Post-Operative Cognitive Dysfunction in Elderly Patients Receiving Propofol Sedation for Gastrointestinal Endoscopies: An Observational Study Utilizing Processed Electroencephalography.

BACKGROUND: Propofol sedation is commonly administered during gastrointestinal (GI) procedures. The Patient State Index (PSI) is a processed electroencephalography (EEG) parameter obtained with the SedLine® Sedation Monitoring system (Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA). When used to objectively assess the patient's level of consciousness, PSI may provide a more effective, safer titration of sedation during GI procedures. We hypothesize that having more or longer episodes of deep sedation as assessed by PSI (i.e., PSI<26) would correlate with developing new-onset or worsening post-operative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). METHODS: This was a pragmatic, double-blinded observational study of 400 patients aged ≥65 years undergoing upper GI endoscopy, lower GI endoscopy, or a combined procedure utilizing propofol sedation at a tertiary-care [A1] academic medical center. The patients were monitored with the SedLine® Brain Function Monitor, software version 2 (Masimo Corporation, Irvine, CA), throughout the case, starting at baseline (i.e., before administration of propofol) and stopping at case end. We assessed the subjects' cognitive function via an in-person interview at baseline (pre-procedure) and telephone interviews at 1, 7 (±1), and 90 days after study enrollment. Cognitive function was assessed by administering the short blessed test (SBT), which is a validated brief cognitive screening appropriate for in-person and telephone administration. RESULTS: The correlations between the change in SBT score and the pre-defined parameters of PSI were not significant (all p-values >5%). There was a significant drop in SBT scores on day seven. Higher age was also significantly associated with a drop in SBT from baseline. Deep sedation, as evidenced by the number of times PSI was lower than 26, was not predictive of the change in SBT, nor was gender, total propofol dose, or vasoactive drug use during the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The observed incidence of POCD after GI procedures with propofol sedation was low (1.3% at seven days and 2.95% at 90 days) and lower than at the baseline. Age was associated with a greater average decline in SBT score, although the absolute change was small (-0.067 per year of age increase). Deeper sedation, as documented by the PSI score, was not associated with a change in POCD measured with the SBT.

The Incidence, Degree, and Timing of Hypocalcemia From Massive Transfusion: A Retrospective Review.

BACKGROUND: Electrolyte administration during massive transfusion without readily available calcium laboratory values is likely ubiquitous but not well standardized. We aimed to quantify the incidence, degree, and timing of hypocalcemia during the first 24 hours after initiation of a massive transfusion with the institutional massive transfusion protocol (MTP). We hypothesized that hypocalcemia is prevalent during acute resuscitation (first six hours) despite efforts of the treatment team to replete calcium during active resuscitation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent MTP at our institution between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2017, was performed. The primary outcome was hypocalcemia from a massive transfusion during the first six hours after the initiation of the MTP. Secondary outcomes of interest included hypercalcemia, hypomagnesemia, hospital mortality, peak and nadir timing of hypocalcemia and hypercalcemia, calcium supplementation, and calcium supplementation timing. Calcium administration and blood product transfusion is reported relative to the start of the MTP. The association between the total amount of calcium administered and the total number of blood products transfused was assessed. RESULTS: Data from 52 massive transfusions were analyzed. Ninety-seven percent of patients were hypocalcemic during the first six hours of resuscitation. The nadir occurred after median of eight units of blood product were given, (interquartile range {IQR}: 4-16). Calcium supplementation correlated with the total number of blood products transfused (ρ = 0.47, p < 0.01). Patients in whom calcium was supplemented received more blood products when compared to patients in whom calcium was not supplemented (median: 16, IQR: 12-26 vs. median: 9, IQR: 7-12, p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Hypocalcemia from massive transfusion is common. The incidence of hypocalcemia in MTP has been reported to be 85-97%. Calcium supplementation that is not standardized in MTP may lead to underutilization during massive transfusion and to hypocalcemia in these patients.

Complications of Transesophageal Echocardiography: A Review of Injuries, Risk Factors, and Management.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) use has become widespread in cardiac surgical operating rooms over the last 2 decades. Surgical and medical decision-making often are guided by the findings of the TEE examination, rendering TEE an invaluable tool both inside and outside the operating room. TEE has become ubiquitous in some parts because it is considered safe and relatively noninvasive. However, it is imperative for clinicians to understand that TEE can cause severe and possibly life-threatening complications, and the risks of TEE must be balanced against its benefits as a diagnostic tool. Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) injuries are the most commonly described complications of TEE; however, the relative infrequency of injuries and lack of uniform reporting make it difficult to definitively identify potential risk factors. Some large retrospective trials suggested that patient factors (age, body mass index, anatomic abnormalities), comorbid conditions (previous stroke), and procedural variables (procedure time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, etc.) are associated with TEE-related injuries. In this narrative review of complications from TEE, the authors focus on the incidence of UGI injuries, the spectrum of injuries associated with TEE, risk factors that may contribute to UGI injuries, as well as diagnosis and management options. Lastly, the discussion focuses on the prevention of injuries as TEE use continues to become more prevalent.

Handoffs and transitions in critical care-understanding scalability: study protocol for a multicenter stepped wedge type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial.

BACKGROUND: The implementation of evidence-based practices in critical care faces specific challenges, including intense time pressure and patient acuity. These challenges result in evidence-to-practice gaps that diminish the impact of proven-effective interventions for patients requiring intensive care unit support. Research is needed to understand and address implementation determinants in critical care settings. METHODS: The Handoffs and Transitions in Critical Care-Understanding Scalability (HATRICC-US) study is a Type 2 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of standardized operating room (OR) to intensive care unit (ICU) handoffs. This mixed methods study will use a stepped wedge design with randomized roll out to test the effectiveness of a customized protocol for structuring communication between clinicians in the OR and the ICU. The study will be conducted in twelve ICUs (10 adult, 2 pediatric) based in five United States academic health systems. Contextual inquiry incorporating implementation science, systems engineering, and human factors engineering approaches will guide both protocol customization and identification of protocol implementation determinants. Implementation mapping will be used to select appropriate implementation strategies for each setting. Human-centered design will be used to create a digital toolkit for dissemination of study findings. The primary implementation outcome will be fidelity to the customized handoff protocol (unit of analysis: handoff). The primary effectiveness outcome will be a composite measure of new-onset organ failure cases (unit of analysis: ICU). DISCUSSION: The HATRICC-US study will customize, implement, and evaluate standardized procedures for OR to ICU handoffs in a heterogenous group of United States academic medical center intensive care units. Findings from this study have the potential to improve postsurgical communication, decrease adverse clinical outcomes, and inform the implementation of other evidence-based practices in critical care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04571749 . Date of registration: October 1, 2020.