Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
1.
Transpl Int ; 34(1): 118-126, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33067898

RESUMEN

Kidneys from very small donors have the potential to significantly expand the donor pool. We describe the collective experience of transplantation using kidneys from donors aged ≤1 year in Australian and New Zealand. The ANZDATA registry was analysed on all deceased donor kidney transplants from donors aged ≤1 year. We compared recipient characteristics and outcomes between 1963-1999 and 2000-2018. From 1963 to 1999, 16 transplants were performed [9 (56%) adults, 7 (44%) children]. Death-censored graft survival was 50% and 43% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Patient survival was 90% and 87% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. From 2000 to 2018, 26 transplants were performed [25 (96%) adults, 1 (4%) children]. Mean creatinine was 73 µmol/l ±49.1 at 5 years. Death-censored graft survival was 85% at 1 and 5 years. Patient survival was 100% at 1 and 5 years. Thrombosis was the cause of graft loss in 12% of recipients in the first era from 1963 to 1999, and 8% of recipients in the second era from 2000 to 2018. We advocate the judicious use of these small paediatric grafts from donors ≤1 year old. Optimal selection of donor and recipients may lead to greater acceptance and success of transplantation from very young donors.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón , Adulto , Australia , Niño , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Lactante , Nueva Zelanda , Sistema de Registros , Diálisis Renal , Donantes de Tejidos
2.
J Surg Case Rep ; 2020(8): rjaa239, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32821370

RESUMEN

Small bowel obstruction (SBO) following intraperitoneal renal transplantation, either solitary or due to simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, is a known complication. While SBO is most commonly due to adhesions, there have been documented cases of internal herniation following simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation with enteric drainage due to the formation of a mesenteric defect. We present a unique complication in which the transplant ureter has caused strangulation and necrosis of a length of small intestine. The transplant ureter was mistaken for a band adhesion and divided. Post-operative anuria signalled this difficult diagnosis. Subsequent re-look laparotomy and ureteric reimplantation with Boari flap were required. Therefore, it is important to consider the ureter as a cause of internal herniation in kidney transplant patients and recognize that a band adhesion within the pelvis may in fact be the transplant ureter, obstructing a loop of small intestine beneath its course.

4.
ANZ J Surg ; 88(3): 167-171, 2018 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26947137

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Australian kidney paired donation program adopted the principles of within-chain simultaneous live donor surgery and of organ transport, with the requirement of keeping cold ischemia time (CIT) to <12 h. Whether these principles could be adhered to and what impact on transplant outcome they might have is unknown. METHODS: We evaluated the logistic challenges and outcomes of the first 100 kidney transplants performed in the Australian kidney paired donation program. RESULTS: Within 4 years, 17 donor surgeons at 12 centres were involved in 37 chain exchange surgeries. Sixteen kidneys were transplanted at the same hospital and 84 required transport to the recipient hospital. Mean (±SD) within chain anaesthetic induction time variability was 8 ± 18 min and mean individual surgeon operating time was 115 ± 44 min. In two cases, delays during donor surgery resulted in increased CIT by 1 h because of deferred transport. CIT was 2.6 ± 0.6 h for non-shipped and 6.8 ± 2.8 h for shipped kidneys, four kidneys had CIT of 12-14 h. Immediate allograft function was observed in 85% of recipients, with no difference between shipped and non-shipped kidneys. There were only two cases of delayed graft function requiring temporary dialysis; both had CIT <7 h. There was no difference in serum creatinine at 1 month between non-shipped and shipped kidneys (105 ± 26 versus 112 ± 50 µmol/L) and allograft survival at 1 year was 97%. CONCLUSION: The study provided a favourable audit of kidney transplant activity, despite challenges of simultaneous surgery, organ transport coordination and prolonged CIT. The decision to ship donor kidneys rather than the donor was demonstrated to be feasible and safe.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia Fría/métodos , Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Donadores Vivos/provisión & distribución , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/organización & administración , Adulto , Australia , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Riñón/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Medición de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Análisis de Supervivencia , Adulto Joven
5.
HPB (Oxford) ; 16(2): 101-8, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23509899

