RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Catheter-directed therapy (CDT) for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is an emerging therapy that combines heterogeneous techniques. The aim of the study was to provide a nationwide contemporary snapshot of clinical practice and CDT-related outcomes. METHODS: This Investigator-initiated multicenter registry aimed to include consecutive patients with intermediate-high risk (IHR) or high-risk (HR), acute PE eligible for CDT. The primary outcome of the study was in-hospital all-cause death. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients were included, of whom 93 (36.8%) had HR-PE, and 160 (63.2%) had IHR-PE with a mean age of 62.3±15.1 years. Local thrombolysis was performed in 70.8% and aspiration thrombectomy in 51.8%, with 23.3% of patients receiving both. However, aspiration thrombectomy was favored in the HR-PE cohort (80.6% vs 35%; P<.001). Only 51 patients (20.2%) underwent CDT with specific PE devices. The success rate for CDT was 90.9% (98.1% of IHR-PE patients vs 78.5% of HR-PE patients, P<.001). In-hospital mortality was 15.5%, and was highly concentrated in the HR-PE patients (37.6%) and significantly lower in IHR-PE patients (2.5%), P<.001. Long-term (24-month) mortality was 40.2% in HR-PE patients vs 8.2% in IHR-PE patients (P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high success rate for CDT, in-hospital mortality in HR-PE is still high (37.6%) compared with very low IHR-PE mortality (2.5%).
Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos , Embolia Pulmonar , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Embolia Pulmonar/terapia , Trombectomía/métodos , Catéteres , Sistema de Registros , Estudios RetrospectivosAsunto(s)
Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Enfermedades Vasculares , Angiografía Coronaria , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/epidemiología , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/cirugía , Humanos , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Vasculares/congénito , Enfermedades Vasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/cirugíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: TiNO-coated BAS have demonstrated competitive outcomes compared to drug-eluting stents (DES). These devices allow short antiplatelet regimens and may be a good option for the growing elderly population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: Multicenter observational trial in routine clinical practice. A propensity-score matched analysis compared a prospective cohort of patients ≥ 75 years undergoing PCI with BAS, with a contemporary and retrospective cohort treated with last-generation DES. The co-primary endpoints of the study were the Target-Lesion-Failure (Cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (total death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, or new revascularization) at 1 year. RESULTS: Whole population included 1000 patients, and 326 patients in each group were matched for analysis. No differences in primary endpoints were found: TLF 10.4% vs. 11% (HR 0.96 (Confidence Interval 95%, 0.36-1.7; p = 0.87)) and MACE 16.3% vs. 17.2% (HR 0.98 (Confidence Interval 95%; 0.3-1.5, p = 0.93)). Patients treated with BAS received shorter antiplatelets regimens (dual antiplatelet therapy at 1 year, 25.7% vs. 70.6%, p = 0.0001), and they presented lower incidence of bleeding (3.7% vs. 11.7%, HR 0.3 (IC 95% 0.16-0.6, p = 0.001)). CONCLUSION: In this real-life registry of patients ≥ 75 years, BAS were similar to the latest-generation DES in terms of efficacy and reduced the duration of the antithrombotic therapy, lowering bleeding events.
Asunto(s)
Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Anciano , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare but increasingly recognized cause of acute coronary syndrome. Many patients with SCAD have associated coronary risk factors. However, the implications of arterial hypertension in SCAD patients remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to assess the clinical implications of arterial hypertension in a nationwide cohort of patients with SCAD. METHODS: The Spanish SCAD registry (NCT03607981) prospectively enrolled 318 consecutive patients. All coronary angiograms were centrally analyzed to confirm the diagnosis of SCAD. Patients were classified according to the presence of arterial hypertension. RESULTS: One-hundred eighteen patients (37%) had a diagnosis of arterial hypertension. Hypertensive SCAD patients were older (60 ± 12 vs. 51 ± 9 years old) and had more frequently dyslipidemia (56 vs. 23%) and diabetes (9 vs. 3%) but were less frequently smokers (15 vs. 35%) than normotensive SCAD patients (all P < 0.05). Most patients in both groups were female (90 vs. 87%, NS) and female patients with hypertension were more frequently postmenopausal (70 vs. 47%, P < 0.05). Hypertensive SCAD patients had more severe lesions and more frequently multivessel involvement (15 vs. 7%, P < 0.05) and coronary ectasia (19 vs. 7%, P < 0.05) but showed a similar prevalence of coronary tortuosity (34 vs. 26%, NS). Revascularization requirement was similar in both groups (17 vs. 26%, NS) but procedural success was significantly lower (65 vs. 88%, P < 0.05) and procedural-related complications more frequent (65 vs. 41%, P < 0.05) in SCAD patients with hypertension. CONCLUSION: Patients with SCAD and hypertension are older, more frequently postmenopausal and have more coronary risk factors than normotensive SCAD patients. During revascularization SCAD patients with hypertension obtain poorer results and have a higher risk of procedural-related complications (NCT03607981).
