A Retrospective Cohort Analysis Comparing the Costs of Ankle Fracture Fixation in Orthopaedics and Podiatry in a U.S. Medicare Limited Data Set.

BACKGROUND: Increasing overlap exists between surgeries performed by podiatrists and orthopaedic surgeons. Large-scale cost comparisons between the two are lacking despite the current climate of cost containment in health care. Using national Medicare data, we aimed to compare per-case Medicare payments between podiatrists and orthopaedic surgeons for ankle fracture fixation. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients in an outpatient setting undergoing either unimalleolar, bimalleolar, or trimalleolar ankle fracture repair from the national Medicare Limited Data Set (2013-2019). Type of surgeon (podiatrist or orthopaedic surgeon) was determined using publicly available information. The primary outcome was total Medicare payments specific to the procedure, as a surrogate for cost. A subset analysis was also done to directly compare costs of orthopaedic surgeons to podiatric surgeons while excluding other fees (eg, hospital facility fees and surgery-related imaging payments). Additionally, patient demographics and hospital characteristics were compared to determine if any factors associated with costs may influence group differences. Univariable tests assessed significance of group differences. RESULTS: Overall, 16 927 unimalleolar, 17 244 bimalleolar, and 11 717 trimalleolar fracture repairs were included; 86.7% and 13.3%, 92.4% and 7.6%, and 92.2% and 7.8% were performed by an orthopaedic surgeon or podiatrist, respectively. Median age (70-71 years) and median Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index (0) did not significantly differ between patients treated by either surgeon type. Median procedure-specific Medicare payments for all 3 categories of ankle fracture repairs (uni-, bi-, trimalleolar) were significantly lower for orthopaedic surgeons compared to podiatrists: $4156 vs $4300, $4205 vs $4379, and $4396 vs $4525, respectively (all P < .001). CONCLUSION: Our investigation using a national Medicare data set (2013-2019) found that the 3 types of ankle fractures (unimalleolar, bimalleolar, and trimalleolar) performed by orthopaedic surgeons in an outpatient setting were less expensive and that cost differences do not appear to be driven by patient characteristics. These results and further research into the causes of the cost differences may help improve the cost-effectiveness of ankle fracture surgery.

Does Preoperative Bisphosphonate Use Impact the Risk of Periprosthetic Fracture Following Total Hip Arthroplasty?

INTRODUCTION: Bisphosphonate (BP) use is not uncommon among total hip arthroplasty (THA) candidates. While the impact of BP therapy post-THA has been investigated, there is a paucity of literature discussing the impact of BP therapy pre-THA. Using a national dataset, we aimed to study the association between preoperative BP use and surgical outcomes in primary THA recipients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized a commercial claims and Medicare Supplemental Databases to identify adults aged ≥ 18 who had an index non-fracture-related primary THA from 2016 to 2020. The use of BP was defined as ≥ 6 months of BP therapy in the year prior to THA. Outcomes were 90-day all-cause readmission, 90-day readmission related to periprosthetic fracture (PPF), 90-day and 1-year all-cause revision, 1-year PPF-related revision, and 1-year diagnosis of PPF. In a 1:5 propensity-score matched analysis, each THA patient who had preoperative BP use was matched to five THA patients who did not have preoperative BP use. Logistic regression models were fitted; we report odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Of 91,907 THA patients, 1,018 (1.1%) used BP preoperatively. In the propensity-score-matched cohort (1,018 preoperative BP users, 5,090 controls), preoperative BP use was significantly associated with increased odds of 90-day all-cause revision surgery (OR 1.67; 95% CI 1.10 to 2.53; P = 0.02), 1-year PPF-related revision (OR 2.23; 95% CI 1.21 to 4.10; P = 0.01), and 1-year PPF diagnosis (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.10 to 3.20; P = 0.02). There was no significant association between preoperative BP use and the other outcomes in the matched cohort. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that preoperative BP use is associated with an increased risk of revision surgery and PPF in both the short and long term. This information can help in preoperative planning and patient counseling, potentially leading to improved surgical outcomes and reduced complication rates.

