Real-Life Evidence of Mepolizumab Treatment in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Multicentric Study.

Background: The introduction of biological drugs in the management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is allowing new and increasingly promising therapeutic options. This manuscript aims to provide a multicenter trial in a real-life setting on Mepolizumab treatment for severe uncontrolled CRSwNP with or without comorbid asthma. Methods: A retrospective data analysis was jointly conducted at the Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery departments of La Sapienza University and San Camillo Forlanini Hospital in Rome. Both institutions participated by sharing clinical information on patients with CRSwNP treated with Mepolizumab. Patients were evaluated before starting Mepolizumab, at six months and at twelve months from the first drug administration. During follow-up visits, patients underwent endoscopic evaluation, quality of life assessment, nasal symptoms assessment, and blood tests to monitor mainly neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils, and IgG, IgA, and IgE assay. Results: Twenty patients affected by CRSwNP and treated with Mepolizumab were enrolled (12 females and 8 males with a mean age of 63.7 years). Sixteen patients (80%) had concomitant asthma. During follow-up, a gradual improvement in nasal polyp score, quality of life and nasal symptoms, assessed by SNOT-22 and VAS and loss of smell measured by olfactory VAS, was found. Regarding blood tests, eosinophils decreased gradually, while other blood parameters showed no statistically significant changes. Conclusions: Mepolizumab has been shown to be effective in the therapeutic management of patients with CRSwNP. Further studies are needed to support our findings and better understand the underlying immune pathways to predict patients' response to biological treatment in CRSwNP.

[Short-term quality of life assessment after sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis]. / Kurzfristige Lebensqualitätsbewertung nach Nasennebenhöhlenoperation bei chronischer Rhinosinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) has a negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is the treatment of choice for those not responding to medical treatments. To date, the short-term effects of FESS on HRQoL are still unclear. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of the short-term effects of FESS on HRQoL in CRS patients using the SNOT-22 questionnaire. METHODS: The results of the validated German version of the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) questionnaire were analysed from 89 patients with CRS before surgery and 10-14 days (n = 77), four (n = 77), six weeks (n = 76) and 6 months (n = 71) after FESS, and compared with those of 1,000 healthy controls selected using a non-probability quota sample in accordance to the distribution of the German Microcensus. RESULTS: Compared to the preoperative mean SNOT-22 score (47.35), CRS patients significantly improved in HRQoL 10-14 days (31.75, p < 0.01), 4 weeks (25.84, p < 0.01), 6 weeks (24.16, p < 0.01) and 6 months after FESS (27.16, p < 0.01). Pre- and 6 months postoperatively, the five most important SNOT-22 items were nasal obstruction, smell and taste reduction, thick, mucous nasal secretions, need to blow the nose and postnasal drip. At the 2, 4 and 6-week follow-up, the reduction in smell and taste was most frequently perceived as limiting the HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS: This follow-up study shows for the first time that the reduction in smell and taste should be treated and controlled concervatively in the short term after FESS.

Long-term health-related quality of life in head and neck cancer survivors: A large multinational study.

Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients suffer from a range of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues, but little is known about their long-term HRQoL. This study explored associations between treatment group and HRQoL at least 5 years' post-diagnosis in HNC survivors. In an international cross-sectional study, HNC survivors completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life core questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and its HNC module (EORTC-QLQ-H&N35). Meaningful HRQoL differences were examined between five treatment groups: (a) surgery, (b) radiotherapy, (c) chemo-radiotherapy, (d) radiotherapy ± chemotherapy and neck dissection and (e) any other surgery (meaning any tumour surgery that is not a neck dissection) and radiotherapy ± chemotherapy. Twenty-six sites in 11 countries enrolled 1105 survivors. They had a median time since diagnosis of 8 years, a mean age of 66 years and 71% were male. After adjusting for age, sex, tumour site and UICC stage, there was evidence for meaningful differences (10 points or more) in HRQoL between treatment groups in seven domains (Fatigue, Mouth Pain, Swallowing, Senses, Opening Mouth, Dry Mouth and Sticky Saliva). Survivors who had single-modality treatment had better or equal HRQoL in every domain compared to survivors with multimodal treatment, with the largest differences for Dry Mouth and Sticky Saliva. For Global Quality of Life, Physical and Social Functioning, Constipation, Dyspnoea and Financial Difficulties, at least some treatment groups had better outcomes compared to a general population. Our data suggest that multimodal treatment is associated with worse HRQoL in the long-term compared to single modality.

