Prevalence of HIV in mental health service users: a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of HIV in a cohort of people who have used secondary mental health services in the UK. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Routinely collected clinical data from secondary mental health services in South London, UK available for research through the Clinical Record Interactive Search tool at the National Institute for Health and Care Research Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre were matched with pseudonymised national HIV surveillance data held by the UK Health Security Agency using a deterministic matching algorithm. PARTICIPANTS: All adults aged 16+ who presented for the first time to mental health services in the South London and Maudsley (SLaM) National Health Service Trust between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2018 were included. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Point prevalence of HIV. RESULTS: There were 181 177 people who had contact with mental health services for the first time between 2007 and 2018 in SLaM. Overall, 2.47% (n=4481) of those had a recorded HIV diagnosis in national HIV surveillance data at any time (before, during or after contact with mental health services), 24.73 people per 1000. HIV point prevalence was highest in people with a diagnosed substance use disorder at 3.77% (n=784). A substantial percentage of the sample did not have a formal mental health diagnosis (27%), but even with those excluded, the point prevalence remained high at 2.31%. Around two-thirds of people had their diagnosis of HIV before contact with mental health services (67%; n=1495). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HIV in people who have had contact with mental health services was approximately 2.5 times higher than the general population in the same geographical area. Future work should investigate risk factors and disparities in HIV outcomes between those with and without mental health service contact.

Sexual and reproductive health needs assessment and interventions in a female psychiatric intensive care unit.

AIMS AND METHOD: To assess the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs of women admitted to a psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU), and acceptability of delivering specialist SRH assessments and interventions in this setting. Within a quality improvement framework, staff were trained, a clinical protocol developed and clinical interventions made accessible. RESULTS: Thirty per cent of women were identified as having unmet SRH needs and proceeded to a specialist appointment, representing a 2.5-fold increase in unmet need detection. Forty-two per cent of women were assessed, representing a 3.5-fold increase in uptake. Twenty-one per cent of women initiated SRH interventions, of which 14% had all their SRH needs met. Staff, patients and carers highlighted the acceptability and importance of SRH care, if interventions were appropriately timed and patients' individual risk profiles were considered. Barriers to access included lack of routine enquiry, illness acuity and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: SRH needs for PICU admissions are greater than previously realised. Providing a nurse-led SRH assessment is acceptable, feasible and beneficial for PICU patients.

Homelessness among an inpatient HIV-positive cohort at a tertiary care hospital in central London.

A cohort review was conducted at a central London tertiary care hospital trust on the prevalence of homelessness among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive inpatients over a year. Data were collected on the duration of inpatient stay, co-morbidities including acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS)-defining illnesses, co-infections, initiation of antiretroviral therapy, CD4 cell count, HIV viral load and substance misuse. Homeless people were found to be at high risk for hepatitis C, mental health illness, substance misuse including injecting drug use, recurrent bacterial infections, AIDS-associated illnesses, lower CD4 cell counts and HIV viremia. They also had more missed HIV outpatient appointments. It was highlighted that a multidisciplinary approach in their care was necessary to address their needs and reduce the morbidity burden in this cohort.

The magnitude and severity of abortion-related morbidity in settings with limited access to abortion services: a systematic review and meta-regression.

INTRODUCTION: Defining and accurately measuring abortion-related morbidity is important for understanding the spectrum of risk associated with unsafe abortion and for assessing the impact of changes in abortion-related policy and practices. This systematic review aims to estimate the magnitude and severity of complications associated with abortion in areas where access to abortion is limited, with a particular focus on potentially life-threatening complications. METHODS: A previous systematic review covering the literature up to 2010 was updated with studies identified through a systematic search of Medline, Embase, Popline and two WHO regional databases until July 2016. Studies from settings where access to abortion is limited were included if they quantified the percentage of abortion-related hospital admissions that had any of the following complications: mortality, a near-miss event, haemorrhage, sepsis, injury and anaemia. We calculated summary measures of the percentage of abortion-related hospital admissions with each complication by conducting meta-analysis and explored whether these have changed over time. RESULTS: Based on data collected between 1988 and 2014 from 70 studies from 28 countries, we estimate that at least 9% of abortion-related hospital admissions have a near-miss event and approximately 1.5% ends in a death. Haemorrhage was the most common complication reported; the pooled percentage of abortion-related hospital admissions with severe haemorrhage was 23%, with around 9% having near-miss haemorrhage reported. There was strong evidence for between-study heterogeneity across most outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of the challenges on how near miss morbidity has been defined and measured in the included studies, our results suggest that a substantial percentage of abortion-related hospital admissions have potentially life-threatening complications. Estimates that are more reliable will only be obtained with increased use of standard definitions such as the WHO near-miss criteria and/or better reporting of clinical criteria applied in studies.