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the liver metastases rather than the colorectal cancer itself is the main determinant of patient's survival, the 'Liver-First Approach (LFA)' with upfront chemotherapy followed by a hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) and finally a colorectal cancer resection was proposed. The aim of this review was to analyse the evidence for LFA in patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous CLM. METHODS: A literature search of databases (MEDLINE and EMBASE) to identify published studies of LFA in patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous CLM was undertaken focussing on the peri-operative regimens of LFA and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Three observational studies and one retrospective cohort study were included for review. A total of 121 patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous CLM were selected for LFA. Pre-operative chemotherapy was used in 99% of patients. One hundred and twelve of the initial 121 patients (93%) underwent a hepatic resection of CLM. In total, 60% had a major liver resection and the R0 resection rate was 93%. Post-operative morbidity and mortality after the hepatic resection were 20% and 1%, respectively. Ultimately, 89 of the initial 121 (74%) patients underwent a colorectal cancer resection. Post-operative morbidity and mortality after a colorectal resection were 50% and 6%, respectively. The median overall survival was 40 months (range 19-50) with a recurrence rate of 52%. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that LFA is safe and feasible in selected patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous CLM. Future studies are required to further define patient selection criteria for LFA and the exact role of LFA in the management of synchronous CLM.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Colectomía , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Reino Unido/epidemiología
7.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 17(11): 1984-96, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24002759

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is an inverse relationship between hospital and surgeon volume and mortality in many types of complex surgery. The aim of this paper is to investigate the volume effect on outcomes of liver surgery. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. A literature search was conducted using Medline and EMBASE from 1995 to 2012. A random effects model was used. RESULTS: Seventeen studies were selected for detailed analysis. Definition of a high-volume institution varied from 2 to more than 33 procedures per year. The pooled odds ratio of mortality rate in low- vs high-volume centres was 2.0 [95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.6-2.4; P < 0.001]. Some studies divided centres into more than two groups and compared the highest and lowest volume groups. The pooled odds ratio of mortality rate for this comparison type was 3.2 (95 % CI, 1.7-5.8; P < 0.001). Funnel plots suggest possible publication bias. There was inadequate data to compare morbidity. Only two of seven studies demonstrated a shorter length of stay in the high-volume centres. There was no convincing volume effect on long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a strong relationship between volume and perioperative mortality. No difference in morbidity, length of stay or survival was demonstrated.


Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Análisis de Supervivencia
8.
HPB (Oxford) ; 15(7): 483-91, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23750490

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Selected patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) may be rendered resectable using the two-stage hepatectomy (TSH) approach. This review was conducted with the aim of collating and evaluating published evidence for TSH in patients with initially unresectable CLM. METHODS: Searches of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were undertaken to identify studies of TSH in patients with initially unresectable CLM. Studies were required to focus on the perioperative treatment regimen, operative strategy, morbidity, technical success and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Ten observational studies were reviewed. A total of 459 patients with initially unresectable CLM were selected for the first stage of TSH. Preoperative chemotherapy was used in 88% of patients and achieved partial and stable response rates of 59% and 39%, respectively. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after the first stage of TSH were 17% and 0.5%, respectively. Portal vein embolization (PVE) was used in 76% of patients. Ultimately, 352 of the initial 459 (77%) patients underwent the second stage of TSH. Major liver resection was undertaken in 84% of patients; the negative margin (R0) resection rate was 75%. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after the second stage of TSH were 40% and 3%, respectively. Median overall survival was 37 months (range: 24-44 months) in patients who completed both stages of TSH. In patients who did not complete both stages of TSH, median survival was 16 months (range: 10-29 months). The 3-year disease-free survival rate was 20% (range: 6-27%). CONCLUSIONS: Two-stage hepatectomy is safe and effective in selected patients with initially unresectable CLM. Further studies are required to better define patient selection criteria for TSH and the exact roles of PVE and preoperative and interval chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Hepatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Embolización Terapéutica , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/irrigación sanguínea , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Selección de Paciente , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 17(7): 1312-21, 2013 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23525970