Trends in hip fracture surgery in the United States from 2016 to 2021: patient characteristics, clinical management, and outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Hip fractures are a serious health concern and a major contributor to healthcare resource utilisation. We aimed to investigate nationwide trends in the USA in patient characteristics and outcomes in patients after hip fracture repair surgery. METHODS: From the Premier Healthcare dataset, we extracted patient encounters for surgical hip fracture repair from 2016 to 2021. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, complications, and anaesthetic and surgical details were analysed. Cochran-Armitage trend tests and simple linear regression were used to determine trends. RESULTS: We included 347 086 hip fracture repair encounters. Notable trends included the following: median patient age declined from 82 yr [interquartile range: 73-88 yr] to 81 yr [interquartile range: 73-88 yr], (P-value=0.002), the proportion of female patients decreased from 68% to 66.2% (P-value=0.019); internal fixation was the most common intervention initially, but with a declining percentage from 49.9% to 43.8% (P-value <0.001); in general, patients carried a greater comorbidity burden, with the proportion with three or more Elixhauser comorbidities increasing from 56.4% to 58.6% (P-value=0.006); general anaesthesia remained the most common anaesthetic technique, from 68.90% to 56.80% without a significant trend; per 1000 inpatient days, the most common complication remained acute renal failure; despite a higher comorbidity burden, no complication showed a statistically significant upward trend, and many showed downward trends. CONCLUSIONS: Over the 6-yr period from 2016 to 2021, a majority of hip fracture repairs continued to be performed under general anaesthesia but with that percentage declining over time. Notable trends included a lower percentage of female patients, an increase in femoral neck fractures, a higher comorbidity burden among patients, and a decrease in complications.

Did Payment Reform Lead to Patient Selection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasties? An Observational Study Using New York State Data.

Background: While the comprehensive care for joint replacement (CJR) bundled payment program for total joint replacement (TJR) emphasizes value, concerns persist regarding unintended consequences, primarily hospital selection of healthier, younger patients. Purpose: We sought to assess changes in patient characteristics and outcomes after CJR implementation in New York State. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included primary total hip and total knee arthroplasties from the New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) database. Procedures performed before (July 2014 to March 2016; n = 58,610) and after (April 2016 to December 2017; n = 78,728) CJR implementation were compared. Primary outcomes were patient characteristics: Deyo-Comorbidity Index and age. Secondary outcomes were increased hospitalization cost, discharge to institutional post-acute care, and prolonged length of stay. A difference-in-differences analysis estimated changes after CJR implementation, comparing CJR to non-CJR hospitals. Results: We found that CJR implementation (in 49 of 144 New York State hospitals) coincided with slightly older and more comorbid TJR recipients. The CJR program coincided with significantly reduced hospitalization cost and discharge to institutional post-acute care but not length of stay. Some CJR effects appear to have affected non-Medicare patients, as well. Conclusion: This retrospective analysis suggests that in New York State, the CJR bundled payment program did not result in hospitals selecting younger and healthier TJR recipients and coincided with decreased costs and fewer discharges to institutional postacute care.

Associations Between Prehabilitation and Postoperative Healthcare Utilization for Total Hip or Total Knee Arthroplasty in Medicare Beneficiaries.

