[The COVID-pandemic and specialist training in Head and Neck oncology: A Survey among Physicians]. / Die COVID-19-Pandemie und ihr Einfluss auf die ärztliche Weiterbildung in der Kopf-Hals-Onkologie.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on the healthcare system and medical education. In this publication, the influence of the pandemic on the education of physicians active in Head and Neck oncology was examined using a survey. METHODS: A survey comprising 53 questions was conducted to gather data on work settings, daily activities, team events, and educational aspects during the pandemic. A total of 497 oncologists participated, including 131 individuals working in the field of Head and Neck oncology. This subgroup consisted of 99 (75.6%) radiation oncologists, 10 (7.6%) maxillofacial specialists, and 22 (16.8%) otolaryngologists. RESULTS: Nearly half of the participants reported experiencing increased clinical burden, which resulted in reduced engagement in scientific activities. Digital platforms became the predominant mode of continuing education, albeit with reduced accessibility. The pandemic significantly impacted clinical training that involved direct patient interaction. On the other hand, positive effects were observed in terms of cost and availability for external educational events such as conferences. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight the detrimental effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on various aspects of medical education. While digitalization has accelerated in response, many physicians expressed a lack of professional interaction. Developing alternative digital learning platforms can provide a means to better cope with similar situations in the future. However, the importance of personal contact with colleagues and supervisors should not be overlooked when considering the quality of teaching.

[Vestibular Schwannoma: Factors in Therapy Decision-Making]. / Vestibularisschwannom: Faktoren bei der Therapieentscheidung.

The treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VS) has always posed a challenge for physicians. Three essential treatment principles are available: wait-and-scan, surgery, and stereotactic radiotherapy. In addition to the type of treatment, decisions must be made regarding the optimal timing of therapy, the combination of different treatment modalities, the potential surgical approach, and the type and intensity of radiation. Factors influencing the therapy decision include tumor location and size or stage, patient age, comorbidities, symptoms, postoperative hearing rehabilitation options, patient preferences, and, not least, the experience of the surgeons and the personnel and technical capabilities of the clinical site. This article begins with a brief overview of vestibular schwannomas, then outlines the fundamental interdisciplinary treatment options, and finally discusses the ENT (ear, nose, and throat)-relevant factors in the therapy decision.

Otomicroscopic and functional outcomes after cleft palate repair via Sommerlad intravelar veloplasty vs. modified Veau-Wardill-Kilner push-back.

OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare the modified Veau-Wardill-Kilner push-back technique (VWK) and the Sommerlad intravelar veloplasty (Sommerlad IVVP) in terms of middle ear outcomes and oronasal fistulae frequency in three years old children. METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study, data were collected and anonymized from consecutive patients with cleft palate (with or without cleft lip) who underwent surgery in our hospital between January 2008 and December 2018. Patients with syndromic diagnoses and patients who underwent surgical treatment elsewhere were excluded. We collected data from 101 children (202 ears) regarding middle ear complications at the age of three, including acute otitis media, middle ear effusion, tympanic membrane retraction, tympanic membrane perforation, tympanic membrane atelectasis and chronic otitis media with cholesteatoma. In addition, the presence of oronasal fistulae and the number of ventilation tubes received by the age of three were recorded. RESULTS: The odds of children having a normal middle ear evaluation were 3.07 (95% Confidence interval (95%CI): [1.52, 6.12]; p < 0.05) times higher when children received Sommerlad IVVP compared to modified VWK. With 40.7% compared to 26.7%, a significantly higher incidence of middle ear effusion was present in the modified VWK group compared to Sommerlad IVVP (X2(1) = 4.38, p < 0.05). Furthermore, this group needed significantly more ventilation tube reinsertions (X2(2) = 12.22, p < 0.05) and was found to have a significantly higher incidence of oronasal fistula (53.5% vs. 17.2%, X2(1) = 14.75, p < 0.05). The latter was significantly associated with a higher need for ventilation tube reinsertion (X2(1) = 7.34, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This study shows superior middle ear outcomes and fewer oronasal fistulae after Sommerlad IVVP compared to modified Veau-Wardill-Kilner push-back at the age of three.