Quality of Life Improvement in Concurrent Septorhinoplasty and Endoscopic Sinus Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: Septorhinoplasty (SRPL) and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) are two frequently performed surgeries to improve quality of life (QoL) in patients with nasal symptoms. It has been demonstrated as a safe combination regarding complication rates, but patient satisfaction in concurrent surgery has not been adequately studied yet. METHODS: Patients undergoing sole FESS due to chronic rhinosinusitis (n = 57), sole SRPL (n = 148), and concurrent surgery (n = 62) were prospectively evaluated for their disease-specific QoL before and one year after surgery. Each procedure was performed by the same surgeon (OCB). For SRPL, the patient-reported outcome measures Rhinoplasty Outcomes Evaluation (ROE) and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory (FROI-17) were utilized, and for chronic rhinosinusitis, the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT22). RESULTS: All three groups showed significant improvement in the postoperative QoL measurements (all p < 0.01). The postoperative improvements were slightly smaller in the concurrent surgery group compared with the single surgery groups measured with ROE (combined: +55.2 ± 9.3, single: +58.8 ± 9.8, p = 0.02), FROI total score (combined: +47.6 ± 5.2, single: +49 ± 5.4; p = 0.08) and SNOT22 (combined: +33.1 ± 6.7, single +34.5 ± 7, p = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: SRPL, FESS, and combined surgery improve disease-specific QoL. When applicable, surgeons may offer the benefits of a combined procedure without compromising the QoL gain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 134:1239-1245, 2024.

Normative data for interpreting the SNOT-22.

Objectives: The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) is a validated patient-reported outcome instrument to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). There are no published normative SNOT-22 scores, limiting its interpretation. Methods: Symptom scores from 1,000 SNOT-22 questionnaires were analysed by principal component analysis (PCA) and exploratory factor analyses. Data were derived from a survey with 1,000 healthy Europeans (reference cohort) who were recruited using the Respondi panel for market and social science research. This subsample was quoted to the population distribution of the German Microcensus and selected from a non-probability panel. Results: The overall normative SNOT-22 score can be detected to be 20.2 ± 19.44. Male (18.49 ± 19.15) and older (> 50 years old; 18.3 ± 17.49) participants had overall lower SNOT-22 mean results than females (21.8 ± 19.6) and younger (21.4 ± 20.55) participants, indicating higher levels of satisfaction. PCA proposed two SNOT-22 domains ("physiological well-being" and "psychological well-being"), which explained 65% of the variance. Conclusions: These are the first published (German) normative scores for the SNOT-22 and provide a clinical reference point for the interpretation of data.

[Validity of the German Menière's Disease Patient-Oriented Symptom Severity Index]. / Validierung des deutschsprachigen Menière's Disease Patient-Oriented Symptom Severity Index.

BACKGROUND: The MD POSI is a disease-specific questionnaire to determine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients with Menière's disease (MD). OBJECTIVES: Validity and reliability of the German translation of the MD POSI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective data analysis of a patient group with vertigo (n = 162), which was treated in the otorhinolaryngology of a University Hospital from 2005-2019. A clinical selection was made according to the new Bárány classification in a "definite" and "probable" Menière's disease. HRQoL was assessed using the German translation of the MD POSI, the Vertigo Symptom Score (VSS) and the Short Form (SF-36). Reliability was measured by Cronbach's α and test-retesting after 12 months and again 2 weeks later. Content and agreement validity were examined. RESULTS: Cronbach α values greater than 0.9 indicated good internal consistency. There was no statistically significant difference from baseline to 12 months, except for the subscore "during the attack". There were significant positive correlations between the VSS overall/VER/AA and the overall index of the MD POSI and negative significant correlations with the SF-36 domains physical functioning, physical role functioning, social functioning, emotional role functioning, mental well-being. There were low SRM (standardized response mean) values below 0.5. CONCLUSIONS: The German translation of the MD POSI is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate the impact of MD on patients' disease-specific quality of life.

Serious Long-Term Effects of Head and Neck Cancer from the Survivors' Point of View.