BACKGROUND: Prehabilitation has potential to improve outcomes in value-based care models. We examined the associations between receipt of prehabilitation (physical therapy [PT] services within 30 days preoperatively) and postoperative healthcare utilization in a national cohort of fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the 5% fee-for-service claims from the Medicare Limited Data Set to identify unilateral elective inpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures (n = 25,509) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) procedures (n = 40,091) from January 1, 2016 to September 30, 2021. Associations between prehabilitation and postoperative healthcare utilization were analyzed in mixed-effects generalized linear models adjusting for patient-level and hospital-level factors. We report adjusted odds ratios (OR) or % differences. RESULTS: Prehabilitation (13.1% THA, 13.1% TKA) was not significantly associated with institutional post-acute care discharge, 30-day emergency department visits, or 90-day readmissions. For TKA, prehabilitation was significantly associated with decreased odds of an extended hospital length of stay (OR = 0.86, P = 0.02) and reduced length of stay in an institutional post-acute care facility (-5.71%, P = 0.004). In both THA and TKA, prehabilitation was associated with decreased use of 90-day home health physical and/or occupational therapy (THA: OR = 0.82, P = 0.001; TKA: OR = 0.67, P < 0.001). In contrast, prehabilitation in both cohorts was associated with increased odds of receiving any 90-day outpatient PT (THA: OR = 2.08, P < 0.001; TKA: OR = 2.48, P < 0.001) and an increased number of 90-day outpatient PT visits (THA: +4.04%, P = 0.01; TKA: +5.21%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Prehabilitation was associated with some decreases in postoperative healthcare utilization, particularly for TKA. Associations of preoperative physical therapy with increased postoperative outpatient physical therapy may reflect variation in referral patterns or patient access. These results highlight the importance of continued research into the impact of prehabilitation on healthcare utilization, patient outcomes, and episode costs. Additionally, further research should identify which patients would benefit the most from prehabilitation to increase the value of care.

Patient Factors Associated With Reimplantation After Girdlestone Resection Arthroplasty for Treatment of Periprosthetic Joint Infections of the Hip.

INTRODUCTION: For patients unsuitable for prosthesis reimplantation or temporary spacer placement, Girdlestone resection arthroplasty (GRA) is a suitable option to eliminate infection. Using a large-scale database, this study aims to determine factors associated with reimplantation. METHODS: This study included patients who underwent GRA and subsequent total hip arthroplasty (2012 to 2015 Medicare Limited Data Set with ≥5-year follow-up). A mixed-effects model measured associations between patient characteristics and reimplantation. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. RESULTS: Among 2,772 GRA cases, 2,025 (73.1%) were reimplanted (median time to reimplantation 3.0 months). In multivariable analysis, patient factors associated with reduced odds of reimplantation were increased age (OR 0.96; CI, 0.94 to 0.97; P < 0.0001), Black race (OR, 0.58; CI, 0.37 to 0.90; P = 0.0149), obesity (OR, 0.74; CI, 0.58 to 0.94; P = 0.0150), and increased Deyo-Charlson comorbidities (1 comorbidity: OR, 0.78; CI, 0.61 to 0.99; P = 0.0453; two comorbidities: OR, 0.53; CI, 0.39 to 0.71; P < 0.0001; ≥3 comorbidities: OR, 0.69; CI, 0.49 to 0.95; P = 0.0244). Male (versus female) patients, however, had increased odds of reimplantation (OR, 1.64; CI, 1.32 to 2.02; P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Age, race, and comorbidities influence the likelihood of reimplantation after GRA. Owing to variability in patients who undergo additional surgery, additional studies should be conducted to determine the rationale of patient selection.

Multimodal Analgesia and Outcomes in Hysterectomy Surgery-A Population-Based Analysis.

Objective: We aimed to investigate the impact of multimodal analgesia on postoperative complications and opioid prescription on a national level. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study included n = 1,307,923 hysterectomies (01/2006-12/2022, Premier Healthcare claims data). Multimodal analgesia was defined as opioid use with the addition of non-opioid analgesic modes, grouped into four categories: opioid-only and 1, 2, or 3 or more additional non-opioid analgesics. Multivariable regression models measured associations between multimodal categories and outcomes (composite/respiratory/cardiac/gastrointestinal/genitourinary, and CNS complications, oral morphine milligram equivalents [MME], and length of hospital stay [LOS]). Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are reported. Results: Overall, 84.3% (1,102,812/1,307,923) received multimodal analgesia, of which 58.9%, 28.0%, and 13.1% received 1, 2, or 3 or more additional non-opioid analgesics, respectively. The odds of any composite complication (any ≥1 complication) decreased with the addition of 1, 2, 3, or more analgesic modalities (versus opioid-only): OR 0.66 (CI 0.64; 0.68), OR 0.63 (CI 0.61; 0.66), OR 0.65 (CI 0.62; 0.67), respectively. Similar patterns existed for respiratory, cardiac, and genitourinary complications. Opioid prescription decreased incrementally with 1,2, 3, or more non-opioid analgesic modalities by 9.51 mg (CI 11.16; 7.86) and 15.29 mg (CI 17.21; 13.37) and 29.35 mg (CI 31.79; 26.91) cumulative MME. LOS was reduced by 0.52 days (CI 0.54; 0.51), 0.49 days (CI 0.51; 0.47), and 0.40 days (CI 0.43; 0.38), respectively. Costs were reduced by $765 (CI 817; 714) or $479 (CI 539; 419) with 1 or 2 multimodal modes. Conclusions: These findings suggest substantial benefits of multimodal analgesia, including significant decreases in serious complications (especially respiratory, cardiac, and genitourinary), opioid consumption, and hospitalizations. Multimodal analgesia may facilitate safe and efficient pain management with optimized opioid consumption.

