Atrial Fibrillation Incidence Associated With Exposure to Anticancer Drugs Used as Monotherapy in Clinical Trials.

Background: The incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with anticancer drugs in cancer patients remains incompletely defined. Objectives: The primary outcome was the annualized incidence rate of AF reporting associated with exposure to 1 of 19 anticancer drugs used as monotherapy in clinical trials. The authors also report the annualized incidence rate of AF reported in the placebo arms of these trials. Methods: The authors systematically searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase 2 and 3 cancer trials studying 19 different anticancer drugs of interest used as monotherapy, up to September 18, 2020. The authors performed a random-effects meta-analysis to compute summary AF annualized incidence rate with its 95% CI using log transformation and inverse variance weighting. Results: A total of 191 clinical trials (47.1% were randomized) of 16 anticancer drugs across 26,604 patients were included. Incidence rates could be calculated for 15 drugs administered singly as monotherapy. Summary annualized incidence rates of AF reporting associated with exposure to 1 of the 15 anticancer drugs used as monotherapy were derived; these ranged from 0.26 to 4.92 per 100 person-years. The 3 highest annualized incidence rates of AF reporting were found for ibrutinib 4.92 (95% CI: 2.91-8.31), clofarabine 2.38 (95% CI: 0.66-8.55), and ponatinib 2.35 (95% CI: 1.78-3.12) per 100 person-years. Summary annualized incidence rate of AF reporting in the placebo arms was 0.25 per 100 person-years (95% CI: 0.10-0.65). Conclusions: AF reporting is not a rare event associated with anticancer drugs in clinical trials. A systematic and standardized AF detection should be considered in oncological trials, particularly those studying anticancer drugs associated with high AF rates. (Incidence of atrial fibrillation associated with anticancer drugs exposure in monotherapy, A safety meta-analysis of phase 2 and 3 clinical trials; CRD42020223710).

Cardiovascular immunotoxicities associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a safety meta-analysis.

AIMS: The risk and incidence of cardiovascular (CV) immune-related adverse events (irAEs) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients remain unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We systematically reviewed all randomized clinical trials (RCTs) including at least one ICI-containing arm and available CV adverse event (CVAE) data in cancer patients in the ClinicalTrials.gov registry, Medline, and the Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, up to 31 August 2020 (CRD42020165672). The primary outcome was the summary risk of 16 different CVAEs associated with ICI exposure vs. controls (placebo and non-placebo) in RCTs. CVAEs with an increased risk associated with ICI exposure were considered as CV irAEs. Summary incidences of CV irAEs identified in our primary outcome analyses were computed using all RCTs including at least one ICI-containing arm. We used a random-effects meta-analysis to obtain Peto odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and logit transformation and inverse variance weighting to compute summary incidences. Sixty-three unique RCTs with at least one ICI-containing arm (32 518 patients) were retrieved, among which 48 (29 592 patients) had a control arm. Among the 16 CVAEs studied, ICI use was associated with an increased risk of 6 CV irAEs including myocarditis, pericardial diseases, heart failure, dyslipidemia, myocardial infarction, and cerebral arterial ischaemia with higher risks for myocarditis (Peto OR: 4.42, 95% CI: 1.56-12.50, P < 0.01; I2 = 0%, P = 0.93) and dyslipidemia (Peto OR: 3.68, 95% CI: 1.89-7.19, P < 0.01; I2 = 0%, P = 0.66). The incidence of these CVAEs ranged from 3.2 (95% CI 2.0-5.1) to 19.3 (6.7-54.1) per 1000 patients, in studies with a median follow-up ranging from 3.2 to 32.8 months. CONCLUSION: In RCTs, ICI use was associated with six CV irAEs, not confined to myocarditis and pericarditis.

Identification of anticancer drugs associated with atrial fibrillation: analysis of the WHO pharmacovigilance database.

