Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(16)2024 Aug 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39201511

RESUMEN

It has been shown that vertical transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 strain is relatively rare, and there is still limited information on the specific impact of maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection on vertical transmission. The current study focuses on a transcriptomics analysis aimed at examining differences in gene expression between placentas from mother-newborn pairs affected by COVID-19 and those from unaffected controls. Additionally, it investigates the in situ expression of molecules involved in placental inflammation. The Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital in Bergamo, Italy, has recorded three instances of intrauterine transmission of SARS-CoV-2. The first two cases occurred early in the pandemic and involved pregnant women in their third trimester who were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2. The third case involved an asymptomatic woman in her second trimester with a twin pregnancy, who unfortunately delivered two stillborn fetuses due to the premature rupture of membranes. Transcriptomic analysis revealed significant differences in gene expression between the placentae of COVID-19-affected mother/newborn pairs and two matched controls. The infected and control placentae were matched for gestational age. According to the Benjamani-Hochberg method, 305 genes met the criterion of an adjusted p-value of less than 0.05, and 219 genes met the criterion of less than 0.01. Up-regulated genes involved in cell signaling (e.g., CCL20, C3, MARCO) and immune response (e.g., LILRA3, CXCL10, CD48, CD86, IL1RN, IL-18R1) suggest their potential role in the inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2. RNAscope® technology, coupled with image analysis, was utilized to quantify the surface area covered by SARS-CoV-2, ACE2, IL-1ß, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, and TNF-α on both the maternal and fetal sides of the placenta. A non-statistically significant gradient for SARS-CoV-2 was observed, with a higher surface coverage on the fetal side (2.42 ± 3.71%) compared to the maternal side (0.74 ± 1.19%) of the placenta. Although not statistically significant, the surface area covered by ACE2 mRNA was higher on the maternal side (0.02 ± 0.04%) compared to the fetal side (0.01 ± 0.01%) of the placenta. IL-6 and IL-8 were more prevalent on the fetal side (0.03 ± 0.04% and 0.06 ± 0.08%, respectively) compared to the maternal side (0.02 ± 0.01% and 0.02 ± 0.02%, respectively). The mean surface areas of IL-1ß and IL-10 were found to be equal on both the fetal (0.04 ± 0.04% and 0.01 ± 0.01%, respectively) and maternal sides of the placenta (0.04 ± 0.05% and 0.01 ± 0.01%, respectively). The mean surface area of TNF-α was found to be equal on both the fetal and maternal sides of the placenta (0.02 ± 0.02% and 0.02 ± 0.02%, respectively). On the maternal side, ACE-2 and all examined interleukins, but not TNF-α, exhibited an inverse mRNA amount compared to SARS-CoV-2. On the fetal side, ACE-2, IL-6 and IL-8 were inversely correlated with SARS-CoV-2 (r = -0.3, r = -0.1 and r = -0.4, respectively), while IL-1ß and IL-10 showed positive correlations (r = 0.9, p = 0.005 and r = 0.5, respectively). TNF-α exhibited a positive correlation with SARS-CoV-2 on both maternal (r = 0.4) and fetal sides (r = 0.9) of the placenta. Further research is needed to evaluate the correlation between cell signaling and immune response genes in the placenta and the vertical transmission of SARS-CoV-2. Nonetheless, the current study extends our comprehension of the molecular and immunological factors involved in SARS-CoV-2 placental infection underlying maternal-fetal transmission.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Transmisión Vertical de Enfermedad Infecciosa , Placenta , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , COVID-19/inmunología , COVID-19/transmisión , COVID-19/virología , Citocinas/metabolismo , Citocinas/genética , Perfilación de la Expresión Génica , Inflamación/genética , Inflamación/inmunología , Inflamación/virología , Placenta/inmunología , Placenta/metabolismo , Placenta/virología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/inmunología , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Transcriptoma
2.
Viruses ; 16(7)2024 Jul 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39066300

RESUMEN

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the leading infectious cause of brain defects and neurological dysfunctions, including sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Targeted screening in neonates failing the hearing screen is currently recommended in Italy according to national guidelines. However, SNHL may not be present at birth; also, congenital CMV (cCMV) may manifest with subtle signs other than SNHL. Therefore, the inclusion of additional criteria for cCMV screening appears clinically valuable. Starting January 2021, we have implemented expanded targeted cCMV screening at our center, with testing in case of maternal CMV infection during pregnancy, inadequate antenatal care, maternal HIV infection or immunosuppression, birthweight and/or head circumference < 10th centile, failed hearing screen, and prematurity. During the first three years of use of this program (2021-2023), 940 (12.3%) of 7651 live-born infants were tested. The most common indication was birthweight < 10th centile (n = 633, 67.3%). Eleven neonates were diagnosed as congenitally infected, for a prevalence of 1.17% (95%CI 0.48-1.86) on tested neonates and of 0.14% (95%CI 0.06-0.23) on live-born infants. None of the cCMV-infected newborns had a failed hearing screen as a testing indication. Implementation of an expanded cCMV screening program appears feasible and of clinical value.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Citomegalovirus , Citomegalovirus , Tamizaje Neonatal , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Humanos , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/congénito , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Recién Nacido , Femenino , Tamizaje Neonatal/métodos , Embarazo , Italia/epidemiología , Citomegalovirus/genética , Citomegalovirus/aislamiento & purificación , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/virología , Masculino , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/virología , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/diagnóstico , Prevalencia
6.
Microbiol Spectr ; 9(2): e0025021, 2021 10 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34549999

RESUMEN

During the last year, mass screening campaigns have been carried out to identify immunological response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and establish a possible seroprevalence. The obtained results gained new importance with the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination campaign, as the lack of doses has persuaded several countries to introduce different policies for individuals who had a history of COVID-19. Lateral flow assays (LFAs) may represent an affordable tool to support population screening in low-middle-income countries, where diagnostic tests are lacking and epidemiology is still widely unknown. However, LFAs have demonstrated a wide range of performance, and the question of which one could be more valuable in these settings still remains. We evaluated the performance of 11 LFAs in detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection, analyzing samples collected from 350 subjects. In addition, samples from 57 health care workers collected at 21 to 24 days after the first dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine were also evaluated. LFAs demonstrated a wide range of specificity (92.31% to 100%) and sensitivity (50% to 100%). The analysis of postvaccination samples was used to describe the most suitable tests to detect IgG response against S protein receptor binding domain (RBD). Tuberculosis (TB) therapy was identified as a potential factor affecting the specificity of LFAs. This analysis identified which LFAs represent a valuable tool not only for the detection of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection but also for the detection of IgG elicited in response to vaccination. These results demonstrated that different LFAs may have different applications and the possible risks of their use in high-TB-burden settings. IMPORTANCE Our study provides a fresh perspective on the possible employment of SARS-CoV-2 LFA antibody tests. We developed an in-depth, large-scale analysis comparing LFA performance to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) and evaluating their sensitivity and specificity in identifying COVID-19 patients at different time points from symptom onset. Moreover, for the first time, we analyzed samples of patients undergoing treatment for endemic poverty-related diseases, especially tuberculosis, and we evaluated the impact of this therapy on test specificity in order to assess possible performance in TB high-burden countries.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Prueba Serológica para COVID-19/métodos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/inmunología , Adulto , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Técnicas Electroquímicas , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoensayo/métodos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina M/sangre , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Tuberculosis/diagnóstico , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...