TX-001HR is associated with a clinically meaningful effect on severity of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in the REPLENISH trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinically meaningful effect of oral TX-001HR (17ß-estradiol [E2]/progesterone [P4]) capsules on hot flushes severity (vasomotor symptoms [VMS] severity scale) using the patient-reported Clinical Global Impression (CGI). METHODS: REPLENISH (NCT01942668) was a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial that evaluated TX-001HR in postmenopausal women (40-65 y) with a uterus. Those with frequent moderate to severe hot flushes (≥7/d or ≥50/wk) were randomized in a VMS substudy to daily E2/P4 (1/100, 0.5/100, 0.5/50, or 0.25/50 mg/mg), or placebo. Patients rated VMS severity from 1 (mild) to 3 (severe) and symptom improvements with the CGI. CGI results were an anchor in a nonparametric discriminant analysis to define clinically important differences (CIDs) and minimal CID in VMS severity at weeks 4 and 12. RESULTS: In the VMS substudy (n = 726), determined CID and minimal CID severity thresholds were reductions of 0.525 and 0.350 points at week 4, respectively, and 0.775 and 0.225 points at week 12. Significantly more women taking the two highest E2/P4 doses (1/100 and 0.5/100) versus placebo met CID severity thresholds at weeks 4 (40% and 44% vs 17%; P < 0.05) and 12 (56% and 48% vs 29%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: REPLENISH trial data demonstrated that E2/P4 1/100 and 0.5/100 provided clinically meaningful improvements in hot flushes severity in postmenopausal women. In conjunction with previously demonstrated clinically meaningful VMS frequency improvements, these data support oral E2/P4 1/100 and 0.5/100 for postmenopausal women with a uterus seeking treatment for moderate to severe VMS.

Endometrial safety and bleeding profile of a 17ß-estradiol/progesterone oral softgel capsule (TX-001HR).

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of a single-capsule 17ß-estradiol/progesterone (E2/P4), TX-001HR, on endometrial safety, to report on amenorrhea and bleeding patterns of users, and to identify predictors of amenorrhea. METHODS: The REPLENISH trial (NCT01942668) evaluated use of TX-001HR in menopausal women (40-65 y) with vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and a uterus. Women were randomized to daily E2/P4 (mg/mg: 1/100, 0.5/100, 0.5/50, or 0.25/50), or placebo for 12 months. Incidence rate of endometrial hyperplasia was calculated from endometrial biopsies conducted at screening and study completion. Women reported bleeding and spotting in daily diaries. The number of bleeding and/or spotting days and the proportion of women with no bleeding or amenorrhea were compared between treatment and placebo using the Fisher exact test. Predictors of cumulative amenorrhea were assessed by univariate analyses. RESULTS: Women (n = 1,835) who took at least one study dose comprised the safety population; 1,255 had baseline and 12-month biopsies and comprised the endometrial safety population. Incidence of endometrial hyperplasia was ≤0.36% with any dose of TX-001HR after 1 year of use (one-sided upper 95% confidence interval ≤4%). Cumulative amenorrhea (no bleeding/spotting) rates increased over time and were relatively high from cycle 1 to 13 with TX-001HR (56%-73%; placebo 79%; P < 0.05 except with 0.25/50 dose). Few vaginal bleeding adverse events (1.0%-4.6% TX-001HR vs 0.7% placebo) were reported and discontinuations due to bleeding were low (0.4%-1.4% vs 0%). Cumulative amenorrhea was significantly more frequent in older women, those further from their last menstrual period, and those with lower baseline E2 concentrations (all; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: All doses of TX-001HR provided endometrial protection and were associated with an improved bleeding profile over time; older age, further last menstrual period, or lower baseline E2 may predict amenorrhea with TX-001HR.

Physical characteristics and properties of estradiol softgel vaginal inserts.