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Selected patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases (CLM) may be resectable by repeat hepatectomy approach. In this review, we aim to collate and evaluate the published evidence for repeat hepatectomy in patients with recurrent CLM. METHODS: Searches of the Medline and Embase databases were undertaken to identify studies of repeat hepatectomy in patients with recurrent CLM focusing on the perioperative treatment regimen, operative strategy, morbidity, technical success and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-two observational studies were reviewed. A total of 1,610 patients underwent second hepatectomy for recurrent CLM. The median percentage of extra-hepatic disease was 15 % (range, 0-39 %). Preoperative chemotherapy was reported in 5/22 studies. Major liver resection was undertaken in 25 % (range, 9-59 %) of patients and the R0 resection rate was 90 % (range, 77-96 %). Postoperative morbidity and mortality after the second hepatectomy were 23 % and 1.2 %, respectively. Recurrence rate after second hepatectomy was 63.9 % (range, 42-91 %) with a median follow-up period of 32 months (range, 19-59 months). Median overall survival was 35 months (range, 19-56 months). The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 55 % (range, 11-82 %) and 42 % (range, 31-73 %), respectively. CONCLUSION: Second hepatectomy is safe and feasible in selected patients with recurrent CLM and is associated with acceptable perioperative and survival outcomes. Future prospective studies are required to further define the patient selection criteria for repeat hepatectomy and the exact role of perioperative chemotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Humanos , Reoperación
10.
J Surg Res ; 180(1): 176-82, 2013 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23211958

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) of kidneys is intended to mitigate the deleterious effects of cold storage on organ quality, particularly when the cold ischemic time is prolonged or the donor is otherwise marginal. The use of HMP has remained controversial; however, a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have recently been conducted to clarify its benefits. METHODS: We undertook a systematic search of the Medline and Embase databases and of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We included only RCTs in the meta-analysis. Outcomes analyzed were the incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), primary nonfunction (PNF), graft loss, and patient death at 1 y. RESULTS: We identified seven RCT trials and subjected them to meta-analysis, including 1353 kidney transplant recipients. Hypothermic machine perfusion significantly reduced the incidence of DGF (risk ratio [RR] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.96). There was no difference in the incidence of PNF (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.36-1.68), graft loss at 1 y (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.64-1.19), and patient death at 1 y (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.60-1.37) between HMP and donor kidneys preserved using cold storage. CONCLUSIONS: There are few RCT comparing HMP and cold storage of kidneys in deceased donor kidney transplantation. Although these studies are small and heterogeneous in design, HMP appeared to be associated with a reduced incidence of DGF. No difference in the incidence of PNF, graft loss, or patient death at 1 y could be demonstrated.


Asunto(s)
Hipotermia Inducida/instrumentación , Trasplante de Riñón , Preservación de Órganos/instrumentación , Perfusión/instrumentación , Funcionamiento Retardado del Injerto/etiología , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
11.
ANZ J Surg ; 82(5): 299-302, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22507693

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Torsion of kidney transplant refers to rotation of the kidney transplant graft around its vascular pedicle resulting in vascular compromise and infarction. It is a rare complication of kidney transplantation associated with a high rate of graft loss. Clinical presentation and diagnostic imaging modalities are non-specific, and surgical exploration is therefore often delayed. METHODS: We present a case report and review of the literature. Studies were identified by searching Medline and Embase from January 1954 to December 2010. Data was extracted regarding the clinical presentation, investigation, findings on surgical exploration, and treatment outcomes of patients with torsion of kidney transplant. RESULTS: Eight manuscripts with 16 cases of kidney torsion were found. Presenting symptoms were decreased renal function (13 cases), abdominal pain (10 cases), oliguria/anuria (9 cases), nausea and vomiting (4 cases), fever (3 cases), diarrhoea (3 cases), weight gain (2 cases), oedema (3 cases), fatigue (1 case) and impalpable graft (1 case). Investigations were Doppler sonography (11 cases), grey-scale sonography (7 cases), nuclear scintigraphy (5 cases), computed tomography scan (4 cases), and magnetic resonance imaging/magnetic resonance angiography (1 case). Of the 16 published cases of torsion, seven (44%) grafts were detorted and salvaged, three (19%) grafts were detorted but subsequently lost and six (38%) patients underwent immediate nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: A prompt consideration of the diagnosis of torsion of kidney transplant is required to prevent delay in surgical intervention. We recommend urgent Doppler ultrasound be used as first-line investigation, followed by prompt surgical exploration. We recommend the use of prophylactic nephropexy to prevent torsion.