AIMS: The explosion of novel anticancer therapies has meant emergence of cardiotoxicity signals including atrial fibrillation (AF). Reliable data concerning the liability of anticancer drugs in inducing AF are scarce. Using the World Health Organization individual case safety report database, VigiBase®, we aimed to determine the association between anticancer drugs and AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: A disproportionality analysis evaluating the multivariable-adjusted reporting odds ratios for AF with their 99.97% confidence intervals was performed for 176 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- or European Medicines Agency (EMA)-labelled anticancer drugs in VigiBase®, followed by a descriptive analysis of AF cases for the anticancer drugs identified in VigiBase®. ClinicalTrial registration number: NCT03530215. A total of 11 757 AF cases associated with at least one anticancer drug were identified in VigiBase® of which 95.8% were deemed serious. Nineteen anticancer drugs were significantly associated with AF of which 14 (74%) are used in haematologic malignancies and 9 (45%) represented new AF associations not previously confirmed in literature including immunomodulating agents (lenalidomide, pomalidomide), several kinase inhibitors (nilotinib, ponatinib, midostaurin), antimetabolites (azacytidine, clofarabine), docetaxel (taxane), and obinutuzumab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. CONCLUSION: Although cancer malignancy itself may generate AF, we identified 19 anticancer drugs significantly associated with a significant increase in AF over-reporting. This pharmacovigilance study provides evidence that anticancer drugs themselves could represent independent risk factors for AF development. Dedicated prospective clinical trials are now required to confirm these 19 associations. This list of suspected anticancer drugs should be known by physicians when confronted to AF in cancer patients, particularly in case of haematologic malignancies.

Septuagenarian population has similar survival and outcomes to younger patients after left ventricular assist device implantation.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation may be an attractive alternative therapeutic option for elderly patients with heart failure who are ineligible for heart transplantation. AIM: We aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of elderly patients (i.e. aged≥70 years) receiving an LVAD. METHODS: This observational study was conducted in 19 centres between 2006 and 2016. Patients were divided into two groups-younger (aged<70 years) and elderly (aged≥70 years), based on age at time of LVAD implantation. RESULTS: A total of 652 patients were included in the final analysis, and 74 patients (11.3%) were aged≥70 years at the time of LVAD implantation (maximal age 77.6 years). The proportion of elderly patients receiving an LVAD each year was constant, with a median of 10.6% (interquartile range 8.0-15.4%) per year, and all were implanted as destination therapy. Elderly and younger patients had similar durations of hospitalization in intensive care units and total lengths of hospital stays. Both age groups experienced similar rates of LVAD-related complications (i.e. stroke, bleeding, driveline infection and LVAD exchange), and the occurrence of LVAD complications did not impact survival in the elderly group compared with the younger group. Lastly, when compared with younger patients implanted as destination therapy, the elderly group also exhibited similar mid-term survival. CONCLUSION: This work strongly suggests that selected elderly adults can be scheduled for LVAD implantation.

Cardiovascular safety of rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma B-type and/or mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase inhibitors: A mixed approach combining a meta-analysis and a pharmacovigilance disproportionality analysis.

BACKGROUND: The risk of cardiovascular adverse events from rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma B-type (BRAF) and mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitors is not fully characterized. AIM: To evaluate the cardiovascular adverse events risks related to BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors in randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials and in the real-life setting. METHODS: We used two approaches. First, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials reporting the incidence of cardiovascular adverse events for BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors in cancer patients. Second, we performed a disproportionality analysis, using age- and sex-adjusted reporting odds ratios (arORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from the World Health Organization's pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase®) of anticancer drug-associated reports, to investigate real-life data. RESULTS: MEK inhibitors increased the risk of ejection fraction decrease (odds ratio [OR] 3.35, 95% CI 1.58-7.07), peripheral oedema (OR 2.87 95% CI 1.93-4.27) and syncope (OR 6.71, 95% CI 3.00-14.99) compared with placebo in randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. BRAF and MEK inhibitor combination therapy further increased the risk of ejection fraction decrease. In the disproportionality analysis, we found over-reporting of ejection fraction decrease (arOR 8.42, 95% CI 7.03-10.09), peripheral oedema (arOR 1.39, 95% CI 1.17-1.66), syncope (arOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.22-1.99), torsade de pointes/QT prolongation (arOR 6.13, 95% CI 5.04-7.47) and supraventricular arrhythmias (arOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.21-1.85) for BRAF and MEK inhibitors. BRAF and MEK inhibitors were not associated with hypertension in either approach. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, MEK inhibitors increase the risk of ejection fraction decrease, peripheral oedema and syncope in randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials. Real-life data confirm these findings, and suggested additional risks of torsade de pointes/QT prolongation and supraventricular arrhythmias with BRAF/MEK inhibitors.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Rechallenge After Immune-Related Adverse Events in Patients With Cancer.