Socioeconomic, Patient, and Hospital Determinants for the Utilization of Peripheral Nerve Blocks in Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: While peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) are associated with various improved outcomes in patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA), disparities in PNB utilization have been reported. This study assessed the importance of socioeconomic, demographic, clinical, and hospital determinants in explaining PNB utilization using the population-attributable risk (PAR) framework. Subsequently, we examined the association between PNB use and 3 secondary outcomes: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-defined complications, 90-day all-cause readmissions, and length of stay >3 days. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 52,926 THA and 94,795 TKA cases from the 5% 2012 to 2021 Medicare dataset. Mixed-effects logistic regression models measured the association between study variables and PNB utilization. Variables of interest were demographic (age, sex), clinical (outpatient setting, diagnosis, prior hospitalizations in the year before surgery, Deyo-Charlson index, obesity, (non)-opioid abuse, smoking), socioeconomic (neighborhood Social Deprivation Index, race and ethnicity) and hospital variables (beds, ownership, region, rurality, resident-to-bed ratio). The model was used for the calculation of variable-specific and variable category-specific PARs (presented in percentages), reflecting the proportion of variation in PNB use explained after eliminating variables (or groups of variables) of interest with all other factors held constant. Subsequently, regression models measured the association between PNB use and secondary outcomes. Associations are presented with odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS: Socioeconomic and demographic variables accounted for only a small proportion of variation in PNB use (up to 3% and 7%, respectively). Clinical (THA: 46%; TKA: 34%) and hospital variables (THA: 31%; TKA: 22%) were the primary drivers of variation. In THA, variation by clinical variables was driven by increased PNB use in the inpatient setting (OR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.07-1.53]) and decreased use in patients with ≥2 prior hospitalizations (OR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.57-0.90]). Moreover, nonosteoarthritis diagnoses associated with reduced PNB utilization in THA (OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.58-0.72]) and TKA (OR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.34-0.37]).In TKA, PNB use was subsequently associated with fewer complications (OR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.75-0.90]) and less prolonged length of stay (OR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.86-0.95]); no association was found for readmissions (OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.93-1.03]). In THA, associations did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Among THA and TKA patients on Medicare, large variations exist in the utilization of PNBs by clinical and hospital variables, while demographic and socioeconomic variables played a limited role. Given the consistent benefits of PNBs, particularly in TKA patients, more standardized provision may be warranted to mitigate the observed variation.

Comparative effectiveness of neuraxial versus general anesthesia in total joint replacement surgery: an updated retrospective analysis using more recent data.

