Integrating new approaches to care in a vascular wound clinic.

INTRODUCTION: An evidence-based approach is essential in the treatment of wounds to optimise healing, reduce costs and improve patient outcomes. AIM: This case study aimed to demonstrate our model of care, which assesses and manages patients with venous disease and complex wounds. In this case, venous leg ulcer (VLU) was treated with TLC-NOSF dressing and therapeutic compression. The wound was serially assessed using a smart App that gave the patient a graphic representation of their progress. DESIGN: Descriptive Observational Case Study. CLINICAL CARE: An evidence-based approach for managing a chronic, severe VLU. The patient was initially seen at the Outpatient Vascular Wound Clinic twice weekly, then every two weeks for conservative sharp wound debridement, skin care, dressing change, and compression therapy using a compression (Ready) wrap. Wound progress was monitored by the digital application 'Tissue Analytics', a "purposedesigned digital wound management platform that records, tracks, and analyses wounds". RESULTS: Week 1: On initial review, ulcer length was 3.15cm, width was 3.1 cm, and total surface area was 6.31 cm2. The wound base was mildly sloughy (<25%), with areas of good granulation tissue on view. Week 12: Length was 1.32 cm, width 1.50 cm, and total surface area of 1.45 cm2, a 77% reduction in wound size. Week 24: The length was 0.48 cm, the width was 0.64 cm, and the total surface area was 0.18 cm2. This represented a 97% reduction in wound size. Week 36: Length was 0.01 cm, the width 0.06 cm, with a total surface area of 0.00 cm2. This represented a 99.99% reduction in wound size. CONCLUSION: The patient's treatment for a complex venous leg ulcer included the application of TLC-NOSF dressing in combination with individualised therapeutic compression therapy. We found TLC-NOSF was very effective in combination with the best standard of VLU care (i.e. therapeutic graduated compression therapy). The clinician and patient were impressed with the healing rate at 12 weeks, as the wound dimensions were the lowest since the wound started six years ago. This dramatically improved patient concordance and engagement in care. Despite incomplete healing at 36 weeks, the wound-healing journey over the 36 weeks indicated wound closure was close. In addition, using a wound assessment App, the patient could immediately see the benefits of the new treatment, facilitating patient compliance with the treatment.

The Viability and Acceptability of a Virtual Wound Care Command Centre in Australia.

The objective of this study was to assess the viability and acceptability of an innovative Virtual Wound Care Command Centre where patients in the community, and their treating clinicians, have access to an expert wound specialist service that comprises a digital wound application (app) for wound analysis, decision-making, remote consultation, and monitoring. Fifty-one patients with chronic (42.6%) wounds were healed, with a median time to healing of 66 (95% CI: 56-88) days. All patients reported high satisfaction with their wound care, 86.4% of patients recommended the Virtual Wound Care Command Centre with 84.1% of patients reporting the app as easy to use. The data revealed that the Virtual Wound Care Command Centre was a viable and acceptable patient-centred expert wound consultation service for chronic wound patients in the community.

The viability and acceptability of a Virtual Wound Care Command Centre in Australia.

The objective of this study was to assess the viability and acceptability of an innovative Virtual Wound Care Command Centre where patients in the community, and their treating clinicians, have access to an expert wound specialist service that comprises a digitally enabled application for wound analysis, decision-making, remote consultation, and monitoring. Fifty-one patients with chronic wounds from 9 centres, encompassing hospital services, outpatient clinics, and community nurses in one metropolitan and rural state in Australia, were enrolled and a total of 61 wounds were analysed over 7 months. Patients received, on average, an occasion of service every 4.4 days, with direct queries responded to in a median time of 1.5 hours. During the study period, 26 (42.6%) wounds were healed, with a median time to healing of 66 (95% CI: 56-88) days. All patients reported high satisfaction with their wound care, 86.4% of patients recommended the Virtual Wound Care Command Centre with 84.1% of patients reporting the digital wound application as easy to use. Potential mean travel savings of $99.65 for rural patients per visit were recognised. The data revealed that the Virtual Wound Care Command Centre was a viable and acceptable patient-centred expert wound consultation service for chronic wound patients in the community.

Chronic wound care delivery in wound clinics, community nursing and residential aged care settings: A qualitative analysis using Levine's Conservation Model.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To explore patient experience of chronic wound care across diverse models of outpatient wound care delivery. BACKGROUND: Chronic wounds represent a significant personal, family and healthcare system burden. Evidence suggests specialist wound clinics are more effective and less expensive, however, most outpatient wound care is delivered by general community nurses. There is little understanding of how patients experience diverse models of wound care delivery and the subsequent impact on their capacity to adapt to imbalances in their internal/external environment. DESIGN: Descriptive, qualitative study. METHODS: Eighteen patients with chronic wounds from three wound services were engaged in semi-structured interviews. Initial inductive analysis was refined deductively using Levine's Conservation Model. RESULTS: Chronic wounds lead to imbalances and subsequent adaptions in energy conservation and personal, social and structural integrity. Nursing process and wound care system responses suggest specialist wound clinics provide access to the right person and care at the right time, with less care variation. The community nursing model is most effective with a small team of nurses and a documented care plan, with specialist wound nurse oversight. Residential aged care facilities emerged as important sites for wound care delivery revealing higher variance in care and less specialist wound oversight. CONCLUSIONS: The application of Levine's conservation model provides a theoretical understanding and important insights into the patient experience of nurse and system elements across diverse models of wound care delivery. Specialist oversight by expert wound nurses with the capacity for medical specialist referral is the cornerstone of good wound care. A frequently reviewed wound care plan and skill development for nurses in primary, aged care and community settings are vital. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Shared care between specialist and primary care should include evidence-based pain assessment, clear referral pathways, collaborative relationships, telehealth capacity, patient-held wound plans and upskilling of frontline clinicians.

The chaos of hospitalisation for patients with critical limb ischaemia approaching major amputation.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To illuminate the hospital experience for patients and families when major amputation has been advised for critical limb ischaemia (CLI). BACKGROUND: CLI creates significant burden to the health system and the family, particularly as the person with CLI approaches amputation. Major amputation is often offered as a late intervention for CLI in response to the marked deterioration of an ischaemic limb, and functional decline from reduced mobility, intractable pain, infection and/or toxaemia. While a wealth of clinical outcome data on CLI and amputation exists internationally, little is known about the patient/family-centred experience of hospitalisation to inform preservation of personhood and patient-centred care planning. DESIGN: Longitudinal qualitative study using Heideggerian phenomenology. METHODS: Fourteen patients and 13 family carers provided a semistructured interview after advice for major amputation. Where amputation followed, a second interview (6 months postprocedure) was provided by eight patients and seven family carers. Forty-two semistructured interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Hermeneutic phenomenological analysis followed. RESULTS: Hospitalisation for CLI, with or without amputation, created a sense of chaos, characterised by being fragile and needing more time for care (fragile body and fragile mind, nurse busyness and carer hypervigilance), being adrift within uncontrollable spaces (noise, unreliable space, precarious accommodation and unpredictable scheduling) and being confused by missed and mixed messages (multiple stakeholders, information overload and cultural/linguistic diversity). CONCLUSIONS: Patients and families need a range of strategies to assist mindful decision-making in preparation for amputation in what for them is a chaotic process occurring within a chaotic environment. Cognitive deficits increase the care complexity and burden of family advocacy. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: A coordinated, interprofessional response should improve systems for communication, family engagement, operation scheduling and discharge planning to support preparation, adjustment and allow a sense of safety to develop. Formal peer support for patients and caregivers should be actively facilitated.