Long-Acting Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine Dosed Every 2 Months in Adults With Human Immunodeficiency Virus 1 Type 1 Infection: 152-Week Results From ATLAS-2M, a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3b, Noninferiority Study.

BACKGROUND: Cabotegravir (CAB) + rilpivirine (RPV) dosed intramuscularly monthly or every 2 months is a complete, long-acting (LA) regimen for the maintenance of HIV-1 virologic suppression. Here, we report the antiretroviral therapy as long acting suppression (ATLAS)-2M study week 152 results. METHODS: ATLAS-2M is a phase 3b, randomized, multicenter study assessing the efficacy and safety of CAB+RPV LA every 8 weeks (Q8W) versus every 4 weeks (Q4W). Virologically suppressed (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL) individuals were randomized to receive CAB+RPV LA Q8W or Q4W. Endpoints included the proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL and <50 copies/mL, incidence of confirmed virologic failure (CVF; 2 consecutive measurements ≥200 copies/mL), safety, and tolerability. RESULTS: A total of 1045 participants received CAB+RPV LA (Q8W, n = 522; Q4W, n = 523). CAB+RPV LA Q8W demonstrated noninferior efficacy versus Q4W dosing, with 2.7% (n = 14) and 1.0% (n = 5) of participants having HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL, respectively, with adjusted treatment difference being 1.7% (95% CI: 0.1-3.3%), meeting the 4% noninferiority threshold. At week 152, 87% of participants maintained HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (Q8W, 87% [n = 456]; Q4W, 86% [n = 449]). Overall, 12 (2.3%) participants in the Q8W arm and 2 (0.4%) in the Q4W arm had CVF. Eight and 10 participants with CVF had treatment-emergent, resistance-associated mutations to RPV and integrase inhibitors, respectively. Safety profiles were comparable, with no new safety signals observed since week 48. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate virologic suppression durability with CAB+RPV LA Q8W or Q4W for ∼3 years and confirm long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of CAB+RPV LA as a complete regimen to maintain HIV-1 virologic suppression.

Week 96 extension results of a Phase 3 study evaluating long-acting cabotegravir with rilpivirine for HIV-1 treatment.

BACKGROUND: ATLAS (NCT02951052), a phase 3, multicenter, open-label study, demonstrated that switching to injectable cabotegravir (CAB) with rilpivirine (RPV) long-acting dosed every 4 weeks was noninferior at week (W) 48 to continuing three-drug daily oral current antiretroviral therapy (CAR). Results from the W 96 analysis are presented. METHODS AND DESIGN: Participants completing W 52 of ATLAS were given the option to withdraw, transition to ATLAS-2M (NCT03299049), or enter an Extension Phase to continue long-acting therapy (Long-acting arm) or switch from CAR to long-acting therapy (Switch arm). Endpoints assessed at W 96 included proportion of participants with plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml, incidence of confirmed virologic failure (CVF; two consecutive HIV-1 RNA ≥200 copies/ml), safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Most participants completing the Maintenance Phase transitioned to ATLAS-2M (88%, n = 502/572). Overall, 52 participants were included in the W 96 analysis of ATLAS; of these, 100% (n = 23/23) and 97% (n = 28/29) in the Long-acting and Switch arms had plasma HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies/ml at W 96, respectively. One participant had plasma HIV-1 RNA 50 copies/ml or higher in the Switch arm (173 copies/ml). No participants met the CVF criterion during the Extension Phase. No new safety signals were identified. All Switch arm participants surveyed preferred long-acting therapy to their previous daily oral regimen (100%, n = 27/27). CONCLUSION: In this subgroup of ATLAS, 98% (n = 51/52) of participants at the Extension Phase W 96 analysis maintained virologic suppression with long-acting therapy. Safety, efficacy, and participant preference results support the therapeutic potential of long-acting CAB+RPV treatment for virologically suppressed people living with HIV-1.

