RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Angiosarcoma (AS) of the breast is very rare, accounting for 1% of all soft tissue breast tumors. AS may present as primary tumors of the breast or as secondary lesions usually associated with previous radiotherapy. Commonly, secondary AS affects older women (median age 67-71 years) with a clinical history of breast cancer. The preferred site of onset of RIAS is the edge of radiation fields, where radiation doses and tumor necrosis may be heterogeneous, resulting in a DNA damage and instability. Radical surgery is the treatment of choice, but no clear consensus exists on surgical management of breast AS. CASE REPORT: We describe an atypical case of relapsed RIAS after radical mastectomy, treated with new surgery and, considering the higher risk of recurrence, subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy with weekly paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of radiation-induced angiosarcomas (RIAS) after breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy has been increased to 0.14-0.5% among long survivors. Nevertheless, even if RIAS continues to be prognostically an extremely unfavorable cancer due to a high rate of recurrence, distant spread, and median overall survival (OS) of about 60 months, the benefits of loco-regional breast radiotherapy are clearly higher than the risk in developing angiosarcoma.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Hemangiosarcoma , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Hemangiosarcoma/etiología , Hemangiosarcoma/terapia , Hemangiosarcoma/patología , Mastectomía/efectos adversos , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/terapia , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/complicaciones , Radioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly lethal disease despite integrated treatment comprising radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide, with a median overall survival of less than 15 months. For recurrent glioblastoma, there is yet no standard therapy, considering that Bevacizumab have failed to improve overall survival (OS) while regorafenib had a little benefit over standard chemotherapy. In addition, the disease control rate is almost exclusively stability, with a poor objective response rate. CASE REPORT: Here we present a case of rapid response to regorafenib in early glioblastoma progression at the end of adjuvant radiotherapy: after a single cycle of regorafenib the patient observed an impressive improvement in clinical condition, disappearance of headaches and a clear reduction of neoplastic tissue in MRI. A brief review about new radiological patterns in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) related to the introduction in clinical practice of antiangiogenic drugs and tyrosine kinase inhibitors has also been carried out. CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib was certainly a first turning point in the second-line treatment of GBM, showing longer response rates and mostly disease stability than bevacizumab. A switch-maintenance strategy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors may represent a valid second-line therapeutic option.