The long-term problems of head and neck cancer survivors (HNCS) are not well known. In a cross-sectional international study aimed at exploring the long-term quality of life in this population, 1114 HNCS were asked to state their two most serious long-term effects. A clinician recorded the responses during face-to-face appointments. A list of 15 example problems was provided, but a free text field was also available. A total of 1033 survivors responded to the question. The most frequent problems were 'dry mouth' (DM) (n = 476; 46%), 'difficulty swallowing/eating' (DSE) (n = 408; 40%), 'hoarseness/difficulty speaking' (HDS) (n = 169; 16%), and 'pain in the head and neck' (PHN) (n = 142; 14%). A total of 5% reported no problems. Logistic regression adjusted for age, gender, treatment, and tumor stage and site showed increased odds of reporting DM and DSE for chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) alone compared to surgery alone (odds ratio (OR): 4.7, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.5-9.0; OR: 2.1, CI: 1.1-3.9), but decreased odds for HDS and PHN (OR: 0.3, CI: 0.1-0.6; OR: 0.2, CI: 0.1-0.5). Survivors with UICC stage IV at diagnosis compared to stage I had increased odds of reporting HDS (OR: 1.9, CI: 1.2-3.0). Laryngeal cancer survivors had reduced odds compared to oropharynx cancer survivors of reporting DM (OR: 0.4, CI: 0.3-0.6) but increased odds of HDS (OR: 7.2, CI: 4.3-12.3). This study provides evidence of the serious long-term problems among HNCS.

Long-term analysis of prognostic risk factors impacting surgical outcomes in patients with external auditory canal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Malignant neoplasms of the external auditory canal (EAC) are rare. No consensus on management has emerged. OBJECTIVE: To determine possible risk factors influencing tumorgenesis and prognosis of EAC carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 108 patients (87 men/21 women) with an average age of 74 ± 13.8 years were recruited from 2005 to 2019 at Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Heidelberg. The follow-up interval was 43.62 ± 55.39 months. Partial and (sub)total ablative otis, supplementary surgery (petrosectomy, parotidectomy, neck dissection, mastoidectomy) and adjuvant radio(chemo)therapy belonged to treatment options. TNM status was determined at time of diagnosis using the AJCC staging system. RESULTS: 63.9% of patients underwent a total ablative otis. Tumor recurrence was seen in 24.1%. The 1-year survival rate was 87%, the 5-year survival rate was 52%, the mean overall survival (OS) was 3.82 ± 4.6 years. Male EAC carcinoma patients had a better OS (p < 0.001), PFS (p < 0.001) and DSS (p = 0.02) than females. T1 patients had a better OS (p = 0.01), PFS (p = 0.01) and DSS (p < 0.001) than T4 patients. Lymph node but not distant metastasis, tumor grading, perineural, venous and lymphatic invasion, histology, age and tumor localization influenced the OS in EAC carcinoma patients (p = 0.04). The more radical the ablative otis, the worse the OS (p = 0.002), PFS (p = 0.02) and DSS (p < 0.001). Radio(chemo)therapy did not improve the OS. CONCLUSIONS: EAC carcinoma are difficult to treat and benefit from early diagnosis so that a radical combined treatment approach does not need to be used.

Does a tonsillectomy indicated according to the German S2k guideline affect short-term quality of life in adults?

BACKGROUND: Tonsillectomy (TE) for recurrent tonsillitis (RT) is one of the most common surgical interventions. Since 2015, the indication criteria for TE have become much stricter (German S2k guideline). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of short-term quality of life (QoL) after TE have not yet been investigated. PURPOSE: To clarify if stringent indication for TE will better identify patients worthy of surgery and patients' QoL. METHODS: We prospectively studied the Tonsillectomy Outcome Inventory 14 (TOI-14) responses of 38 RT-patients recruited according to the S2k guideline in 2020 and compared their TOI-14 scores with those of a historical RT cohort from 2006 to 2008 and with a healthy middle-European cohort. New RT patients were assessed before, 2, 4, and 14 days and 6 months after TE. TOI-14 was measured as total and as disease-specific score. RESULTS: From pre- to 6-month postoperative, patients' QoL was significantly different, measured by TOI-14 (49.92 vs. 6.35; p < 0.001) and disease-specific score (60.35 vs. 9.9; p < 0.001). Preoperative disease-specific score was not different from that of the 2nd and 4th postoperative days but from the 14th postoperative day (60.35 vs. 29.26; p < 0.001). The historical cohort had significantly less RT complaints than the new cohort beforehand, but more dissatisfaction in QoL after TE. New TE patients had worse QoL pre- (49.92 vs. 11.78; p < 0.001) but more QoL postoperatively (6.34 vs. 11.78; p = 0.004) than healthy individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that the tightening of the indication criteria for TE was justified and that TE patients significantly benefit from this surgery from day 14.