Clinical and epidemiological features of chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection in patients with HIV/AIDS in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

OBJECTIVES: Trypanosoma cruzi reactivation in HIV patients is considered an opportunistic infection, usually with a fatal outcome. The aim of this study was to describe the epidemiological and clinical features of T. cruzi infection in HIV patients and to compare these findings between patients with and without Chagas disease reactivation. METHODS: The medical records of T. cruzi-HIV co-infected patients treated at the Muñiz Infectious Diseases Hospital from January 2005 to December 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. Epidemiological and clinical features were assessed and compared between patients with and without Chagas disease reactivation. RESULTS: The medical records of 80 T. cruzi-HIV co-infected patients were reviewed. The most likely route of T. cruzi infection was vector-borne (32/80 patients), followed by intravenous drug use (12/80). Nine of 80 patients had reactivation. Patients without reactivation had a significantly higher CD4 T-cell count at diagnosis of T. cruzi infection (144 cells/µl vs. 30 cells/µl, p=0.026). Chagas disease serology was negative in two of nine patients with reactivation. CONCLUSIONS: Serological assays for T. cruzi infection may be negative in severely immunocompromised patients. Direct parasitological techniques should be performed in the diagnosis of patients for whom there is a suspicion of T. cruzi reactivation. HIV patients with a lower CD4 count are at higher risk of reactivation.

Fixed-dose combination dolutegravir, abacavir, and lamivudine versus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine in previously untreated women with HIV-1 infection (ARIA): week 48 results from a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3b study.

BACKGROUND: Dolutegravir is a once-daily integrase strand transfer inhibitor with no need for pharmacokinetic boosting that is approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Because women are often under-represented in HIV clinical trials, we addressed the safety and efficacy of dolutegravir in women with HIV-1. METHODS: The ARIA study is a randomised, open-label, multicentre, active-controlled, parallel-group, non-inferiority phase 3b study done in 86 hospital and university infectious disease clinics, local health clinics, and private infectious disease clinics in 12 countries and one US territory, in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, and Asia. Eligible participants were women aged 18 years or older who had HIV-1 RNA viral loads of 500 copies per mL or greater, had received 10 days or less of previous antiretroviral therapy, and had tested negative for the HLA-B*5701 allele. Pregnant women were excluded. Eligible women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either a single-tablet regimen of dolutegravir plus abacavir and lamivudine once a day (dolutegravir group) or a three-tablet combination of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus coformulated tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine once a day (atazanavir group). Random treatment group assignment was stratified by plasma HIV-1 RNA viral loads and CD4 cell count at baseline. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA viral loads of less than 50 copies per mL at week 48 in all participants who received at least one dose of study medication (intention-to-treat exposed population). We used a non-inferiority margin of -12%. Investigators monitored adverse events to assess safety. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01910402. FINDINGS: Between Aug 22, 2013, and Sept 22, 2015, of 705 women assessed, 499 were randomly assigned to either the dolutegravir group (n=250) or the atazanavir group (n=249); two participants from each group were randomised to treatment but did not receive study medication. At week 48, 203 (82%) of 248 participants in the dolutegravir group compared with 176 (71%) of 247 in the atazanavir group had HIV-1 RNA viral loads of less than 50 copies per mL (mean difference 10·5%, 95% CI 3·1-17·8, p=0·005). One participant in the atazanavir group had nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-associated resistance that led to reduced emtricitabine susceptibility. Adverse events were similar between the dolutegravir and atazanavir groups; the most common were nausea (46 [19%] of 248 in the dolutegravir group vs 49 [20%] of 247 in the atazanavir group) and headache (28 [11%] vs 32 [13%]). Fewer participants in the dolutegravir group than the atazanavir group reported drug-related adverse events (83 [33%] vs 121 [49%]) or adverse events that led to discontinuation (ten [4%] vs 17 [7%]). One death was reported in each treatment group, but neither was considered related to the study medications. INTERPRETATION: The non-inferior efficacy and similar safety profile of the dolutegravir combined regimen compared with the atazanavir regimen support the use of dolutegravir for HIV-1 infection in treatment-naive women. FUNDING: ViiV Healthcare.

Prevalencia de interacciones medicamentosas con fármacos anti-retrovirales en Buenos Aires, Argentina / Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions involving antiretroviral drugs in Buenos Aires, Argentina