INTRODUCTION: Over a decade ago, our study group showed improved outcomes among total hip/knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) patients given neuraxial versus general anesthesia. As the use of neuraxial anesthesia has increased and anesthesia practices evolve, updated analyses are critical to ensure if previously found differences still persist. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included elective THA/TKAs from 2006 to 2021 as recorded in the all-payor Premier Healthcare Database. Multivariable regression models measured the association between anesthesia type (neuraxial, general, combined) and several adverse outcomes (pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular events, pulmonary compromise, cardiac complications, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, all infections, acute renal failure, gastrointestinal complications, postoperative mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit admissions, and blood transfusions); models were run separately by period (2006-2015 and 2016-2021) and THA/TKA. RESULTS: We identified 587,919 and 499,484 THAs for 2006-2015 and 2016-2021, respectively; this was 1,186,483 and 803,324 for TKAs. Among THAs, neuraxial anesthesia use increased from 10.7% in 2006 to 25.7% in 2021; during both time periods, specifically neuraxial versus general anesthesia was associated with lower odds for most adverse outcomes, with sometimes stronger (protective) effect estimates observed for 2016-2021 versus 2006-2015 (eg, acute renal failure OR 0.72 CI 0.65 to 0.80 vs OR 0.56 CI 0.50 to 0.63 and blood transfusion OR 0.91 CI 0.89 to 0.94 vs OR 0.44 CI 0.41 to 0.47, respectively; all p<0.001). Similar patterns existed for TKAs. CONCLUSION: These findings re-confirm our study group's decade-old study using more recent data and offer additional evidence toward the sustained benefit of neuraxial anesthesia in major orthopedic surgery.

The Impact of Race/Ethnicity on Disparities in Utilization and Outcomes of Neuraxial Anesthesia for Hip and Femoral Shaft Fractures.

Background/Objectives: The use of neuraxial anesthesia versus general anesthesia for hip fracture surgery remains an active area of research, with recent studies demonstrating mixed findings supporting neuraxial over general anesthesia. The benefits of neuraxial anesthesia have been documented in associated surgeries, including total joint arthroplasty. However, racial disparities in the administration of neuraxial anesthesia have been identified in numerous procedures. We aimed to examine the association of race/ethnicity with neuraxial anesthesia use and the effect of neuraxial anesthesia on length of stay, non-home discharge, 30-day severe adverse events, and rates of readmission among patients undergoing isolated hip and femoral shaft fracture operations. Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program database was queried for isolated hip or femoral shaft fractures from 2015 to 2019. Stepwise logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between race/ethnicity and neuraxial anesthesia use. Within each sex-race stratum, neuraxial anesthesia recipients were propensity-matched to general anesthesia recipients in a 1:2 ratio. Logistic regression and negative binomial regression were performed on the propensity-matched cohort. Results: A total of 12,004 neuraxial and 64,250 general anesthesia hip and femoral shaft fracture patients were identified. Compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients were between 0.64 and 0.61 times less likely to receive neuraxial anesthesia over general anesthesia, respectively (p < 0.05). 11,993 patients who received neuraxial anesthesia were propensity matched to 23,946 patients who received general anesthesia. Propensity-matched logistic regressions found that neuraxial anesthesia was associated with decreased length of stay, 30-day severe adverse events, and acute rehab/skilled nursing facility discharge for White patients (p < 0.05 for all), but only decreased length of stay in Black and Hispanic patients (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Conclusions: Notable disparities exist in the administration of neuraxial anesthesia for isolated hip and femoral shaft fracture patients. Hispanic and Black race/ethnicity in particular influences provision of neuraxial anesthesia. Further research is required to understand the degree of effect modification and root causes of regional anesthesia access and benefits for this high-volume patient population.

Time to surgical treatment for hip fracture care.

BACKGROUND: Studies have demonstrated beneficial outcomes associated with timely surgical treatment of hip fracture. Subsequently, practice recommendations changed with 24-48 h as the recommended time for surgery from admission; however, recent data on timing of hip fracture surgery and how this impacts outcomes are lacking. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients who had a primary diagnosis of hip fracture and underwent a subsequent surgical repair within 3 days of admission (Premier Healthcare claims 2006-2021 data). The primary exposure of interest was time from hip fracture diagnosis to surgery (categorized as 0-1 day, 2 days, and 3 days). Outcomes included any major complication, mortality, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Mixed-effects models measured the association between timing of surgery and outcomes. We report odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Among 501,267 surgical hip fracture patients, 26.0%, 56.0%, and 18.1% of patients received surgery on days 0-1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median ages were 83, 84, and 84 years old, and there were 73.3%, 72.2%, and 68.8% female in each group respectively. Compared with repair on day 0-1, hip fracture surgical treatment on day 2 or day 3 was associated with increased odds of major complications (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.08 and OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.13-1.2), mortality (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.02-1.14 and OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.12-1.28), and ICU admission (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.09 and OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.32-1.4) after adjusting major comorbidities; all p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: Despite the publication of society guidelines in 2015, most fracture patients still received surgery on day 2 or day 3 of admission and were associated with worse outcomes. Balancing optimization of clinical factors with timing of surgery can be challenging, and further research is needed. Nonetheless, our findings reiterate the importance of timely surgical intervention.