Can patient-reported outcomes and inflammatory markers define endotype 2 in chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyps?

BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous disease at the clinical phenotype level (without nasal polyp [CRSsNP] vs with nasal polyp [CRSwNP]) and at the underlying inflammatory endotype level (type 2 vs non-type 2). Whether the endotype is associated with clinical presentation in patients with CRSsNP has yet to be explored in detail. OBJECTIVE: To identify associations between endotypes and their clinical significance in patients with CRSsNP based on tissue interleukin-5 levels. METHODS: A total of 104 patients with CRSsNP who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery between 2013 and 2017 were endotyped. We collected immunologic and clinical parameters and evaluated whether there were associations between the endotype and clinical features using Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22), Sniffin' Sticks test, Lund-Mackay CT score, and nasal endoscopy. RESULTS: Mean tissue interleukin-5 levels were used to identify type 2 inflammation (non-type 2: 3.37 vs type 2: 191.98 pg/g tissue; P < .001). There were no significant clinical differences measured by patient-reported outcome measures between patients with type 2 CRSsNP and those with non-type 2 CRSsNP preoperatively. Type 2 and non-type 2 CRSsNP did not differentiate in CT score, Sniffin' Sticks test, and nasal endoscopy. Postoperative SNOT-22 and VAS scores correlated well with each other (r = 0.75; P < .01). Postoperative VAS scores were in both groups significantly lower than before the operation (type 2: 5.07 vs 2.99; P < .01; non-type 2: 5.74 vs 3.22; P < .01), but not associated to the inflammatory subtype. CONCLUSION: The type of inflammation does not affect the symptoms, the computed tomography scan, or the postoperative results in CRSsNP in contrast to former findings in CRSwNP. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Belgian registration number (B.U.N.) No. B6702020000097.

Does a closed reduction improve aesthetical and functional outcome after nasal fracture?

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSES: How closed reduction (CR) to repair a nasal fracture affects the patient's quality of life (QoL) has not been investigated. Here, we assessed QoL before and after CR using disease-specific questionnaires and compared the QoL scores of patients with nasal fractures with normative scores from a reference cohort. METHODS: This was a prospective study of 96 patients with nasal fractures undergoing CR. Patients were interviewed about aesthetic, functional, and QoL issues before and after surgery using the Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory (FROI-17) and the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE). Photographs of the nasal area were taken before and after surgery and reviewed. Data were compared with those from a reference cohort (n = 1000). RESULTS: Most fractures were type I (80.6%) and most were caused by sport-related accidents (36.5%). The ROE scores increased from 67.3 preoperatively to 73.4 postoperatively (p = 0.001). The FROI-17 also improved, indicating the overall effect of the nose on QoL (p = 0.002). Compared with the reference cohort, patients felt more affected by nasal symptoms before surgery (- 9.37, p = 0.02) than by more general aspects. ROE scores returned to normative values after surgery (p < 0.001). The postoperative cohort had lower scores for the FROI-17 item overall effects of the nose on QoL than the reference cohort did, although the nasal symptom score remained higher in patients than in reference controls. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that CR can improve the aesthetical but not the functional outcome of the nose.

Long-term outcomes and quality of life following parotidectomy for benign disease.

Objective: Parotidectomy worsens quality of life (QoL) in the short-term, but the long-term impact is unknown. In this study, we analysed the long-term effects of parotidectomy on QoL. Methods: In this prospective long-term follow-up study, participants were divided into three groups: short-term (ST) follow-up of six weeks, long-term (LT) follow-up of 13 years and short- and long-term (SLT) follow-up. QoL was assessed using the Parotidectomy Outcome Inventory (POI-8). Parotidectomies were classified based on whether the great auricular nerve (GAN) had been preserved or sacrificed. Results: In total, 164 observations were analysed, 74 in the LT group, 57 in the ST group and 33 in the SLT group. Hypoaesthesia was a major problem and facial palsy was a minor problem. Pain (p < 0.01) and hypoaesthesia (p < 0.001) were significantly lower after 13 years compared with after six weeks, and QoL was higher after 13 years compared with after six weeks (p = 0.04). The disease-specific impairment rate decreased from 70% at short-term follow-up to 30% at long-term follow-up. Removal of the GAN was associated with hypoaesthesia in the ST group (p = 0.028). Conclusions: Hypoaesthesia has a long-term impact on the QoL, and this should be emphasised during preoperative discussions.