Introduction: Antiretroviral agents (ARVs) have a high potential for drug interactions. However, the prevalence and risk factors for clinically significant drug-drug interactions (CSDDIs) with ARVs from Latin American countries is unknown. Aim: To evaluate the prevalence and risk factors for CSDDIs in HIV outpatients attending at two centers in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study (september to november 2012). HIV-1 infected patients under ARV treatment at the time of the study were randomly assessed for concomitant medication. CSDDIs were screened using the University of Liverpool Drug Interactions Program (www.hiv-druginteractions.org). Results: A total of 217 patients were included. Male sex: 64% (CI 95: 57-70). Median age (IQR): 41 (36-48). Presence of comorbidities: 19%. ARV regimen: NNRTI-based: 48%, PI-based: 50% and NNRTI plus PI: 2%. Median of CD4 T-cell count (IQR): 402 cells/mL (235-588). Viral load < 50 copies/mL: 78%. Overall, 64% (CI 95: 57-70) of patients had > 1 co-medication of whom a 49% had at least one CSDDI. Two patients had a CSDDI between ARVs. The most frequent co-medications observed were antimicrobial (40%), cardiovascular (25%) and gastrointestinal agents (22%). In the multivariate analysis the number of co-medications and use of CNS agents were associated with the presence of CSDDIs. Conclusions: Co-medications and CSDDIs were common in our setting. In this context, training of HIV physicians in drug interactions is of major importance for adequate management of these patients.

Introducción: Los fármacos anti-retrovirales (ARVs) tienen un alto potencial de interaccionar farmacológicamente con otros medicamentos. Sin embargo, los datos sobre la prevalencia y los factores de riesgo para la presencia de interacciones medicamentosas clínicamente significativas (IMCS) con ARVs en países latinoamericanos son limitados. Objetivo: Evaluar la prevalencia y los factores de riesgo para estas IMCS en dos centros de atención ambulatoria en Buenos Aires, Argentina. Métodos: Estudio transversal y descriptivo (septiembre-noviembre de 2012). Se evaluó la presencia de medicación concomitante en pacientes infectados por VIH bajo tratamiento ARV. Para evaluar la presencia de IMCS se utilizó la base de datos de interacciones de la Universidad de Liverpool (www.hiv-druginteractions.org). Resultados: Se incluyeron 217 pacientes. Sexo masculino: 64% (IC 95: 57-70). Mediana de edad (IQR): 41 (36-48). Presencia de co-morbilidades: 19%. Tratamiento ARV basado en INNTI: 48%, basado en IP: 50% y basado en INNTI más IP: 2%. Mediana de linfocitos T-CD4 (IQR): 402 céls/ml (235-588). Carga viral < 50 copias/ml: 78%. El 64% (IC 95: 57-70) de los pacientes tenían > 1 medicación concomitante: antimicrobianos (40%), fármacos cardiovasculares (25%) y gastrointestinales (22%). De los pacientes que presentaban medicación concomitante 68 (49%) tenían > 1 IMCS y sólo tres (2%) presentaban una asociación contraindicada. Además, dos pacientes tenían una IMCS entre ARVs. En el análisis multivariado, el número de medicamentos concomitantes y el uso psicofármacos se asociaron con una mayor chance de presentar IMCS. Conclusiones: La presencia de medicación concomitante e IMCS fue común en nuestra población. En este contexto, la formación de profesionales de la salud en la detección de interacciones medicamentosas es de suma importancia para un manejo adecuado de pacientes con infección por VIH que reciban tratamiento ARV.

Maraviroc, as a Switch Option, in HIV-1-infected Individuals With Stable, Well-controlled HIV Replication and R5-tropic Virus on Their First Nucleoside/Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Plus Ritonavir-boosted Protease Inhibitor Regimen: Week 48 Results of the Randomized, Multicenter MARCH Study.

BACKGROUND: Alternative combination antiretroviral therapies in virologically suppressed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients experiencing side effects and/or at ongoing risk of important comorbidities from current therapy are needed. Maraviroc (MVC), a chemokine receptor 5 antagonist, is a potential alternative component of therapy in those with R5-tropic virus. METHODS: The Maraviroc Switch Study is a randomized, multicenter, 96-week, open-label switch study in HIV type 1-infected adults with R5-tropic virus, virologically suppressed on a ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor (PI/r) plus double nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (2 N(t)RTI) backbone. Participants were randomized 1:2:2 to current combination antiretroviral therapy (control), or replacing the protease inhibitor (MVC + 2 N(t)RTI arm) or the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor backbone (MVC + PI/r arm) with twice-daily MVC. The primary endpoint was the difference (switch minus control) in proportion with plasma viral load (VL) <200 copies/mL at 48 weeks. The switch arms were judged noninferior if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in the primary endpoint was < -12% in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. RESULTS: The ITT population comprised 395 participants (control, n = 82; MVC + 2 N(t)RTI, n = 156; MVC + PI/r, n = 157). Baseline characteristics were well matched. At week 48, noninferior rates of virological suppression were observed in those switching away from a PI/r (93.6% [95% CI, -9.0% to 2.2%] and 91.7% [95% CI, -9.6% to 3.8%] with VL <200 and <50 copies/mL, respectively) compared to the control arm (97.6% and 95.1% with VL <200 and <50 copies/mL, respectively). In contrast, MVC + PI/r did not meet noninferiority bounds and was significantly inferior (84.1% [95% CI, -19.8% to -5.8%] and 77.7% [95% CI, -24.9% to -8.4%] with VL <200 and <50 copies/mL, respectively) to the control arm in the ITT analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These data support MVC as a switch option for ritonavir-boosted PIs when partnered with a 2-N(t)RTI backbone, but not as part of N(t)RTI-sparing regimens comprising MVC with PI/r. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01384682.

