Defining estimands for efficacy assessment in single arm phase 1b or phase 2 clinical trials in oncology early development.

The addendum of the ICH E9 guideline on the statistical principles for clinical trials introduced the estimand framework. The framework is designed to strengthen the dialog between different stakeholders, to introduce greater clarity in the clinical trial objectives and to provide alignment between the estimand and statistical analysis. Estimand framework related publications thus far have mainly focused on randomized clinical trials. The intention of the Early Development Estimand Nexus (EDEN), a task force of the cross-industry Oncology Estimand Working Group (www.oncoestimand.org), is to apply it to single arms Phase 1b or Phase 2 trials designed to detect a treatment-related efficacy signal, typically measured by objective response rate. Key recommendations regarding the estimand attributes include that in a single arm early clinical trial, the treatment attribute should start when the first dose is received by the participant. Focusing on the estimation of an absolute effect, the population-level summary measure should reflect only the property used for the estimation. Another major component introduced in the ICH E9 addendum is the definition of intercurrent events and the associated possible ways to handle them. Different strategies reflect different clinical questions of interest that can be answered based on the journeys an individual subject can take during a trial. We provide detailed strategy recommendations for intercurrent events typically seen in early-stage oncology. We highlight where implicit assumptions should be made transparent as whenever follow-up is suspended, a while-on-treatment strategy is implied.

Comprehensive clinical pharmacology characterization of AZD4635 in healthy participants to support dosing considerations.

AIMS: Two phase 1 studies characterized the oral bioavailability of AZD4635 (potential anticancer therapy) and factors that may influence its pharmacokinetics (PKs; food, smoking, proton-pump inhibitors [PPIs] and CYP1A2 inhibitors) to support continued clinical development of AZD4635. METHODS: Study 1 (comparative PK study; nonsmokers) consists of Part A and Part B. Participants (fasted) in Part A were administered 50 mg of AZD4635 either as nanosuspension or capsule. In Part B, these participants were administered a 50-mg capsule either following a high-fat meal or with a PPI in the fasted state. In Study 2 (CYP1A2 mediated drug-drug interaction study), a 25-mg AZD4635 capsule was administered to smokers and nonsmokers (fasted) with or without 100 mg of fluvoxamine. RESULTS: In Study 1 (N = 21), AZD4635 exposure was comparable between the capsule and nanosuspension. The high-fat meal produced a 12% decrease in AUCinf , a ≥50% reduction in Cmax and delayed absorption (Tmax : 4.0 h vs 1.5 h) for the capsule. The PPI did not affect the oral bioavailability of the AZD4635 capsule. In Study 2 (N = 28), AZD4635 + fluvoxamine (compared with AZD4635 alone) produced ~5-fold increases in AUCinf , 2-fold increases in Cmax and prolonged AZD4635 elimination half-life in smokers (22.7 vs 9.0 h) and nonsmokers (22.4 vs 9.2 h). All treatment regimens were well tolerated. The most common adverse events included dizziness, nausea and headache. CONCLUSIONS: The high-fat meal reduced the rate but not the extent of AZD4635 absorption. The effect of gastric pH on AZD4635 was minimal. Smoking had no effect on the exposure (Cmax and AUCinf ) of AZD4635, while fluvoxamine increased AZD4635 Cmax and total exposure. No new safety concerns were identified.

Phase Ia/b, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of AZD4635 (an Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonist) as Monotherapy or Combined with Durvalumab, in Patients with Solid Tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate AZD4635, an adenosine A2A receptor antagonist, as monotherapy or in combination with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In phase Ia (dose escalation), patients had relapsed/refractory solid tumors; in phase Ib (dose expansion), patients had checkpoint inhibitor-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) or colorectal carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer with prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 exposure, or other solid tumors (checkpoint-naïve or prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 exposure). Patients received AZD4635 monotherapy (75-200 mg once daily or 125 mg twice daily) or in combination with durvalumab (AZD4635 75 or 100 mg once daily). The primary objective was safety; secondary objectives included antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics; exploratory objectives included evaluation of an adenosine gene signature in patients with mCRPC. RESULTS: As of September 8, 2020, 250 patients were treated (AZD4635, n = 161; AZD4635+durvalumab, n = 89). In phase Ia, DLTs were observed with monotherapy (125 mg twice daily; n = 2) and with combination treatment (75 mg; n = 1) in patients receiving nanosuspension. The most common treatment-related adverse events included nausea, fatigue, vomiting, decreased appetite, dizziness, and diarrhea. The RP2D of the AZD4635 capsule formulation was 75 mg once daily, as monotherapy or in combination with durvalumab. The pharmacokinetic profile was dose-proportional, and exposure was adequate to cover target with 100 mg nanosuspension or 75 mg capsule once daily. In patients with mCRPC receiving monotherapy or combination treatment, tumor responses (2/39 and 6/37, respectively) and prostate-specific antigen responses (3/60 and 10/45, respectively) were observed. High versus low blood-based adenosine signature was associated with median progression-free survival of 21 weeks versus 8.7 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: AZD4635 monotherapy or combination therapy was well tolerated. Objective responses support additional phase II combination studies in patients with mCRPC.

Complete Laryngo-Tracheo-Oesophageal Cleft masquerading as Oesophageal Atresia and Tracheo-oesophageal Fistula: A Potential Diagnostic and Management Challenge.

