronary angiography analysis. RESULTS: Ten patients (17%) had one significant stenosis, whereas 3 patients (5%) had 2-vessel disease and none had 3-vessel disease. MSCT was performed successfully on 60 patients enrolled in our analysis. Forty-two of 44 patients (95%) who were estimated to be fully evaluable for MSCT were correctly classified. On per-segment-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 59%, 94%, 91% and 99.43%, respectively. After exclusion of unevaluable segments, sensitivity and specificity increased to 71% and 99.86%, respectively. On per-patient-based analysis, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were 88%, 97%, 88% and 97%, respectively, in evaluable transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: MSCT with its high specificity and high negative predictive value allows the exclusion of significant coronary artery vasculopathy in evaluable patients. From the clinical point of view, this might spare additional invasive coronary angiography in heart transplant patients.

Volumetric intravascular ultrasound imaging to illustrate the extent of coronary plaque burden in type 2 diabetic patients.

BACKGROUND: Although angiography is the gold standard for coronary imaging, its efficacy in outlining diffuse coronary atherosclerosis in diabetic patients remains questionable. We aimed to compare quantitative cineangiographic analysis (QCA) with three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) imaging in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: IVUS runs of 104 significant coronary lesions in 88 diabetic patients were performed. Arterial remodeling index was calculated as vessel area at minimal lumen area divided by mean reference vessel area. RESULTS: No difference between the two analysis modes was shown for lesion length and minimal lumen diameter, whereas a significant discrepancy between QCA and IVUS was found for diameter stenosis (10 +/- 9% vs. 41 +/- 8%; P<.001) and vessel diameter (3.01 +/- 0.66 vs. 4.53 +/- 0.70 mm; P<.001). A significant difference on arterial remodeling at lesion site was found between insulin-treated diabetic patients and non-insulin-treated diabetic patients (remodeling index: 0.98 +/- 0.16 vs. 1.07 +/- 0.21; P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary angiographic diagnosis in diabetic patients may be distorted due to a large plaque burden over longer vessel segments and the resulting absence of plaque-free reference segments. This distortion was found to be more pronounced in QCA analysis requiring a reference diameter, whereas volumetric IVUS imaging illustrated coronary artery dimensions more accurately according to anatomic structures. Constrictive arterial remodeling was observed more frequently in type 2 diabetic patients treated with insulin.

Randomized comparison between intracoronary beta-radiation brachytherapy and implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Intracoronary brachytherapy was the primary therapeutic option for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR) during the last years. Especially for the treatment of diffuse ISR (lesions >10mm), beta-source brachytherapy was significantly superior to singular balloon angioplasty. Despite lacking clinical database, the implantation of drug eluting stents recently became a common procedure for the treatment of ISR. This randomized trial aimed to compare the efficacy of beta-brachytherapy with beta-radioisotopes (90)Sr/(90)Y and paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of diffuse ISR. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with diffuse ISR were randomly assigned to beta-brachytherapy after balloon angioplasty (Beta-Cath in 17 patients) or paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation (Taxus-Express2 in 20 patients). Six-month clinical follow-up was obtained for all patients, while angiographic follow-up was available for 30 patients. RESULTS: Binary ISR (restenosis >50%) within target segment was observed in three patients treated with Beta-Cath, of which one needed target segment revascularisation for recurrent ISR, whereas no significant restenosis occurred in the patients treated with Taxus-Express2 (P=0.037). No further major adverse cardiac (target segment revascularisation, myocardial infarction, death) was found in either group (P=NS). Stent implantation was the more time-saving (31+/-11 min versus 60+/-23 min, P<0.001) procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Although this trial revealed a significant reduction of binary restenosis in the Taxus-Express2 arm, we found no difference in clinical outcome after implantation of paclitaxel-eluting stents for the treatment of diffuse ISR when compared to beta-brachytherapy.