[Prevalence of potential drug-drug interactions involving antiretroviral drugs in Buenos Aires, Argentina]. / Prevalencia de interacciones medicamentosas con fármacos anti-retrovirales en Buenos Aires, Argentina.

INTRODUCTION: Antiretroviral agents (ARVs) have a high potential for drug interactions. However, the prevalence and risk factors for clinically significant drug-drug interactions (CSDDIs) with ARVs from Latin American countries is unknown. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence and risk factors for CSDDIs in HIV outpatients attending at two centers in Buenos Aires, Argentina. METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study (september to november 2012). HIV-1 infected patients under ARV treatment at the time of the study were randomly assessed for concomitant medication. CSDDIs were screened using the University of Liverpool Drug Interactions Program (www.hiv-druginteractions.org). RESULTS: A total of 217 patients were included. Male sex: 64% (CI 95: 57-70). Median age (IQR): 41 (36-48). Presence of comorbidities: 19%. ARV regimen: NNRTI-based: 48%, PI-based: 50% and NNRTI plus PI: 2%. Median of CD4 T-cell count (IQR): 402 cells/mL (235-588). Viral load < 50 copies/mL: 78%. Overall, 64% (CI 95: 57-70) of patients had > 1 co-medication of whom a 49% had at least one CSDDI. Two patients had a CSDDI between ARVs. The most frequent co-medications observed were antimicrobial (40%), cardiovascular (25%) and gastrointestinal agents (22%). In the multivariate analysis the number of co-medications and use of CNS agents were associated with the presence of CSDDIs. CONCLUSIONS: Co-medications and CSDDIs were common in our setting. In this context, training of HIV physicians in drug interactions is of major importance for adequate management of these patients.

Experiencia en el abordaje de pacientes con profilaxis posexposición no ocupacional al VIH / Experience with patients seeking post-exposure prophylaxis against HIV after non-occupational accidents

Introducción: El objetivo es analizar los datos epidemiológicos y las conductas sexuales de una cohorte de adultos sanos que recibieron profilaxis posexposición no ocupacional (PPENO) al VIH. Métodos: Se analizaron todos los individuos que concurrieron a la Unidad de Consultorios Externos del Hospital de Enfermedades Infecciosas F. J. Muñiz y que requirieron PPENO desde diciembre de 2004 a diciembre de 2008. Se evaluaron los datos demográficos, el tipo de exposición, el conocimiento de la fuente y el uso de preservativo. Se realizaron pruebas no paramétricas; se definió el nivel de significación como p = 0.05. Cuando fue posible, se analizó el riesgo relativo y los odds ratios. Resultados: Se asistieron 1318 personas, 499 mujeres, con un promedio de edad de 30.4 años mediana: 28.0. Tipo de exposición: sexual: 1054 (80.0%), sangre: 247 (18.7%), sexual y sanguínea: 14 (1.1%), sin datos: 3 (0.2%). No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas entre el sexo y el tipo de exposición, ni entre la edad y el tipo de exposición. Se conocía al individuo fuente en 413 casos (31.3%); no lo conocían 897 (68.1%); sin datos: 8 (0.6%). El conocimiento de la fuente fue mayor en las mujeres (35.6%). El promedio de edad fue mayor entre aquellos que conocían la fuente (31.3 años) en comparación con los que no la conocían (28.8). Usaron preservativos 859 casos (65.2%). Su empleo fue mayor entre hombres que no conocían la fuente y entre aquellos de mayor edad; sin embargo, la mayor edad no estuvo necesariamente asociada con el uso de preservativo. El tiempo medio desde la exposición hasta la consulta fue de 1.9 día, sin cambios durante el período estudiado. No se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas en el tiempo entre la exposición accidental y la consulta en relación con el sexo o con la edad.