Newborn babies presenting with difficulties related to the aerodigestive tract (ADT) are often provisionally diagnosed and managed as having oesophageal atresia +/- tracheo-oesophageal fistula. Continuing difficulties with management and abnormal findings on investigations should lead to the consideration of other congenital anomalies of the ADT, including complete larnygo-tracheo-oesophageal cleft (LTOC). We present two patients who were eventually diagnosed with complete LTOC and care was withdrawn. We discuss the inherent difficulties in reaching this diagnosis and present an algorithm to help manage these rare and challenging situations.

Developing family-centred care in a neonatal intensive care unit: An action research study.

AIM: To develop, implement and evaluate family-centred interventions to promote parental involvement in caregiving in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. METHODOLOGY: A participatory action research approach was used to implement two changes in practice a) improved skin-to-skin contact b) unlimited parental presence at the cot-side. The changes were underpinned by a family-centred philosophy of care and education. Data were collected from staff using a questionnaire, focus groups and interviews, and from parents using focus groups and interviews. Qualitative data were analysed using Framework and quantitative data analysed using descriptive and t-test statistics. SETTING: A Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in England. FINDINGS: Changes in practice were successfully implemented. Nurses reported positively on improvements in Family Centred Care; most notably information-sharing with parents, providing family support, enabling parental participation in care and improved competence supporting parents in care-giving. These changes were reflected in parental feedback. CONCLUSION: Understanding the context of the neonatal unit can support cultural change when change is actively facilitated and owned by the staff concerned. Acknowledging parents as the main caregiver can be challenging for nurses and they require support and education to enable them to manage the changes necessary to provide Family-Centred Care.

Initial experience of an investigational 3T MR scanner designed for use on neonatal wards.

OBJECTIVES: MR imaging of neonates is difficult for many reasons and a major factor is safe transport to the MR facilities. In this article we describe the use of a small, investigational 3-T MR customised for brain imaging and sited on a neonatal unit of a tertiary centre in the UK, which is in contrast to a 300-m journey to the whole-body MR scanner used at present for clinical cases. METHODS: We describe our methods for preparing babies for safe transport and scanning on an investigational 3-T MR scanner on a neonatal unit and the development of appropriate MR sequences. The MR scanner does not have CE marking at present so this early development work was undertaken on normal neonates whose parents consented to a research examination. RESULTS: Fifty-two babies were scanned and there were no serious adverse events. The MR examinations were considered to be diagnostically evaluable in all 52 cases and in 90% the imaging was considered to be at least as good as the quality obtained on the 1.5-T scanner currently used for clinical cases. CONCLUSION: We have shown that this investigational 3-T MR scanner can be used safely on a neonatal unit and we have refined the MR sequences to a point that they are clinically usable. KEY POINTS: • Access to neonatal MR imaging is limited. • We describe an investigational 3-T MR scanner site on a neonatal unit. • The scanner produces images suitable for clinical practice.

Developing family-centred care in a neonatal intensive care unit: an action research study protocol.

AIM: The aim of this study was to develop, implement and evaluate evidence-based family-centred interventions and to promote parental involvement in the care of infants in neonatal intensive care. BACKGROUND: Parental involvement in the care of their infants in Neonatal Intensive Care Units leads to improved neonatal outcomes. Although research identifies the benefits of individual interventions to promote family-centred care, little is known about how they might be implemented in everyday practice. DESIGN: Participatory action research. METHODS: Funding commenced in January 2015. The study comprises three phases: (i) Exploration: Baseline measures of staff and parental satisfaction with care and parental stress will be obtained using validated survey instruments. Baseline infant data includes breast feeding and skin-to-skin contact. Staff focus groups and interviews will provide insight into the context of parental involvement and perceived barriers to change. Parent focus groups and diaries will provide insight into factors influencing parental involvement in care. The data will inform the development of the evidence-based intervention; (ii) INTERVENTION: Three action research cycles and ongoing data collection from parents and staff will inform the further development of the intervention and change process; (iii) EVALUATION: Baseline measures will be repeated to identify changes. Focus groups and interviews with staff and parents will provide insight into their perceptions of the success of the initiative in promoting family-centred care. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute new knowledge about approaches to actively involve parents in the care of their infant on neonatal intensive care units. Greater understanding of the impact of family-centre care on staff and parents will be gained with the potential to inform future policy and practice.

Neonatal seizures-part 2: Aetiology of acute symptomatic seizures, treatments and the neonatal epilepsy syndromes.

Most neonatal epileptic seizures are provoked by an underlying condition or problem-'acute symptomatic seizures'. However, a few neonatal epilepsy syndromes exist, and these are defined by the constellation of seizure types, EEG findings and family history seen. Making an accurate diagnosis of an epilepsy syndrome can help direct investigations, treatment options and provide prognostic information. This article discusses the investigative approach and treatments for neonatal epileptic seizures, including the neonatal epilepsy syndromes.

Neonatal seizures-part 1: Not everything that jerks, stiffens and shakes is a fit.

The neonatal period is the most frequent time of life to have epileptic seizures. However, neonates can also exhibit unusual movements that are not epileptic seizures. Differentiating between epileptic and non-epileptic movements can be difficult. Many neonatal seizures exhibit few or no clinical features at all. This article is for the benefit of paediatric trainees and reviews the published evidence on which neonatal movements are likely to be epileptic seizures and which are not. We also discuss epileptic seizure classification.