Importance: Limited information is available on the safety of a rechallenge with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) after an immune-related adverse event (irAE). Objective: To identify the recurrence rate of the same irAE that prompted discontinuation of ICI therapy after an ICI rechallenge in patients with cancer and to identify the clinical features associated with such recurrences. Design, Setting, and Participants: This observational, cross-sectional, pharmacovigilance cohort study examined individual case safety reports from the World Health Organization database VigiBase, which contains case reports from more than 130 countries. Case reports were extracted from database inception (1967) to September 1, 2019. All consecutive ICI cases with at least 1 associated irAE were included. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the rate of recurrence of the initial irAE after an ICI rechallenge. Secondary outcomes included the factors associated with the recurrence after a rechallenge among informative rechallenges, the recurrence rate according to the ICI regimen (anti-programmed cell death 1 or anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 monotherapy, anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 monotherapy, or combination therapy), and the rate of occurrence of a different irAE after a rechallenge. Results: A total of 24 079 irAE cases associated with at least 1 ICI were identified. Among the irAEs, 452 of 6123 irAEs associated with ICI rechallenges (7.4%) were informative rechallenges. One hundred thirty recurrences (28.8%; 95% CI, 24.8-33.1) of the initial irAE were observed. In a rechallenge, colitis (reporting odds ratio [OR], 1.77; 95% CI, 1.14-2.75; P = .01), hepatitis (reporting OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.31-8.74; P = .01), and pneumonitis (reporting OR, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.18-4.32; P = .01) were associated with a higher recurrence rate, whereas adrenal events were associated with a lower recurrence rate (reporting OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13-0.86; P = .03) compared with other irAEs. Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found a 28.8% recurrence rate of the same irAE associated with the discontinuation of ICI therapy after a rechallenge with the same ICI. Resuming ICI therapy could be considered for select patients, with appropriate monitoring and use of standard treatment algorithms to identify and treat toxic effects.

Late cardiac adverse events in patients with cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-associated early cardiac adverse events (CAEs), mostly acute and fulminant myocarditis, have been well characterized and mainly occur during the first 90 days after ICI therapy initiation. ICI-associated late CAEs (occurring after the first 90 days of treatment) have not yet been described. METHODS: First, we compared characteristics of a cohort involving early (defined as a CAE time to onset (TTO) of <90 days after ICI therapy initiation) and late (defined as a CAE TTO of ≥90 days after ICI therapy initiation) ICI-associated CAE consecutive cases who were referred to three French cardio-oncology units. Second, ICI-associated CAE cases were searched in VigiBase, the WHO global individual case safety report database, and early and late ICI-associated CAEs were compared. RESULTS: In the cohort study, compared with early CAE cases (n=19, median TTO of 14 days), late ICI-associated CAE cases (n=19, median TTO of 304 days) exhibited significantly more left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and heart failure (HF) and less frequent supraventricular arrhythmias. In VigiBase, compared with early cases (n=437, 73.3%, median TTO 21 days), the late ICI-associated CAE reports (n=159, 26.7%, median TTO 178 days) had significantly more frequent HF (21.1% vs 31.4%, respectively, p=0.01). Early and late ICI-associated CAE cases had similarly high mortality rates (40.0% vs 44.4% in the cohort and 30.0% vs 27.0% in VigiBase, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Late CAEs could occur with ICI therapy and were mainly revealed to be HF with LVSD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT03678337, NCT03882580, and NCT03492528.