Asunto(s)
Isquemia/etiología , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Riñón/irrigación sanguínea , Anomalía Torsional/cirugía , Trasplantes/efectos adversos , Adulto , Humanos , Isquemia/diagnóstico , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Masculino , Nefrectomía , Nefritis Intersticial/complicaciones , Anomalía Torsional/diagnóstico , Anomalía Torsional/etiología
12.
ANZ J Surg ; 82(3): 140-4, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22510123

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using F18-fluorodeoxyglucose has been shown to be valuable in the management of malignant disease. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of this technique on the management of patients with resectable pancreatic tumours. METHODS: Thirty-six patients with 37 potentially resectable pancreatic tumours on diagnostic CT imaging underwent PET/CT scans. Operative findings, histological reports and/or clinical follow-up served as standard of reference. The impact of PET/CT on patient management was estimated by calculating the percentage of patients whose treatment plan was altered due to PET/CT. RESULTS: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma was diagnosed in 30 patients, neuroendocrine tumours in 3, mass-forming pancreatitis in 3 and serous cystadenoma in 1. The median standard uptake (max) value was 5.0 (range 2.2-12.0). Sensitivity and specificity of detecting extrapancreatic metastatic disease were 73% and 100%, respectively. Three occult liver metastases were detected at laparotomy following negative PET/CT. PET/CT findings influenced the management of 8 (22%) patients - 3 with liver metastases, 3 with bone metastases, 1 with lymph node metastases and 1 by identifying the benign appearance of the pancreatic tumour. CONCLUSION: PET/CT achieves a significant diagnostic impact in detecting extrapancreatic metastatic disease. F18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT appears to be useful in assessing suspicious pancreatic masses.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Cistadenoma Seroso/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen Multimodal , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Pancreatitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Cistadenoma Seroso/patología , Cistadenoma Seroso/cirugía , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Femenino , Fluorodesoxiglucosa F18 , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Pancreatectomía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreatitis/patología , Pancreatitis/cirugía , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Radiofármacos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
13.
HPB (Oxford) ; 14(5): 285-90, 2012 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22487065

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection is a potentially curative therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but recurrence of disease is very common. Few studies have reported 10-year actual survival rates following hepatic resection; instead, most have used actuarial measures based on the Kaplan-Meier method. This systematic review aims to document 10-year actual survival rates and to identify factors significant in determining prognosis. METHODS: A comprehensive search was undertaken of MEDLINE and EMBASE. Only studies reporting the absolute number of patients alive at 10 years after first resection for HCC were included; these figures were used to calculate the actual 10-year survival rate. A qualitative review and analysis of the prognostic factors identified in the included studies were performed. RESULTS: Fourteen studies, all of which were retrospective case series, including data on 4197 patients with HCC were analysed. Ten years following resection, 303 of these patients were alive. The 10-year actual survival rate was 7.2%, whereas the actuarial survival quoted from the same studies was 26.8%. Positive prognostic factors included better hepatic function, a wider surgical margin and the absence of satellite lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The actual long-term survival rate after resection of HCC is significantly inferior to reported actuarial survival rates. The Kaplan-Meier method of actuarial survival analysis tends to overestimate survival outcomes as a result of censorship of data and subgroup analysis.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Femenino , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Regresión , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
14.
HPB (Oxford) ; 14(3): 153-61, 2012 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22321033

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy is associated with increased risks in patients with cirrhosis. The well-established advantages of laparoscopic surgery may be offset by the increased risk for complications relating particularly to portal hypertension and coagulopathy. METHODS: A systematic search was undertaken to identify studies comparing open cholecystectomy (OC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in patients with cirrhosis. A meta-analysis was performed of the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS: Forty-four studies were analysed. These included a total of 2005 patients with cirrhosis who underwent laparoscopic (n= 1756) or open (n= 249) cholecystectomy, with mortality rates of 0.74% and 2.00%, respectively. A meta-analysis of three RCTs involving a total of 220 patients was conducted. There was a reduction in the overall incidences of postoperative complications and infectious complications and a shorter length of hospital stay in LC. However, frequencies of postoperative hepatic insufficiency did not differ significantly. CONCLUSIONS: There are few RCTs comparing OC and LC in patients with cirrhosis. These studies are small, heterogeneous in design and include almost exclusively patients with Child-Pugh class A and B disease. However, LC appears to be associated with shorter operative time, reduced complication rates and reduced length of hospital stay.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Colecistectomía/métodos , Colelitiasis/cirugía , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía/mortalidad , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/mortalidad , Colelitiasis/complicaciones , Colelitiasis/mortalidad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Cirrosis Hepática/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
15.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 19(4): 1292-301, 2012 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21922338