OBJECTIVE: TX-004HR is a low-dose estradiol (E2) softgel vaginal insert designed to be rapidly dissolving and mucoadhesive. This report describes the physical attributes and pharmacokinetic parameters of the softgel vaginal insert evaluated for the treatment of moderate to severe dyspareunia due to menopausal vulvar and vaginal atrophy. METHODS: In vitro dissolution studies with 25-µg E2 inserts were performed and media samples were analyzed for E2 by high-performance liquid chromatography. Effects of body position on E2 bioavailability were assessed in a phase 1, randomized trial of the 25-µg softgel capsule versus a reference product in which women remained supine after dosing (n = 16), and in a substudy (n = 16) in which women were ambulatory or seated after dosing. Estradiol C max, AUC0-24, and t max were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectroscopy. A phase 2, randomized study (n = 50) of 10-µg E2 versus placebo inserts assessed timing of capsule disintegration at days 1 and 15. RESULTS: In vitro testing detected more than 80% of E2 in the dissolution medium by 15 minutes (first time point measured). In the phase 1 studies, baseline-corrected E2 plasma levels were not significantly different regardless of supine versus ambulatory/seated position after dosing: C max, 24.1 versus 34.3 pg/mL; AUC0-24, 77.6 versus 93.7 h ·â€Špg/mL; and t max, 2.1 versus 1.9 hours, respectively. In the phase 2 study, no remnants of the softgel capsule were found at day 1 (6 hours) after dosing and day 15. Vaginal discharge was minimal (1/48 women; 2.1%). CONCLUSIONS: The presented data support rapid dissolution of the softgel capsule and similar E2 pharmacokinetic parameters regardless of body position after dosing.

Estradiol and progesterone bioavailability for moderate to severe vasomotor symptom treatment and endometrial protection with the continuous-combined regimen of TX-001HR (oral estradiol and progesterone capsules).

OBJECTIVE: In the REPLENISH trial, women receiving TX-001HR-an oral, softgel capsule, combining 17ß-estradiol (E2) and progesterone (E2 mg/P4 mg 1/100, 0.5/100), had significantly improved vasomotor symptoms, while having their endometrium protected from hyperplasia. The objective here was to describe P4 levels sufficient to counteract the potential endometrial effects of 1 or 0.5 mg oral E2 with TX-001HR. METHODS: In REPLENISH (phase 3; NCT01942668), serum P4, E2, and estrone (E1) levels were characterized in postmenopausal women treated with TX-001HR (E2 mg/P4 mg: 1/100, 0.5/100, [0.5/50, 0.25/50 and placebo not reported here]) at baseline, week 12, and month 12 for P4, and at baseline, weeks 4 and 12, and months 6, 9, and 12 for E2 and E1. In a phase 1 study, pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed after 7 daily doses of oral E2 mg/P4 mg (1/100 and 0.5/100). RESULTS: In REPLENISH (n = 1,835), mean P4 levels were 0.39 to 0.55 ng/mL with 100-mg P4 doses; E2 levels were 42.3 to 45.6 pg/mL and 23.0 to 27.4 pg/mL for the 1-mg and 0.5-mg E2 doses, respectively; E1 levels were 214 to 242 pg/mL and 114 to 129 pg/mL for the 1-mg and 0.5-mg E2 doses. In the phase 1 study (n = 40; day 7), mean Cavg for P4 was 0.66 ng/mL with 100-mg P4 doses; E2 was 38.1 pg/mL and 29.2 pg/mL for 1 mg and 0.5 mg E2, respectively; and E1 was 211 and 106 pg/mL for 1 mg and 0.5 mg E2. All three analytes reached steady state within 7 days; accumulation ratios were 1.36 to 1.94. CONCLUSIONS: P4 levels observed with TX-001HR were similar in the phase 1 and 3 studies, and were associated with no endometrial hyperplasia with either E2 daily dose over 1 year in the REPLENISH phase 3 study, which showed significant improvements in menopausal vasomotor symptoms.

Estradiol vaginal inserts (4 µg and 10 µg) for treating moderate to severe vulvar and vaginal atrophy: a review of phase 3 safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic data.

OBJECTIVE: To review safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK) data from the phase 3 REJOICE trial, which evaluated a 17ß-estradiol (E2) softgel vaginal insert approved in 2018 for moderate to severe dyspareunia associated with menopausal vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA). METHODS: REJOICE (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02253173) was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in which women with moderate to severe dyspareunia due to menopausal VVA received 4 µg, 10 µg or 25 µg of an E2 vaginal insert or placebo for 12 weeks. The published data for the recently approved 4 µg and 10 µg doses of the E2 vaginal insert, including four co-primary efficacy endpoints (change from baseline to week 12 in percentages of superficial and parabasal cells, vaginal pH and severity of dyspareunia), safety and PK (which included serum E2 levels measured by gas chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry), are summarized here. RESULTS: Women were randomized to receive the E2 vaginal insert (4 µg [n = 186] or 10 µg [n = 188]; Imvexxy a ) or placebo (n = 187) in the modified intention-to-treat population. The E2 vaginal insert (4 µg and 10 µg) significantly improved the percentages of superficial and parabasal cells (p < .0001), vaginal pH (p < .0001), and the severity score for dyspareunia (p < .05) from baseline to week 12 compared with placebo. The recently approved E2 vaginal insert was well tolerated, with no clinically significant differences in treatment-emergent or serious adverse events versus placebo. Systemic absorption of E2 with both doses was minimal. CONCLUSIONS: The recently FDA-approved E2 softgel vaginal insert (4 µg and 10 µg) was safe and effective over 12 weeks for treating moderate to severe dyspareunia due to menopausal VVA with minimal systemic E2 levels.