Do women requesting only contraception find attendance at an integrated sexual health clinic more stigmatizing than attendance at a family planning-only clinic?

PURPOSE: Both sexually transmitted infections and the genitourinary medicine clinics that patients attend for management of sexually transmitted infections are stigmatized by patients' perceptions. The aim of this study was to assess whether women requesting contraception only find attendance at an integrated sexual health clinic (ISHC) more stigmatizing than attendance at a family planning (FP)-only clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women requesting contraception only were asked to complete a stigma assessment questionnaire in the waiting room of the clinic they attended. Ease of understanding was assessed for each item of the questionnaire prior to commencement of the survey. The questionnaire was given to women attending either an ISHC or a FP-only clinic. RESULTS: One hundred questionnaires that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were returned. The users of FP-only services were generally older than the users of ISHCs and were more likely than the users of ISHCs to classify themselves as UK white. Stigma perception was significantly higher for the ISHC than the FP-only clinic. CONCLUSION: The results of this research indicate that among women who request contraception only, perceived stigma is higher when they attend an ISHC than when they attend a FP-only clinic. As this survey only enrolled clinic users, the authors were unable to assess whether integration generates sufficient stigma to deter some women from accessing contraception from integrated services. Of all stigma-related issues, disclosure concerns are likely to be the most important to the service user. Stigma is not an issue of overriding concern for most service users.

Antenatal contraception - simple, feasible, but is it safe and ethical in resource-poor environments?

In developing countries, antenatal care is used by more women than any other reproductive health services available and many women who receive antenatal care will not receive intrapartum care by a trained provider and even fewer will receive postnatal care. At present, antenatal care provides contraceptive counselling but not contraceptive provision. An important reason for this is the perceived absence of a suitable method that could be distributed or started during antenatal care. In this article, we discuss the available options. We conclude that antenatal insertion of subdermal contraceptive implants is very likely to be safe and ethically defensible where access to contraceptive services is poor.

Counselling styles and their effect on subdermal contraceptive implant continuation rates.

OBJECTIVES: This study compares whether counselling style prior to insertion of subdermal implants (SDIs) affects continuation rates at one-year post-insertion. Two senior doctors in a North London Integrated Sexual Health Clinic counselled patients in different ways. METHOD: This was a study involving 50 patients. Of these 25 received 'cautious' counselling: they were advised to think carefully about having a SDI inserted and the counsellor emphasised the risks and relative inconvenience of inserting and removing the implant. The second group of 25 women received 'just-try-it' counselling; this consisted of encouraging the patients to have a SDI inserted and emphasising the reversibility of the method. RESULTS: Continuation rates were 92% (23/25) for the 'cautious' approach and 80% (20/25) for the 'just-try-it' approach. More SDI acceptors in the 'just-try-it' group (5/25) first learned about the existence of this contraceptive method during the same consultation in which the implant was inserted than in the 'cautious' group (1/25). All six of these immediate acceptors kept their implant for at least a year. CONCLUSION: Continuation rates did not differ much between the two counselling styles and approaches were compatible with high continuation rates. Lowering the barriers to SDI use can benefit patients and reduce costs to the health economy.

Should we change the focus of health promotion in sexual health clinics?

The effectiveness of sexual behaviour change interventions in sexual health clinics is unknown. Risk factors for poor sexual and reproductive health such as depression, violence, alcohol and smoking in sexual health clinics are all common and can be identified easily in sexual health services. Targeting these risk factors could be as effective as traditional sexual health promotion and could have additional benefits. The authors propose a pilot to assess the cost-effectiveness and acceptability of incorporating screening and interventions for these risk factors.