Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Surgery ; 151(2): 199-205, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21975288

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In a population-based study, we examined recurrence rates of acute pancreatitis (AP) after cholecystectomy performed to prevent recurrences of AP. METHODS: We abstracted data from medical records of all Olmsted county residents who underwent cholecystectomy at Mayo Clinic for the management of presumed gallstone or idiopathic AP between 1990 and 2005 (n = 239). Based on (i) significantly elevated liver enzymes (≥threefold increase of alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase) on day 1 and (ii) the presence of gallstones/sludge in the gall bladder, we categorized patients into 4 groups: A (i + ii), B (i but not ii), C (ii but not i), and D (neither i nor ii). Recurrence rates of AP after cholecystectomy were determined in all groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up after cholecystectomy was 99 months (range, 8-220). AP recurred in 13 of 142 patients (9%) in group A, 1 of 17 patients (6%) in group B, 13 of 57 patients (23%) in group C, and 14 of 23 patients (61%) in group D (P < .0001 D vs. all other groups and P = .001 C vs. groups A and B). No difference was seen in recurrence rates in groups A vs. B (P = 1.0). Recurrences were more frequent in patients with normal liver enzymes (A + B vs. C + D; P = .000003) and in patients without sonographic evidence of gallstones/sludge (A + C vs. B + D; P = .0008). CONCLUSION: When AP is associated with significantly elevated liver enzymes on day 1, recurrence rates after cholecystectomy are low (9%). However, postcholecystectomy recurrence rates of AP are high in those without such laboratory abnormalities (34%), especially in those without gall bladder stones/sludge (61%) on abdominal ultrasonography. Our results raise doubts about the efficacy of cholecystectomy to prevent recurrent AP in patients with the absence of either a significant elevation of liver tests on day 1 of AP or gallstones and/or sludge in the gall bladder on initial ultrasound examination.


Asunto(s)
Alanina Transaminasa/metabolismo , Aspartato Aminotransferasas/metabolismo , Bilis/diagnóstico por imagen , Cálculos Biliares/diagnóstico por imagen , Cálculos Biliares/cirugía , Hígado/enzimología , Pancreatitis/epidemiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Colecistectomía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pancreatitis/prevención & control , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Prevención Secundaria , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ultrasonografía , Adulto Joven
2.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 19(12): 1111-3, 2007 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17998837

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of Escherichia coli Nissle (Mutaflor, Ardeypharm GmbH, Herdecke, Germany) on the intestinal colonization, level of endotoxin and liver functions in patients with liver cirrhosis. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with liver cirrhosis diagnosed by means of biopsy and clinical examinations were randomly allocated to treatment with E. coli Nissle or placebo for 42 days. Standard clinical examination, biochemical and hematological examinations, level of endotoxin and microbiological examination of the stool were performed before and after the treatment. RESULTS: In comparing the treatment of E. coli Nissle and placebo, significant improvement of the intestinal colonization (P<0.001) in the E. coli Nissle group was described. We found a trend of significant lowering of the endotoxemia (P=0.07) and improvement of liver functions evaluated by Child-Pugh score (P=0.06). CONCLUSION: E. coli Nissle seems to be effective in the restoration of normal colonic colonization and can probably lower endotoxemia in cirrhotic patients.


Asunto(s)
Endotoxemia/terapia , Escherichia coli , Cirrosis Hepática/terapia , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Colon/microbiología , Método Doble Ciego , Endotoxemia/complicaciones , Endotoxinas/sangre , Heces/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hígado/fisiopatología , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/microbiología , Cirrosis Hepática/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 17(10): 1105-10, 2005 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16148557

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of bacterial infection in patients admitted to hospital with variceal bleeding in comparison with patients with liver cirrhosis admitted because of another reason. To compare the effect of orally administered antibiotics vs. intravenous antibiotics. METHODS: Bacteriological investigation of blood culture, urine, throat smear, perianal smear and ascites (polymorphonuclear count as well in ascites) was made in 46 cirrhotic patients admitted to hospital with variceal bleeding and 48 cirrhotic patients admitted because of another reason. Bleeders were treated endoscopically (sclerotization) and pharmacologically (terlipressin 1 mg every 4 h for 5 days), and were randomly allocated to the treatment with oral norfloxacin (25 patients) or intravenous ampicillin/sulbactam (21 patients). Early and late mortalities were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of infection was high in both groups (63.0% bleeders vs. 54.2% controls), but bleeding patients more often had positive blood culture (17.3% vs. 8.6%) and statistically significantly more positive findings in the throat smears (36.9% vs. 17.3%, P=0.04), which gives the evidence of increased pathological colonization in these patients. No difference in survival was seen in patients with per-oral or intravenous administration of antibiotics. CONCLUSION: Bacterial infection was demonstrated in high percentage in patients with liver cirrhosis admitted to hospital. The administration of antibiotics is indicated in these patients. Intravenous application is probably of the same efficacy as per-oral one.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/complicaciones , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hipertensión Portal/complicaciones , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ampicilina/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/diagnóstico , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Humanos , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática Alcohólica/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Norfloxacino/uso terapéutico , Sulbactam/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...