Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid: A Cohort Study and Literature Review.

PURPOSE: Ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease and a potentially blinding subepithelial blistering disorder. The purpose of this study was to describe the clinical spectrum of the disease and to assess the efficacy and safety of immunosuppressive agents in a cohort of patients with OCP. METHODS: We conducted a monocentric retrospective cross-sectional cohort study of all unselected consecutive patients diagnosed with progressive OCP. Ocular and extra ophthalmological involvement as well as histological findings were gathered. Other outcomes were exposures to immunosuppressive agents defined by the use of a particular treatment. For each exposure, success in controlling ocular inflammation was graded as a complete response, response, or failure. Relapses and adverse events (AE) were also recorded. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (34 affected eyes), 35% of whom were women, were included, with an age at diagnosis of 75 ± 11 years. Corneal involvement was diagnosed in 30 of 34 eyes, and 22 of 34 eyes had progressive fibrosing conjunctival involvement. Sixty-two exposures to immunosuppressive agents or biologics were recorded: dapsone, n = 26; mycophenolate mofetil, n = 6; azathioprine, n = 4; cyclophosphamide, n = 10; rituximab, n = 14; and intravenous immunoglobulin, n = 2. Rates of response and of complete response achievement during the first 3 months were 84% and 45%, respectively. Response rates were 100%, 100%, 86%, 85%, and 80% for intravenous immunoglobulin, mycophenolate mofetil, rituximab, dapsone, and cyclophosphamide, respectively. Thirteen percent of those drugs were discontinued because of an adverse event in 4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the efficacy of immunosuppressants or biologics with an acceptable safety profile for OCP.

Primary sulcus implantation of a diffractive multifocal pseudophakic piggyback intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combined implantation of a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in the capsular bag with a diffractive multifocal IOL designed for sulcus placement (Reverso). SETTING: Purpan Hospital, Toulouse, and Helios Clinic, Saint-Jean-de-Luz, France. DESIGN: Prospective case series. METHODS: The multifocal IOL piggyback IOL was implanted in the sulcus during cataract surgery. Visual acuity, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, IOL positioning, and patient satisfaction were assessed with 1-year follow-ups. RESULTS: Fifty-four eyes of 27 patients were included. At 1-month, monocular uncorrected distance (UDVA) and near (UNVA) visual acuities were 0.13 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) ± 0.18 (SD) and 0.20 ± 0.16 logMAR, respectively. Binocular UDVA and UNVA were 0.03 ± 0.06 and 0.12 ± 0.08 logMAR, respectively. At 1 year, the mean monocular logMAR UDVA, corrected distance visual acuity, UNVA, and corrected near visual acuity were 0.10 ± 0.11, 0.02 ± 0.06, 0.18 ± 0.12, and 0.13 ± 0.08, respectively. The defocus curve and contrast sensitivity values were comparable to those obtained with other multifocal IOLs. On Scheimpflug imaging, the mean distance between the sulcus multifocal IOL and the monofocal IOL was 517 ± 141 µm. At 1 year, ultrasound biomicroscopy showed an annular fibrosis of the anterior capsule in 94.4% of the eyes. Complications included 1 posttraumatic IOL decentration and 1 slight corectopia. Eighty-nine percent of patients reported satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: The piggyback implantation of this multifocal IOL seemed to be safe and effective. It might provide similar results as a primary in-the-bag multifocal IOL, with the advantage of reversibility that might extend primary or secondary implantation.