A 17ß-Estradiol-Progesterone Oral Capsule for Vasomotor Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy, endometrial safety, and overall safety of a single-capsule 17ß-estradiol-progesterone (TX-001HR) for treating menopausal moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms. METHODS: REPLENISH was a phase 3, 12-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial. Women (aged 40-65 years) with vasomotor symptoms and a uterus were randomized to daily estradiol (mg)-progesterone (mg) (1/100, 0.5/100, 0.5/50, or 0.25/50), and women in the vasomotor symptoms substudy (women with moderate-to-severe hot flushes [seven or greater per day or 50 or greater per week]) to those estradiol-progesterone doses or placebo. The primary safety endpoint was endometrial hyperplasia incidence at 12 months in all women (the total population), and the primary efficacy endpoints were frequency and severity changes (from daily diaries) in moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms with estradiol-progesterone compared with placebo at weeks 4 and 12 in the vasomotor symptoms substudy. A sample size of 250 women in each active treatment arm with two or less endometrial hyperplasia cases would result in 1% or less annual incidence (upper bound 2.5% or less, one-sided 95% CI). RESULTS: One thousand eight hundred forty-five women were enrolled and randomized from August 2013 to October 2015; 1,835 received medication (safety population); 1,255 were eligible for the endometrial safety population; 726 comprised the vasomotor symptoms substudy; their mean age and body mass index were 55 years and 27, respectively; one third were African American. No endometrial hyperplasia was found. Frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms significantly decreased from baseline with 1 mg estradiol and 100 mg progesterone and 0.5 mg estradiol and 100 mg progesterone compared with placebo at week 4 (frequency: by 40.6 and 35.1 points [1 mg and 100 mg and 0.5 mg and 100 mg, respectively] vs 26.4 points [placebo]; severity: by 0.48 and 0.51 vs 0.34 points) and week 12 (by 55.1 and 53.7 vs 40.2; severity: by 1.12 and 0.90 vs 0.56); 0.5 mg estradiol and 50 mg progesterone improved (P<.05) frequency and severity at week 12, and 0.25 mg estradiol and 50 mg progesterone frequency but not severity at weeks 4 and 12. CONCLUSION: No endometrial hyperplasia was observed while single-capsule estradiol-progesterone provided clinically meaningfully improvements in moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms. This estradiol-progesterone formulation may represent a new option, using naturally occurring hormones, for the estimated millions of women using nonregulatory-approved, compounded hormone therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01942668.

Tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC): a review.

OBJECTIVE: This review describes historical development of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and their combination with estrogens, termed a tissue selective estrogen complex (TSEC), and considers the potential for future TSEC development. METHODS: This narrative review is based on literature identified on PubMed and the TSEC research and development experience of the authors. RESULTS: SERMs have estrogenic and antiestrogenic effects in various tissues; however, no single agent has achieved an optimal balance of agonist and antagonist effects for the treatment of menopausal symptoms. Clinically, a number of SERMs protect against osteoporosis and breast cancer but can exacerbate vasomotor symptoms. Estrogens alleviate menopausal hot flushes and genitourinary symptoms as well as reduce bone loss, but the addition of a progestogen to menopausal hormone therapy to protect against endometrial cancer increases vaginal bleeding risk, breast tenderness, and potentially breast cancer. The search for an effective menopausal therapy with better tolerability led to the investigation of TSECs. Clinical development of a TSEC consisting of conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene increased understanding of the importance of a careful consideration of the combination's components and their respective doses to balance safety and efficacy. Bazedoxifene is an estrogen receptor agonist in bone but an antagonist/degrader in the endometrium, which has contributed to its success as a TSEC component. Other oral TSEC combinations studied thus far have not demonstrated similar endometrial safety. CONCLUSIONS: Choice of SERM, selection of doses, and clinical trial data evaluating safety and efficacy are key to ensuring safety and adequate therapeutic effect of TSECs for addressing menopausal symptoms.