Is Limited English Proficiency Associated With Differences in Care Processes and Treatment Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Orthopaedic Surgery? A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 25 million people in the United States have limited English proficiency. Current developments in orthopaedic surgery, such as the expansion of preoperative education classes or patient-reported outcome collection in response to bundled payment models, may exacerbate language-related barriers. Currently, there are mixed findings of the associations between limited English proficiency and care processes and outcomes, warranting a cross-study synthesis to identify patterns of associations. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this systematic review, we asked: Is limited English proficiency associated with (1) differences in clinical care processes, (2) differences in care processes related to patient engagement, and (3) poorer treatment outcomes in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery in English-speaking countries? METHODS: On June 9, 2023, a systematic search of four databases from inception through the search date (PubMed, Ovid Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus) was performed by a medical librarian. Potentially eligible articles were observational studies that examined the association between limited English proficiency and the prespecified categories of outcomes among pediatric and adult patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery or receiving care in an orthopaedic surgery setting. We identified 10,563 records, of which we screened 6966 titles and abstracts after removing duplicates. We reviewed 56 full-text articles and included 29 peer-reviewed studies (outcome categories: eight for clinical care processes, 10 for care processes related to patient engagement, and 15 for treatment outcomes), with a total of 362,746 patients or encounters. We extracted data elements including study characteristics, definition of language exposure, specific outcomes, and study results. The quality of each study was evaluated using adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scales for cohort or cross-sectional studies. Most studies had a low (48%) or moderate (45%) risk of bias, but two cross-sectional studies had a high risk of bias. To answer our questions, we synthesized associations and no-difference findings, further stratified by adjusted versus unadjusted estimates, for each category of outcomes. No meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: There were mixed findings regarding whether limited English proficiency is associated with differences in clinical care processes, with the strongest adjusted associations between non-English versus English as the preferred language and delayed ACL reconstruction surgery and receipt of neuraxial versus general anesthesia for other non-Spanish versus English primary language in patients undergoing THA or TKA. Limited English proficiency was also associated with increased hospitalization costs for THA or TKA but not opioid prescribing in pediatric patients undergoing surgery for fractures. For care processes related to patient engagement, limited English proficiency was consistently associated with decreased patient portal use and decreased completion of patient-reported outcome measures per adjusted estimates. The exposure was also associated with decreased virtual visit completion for other non-Spanish versus English language and decreased postoperative opioid refill requests after TKA but not differences in attendance-related outcomes. For treatment outcomes, limited English proficiency was consistently associated with increased hospital length of stay and nonhome discharge per adjusted estimates, but not hospital returns. There were mixed findings regarding associations with increased complications and worse postoperative patient-reported outcome measure scores. CONCLUSION: Findings specifically suggest the need to remove language-based barriers for patients to engage in care, including for patient portal use and patient-reported outcome measure completion, and to identify mechanisms and solutions for increased postoperative healthcare use. However, interpretations are limited by the heterogeneity of study parameters, including the language exposure. Future research should include more-precise and transparent definitions of limited English proficiency and contextual details on available language-based resources to support quantitative syntheses. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Preoperative Cervical Epidural Steroid Injections: Utilization and Postoperative Complications in ACDF, PCDF, and Decompression.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Identify factors associated with cervical epidural steroid injection (CESI) receipt before anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF), or decompression; evaluate the association between CESI receipt and 90-day postoperative complications; and determine characteristics of CESI associated with complications. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous literature has suggested that a preoperative CESI may increase the risk of postoperative complications. However, these studies were limited in the procedures and complications they evaluated. METHODS: The IBM MarketScan database was queried for patients aged 18 years or older who underwent ACDF, PCDF, or cervical decompression for disc herniation, stenosis, radiculopathy, myelopathy, and/or spondylosis without myelopathy between January 1, 2014 and September 30, 2020. CESI receipt within 12 months preoperatively, injection characteristics, and postoperative complications were extracted. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between patient characteristics and receipt of CESI, receipt of a CESI and each 90-day postoperative complication, and CESI characteristics and each 90-day complication. RESULTS: Among the unique patients who underwent each procedure, 20,371 ACDF patients (30.93%), 1259 (22.24%) PCDF patients, and 3349 (36.30%) decompression patients received a preoperative CESI. In all 3 cohorts, increasing age, increasing comorbidity burden, smoker status, and diagnosis of myelopathy were associated with decreased odds of preoperative CESI receipt, while female sex and diagnosis of radiculopathy and spondylosis without myelopathy were associated with increased odds. There were no meaningful between-group comparisons or significant associations between preoperative CESI receipt and any 90-day postoperative complications in multivariable models (all P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study elucidated the main determinants of CESI receipt and found no differences in the odds of developing 90-day postoperative complications, but did identify differential outcomes with regard to some injection characteristics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Prolonged Opioid Use and Associated Factors After Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Tibial Shaft Fractures.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective cohort study was to determine the rate of prolonged opioid use and identify associated risk factors after perioperative opioid exposure for tibial shaft fracture surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database (IBM) to identify patients 18 to 64 years old who filled a peri-operative opioid prescription after open reduction and internal fixation of a tibial shaft fracture from January 2016 to June 2020. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors (eg, demographics, comorbidities, medications) associated with prolonged opioid use (ie, filling an opioid prescription 91 to 180 days postoperatively); adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs were reported. RESULTS: The rate of prolonged opioid use was 10.5% (n=259/2475) in the full cohort and 6.1% (n=119/1958) in an opioid-naive subgroup. In the full cohort, factors significantly associated with increased odds of prolonged use included preoperative opioid use (OR, 4.76; 95% CI, 3.60-6.29; P<.001); perioperative oral morphine equivalents in the 4th (vs 1st) quartile (OR, 2.68; 95% CI, 1.75-4.09; P<.001); age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04; P<.001); and alcohol or substance-related disorder (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.15-2.40; P=.01). Patients in the Northeast and North Central (vs South) regions had decreased odds of prolonged use (OR, 0.61-0.69; P=.02-.04). When removing preoperative use, findings were similar in the opioid-naive subgroup. CONCLUSION: Prolonged opioid use is not uncommon in this orthopedic trauma population, with the strongest risk factor being preoperative opioid use. Nevertheless, shared risk factors exist between the opioid-naive and opioid-tolerant subgroups that can guide clinical decision-making. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(4):e188-e196.].