Predicted susceptibility of etravirine in HIV patients experiencing virological failure secondary to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance in Argentina.

INTRODUCTION: Virological response to etravirine (ETR) is dependent on the type and number of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) resistance-associated mutations (RAMs). METHODS: Data on NNRTI used in HAART at the time of failure and the number of NNRTI-RAMs were collected and retrospectively analyzed. ETR-RAMs were defined as V90I, A98G, L100I, K101E/H/P, V106I, E138A, V179D/F/T, Y181C/I/V, G190A/S, and M230L, and were analyzed according to the weighted mutation score to predict susceptibility (Vingerhoets 2008). RESULTS: N=150. Efavirenz (EFV) containing regimen: 76.7%; nevirapine (NVP): 23.3%. Frequency of ETR-RAMs acquired after NNRTI failure: zero=38.7%, one=39.3%, two=17.3%, three=3.3%, four=1.3%. Most frequent ETR-RAMs after failure with EFV: G190A (28.1%), K101E (14.9%), L100I (10.5%); and with NVP: Y181C (41.7%), G190A (30.6%) and A98G (13.9%). Global predicted susceptibility of ETR: highest response: 69.3%, intermediate response: 24.7%, reduced response: 6%. Comparing maximal response with duration of virological failure: EFV-containing regimen: 94.4% (< 24-weeks) vs. 69.8% (>24-weeks) (p=0.02); NVP-containing regimen: 42.9% (< 24-weeks) vs. 56.5% (>24-weeks) (p=0.41). The presence of lamivudine regimen was associated with a better predicted susceptibility (highest response) to ETR (79% vs. 25%; P=.001). DISCUSSION: The majority of patients maintained susceptibility to ETR after the acquisition of NNRTI resistance. Failing with an EFV-containing regimen had a better predicted susceptibility to ETR than with NVP, especially after short-term virological failure.

Adenitis infecciosa. Parte 3 / Infectious adenitis. Part 3

Se analizó un grupo de pacientes que concurrieron a los consultorios externos de un hospital de enfermedades infecciosas, presentando como síntoma principal adenopatías regionales o generalizadas. El 78 se hallaban entre los 20 y 40 años de edad, el 56 fue de evolución aguda, predominando netamente la distribución regional, en especial la localización cervical. Se llegó al diagnóstico final en el 80 de los casos. En base a la experiencia realizada, se presenta un algoritmo diagnóstico y se establecen pautas de conducta ante este síndrome

Valoración de la eficacia y tolerancia de la combinación de Rifampicina + Trimetoprim en infecciones respiratorias bajas (adultos) / Valuation of the tolerance and efficacy of the combination refampicin + trimetroprim

Se estudiaron 41 pacientes con diagnóstico de infección respiratoria baja (neumopatía, bronquitis aguda o crónica reagudizada), sin tratamiento antibacteriano durante la semana anterior. No se admitieron pacientes con enfermedades graves o consecutivas, ni con afecciones que contraindicaran el uso de rifampicina y/o trimetoprim. Los pacientes recibieron 3 cápsulas diarias de RIFAPRIM (rifampicina 300 mg + trimetoprim 80 mg) durante 10 días y fueron controlados clínicamente. Se realizó además radiografía de tórax (frente y perfil), examen directo y cultivo de esputo y exámenes hematológicos de rutina. La temperatura corporal, la tos, la expectoración y la extensión y gravedad de las imágenes radiológicas disminuyeron significativamente al final del tratamiento. Los cultivos de esputo de los pacientes que presentaban expectoración al final del tratamiento, fueron negativos. El juicio global del investigador al final del tratamiento fue 56% de resultados excelentes y 44% de resultados buenos, no observándose fracaso. Desde el punto de vista de la tolerancia, se observaron 10 casos de epigastralgia leves, que cedieron sin necesidad de discontinuar la medicación. Se considera a RIFAPRIM como una nueva alternativa excelente desde el punto de vista terapéutico en infecciones respiratorias bajas