Comparative Analysis of Putative Virulence-Associated Factors of Microsporum canis Isolates from Human and Animal Patients.

Microsporum canis is a zoophilic dermatophyte and the most common fungus isolated from dogs and cats worldwide. To invade skin, this pathogen uses different enzymes, which may be associated with virulence, that contribute to the fungal pathogenicity. The aim of this study is to compare the expression of enzymes that may be associated with virulence, and thermotolerance of M. canis strains isolated from dogs, cats, and humans. The in vitro expression of the enzymes keratinase, catalase, urease, hemolysin, and aspartic protease was evaluated in 52 M. canis strains recently isolated from 14 human patients, 12 dogs, 15 symptomatic, and 11 asymptomatic cats. In addition, thermotolerance was assessed by comparative analysis of fungal growth at 25 °C and 35 °C. Keratinase activity was low in 34 and moderate in 18 strains. Aspartic-protease activity was low in 7, moderate in 33, and high in 12 strains. Hemolysin activity was low in 44 and moderate in 8 strains. All strains were classified as low producers of catalase. All but three strains produced urease in vitro, with a broad range of activity. The strains presented in vitro growth at the two studied temperatures were classified as presenting low (36.5%), medium (44.3%), or high (19.2%) thermotolerance. There was no statistically significant difference in the new putative virulence-associated factors studied among the different hosts, which suggests that they may have a similar role on human, cat, and dog infection. Also, no difference was observed between strains isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic cats. This suggests that these factors have a limited impact on the fate of feline dermatophytosis caused by M. canis.

Performance of mycology and histopathology tests for the diagnosis of toenail onychomycosis due to filamentous fungi: Dermatophyte and non-dermatophyte moulds.

Improvement of laboratory diagnosis of onychomychosis is important so that adequate treatment can be safely implemented. To evaluate and compare the performance of mycological and histopathological examinations in onychomycoses caused by dermatophyte and non-dermatophyte moulds. Patients with lateral/distal subungual onychomycosis in at least one hallux were enrolled in the protocol and assessed via mycological and histopathological tests. The isolation of filamentous fungi was considered the gold standard. Test performance was evaluated through sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values. A total of 212 patients were enrolled in the study. Direct microscopy (DM) was positive in 57.5% patients, and cultures in 34.4%. Among these patients, 23.3% were positive for dermatophytes, with Trichophyton rubrum the most frequently isolated, and 86.3% were positive for non-dermatophytes, with Neoscytalidium dimidiatum predominance. Histopathology was positive in 41.0% samples. Direct microscopy showed better sensitivity for non-dermatophyte moulds (P=.000) and nail clipping was more specific for dermatophyte (P=.018). Histopathology of the distal nail plate is a valuable complementary tool for the diagnosis of onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes and direct microscopy is especially useful for non-dermatophyte molds.