Initial investigation into the optimal dose ratio of conjugated estrogens and bazedoxifene: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 dose-finding study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to explore dose-related endometrial effects of conjugated estrogens/bazedoxifene (CE/BZA). METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase 2 study, 408 nonhysterectomized, symptomatic (with hot flushes [HFs]) postmenopausal women received ≥1 dose of CE 0.3 or 0.625 mg alone or with BZA 5, 10, or 20 mg/d; placebo; BZA 5 mg/d alone; or CE 0.625 mg with medroxyprogesterone acetate 2.5 mg/d for 84 days. The primary outcome was endometrial thickness on transvaginal ultrasound. HF frequency and severity based on diaries were key secondary outcomes. RESULTS: CE 0.625 mg alone increased endometrial thickness compared with placebo (mean 5.5 vs 2.95 mm, P < 0.001); BZA countered this in a dose-related manner such that average thickness with the addition of BZA 5, 10, and 20 mg was 5.99, 4.33, and 3.54 mm, respectively. On average, endometrium was significantly less thick with CE 0.625 mg/BZA 20 mg than CE 0.625 mg (P < 0.001) and CE 0.3 mg/BZA 20 mg versus CE 0.3 mg (2.94 vs 3.92 mm, P < 0.05); endometrial thickness was similar to placebo with CE 0.625 mg/BZA 20 mg. Lower BZA doses failed to reduce endometrial thickness relative to the same dose of CE alone. Regimens containing CE 0.625 mg reduced HF frequency and severity versus placebo; CE 0.3 mg with BZA 10 or 20 mg was ineffective. CONCLUSIONS: BZA ≥20 mg is needed to counter endometrial growth resulting from treatment with CE 0.3 or 0.625 mg. CE 0.3 mg inadequately controls HFs if given with BZA 20 mg.

Safety and benefit considerations for menopausal hormone therapy.

INTRODUCTION: While benefits and risks of hormone therapy (HT) have been shown in rigorous randomized, controlled trials, clinical use and further study have discovered effects of age, time of HT initiation, and differential effects of various regimens and administration routes on its safety profile. Areas covered: The safety of HT with regard to cardiovascular disease, thrombosis, the endometrium, the breast, and cognition was reviewed. Differential safety effects of estradiol versus conjugated equine estrogens, and progesterone versus synthetic progestins are reported. Expert opinion: Perceived safety of HT has evolved based on data from observational studies, the Women's Health Initiative and its subsequent analyses, more recent randomized, controlled trials, and studies examining the differences between different estrogens and between different progestogens. Unexpected safety concerns with HT became apparent with release of the first results from WHI. Differences between estrogen-alone versus estrogen-progestogen therapies, estradiol versus conjugated equine estrogens, and progesterone versus progestins were found in subsequent WHI analyses and studies examining components of various regimens. The decision to use HT depends on balancing risks and benefits for each individual and determining the most appropriate choice of therapy, dosing, and route of administration, while also considering the safety evidence of different estrogens and progestogens.

A vaginal estradiol softgel capsule, TX-004HR, has negligible to very low systemic absorption of estradiol: Efficacy and pharmacokinetic data review.

This paper reviews the efficacy, safety, and systemic absorption of estradiol with TX-004HR, an investigational, low-dose 17ß-estradiol vaginal softgel capsule, designed to treat vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) in postmenopausal women, with an improved user experience. In phase 2 (NCT02449902) and phase 3 REJOICE (NCT02253173) studies, TX-004HR significantly improved the proportions of vaginal superficial and parabasal cells and vaginal pH, and in the phase 3 study decreased the severity of dyspareunia, vaginal dryness, and vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation. In two randomized, phase 1 trials, estradiol Cmax and AUC0-24 were significantly lower with 10µg and 25µg TX-004HR than with the same doses of an approved vaginal estradiol tablet. A substudy (n=72) of the REJOICE trial showed that estradiol Cavg and AUC0-24 with 4µg and 10µg TX-004HR were not different from placebo on days 1 and 14. While TX-004HR 25µg was associated with higher Cavg and AUC0-24 versus placebo on days 1 and 14, these levels remained within the postmenopausal range. Estradiol day-84 values for all three doses were not different from placebo, demonstrating no estradiol accumulation. All TX-004HR doses were well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile in all reviewed studies. The local vaginal efficacy of TX-004HR was significantly better than that of placebo, while the overall safety profile was similar to that of placebo. Negligible to very low systemic estradiol absorption was observed whether given at 4, 10, or 25µg. If approved, TX-004HR may be an alternative option for women with symptomatic VVA without increasing mean systemic estradiol absorption above postmenopausal levels.

Consistency of Effect with a Low-Dose, Estradiol Vaginal Capsule (TX-004HR): Evaluating Improvement in Vaginal Physiology and Moderate-to-Severe Dyspareunia in Subgroups of Postmenopausal Women.

