Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Nurs Res ; 31(1): e259, 2023 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36692838

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nerve damage after abdominal and pelvic surgery is rare but potentially serious. The incidence of peripheral nerve injury is difficult to assess, and rates of between 0.02% and 21% have been cited in the literature. Signs and symptoms of this type of injury may appear immediately after surgery or a few days later. PURPOSE: This study was developed to assess the rate of peripheral nerve injury after pelvic laparoscopy and to identify associated risk factors. METHODS: A pilot prospective cohort study was conducted between March 2018 and April 2019 on 101 patients with a 1-month follow-up using two semistructured clinical interviews. We carried out a descriptive analysis followed by univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were found to have peripheral nerve injuries, representing a rate of 12.9%. Overall, 14 injuries (five severe and nine mild) were detected. One patient had two mild injuries. In this study, the risk of injury was found to increase 1.77-fold (OR = 1.77, 95% CI [1.13, 2.76], p = .007) for each hour the patient was in the Trendelenburg position. CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The longer the patient is in the Trendelenburg position, the greater the risk of peripheral nerve damage. Patients aged 60 years or less also face a higher risk of nerve injury.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos , Humanos , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos/epidemiología , Traumatismos de los Nervios Periféricos/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos
3.
Cir Esp ; 81(3): 134-8, 2007 Mar.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17349237

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the viability, safety and short-term results of laparoscopic colon surgery during the first few years after its introduction in our department. METHOD: Between January 2002 and December 2005, laparoscopic surgery was performed in patients with surgical indication for benign colon disease. After 2003, patients with malignant disease were also included. A database was created and demographic data, surgical indication, technique, conversion rate, morbidity and postoperative length of stay were recorded. All patients were operated on by the same team of three surgeons. RESULTS: Ninety consecutive patients, with a mean age of 59.2 years (20-88) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Of these, 53 were men (59%). In total, 32 patients had previously undergone one or more open laparotomies (35.5%). Surgery was indicated for benign disease in 60 patients (66%). Distribution was left colon in 79 patients and right colon in 11 patients. The most frequent technique was sigmoidectomy (67.7%). The conversion rate was 12.2%. Operating time was 199 min. (120-340) and length of postoperative stay was 7.5 days (4-57). Morbidity was 18.8% and mortality was 1.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery of the colon is safe and reproducible. Our short-term results are similar to those of previous studies. We believe that prior experience of laparoscopic surgery is important and that a stable surgical team minimizes the effect of the learning curve.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/epidemiología , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Colonoscopía/métodos , Colonoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Cirugía en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , España/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...