Differences in Perioperative Metrics by Race and Ethnicity and Insurance After Pelvic Fracture: A Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in orthopedic trauma care have been reported for racial-ethnic minority and socially disadvantaged patients. We examined differences in perioperative metrics by patient race and ethnicity and insurance after pelvic fracture in a national sample in the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 2016-2019 National Inpatient Sample was queried for White, Black, and Hispanic patients 18 to 64 years old with private, Medicaid, or self-pay insurance who underwent non-elective pelvic fracture surgery. Associations between combined race and ethnicity and insurance subgroups and perioperative metrics (time to surgery, length of stay, inhospital complications, institutional discharge) were assessed using multivariable generalized linear and logistic regression models. Adjusted percent differences or odds ratios (ORs) were reported. RESULTS: A weighted total of 14,375 surgeries were included (68.8% in White patients, 16.1% in Black patients, and 15.1% in Hispanic patients; 60.0% private insurance, 26.3% Medicaid, and 13.7% self-pay). Compared with White patients with private insurance, all Black insurance subgroups had longer length of stay (+15.38% to +38.78%, P≤.001), as did Hispanic patients with Medicaid (+28.03%, P<.001), White patients with Medicaid (+13.08%, P<.001), and White patients with self-pay (+9.47%, P=.04). Additionally, compared with White patients with private insurance, decreased odds of institutional discharge were observed for all patients with self-pay (OR, 0.24-0.37, P<.001) as well as White patients with Medicaid (OR, 0.70, P=.003) and Hispanic patients with Medicaid (OR, 0.57, P=.002). There were no significant adjusted associations between race and ethnicity and insurance subgroups and in-hospital complications or time to surgery. CONCLUSION: These differences in perioperative metrics, primarily for Black patients and patients with self-pay insurance, warrant further examination to identify whether they reflect disparities that should be addressed to promote equitable orthopedic trauma care. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(5):e233-e240.].