Prospective study on health-related quality of life in patients before and after cochlear implantation.

PURPOSE: Assessing cochlear implant (CI)-associated patient outcomes is a focus of implant research. Most studies have analyzed outcomes retrospectively with low patient numbers and few measurement time points. In addition, standardized CI-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instruments have not been used. To address this, we prospectively assessed HRQoL in patients before and after implantation. METHODS: We assessed HRQoL using the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ), Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), Hearing Participation Scale (HPS), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) in 100 deaf or severely hearing-impaired patients (57 unilaterally deaf and 43 bilaterally deaf) before and 3, 6, and 12 months after cochlear implantation. We compared the results of unilaterally and bilaterally hearing-impaired patients and patients with or without a hearing aid. Principal component (PCA) and exploratory factor analyses (EFA) were also conducted. RESULTS: The NCIQ measured improvements in all 6 domains after CI and correlated well with other QoL instruments. The PCA revealed that the NCIQ can be better explained by physical, physical advanced, and socio-psychological components. The APHAB score ameliorated over time, except for the background noise domain. The overall HPS score improved over time, but the hearing handicap subscore significantly decreased. Sociodemographic influences on the questionnaire scores were relatively weak. CONCLUSION: Assessing HRQoL is essential for quantifying the patient outcome after CI. NCIQ scores in our patient cohort showed improved HRQoL in all domains and we recommend that the NCIQ be used as a first-line questionnaire for assessing QoL in hearing-impaired patients after CI.

Diagnostic performance of nasal cytology.

PURPOSE: Nasal pathologies are characterized by a symptomatology that hardly allows to distinguish allergic rhinitis (AR), non-allergic rhinitis (NAR), and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Nasal cytology (NC) has shown increasing importance in helping the clinician to differentiate the various phenotypes of rhinitis. NC allows us to evaluate nasal cellularity by distinguishing AR and various types of NAR. The objective of the study is to assess the diagnostic performance of the NC by evaluating its sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value. METHODS: We recruited 387 patients with persistent rhinitis symptoms, and nasal cytology was performed. The rhinocytogram was obtained by reading for fields and the cellular count was made using quantitative and semi-quantitative grading together. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifteen patients (55.5%; 38 had acute rhinitis, 24 acute sinusitis, 153 chronic rhinosinusitis) out of 387 referred nasal symptoms. Cytological specimen showed a mean of 94 ± 4% ciliated cells, 29 ± 0.2% mucinous cells, 16 ± 0.1% neutrophils, 11 ± 0.08% eosinophils, 4 ± 0.03 lymphocytes, 4 ± 0.03% mast cells, and 4 ± 0.01% other cells. NC was positive in 271 cases (70%). After revision of medical history, 153 patients (39%) were considered positive for NAR. Test sensibility was 100% (95% CI 97-100), specificity was 49.6% (95% CI 43-56%). Positive predictive value (PPV) was 56% (95% CI 50-62%), and negative predictive value (NPV) was 100% (95% CI 96-100%). The positive likelihood ratio was 1.98 (95% CI 1.75-2.25). Accuracy of the test was 69.5% (95% CI 64.6-74.0%). CONCLUSION: Our data showed ability to identify the true-positive patients with NAR but a low ability to identify the true-negative patients, with a global accuracy of 69.5%.

[Validity and reliability of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire in German]. / Validierung und Reliabilitätsprüfung des Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire in deutscher Sprache.

BACKGROUND: The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) is a disease-specific questionnaire to determine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients before and after cochlear implantation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the German translation of the NCIQ. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study was performed in 100 postlingually deaf or severely hearing-impaired patients. HRQoL was assessed using the NCIQ, the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), and the Hearing Participation Scale (HPS) before as well as 3 and 6 months after cochlear implantation. An untreated group of postlingually deaf or severely hearing-impaired patients (n = 54) served as a control. Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability were measured. The content, discrimination, and agreement validity were tested. The evaluation of construct validity was based on recently published data. Sensitivity and receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis, including consideration of the area under the curve (AUC), were used as quality criteria. RESULTS: The test-retest analysis showed stable NCIQ values 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The Cronbach's α values indicated good internal consistency. The NCIQ validly discriminated between treated and untreated patient groups. There were statistically significant albeit weak correlations between the NCIQ and the APHAB (r = -0.22; p = 0.04) and the HPS (r = 0.30; p = 0.01). Sensitivity and ROC analyses showed good measurement quality of the German-speaking NCIQ. CONCLUSION: The German translation of the NCIQ reliably and validly measures HRQoL before and after cochlear implantation and can be used for clinical monitoring after treatment with cochlear implants.