BACKGROUND: The 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, phase 3 REJOICE trial demonstrated that TX-004HR, an investigational, applicator-free, low-dose vaginal softgel capsule containing solubilized 17ß-estradiol, effectively and rapidly treats symptoms of vulvar and vaginal atrophy (VVA) with negligible to very low systemic absorption. The aim of this analysis was to assess whether the efficacy of TX-004HR varies with age, body mass index (BMI), uterine status, pregnancy status, and vaginal delivery. METHODS: The REJOICE trial evaluated the efficacy of 4-, 10-, and 25-µg doses of TX-004HR in postmenopausal women (40-75 years) with VVA and a self-identified most bothersome symptom of moderate-to-severe dyspareunia. Prespecified subgroup analyses of the four co-primary endpoints (percentages of superficial cells and parabasal cells, vaginal pH, and severity of dyspareunia) were analyzed with respect to age, BMI, uterine status, pregnancy status, and vaginal births. Each dose was compared with placebo for change from baseline to week 2 through week 12, respectively. RESULTS: TX-004HR significantly improved superficial cells, parabasal cells, and vaginal pH from baseline to weeks 2 and 12 in most subgroups. All TX-004HR doses numerically reduced the severity of dyspareunia by 2 weeks and maintained efficacy over 12 weeks, with many of the subgroups having statistically significant improvement relative to placebo. CONCLUSIONS: TX-004HR was efficacious for treating symptomatic VVA, and it demonstrated a consistency of effect when women's age, BMI, uterine status, pregnancy status, and vaginal births were evaluated. Clinical Trial Identifier: NCT02253173.

The REJOICE trial: a phase 3 randomized, controlled trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of a novel vaginal estradiol soft-gel capsule for symptomatic vulvar and vaginal atrophy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of TX-004HR vaginal estradiol soft-gel capsules for moderate-to-severe dyspareunia associated with postmenopausal vulvar and vaginal atrophy. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, postmenopausal women with a self-identified most bothersome symptom of dyspareunia received 4, 10, or 25 µg TX-004HR or placebo for 12 weeks. Four co-primary efficacy endpoints were change from baseline to week 12 in percentages of superficial and parabasal cells, vaginal pH, and severity of dyspareunia. Secondary endpoints included severity of vaginal dryness and vulvar and/or vaginal itching or irritation. Endometrial histology and adverse events (AEs) were included in the safety endpoints. RESULTS: In all, 764 women were randomized (modified intent-to-treat population, n = 747; mean age 59 y). Compared with placebo, all three doses of TX-004HR significantly improved the four co-primary endpoints (P < 0.0001 for all, except dyspareunia with 4 µg, P = 0.0149). Changes in cytology, pH, and dyspareunia were also significant at weeks 2, 6, and 8. Vaginal dryness and vaginal itching/irritation improved. Sex hormone binding globulin concentrations did not change with treatment. TX-004HR was well-tolerated, with no clinically meaningful differences in treatment-emergent AEs versus placebo, and no treatment-related serious AEs or deaths. CONCLUSIONS: TX-004HR (4, 10, and 25 µg) was safe, well-tolerated, and effective for treating moderate-to-severe dyspareunia within 2 weeks with minimal systemic estrogen exposure. This novel product may be a potential new treatment option for women experiencing postmenopausal vulvar and vaginal atrophy.

Back to the future: Hormone replacement therapy as part of a prevention strategy for women at the onset of menopause.

In the late 1980s, several observational studies and meta-analyses suggested that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was beneficial for prevention of osteoporosis, coronary heart disease, dementia and decreased all-cause mortality. In 1992, the American College of Physicians recommended HRT for prevention of coronary disease. In the late 1990s and early 2000s, several randomized trials in older women suggested coronary harm and that the risks, including breast cancer, outweighed any benefit. HRT stopped being prescribed at that time, even for women who had severe symptoms of menopause. Subsequently, reanalyzes of the randomized trial data, using age stratification, as well as newer studies, and meta-analyses have been consistent in showing that younger women, 50-59 years or within 10 years of menopause, have decreased coronary disease and all-cause mortality; and did not have the perceived risks including breast cancer. These newer findings are consistent with the older observational data. It has also been reported that many women who abruptly stopped HRT had more risks, including more osteoporotic fractures. The current data confirm a "timing" hypothesis for benefits and risks of HRT, showing that younger have many benefits and few risks, particularly if therapy is predominantly focused on the estrogen component. We discuss these findings and put into perspective the potential risks of treatment, and suggest that we may have come full circle regarding the use of HRT. In so doing we propose that HRT should be considered as part of a general prevention strategy for women at the onset of menopause.