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Selected patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM) may be rendered resectable after systemic chemotherapy. We reviewed the evidence of downsizing systemic chemotherapy followed by rescue liver surgery in patients with initially unresectable CLM. METHODS: Literature search of databases (Medline and PubMed) to identify published studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by liver resection in patients with initially unresectable CLM was undertaken and focused on response rate of chemotherapy and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Ten observational studies were reviewed. A total of 1,886 patients with initially unresectable CLM underwent systemic chemotherapy. An objective response was observed in 64% (range, 43-79%) of patients after systemic chemotherapy. Of these, 22.5% underwent macroscopically curative liver resection. Median overall survival was 45 (range, 36-60) months with 19% of patients alive and recurrence-free. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence suggests that downsizing systematic chemotherapy followed by rescue liver resection is safe and effective for selected patients with initially unresectable CLM. Further studies are required to examine response rates and secondary resectability using new targeted molecular therapy-based regimens.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Premedicación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Cetuximab , Neoplasias Colorrectales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Metastasectomía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Transplantation ; 92(6): 663-73, 2011 Sep 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21849931

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Management of lymphoceles after kidney transplantation is highly variable. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the different approaches of lymphocele management among kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for case studies published between 1954 and 2010. Inclusion criteria were symptomatic lymphoceles developing in recipients of deceased or living donor kidneys with specified intervention and outcome. Primary outcome was the rate of recurrence. Secondary outcomes were the rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery, hospital stay, and complication rates. RESULTS: Fifty-two retrospective case series with 1113 cases of primary lymphocele were selected for review. No randomized controlled trials or prospective cohort studies were located. Primary treatment modalities included were as follows: aspiration (n=218), sclerotherapy (n=155), drainage (n=219), laparoscopic surgery (n=333), and open surgery (n=188). Of the 218 cases of lymphocele managed with aspiration alone, 141 recurred with a recurrence rate of 59% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 52-67). Among those who received laparoscopic and open surgery, the recurrence rates were 8% (95% CI: 6-12) and 16% (95% CI: 10-24), respectively. The conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery was 12% (95% CI: 8-16). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic fenestration of a symptomatic lymphocele is associated with the lowest risk of lymphocele recurrence. However, the evidence base to support a recommendation for laparoscopic surgery as first line treatment is weak and highlights the need for a multicenter prospective cohort study to examine the benefits of incorporating initial simple aspiration into the management of lymphocele after kidney transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Linfocele/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Drenaje/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Donadores Vivos , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Escleroterapia/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Surg Endosc ; 25(12): 3724-30, 2011 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21656324

RESUMEN

AIM: To review the current status of the novel technique of endoscopic necrosectomy in the management of pancreatic necrosis after acute pancreatitis. METHODS: Studies were identified by searching Medline, PubMed and Embase databases for articles from January 1990 to December 2009 using the keywords "acute pancreatitis", "pancreatic necrosis" and "endoscopy". Additional papers were identified by a manual search of the references from the key articles. Case series of fewer than five patients and case reports were excluded. RESULTS: Indications, techniques and outcomes of endoscopic necrosectomy were analysed. There were no randomised controlled trials identified. Ten case series were included in this analysis. There were a total of more than 1,100 endoscopic necrosectomy procedures in 260 patients with pancreatic necrosis. One hundred fifty-five were proven to be infected necrosis on culture. The overall mortality rate was 5%. The mean procedure-related morbidity rate was 27%. The rate of complete resolution of pancreatic necrosis with the endoscopic method alone was 76%. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic necrosectomy is a safe and effective treatment option in selected patients with pancreatic necrosis after acute pancreatitis. Future studies will be required to further define the selection criteria and the techniques for the endoscopic procedure.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Páncreas/patología , Pancreatitis/complicaciones , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Necrosis/cirugía , Páncreas/cirugía , Pancreatitis/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
18.
Transplantation ; 91(10): 1110-3, 2011 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21389903