Prognostic Gene Signature for Squamous Cell Carcinoma with a Higher Risk for Treatment Failure and Accelerated MEK-ERK Pathway Activity.

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the most prevalent histological type of human cancer, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). However, reliable prognostic gene signatures for SCC and underlying genetic and/or epigenetic principles are still unclear. We identified 37 prognostic candidate genes by best cutoff computation based on survival in a pan-SCC cohort (n = 1334) of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), whose expression stratified not only the pan-SCC cohort but also independent HNSCC validation cohorts into three distinct prognostic subgroups. The most relevant prognostic genes were prioritized by a Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator Cox regression model and were used to identify subgroups with high or low risks for unfavorable survival. An integrative analysis of multi-omics data identified FN1, SEMA3A, CDH2, FBN1, COL5A1, and ADAM12 as key nodes in a regulatory network related to the prognostic phenotype. An in-silico drug screen predicted two MEK inhibitors (Trametinib and Selumetinib) as effective compounds for high-risk SCC based on the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia, which is supported by a higher p-MEK1/2 immunohistochemical staining of high-risk HNSCC. In conclusion, our data identified a molecular classifier for high-risk HNSCC as well as other SCC patients, who might benefit from treatment with MEK inhibitors.

How to predict the outcome of septorhinoplasty? A normative study of ROE and FROI-17 scores.

OBJECTIVE: Normative values of patient-reported outcome instruments are needed to identify good candidates for rhinoplasty. Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) and Functional Rhinoplasty Outcome Inventory-17 (FROI-17) are disease-specific questionnaires that evaluate quality of life in patients undergoing rhinoplasty. METHODS: The reference cohort contained 1,000 participants, selected from a non-probability panel. Normative ROE and FROI-17 scores from this reference cohort were compared with ROE and FROI-17 scores from a patient cohort before (n = 104) and 6 (n = 55) and 12 months (n = 32) after septorhinoplasty. RESULTS: Mean FROI-17 scores (± SD) were: overall score, 20.8 ± 17; nasal symptoms, 16.8 ± 7; general symptoms, 24.8 ± 22; and self-confidence, 16.4 ± 21. The ROE total score was 73.1 ± 16. Normative values differed significantly from the preoperative ROE and FROI-17 scores of septorhinoplasty patients (p < 0.01). Except for the FROI-17 general score at 12 months postoperatively (p = 0.004), there were no significant differences between normative ROE/FROI-17 and septorhinoplasty scores postoperatively, indicating that they returned to normalcy. CONCLUSIONS: Normative scores for ROE and FROI-17 provide a reference point from which to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from rhinoplasty.

EGFR and PI3K Pathway Activities Might Guide Drug Repurposing in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancers.

While genetic alterations in Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and PI3K are common in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC), their impact on oncogenic signaling and cancer drug sensitivities remains elusive. To determine their consequences on the transcriptional network, pathway activities of EGFR, PI3K, and 12 additional oncogenic pathways were inferred in 498 HNSCC samples of The Cancer Genome Atlas using PROGENy. More than half of HPV-negative HNSCC showed a pathway activation in EGFR or PI3K. An amplification in EGFR and a mutation in PI3KCA resulted in a significantly higher activity of the respective pathway (p = 0.017 and p = 0.007). Interestingly, both pathway activations could only be explained by genetic alterations in less than 25% of cases indicating additional molecular events involved in the downstream signaling. Suitable in vitro pathway models could be identified in a published drug screen of 45 HPV-negative HNSCC cell lines. An active EGFR pathway was predictive for the response to the PI3K inhibitor buparlisib (p = 6.36E-03) and an inactive EGFR and PI3K pathway was associated with efficacy of the B-cell lymphoma (BCL) inhibitor navitoclax (p = 9.26E-03). In addition, an inactive PI3K pathway correlated with a response to multiple Histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDAC) inhibitors. These findings require validation in preclinical models and clinical studies.