Occluded or Not?: A Subtle Electrocardiographic Answer.

This report describes the case of a 48-year-old man whose electrocardiogram after cardiopulmonary resuscitation showed up-sloping ST-segment depression at the J point in precordial leads combined with tall symmetrical T waves. This electrocardiographic pattern corresponded to de Winter syndrome and is related to proximal left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion. (Level of Difficulty: Beginner.).

PAR1 contribution in acute electrophysiological properties of oral anticoagulants in rabbit pulmonary vein sleeve preparations.

Whether oral anticoagulants, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), and nonvitamin K oral anticoagulant (NOACs) frequently prescribed to atrial fibrillation (AF) patients, do themselves have a pro- or anti-arrhythmic effect have never been addressed. Transmembrane action potentials were recorded in an acute rabbit model of superfused pulmonary veins (PVs) sleeves preparations using standard microelectrode technique. Fluindione 10 µm (n = 6) increased the AP (action potential) duration (APD), induced a significantly Vmax depression (from 95 ± 14 to 53 ± 5 V/s, P < 0.05), and 2 : 1 blocks during rapid atrial pacing thus evoking class I anti-arrhythmic properties, and prevented spontaneous trigger APs. Apixaban 10 µm (n = 6) increased the APD, significantly prolonged the effective refractory period (from 56.3 ± 4.2 to 72.0 ± 8.6 ms, P < 0.05), and prevented triggered APs occurrence. Fluindione and apixaban effects were suppressed with the addition of the protease-activated receptors 1 (PAR 1) agonist SFLLR-NH2 . Warfarin 10 µm (n = 6) significantly abbreviated the early refractory period (from 56.3 ± 4.2 to 45.0 ± 2.2 ms, P < 0.05) and increased triggered APs occurrence that were successfully prevented by nifedipine but not by the addition of the protease-activated receptors 1 agonist SFLLR-NH2 . In this acute rabbit PVs model, VKAs and NOACs, at physiological concentrations, exhibited very different pharmacological properties that influence PVs electrophysiology, implying PAR1, with fluindione and apixaban which exhibited more anti-arrhythmic properties, whereas warfarin exhibited more pro-arrhythmic properties.

Preoperative plasma aldosterone and the risk of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is associated with poor outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. We aimed to assess the additional value of preoperative plasma aldosterone levels, a biomarker promoting proarrhythmic and profibrotic pathways, for predicting POAF after CABG. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study involving consecutive patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) more than 50% requiring elective CABG in our university hospital. Plasma aldosterone levels, two-dimensional echocardiography including left atrial strain analysis and galectin-3 (Gal-3) examination were assessed before cardiac surgery. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of POAF within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: POAF occurred in 34 (24.8%) out of the 137 included patients. Compared with controls, patients experiencing POAF were significantly older (73 years old ±â€Š8 vs 65 ±â€Š11, P < 0.001) and had higher preoperative plasma aldosterone levels [183 pmol/l (interquartile range 138-300) vs 143 pmol/l (interquartile range 96.5-216.5), P < 0.01]. Age [odds ratio (OR), 1.088; 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.038-1.140); P = 0.0004] and plasma aldosterone levels [OR, 1.007; 95% CI (1.003-1.012); P = 0.0013] were independently associated with POAF in multivariate analysis and could therefore be combined to predict the occurrence of POAF ['Aldoscore', OR, 2.7; 95% CI (1.7-4.3); P < 0.0001]. Reverse transcriptase PCR analysis performed on right atrial appendage and plasma examination revealed that Gal-3 was activated in POAF patients. CONCLUSION: We developed the preoperative 'Aldoscore' for POAF risk stratification among patients with preserved LVEF requiring elective CABG. This new tool may be helpful to identify good responders to interventions targeting the proarrhythmic and profibrotic pathways of aldosterone.