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Given the disparity between static supply and increasing demand for organs, the greatest challenge is broadening access to the benefits of kidney transplantation. Organs from small deceased pediatric donors are a potentially underused resource. These may be transplanted as en bloc kidney transplants (EBKTs) to one recipient or as single kidney transplants (SKTs) to two recipients, albeit with an increased risk of graft failure. METHODS: A systematic literature search identified data on transplant outcomes for recipients of organs from small pediatric deceased donors. A decision analysis model was constructed to allow the outcome in life years (LY) to be predicted for patients with end-stage kidney disease on the transplant waiting list depending on whether they received EBKT or SKT. RESULTS: At all recipient ages, the projected LY of both recipients of an SKT was greater than the projected LY of an EBKT recipient. The net estimated gain in LY associated with the SKT technique was greatest for recipients aged 20 to 39 years (14.3 years) and lowest for recipients aged 60 to 74 years (3.36 years). Only for recipients of organs from donors weighing less than 10 kg, there was an estimated net loss of LY associated with the SKT technique across all recipient age groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is a greater gain in overall life expectancy using SKTs, because this technique yields two recipients per donor, which more than compensates for the increased risk of graft failure.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Selección de Donante , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón , Riñón/anatomía & histología , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Adulto , Anciano , Peso Corporal , Preescolar , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Esperanza de Vida , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tamaño de los Órganos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Listas de Espera , Adulto Joven
19.
ANZ J Surg ; 80(11): 781-5, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20969683

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of the right donor kidney and multiple arteries, on donor and recipient outcomes in the era of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy (LLDN). METHODS: e retrospectively analysed the 200 donors and recipients who underwent a planned laparoscopic nephrectomy at two hospitals between September 1998 and December 2006. The impact of donor right kidney and multiple donor renal arteries on operative time, hospital stay, graft function, and donor and recipient complications were analysed. RESULTS: Of the total cohort (n=200), 140 (70%) were classified as Simple LLDN (left live donor kidney with single renal artery). The Complex LLDN group (n=60) contained all right-sided kidney (n=28) and left-sided kidneys with multiple renal arteries (n=32). Baseline characteristics, extraction time, conversion to open, length of admission, overall graft function and complication rates were similar between the simple and complex groups. The second warm ischaemic time in the Simple LLDN group was slightly shorter than the Complex LLDN group (32 versus 36 min P=0.016). The 1-month post-operative recipient serum creatinine level was lower in the Simple LLDN group when compared with the Complex LLDN group (117 versus 125 µmol/L P=0.025). There was no difference in post op dialysis, acute rejection within 3 months or graft survival between the Simple and Complex LLDN groups. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic procurements of right kidneys and kidneys with multiple arteries were safe and yielded kidneys with excellent function comparable with those of laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy with single artery.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/métodos , Riñón/irrigación sanguínea , Laparoscopía/métodos , Donadores Vivos , Nefrectomía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Rechazo de Injerto , Supervivencia de Injerto , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Renal/anatomía & histología , Arteria Renal/cirugía , Venas Renales/anatomía & histología , Venas Renales/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Tasa de Supervivencia , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
20.
ANZ J Surg ; 80(6): 411-8, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20618193

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes mellitus is a chronic condition often leading to disabling complications including retinopathy, neuropathy and cardiovascular disease which can be modified by intensive treatment with insulin. Such treatment, however, is associated with a restrictive lifestyle and risk of hypoglycaemic morbidity and mortality. METHODS: This review examines the role of pancreas transplantation in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. RESULTS: Pancreas transplantation is currently the only proven option to achieve long-term insulin independence, resulting in an improvement or stabilization of those diabetic related complications. The hazards of pancreas transplantation as a major operation are well known. Balancing the risks of a surgical procedure, with the benefits of restoring normoglycaemia remains an important task for the pancreas transplant surgeon. Pancreas transplantation is not an emergency operation to treat poorly managed and non-compliant patients with debilitating complications. It is a highly specialized procedure which has evolved both in terms of the surgical technique, patient selection and assessment. CONCLUSION: Pancreas transplantation has emerged as the single most effective way to achieve normal glucose homeostasis in patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/cirugía , Trasplante de Páncreas , Glucemia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Humanos , Páncreas/irrigación sanguínea , Páncreas/cirugía , Pancreatectomía/métodos , Selección de Paciente , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...