Hepatitis E virus infections in blood donors, France.

We screened plasma samples (minipools of 96 samples, corresponding to 53,234 blood donations) from France that had been processed with solvent-detergent for hepatitis E virus RNA. The detection rate was 1 HEV-positive sample/2,218 blood donations. Most samples (22/24) from viremic donors were negative for IgG and IgM against HEV.

Two cases of transfusion-transmitted hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in a low-endemic country before implementation of HBV nucleic acid testing.

BACKGROUND: The risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission by transfusion is higher than that of other blood-borne viruses. In France, before the introduction of HBV nucleic acid testing (NAT) in 2010, blood donations were tested for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibodies against hepatitis B core antigen, and the residual risk of HBV transfusion related to preseroconversion acute phase was estimated at 0.54 per million donations. The additional value of the implementation of a highly sensitive HBV NAT to prevent such transmissions is discussed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Two lookback investigations based on HBV seroconversion of repeat donors were performed. Donors and recipients were followed up in multiple samples that were tested for HBV serologic and molecular markers. RESULTS: The recipients have shown posttransfusion HBsAg seroconversion. The archived samples from the implicated donations were positive for HBV DNA at extremely low viral load in both cases. HBV isolates from donors and recipients of each case were organized in the same cluster with 100% identities into Genotypes A2 and B4, respectively. One recipient spontaneously recovered from infection while the second was successfully treated. CONCLUSION: The present cases highlight the importance of introducing highly sensitive HBV NAT to prevent transmission. Moreover, the lookback studies based on appropriate molecular and serologic investigations of patients transfused with previous donations from newly identified HBV-infected repeat donors offer the opportunity to treat a recently infected recipient.

Molecular characterization of genotype 2 and 4 hepatitis C virus isolates in French blood donors.

The subtype distribution of 142 genotype 2 and 97 genotype 4 hepatitis C virus (HCV) isolates from the sera of 1,319 volunteer blood donors in France was determined by gene sequencing and by phylogenetic analysis of the NS5B region and E1 envelope. Findings underlined a wide range of subtypes in both genotypes, that is, 20 in HCV-2 and 11 in HCV-4. Eighteen of these 31 subtypes had not been defined previously. Some subtypes, that is, 2a, 2b, 2c, 2i, 2k, 4a, and 4d, showed numerous strains while subtypes in donors from West Africa or Central Africa showed an endemic profile with only a few strains. A Bayesian coalescence approach was used to estimate the demographic history of each HCV subtype. The estimated mean dates of the most recent common ancestors (MRCA) were 1,889 (confidence interval (CI), 1,842-1,930) for HCV-2a, 1,886 (CI, 1,843-1,921) for HCV-2b, 1,791 (CI, 1,699-1,848) for HCV-2c, 1,846 (CI, 1,803-1,878) for HCV-2i, 1,911 (CI, 1,879-1,937) for HCV-4a, and 1,957 (CI, 1,943-1,967) for HCV-4d. The period of spread for subtype 2b, 2c, and 2i was between 1900 and 1960 whereas rapid exponential spread for subtype 2a, 4a, and 4d occurred in the 1960s. The inferred histories of population growth indicated that transmission rates differed according to HCV subtype. These results may help to predict the future burden of HCV in France.

A revised method for estimating hepatitis B virus transfusion residual risk based on antibody to hepatitis B core antigen incident cases.

BACKGROUND: To take into account the transient nature of hepatitis B virus (HBV) antigenemia, the calculation of HBV residual risk (RR), based on the incidence/window period model, is adjusted by a correction factor that adds uncertainty to the RR estimates. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This new method to estimate the RR for HBV is a weighted sum of the RR derived from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) incident cases and the one derived from antibody hepatitis B core antigen (HBc) incident cases. An anti-HBc incident case was defined as a donation from a blood donor who had made at least one anti-HBc-negative donation followed by a donation that was found positive with two different assays within a 3-year period and positive for at least one of the following markers: 1) antibody to hepatitis B e antigen or hepatitis B e antigen, 2) anti-HBc immunoglobulin M, 3) HBV DNA, 4) hepatitis B surface antibody without HBV vaccination history, or 5) HBV DNA retrospectively found in the previous donation. Five overlapping 3-year study periods between 2000 and 2006 were analyzed. RESULTS: The HBV RR estimated with the classical method ranged from 1.51 (2000-2002) to 0.69 per million donations in 2004 through 2006 with a decrease in 2002 through 2004 due to only two HBsAg incident cases reported in this period. By applying the revised model, the HBV RR ranged from 1.06 (2000-2002) to 0.49 per million donations (2004-2006), with a regular decrease. CONCLUSION: The new presented model provides HBV RR estimates that do not statistically differ from those obtained with the classical model; however, it provides more accurate data, especially in low endemic areas where the HBsAg incidence is low.

Is an assay for simultaneous detection of hepatitis C virus core antigen and antibody a valuable alternative to nucleic acid testing?

BACKGROUND: A new enzyme immunoassay based on the simultaneous detection of nucleocapsid proteins of hepatitis C virus (HCV) and anti-HCV (Monolisa HCV antigen-antibody Ultra, Bio-Rad) was evaluated as an alternative to nucleic acid testing (NAT) for the diagnosis of HCV infection during the window period in blood donations. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The study included 107 sequential samples from 10 HCV seroconversion commercial panels; 81 samples were in the preseroconversion phase, and 26 were collected after seroconversion. All samples were tested with HCV antigen-antibody assay and the two minipool (MP) NAT procedures that are routinely used in France (transcription-mediated amplification in pools of 8 and COBAS AmpliScreen HCV test [Roche Diagnostic] in pools of 24 donations). RESULTS: From the 44 samples collected during window period that were MP-NAT-positive, 31 (70.5%) were also positive with the Monolisa HCV antigen-antibody assay. The mean delay in detecting HCV infection between these two methods was 5.1 days (range, 0-24 days). The Monolisa HCV antigen-antibody assay led to a reduction in the window period of 26.8 days (range, 0-72 days). All samples collected after seroconversion were detected with the HCV antigen-antibody assay. The specificity analyzed in 2503 consecutive blood donations was estimated at 99.88 percent. CONCLUSION: This new developed assay presents an improvement for the detection of HCV infection, especially in the early phase of infection when antibodies are undetectable. Although less sensitive than NAT, this assay could be a suitable solution for blood screening in developing countries where NAT (or HCV core antigen-specific assay) is not affordable or its implementation is not feasible.