Asunto(s)
Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/complicaciones , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vasculares/congénito , Adulto , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/epidemiología , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/mortalidad , Vasos Coronarios/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/epidemiología , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/mortalidad , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Vasculares/complicaciones , Enfermedades Vasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/mortalidadRESUMEN
AIMS: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a relatively rare but well-known cause of acute coronary syndrome. Clinical features, angiographic findings, management and outcomes of SCAD in old patients (>65 years of age) remain unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Spanish multicentre prospective SCAD registry (NCT03607981), included 318 consecutive patients with SCAD. Data were collected between June 2015 and April 2019. All angiograms were analysed in a centralized corelab. For the purposes of this study, patients were classified according to age in two groups <65 and ≥65 years old and in-hospital outcomes were analysed. Fifty-five patients (17%) were ≥65 years old (95% women). Older patients had more often hypertension (76% vs. 29%, P < 0.01) and dyslipidaemia (56% vs. 30%, P < 0.01), and less previous (4% vs. 18%, P < 0.001) or current smoking habit (4% vs. 33%, P < 0.001). An identifiable trigger was less often present in old patients (27% vs. 43%, P = 0.028). They also had more often severe coronary tortuosity (36% vs. 11%, P = 0.036) and showed more frequently coronary ectasia (24% vs. 9%, P < 0.01). Older patients were more often managed conservatively (89% vs. 75%, P = 0.025), with no significant differences in major adverse cardiac events during index admission (7% vs. 8%, P = 0.858). There were no differences between groups in terms of in-hospital stay, new acute myocardial infarction, unplanned coronary angiography or heart failure. CONCLUSION: Older patients with SCAD show different clinical and angiographic characteristics compared with younger patients. Initial treatment strategy was different between groups, though in-hospital outcomes do not significantly differ (NCT03607981).
Asunto(s)
Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios , Hipertensión , Enfermedades Vasculares , Anciano , Angiografía Coronaria , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Anomalías de los Vasos Coronarios/epidemiología , Vasos Coronarios , Disección , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades Vasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Vasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Vasculares/terapiaAsunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Administración Oral , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Coagulación Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
A dobutamine stress echocardiogram was performed in a 72-year-old woman to assess an intermediate lesion in the left anterior descending artery. After administration of the echocardiography contrast agent, she presented with an anaphylactic reaction and in that context a subacute thrombosis of a drug-eluting stent implanted 15 days before. This is a case of the so-called type III Kounis syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Ecocardiografía/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Kounis/etiología , Hexafluoruro de Azufre/efectos adversos , Anciano , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Síndrome de Kounis/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Hexafluoruro de Azufre/administración & dosificación , Tomografía de Coherencia ÓpticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Balance between embolic and bleeding risk is challenging among patients with cancer. There is a lack of specific recommendations for the use of antithrombotic therapy in oncologic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We compared the embolic and bleeding risk, the preventive management and the incidence of events between patients with and without cancer. We further evaluated the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) within patients with cancer. METHODS AND RESULTS: The AMBER-AF registry is an observational multicentre study that analysed patients with non-valvular AF treated in Oncology and Cardiology Departments in Spain. 1,237 female patients with AF were enrolled: 637 with breast cancer and 599 without cancer. Mean follow-up was 3.1 years. Both groups were similar in age, embolic risk and bleeding risk. Lack of guidelines-recommended therapies was more frequent among patients with cancer. Compared with patients without cancer, adjusted rates of stroke (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]) in cancer patients were higher (1.56 [1.04-2.35]), whereas bleeding rates remained similar (1.25 [0.95-1.64]). Within the group of patients with cancer, the use of DOACs vs VKAs did not entail differences in the adjusted rates of stroke (0.91 [0.42-1.99]) or severe bleedings (1.53 [0.93-2.53]). CONCLUSIONS: Antithrombotic management of AF frequently differs in patients with breast cancer. While breast cancer is associated with a higher risk of incident stroke, bleeding events remained similar. Patients with cancer treated with DOACs experienced similar rates of stroke and bleeding as those with VKAs.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , 4-Hidroxicumarinas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Femenino , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Indenos/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitamina K/administración & dosificación , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The safety and feasibility of ambulatory PCI has been demonstrated in selected patients with "simple" lesions, but it is not well known whether it could be applied in more "complex" scenarios. METHODS: Main objective is to assess the feasibility and safety of ambulatory complex PCI. Prospective multicentre registry of 1047 consecutive patients planned for ambulatory trans-radial PCI. Outcomes in patients with "complex angioplasty" (CA group: 313 (30%)) were analysed and compared with those of "simple angioplasty" (SA group: 734, 70%). The feasibility (% of patients finally discharged) and safety (MACE at 24â¯h and at 1â¯month) were compared between groups. We also analyse admissions, visits to the emergency department and minor vascular complications. RESULTS: Feasibility was higher for SA (80.6% vs. 63.6%, OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.52-2.35, pâ¯<â¯0.001). Ambulatory PCI was very safe in both groups. In CA no MACE occurred at 24â¯h (vs. 0.17% SA) or 30â¯days (vs. 0.68% in SA). There were also no differences in re-admissions, visits to the emergency department or minor vascular complications (there was a non-significant tendency to higher rate of radial occlusion at 1â¯month in the CA group, 5.5% vs. 2.7%, p: 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility of ambulatory PCI in selected patients with complex lesions is lower than in simple lesions, however when it is possible, it is as safe as in selected patients with simple lesions.