Duplex ultrasound-guided angioplasty of hemodialysis vascular access.

OBJECTIVE: Duplex ultrasound-guided angioplasty (DA) for hemodialysis vascular accesses remains questionable regarding its feasibility and safety. Minor complications (requiring no more treatment than nominal therapy) might be over-reported. Our hypothesis is that this procedure has no significant differences between observed rates and the recommended threshold of main outcomes of the procedure defined by the standards of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) angioplasty. METHODS: In a single-center retrospective study, 298 DA performed on 141 patients from 2015 to 2019 were analyzed. Occluded AVF or concomitant use of radiographic guidance were excluded. Duplex ultrasound parameters were collected up to 1 month before, at the end of angioplasty, and on day 30 after the procedure. Complications were registered, and patency rates were studied at 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Anatomical success was achieved in 142 procedures (47.7%), clinical success in 284 (95.3%), and hemodynamic success in 283 (95.0%). Major complications-requiring at least a specific therapy-were reported in 8 procedures (2.7%) and minor complications-requiring no adjunctive therapy-in 157 (52.7%). At 24 months, overall postintervention primary patency was 34.0%, primary-assisted patency 87.4%, and secondary patency 92.5%. There were no significant differences of patency rates between groups with or without minor complications (P value for primary patency, 0.08; primary-assisted patency, 0.08; secondary patency, 0.23) or 30% residual stenosis (P value for primary patency, 0.82; primary-assisted patency, 0.46; secondary patency: 0.63). Duplex parameters further improved at postoperative day 30 after angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: DA of AVF is feasible, safe-despite over-reported minor complications having no impact on postintervention patency rates-and efficient. A minor complication can be seen as an event without bad or good consequences. Anatomical definition of success does not fit on DA for hemodialysis vascular access. Further studies are required to define the duplex parameter threshold for efficacy.

Day and night changes in energy expenditure of patients on automated peritoneal dialysis.

RATIONALE: Automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) treatment for end-stage kidney disease affords patients a degree of autonomy in everyday life. Clinical investigations of their energy expenditure (EE) are usually based on resting EE, which could mask day and night variations in EE. The aim of this study, therefore, was to compare the components of EE in APD patients and healthy control (C) subjects. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Patients treated with APD for more than 3 months were compared with C volunteers matched for age and lean body mass (LBM). Biochemical analyses were performed and body composition was determined by DEXA to adjust EE to LBM. Total EE, its different components and respiratory quotients (RQ) were measured by a gas exchange method in calorimetric chambers. Spontaneous total and activity-related EE (AEE) were also measured in free-living conditions over 4 days by a calibrated accelerometer and a heart rate monitor. RESULTS: APD (n = 7) and C (n = 7) patients did not differ in age and body composition. REE did not differ between the two groups. However, prandial increase in EE adjusted for dietary energy intake was higher in APD patients (+57.5 ± 12.71 kcal/h) than in C subjects (+33.8 ± 10.5 kcal/h, p = 0.003) and nocturnal decrease in EE tended to be lower in APD patients undergoing dialysis sessions (- 4.53 ± 8.37 kcal/h) than in subjects (- 11.8 ± 7.69 kcal/h, p = 0.059). Resting RQ (0.91 ± 0.09 vs 0.81 ± 0.04, p = 0.032) and nocturnal RQ (0.91 ± 0.09 vs 0.81 ± 0.04, p = 0.032) were significantly higher in APD patients, indicating a preferential use of glucose substrate potentially absorbed across the peritoneum. AEE was lower in APD patients (595.9 ± 383.2 kcal/d) than in C subjects (1205.2 ± 370.5 kcal/d, p = 0.011). In contrast, energy intakes were not significantly different (1986 ± 465 vs 2083 ± 377 kcal/d, p = 0.677). CONCLUSION: Although the two groups had identical resting EE, APD patients had a higher prandial increase in EE, a lower activity-related EE and higher resting and nocturnal RQ than healthy subjects.

Circulating 20S proteasome for assessing protein energy wasting syndrome in hemodialysis patients.

Protein energy wasting (PEW) including muscle atrophy is a common complication in chronic hemodialysis patients. The ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS) is the main proteolytic system causing muscle atrophy in chronic kidney disease and proteasome 20S is the catalytic component of the UPS. Circulating proteasome 20S (c20S proteasome) is present in the blood and its level is related to disease severity and prognosis in several disorders. We hypothesized that c20S proteasome could be related with muscle mass, other PEW criteria and their evolution in hemodialysis patients. Stable hemodialysis patients treated at our center for more than 3 months were followed over 2 years. C20S proteasome assay was performed at baseline. Biological and clinical data were collected, muscle mass was assessed by multi-frequency bio-impedancemetry, and nutritional scores were calculated at baseline, 1 year and 2 years. Hospitalizations and mortality data were collected over the 2 years. Forty-nine patients were included. At baseline, the c20S proteasome level was 0.40[0.26-0.55] µg/ml. Low muscle mass as defined by a lean tissue index (LTI) < 10th in accordance with the International Society of Renal Nutrition and Metabolism guidelines was observed in 36% and PEW in 62%. Increased c20S proteasome levels were related with LTI at baseline (R = 0.43, p = 0.004) and with its 2 year-variation (R = -0.56, p = 0.003). Two-year survival rate was not different between higher and lower c20S proteasome values (78.9 vs 78.4%, p = 0.98 log-rank test). C20S proteasome is not a good marker for assessing nutritional status in hemodialysis patients and predicting patient outcomes.

Evaluation of the efficacy of an interdialytic "ethanol 40% v/v - enoxaparin 1000 U/mL" lock solution to prevent tunnelled catheter infections in chronic hemodialysis patients: a multi-centre, randomized, single blind, parallel group study.

BACKGROUND: Tunnelled dialysis catheter (TC) infections are a major health complication and are associated with increased antibiotic consumption, hospital stays, health costs and mortality. Experimental data provide evidence that Ethenox, a mixture of enoxaparine 1000 U/mL in 40% v/v ethanol, could be a promising lock solution. The aim of the study is to compare an interdialytic lock solution of Ethenox with reference lock solutions, unfractionated heparin (UFH) or citrate 4% for the prevention of TCI in hemodialysis patients. METHOD: This study will monitor a multicentre, prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled, parallel group trial. The main inclusion criteria are patients > 18 years old with end-stage renal disease, treated with chronic hemodialysis/hemodiafiltration three times a week, with incident or prevalent non-impregnated internal jugular TCs inserted for at least 2 weeks and able to give informed consent. Exclusion criteria are TCI in the previous 4 weeks and anti-infective treatment for TCI in the previous 2 weeks. Patients will be randomized to receive either study treatment Ethenox in the intervention group or reference solutions in the control group, unfractionated heparin (UFH) or citrate 4% w/v according to usual practice. The primary outcome measure will be time to first TCIs assessed by an endpoint adjudication committee blinded to the study arm according to predefined criteria. Patients will receive the study treatment for up to 12 months. Intention-to-treat analysis of the primary endpoint will be performed with a marginal Cox proportional hazard model. Prospective power calculations indicate that the study will have 90% statistical power to detect a clinical significant two-fold increase in median infection-free survival if 200 patients are recruited into each arm over a period of 24 months. DISCUSSION: Firm evidence of the efficacy of the Ethenox lock in preventing TCI could be of major clinical benefit for patients. The results of this study will allow the development of new guidelines based on a high level of evidence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03083184 , date of registration March 17 2017 and European Clinical Trials Database Identifier: EudraCT 2016-A00180-51), date of registration July 11 2016.