A proposed clinical coagulation score for research in trauma-induced coagulopathy.

BACKGROUND: Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) has been the subject of intense study for greater than a century, and it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The Trans-Agency Consortium for Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy, funded by the National Health Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, was tasked with developing a clinical TIC score, distinguishing between injury-induced bleeding from persistent bleeding due to TIC. We hypothesized that the Trans-Agency Consortium for Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy clinical TIC score would correlate with laboratory measures of coagulation, transfusion requirements, and mortality. METHODS: Trauma activation patients requiring a surgical procedure for hemostasis were scored in the operating room (OR) and in the first ICU day by the attending trauma surgeon. Conventional and viscoelastic (thrombelastography) coagulation assays, transfusion requirements, and mortality were correlated to the coagulation scores using the Cochran-Armitage trend test or linear regression for numerical variables. RESULTS: Increased OR TIC scores were significantly associated with abnormal conventional and viscoelastic measurements, including hyperfibrinolysis incidence, as well as with higher mortality and more frequent requirement for massive transfusion ( p < 0.0001 for all trends). Patients with OR TIC score greater than 3 were more than 31 times more likely to have an ICU TIC score greater than 3 (relative risk, 31.6; 95% confidence interval, 12.7-78.3; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: A clinically defined TIC score obtained in the OR reflected the requirement for massive transfusion and mortality in severely injured trauma patients and also correlated with abnormal coagulation assays. The OR TIC score should be validated in multicenter studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Assessment of Discharge Analgesic Prescription Patterns for Hospitalized Patients With Rib Fractures.

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of data describing opioid prescribing patterns for trauma patients. We investigated pain medication regimens prescribed at discharge for patients with traumatic rib fractures, as well as potential variables predictive of opioid prescribing. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective analysis was performed of 337 adult patients presenting with ≥1 traumatic rib fractures between January and December 2019. The primary outcome was oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prescribed on discharge. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors independently associated with above median (150) MME prescription at discharge. RESULTS: The majority of patients were male (68.8%) with a median age of 53 y. Blunt trauma accounted for 97.3% of cases with a median Injury Severity Score(ISS) of 10. Locoregional pain procedures were utilized in 16.9% of patients. Opioids were the most common analgesic prescribed at discharge, and 74.1% of patients prescribed opioids on discharge were also prescribed a non-opioid adjunct. On multivariable analysis, daily MME prescribed during hospitalization (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02, P < 0.01) and number of rib fractures (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.36-3.74, P < 0.01) were predictive of high MME prescribed on discharge. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with traumatic rib fractures, daily MME during hospitalization and number of rib fractures were predictive of high MME prescribing on discharge. Further prospective studies evaluating strategies for pain management and protocolized approaches to opioid prescribing are needed to reduce unnecessary and inappropriate opioid use in this patient population.

Trust the FAST: Confirmation that the FAST examination is highly specific for intra-abdominal hemorrhage in over 1,200 patients with pelvic fractures.

BACKGROUND: Use of the focused assessment with sonography for trauma (FAST) examination in patients with pelvic fractures has been reported as unreliable. We hypothesized that FAST is a reliable method for detecting clinically significant intra-abdominal hemorrhage in patients with pelvic fractures. METHODS: All patients with pelvic fractures over a 10-year period were reviewed at a Level I trauma center. The predictive ability of FAST was assessed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value against the criterion standard of either computed tomography (CT) or laparotomy findings. The FAST examination was considered "false negative" if findings at laparotomy indicated traumatic intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Likewise, the FAST examination was considered "false positive" if either CT or findings at laparotomy indicated no intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Hemodynamic instability scores were calculated for all patients. RESULTS: There were 1,456 patients with pelvic fractures and an initial FAST reviewed; 1,219 (83.7%) underwent FAST and either CT or operative exploration. Median age was 43 years (interquartile range, 26-56 years) and mean Injury Severity Score was 18.5 ± 12.3. The sensitivity and specificity for FAST in this group of patients with pelvic fracture was 85.4% and 98.1%, respectively. The positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 78.4% and 98.8%, respectively. Of 21 patients with a false-positive FAST, 15 (71.4%) were confirmed with a negative CT scan, and 6 (28.6%) underwent laparotomy without findings of intra-abdominal hemorrhage. Of 13 patients with a false-negative FAST, all were identified with positive findings at the time of laparotomy. The specificity of the FAST examination remained high regardless of hemodynamic instability score grade. CONCLUSION: The false positive rate of FAST examination for intra-abdominal hemorrhage is 1.1%. These data suggest that a positive FAST in this clinical scenario should be considered to represent intra-abdominal fluid. This series contradicts prior reports that FAST is unreliable in patients with pelvic fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, level III.

Trends in hematologic markers after blunt splenic trauma: Risk factor or Epiphenomenon?

BACKGROUND: Most blunt splenic injuries (BSI) are treated with nonoperative management (NOM) or embolization (EMBO). Little is known about the hematologic changes associated with these treatments. We aim to assess the temporal changes of hematologic markers in trauma patients who undergo splenectomy (SPL), packing and splenorrhaphy (P/S), EMBO, or NOM. We hypothesize that differences in trends of hematologic markers exist in patients undergoing EMBO or SPL, compared to NOM. METHODS: An 8-year review of adult patients with BSI and underwent SPL, EMBO, P/S, or NOM. White blood cell count (WBC), hematocrit (HCT) and platelet count (PLT) at presentation to 14 days post-admission were analyzed; post-procedural complications were reviewed. Temporal trends were compared using linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: 478 patients sustained BSI, 298 (62.3%) underwent NOM, 100 (29.2%) SPL, 42 (8.8%) EMBO, and 38 (8.0%) P/S. After adjustment for age, ISS and splenic injury grade, SPL patients had a significantly higher upward trend compared to other management strategies (p < 0.05). Infection further increased this trend. Starting on day 6, SPL patients with infections had significantly higher WBC than those without infection. SPL and P/S were more likely than NOM to develop infections after adjustment for confounders (HR = 3.64; 95%CI: 1.79-7.39 and HR = 2.59; 95%CI: 1.21-5.55, respectively). Day 6 WBC>16,000 cells/ml post-SPL had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 65.2% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 76.9% for infections. Among P/S, Day 6 WBC >10,200 cells/ml had a PPV = 50% and NPV = 86.7% for infections. CONCLUSIONS: We observed distinct patterns of hematologic markers following BSI managed with SPL, EMBO, P/S, and NOM. Day 6 WBC increases after SPL or P/S should raise suspicion of infections and trigger a diagnostic investigation.