Impact of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Bundled Payment Model on Postoperative Utilization of Home Health and Outpatient Physical Therapy Services.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) bundled payment program on postoperative home health and outpatient physical therapy (PT) for total hip or knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort with national Medicare data (5% claims) using a difference-in-differences analysis comparing January 2013-September 2015 (before) versus October 2016-September 2019 (after). SETTING: Administrative claims from hospitals in 34 metropolitan statistical areas with mandatory CJR participation as of 2018 and 42 control metropolitan statistical areas. PARTICIPANTS: Episodes in fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries (5% claims) undergoing elective THA (n=6327) or TKA (n=10,764) with community discharge. INTERVENTIONS: Implementation of CJR bundled payment program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Home health and outpatient PT, including any use and number of visits. RESULTS: Program implementation was associated with an increased percentage of THA episodes using home health PT (+8.0 percentage-point change; 95% CI, +3.5 to +12.6; P=.001) but a decreased per-episode number of home health PT visits for THA (-1.1; 95% CI, -1.6 to -0.6; P<.001) and TKA (-1.1; 95% CI, -1.4 to -0.7; P<.001). The program was also associated with an increased per-episode number of outpatient PT visits for TKA in the primary but not sensitivity analyses (+0.8; 95% CI, +0.1 to +1.4; P=.02). CONCLUSIONS: Findings of increased home health PT may reflect an intentional shift in care from the inpatient postacute setting to the community to decrease costs. Alternatively, the limited effect of CJR, particularly on outpatient PT, could reflect challenges with care coordination in a retrospective bundle spanning multiple care settings.

Oral Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Outpatient Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty: Describing Current Practices.

BACKGROUND: Despite an increase in outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), large-scale data are lacking on current practice for antibiotic prophylaxis prescribing. We aimed to describe current oral antibiotic prophylaxis practices nationally for outpatient THA and TKA. METHODS: This nationwide retrospective cohort study included primary outpatient THA or TKA procedures in patients aged 18 to 64 years from 2018 to 2021 using a national claims database. Oral antibiotic prescriptions filled perioperatively (defined as 5 days before to 3 days after surgery) were extracted; these were categorized and assumed to represent postoperative prophylaxis. Multivariable logistic regression measured associations between patient and surgery characteristics and perioperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. RESULTS: Oral antibiotic prescriptions were filled in 16.5% of 73,015 outpatient THA and TKA (18.4% of 24,857 THAs, 15.5% of 48,158 TKAs) procedures. Prescriptions were most often for cephalosporins (74.3%), with cephalexin (52.8%), and cefadroxil (19.1%) being the most common. Non-cephalosporin antibiotics prescribed were mainly clindamycin (6.8%), sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (6.7%), and doxycycline (6.2%). The odds of receiving oral antibiotic prophylaxis were higher for THA compared to TKA (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09 to 1.18, P < .001) and in the presence of obesity, diabetes, and autoimmune conditions (OR 1.08 to 1.13, P < .001 to .01). Ambulatory surgery center procedures also had significantly increased odds of prophylaxis compared to hospital-based outpatient surgeries (OR 2.62, 95% CI 2.51 to 2.73, P < .001). Additionally, regional and time-based variations were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative oral antibiotic prophylaxis prescriptions were filled in only 16.5% of outpatient THA and TKA cases, with variation in the type of antibiotic prescribed. The receipt of any prophylaxis and specific medications was associated with demographic, clinical, and procedure-related characteristics. Follow-up research will evaluate associations with infection risk reduction.