Improving standard of pediatric surgical care in a low resource setting: the key role of academic partnership.

BACKGROUND: An epidemiological transition is interesting Sub-Saharan Africa increasing the burden of non-communicable diseases most of which are of surgical interest. Local resources are far from meeting needs and, considering that 50% of the population is less than 14 years of age, Pediatric surgical coverage is specially affected. Efforts are made to improve standards of care and to increase the number of Pediatric surgeons through short-term specialist surgical Missions, facilities supported by humanitarian organization, academic Partnership, training abroad of local surgeons. This study is a half term report about three-years Partnership between the University of Chieti- Pescara, Italy and the University of Gezira, Sudan to upgrade standard of care at the Gezira National Centre for Pediatric Surgery (GNCPS) of Wad Medani. Four surgical Teams per year visited GNCPS. The Program was financed by the Italian Agency for Development Cooperation. METHODS: The state of local infrastructure, current standard of care, analysis of caseload, surgical activity and results are reported. Methods utilized to assess local needs and to develop Partnership activities are described. RESULTS: Main surgical task of the visiting Team were advancements in Colorectal procedures, Epispadias/Exstrophy Complex management and Hypospadias surgery (20% of major surgical procedures at the GNCPS). Intensive care facilities and staff to assist more complex cases (i.e. neonates) are still defective. Proctoring, training on the job of junior surgeons, anaesthetists and nurses, collaboration in educational programs, advisorship in hospital management, clinical governance, maintenance of infrastructure together with training opportunities in Italy were included by the Program. Despite on-going efforts, actions have not yet been followed by the expected results. More investments are needed on Healthcare infrastructures to increase health workers motivation and prevent brain drain. CONCLUSIONS: The key role that an Academic Partnership can play, acting through expatriated Teams working in the same constrained contest with the local workforce, must be emphasized. Besides clinical objectives, these types of Global Health Initiatives address improvement in management and clinical governance. The main obstacles to upgrade standard of care and level of surgery met by the Visiting Team are scarce investments on health infrastructure and a weak staff retention policy, reflecting in poor motivation and low performance.

Willingness to pay for one-stop anesthesia in pediatric day surgery.

BACKGROUND: This study assesses the parents' Willingness To Pay (WTP) for One Stop Anesthesia (OSA). OSA is part of a free screening procedure that determines the timing of the anesthesiological assessment. In OSA-positive patients, the preoperative assessment is carried out on the same day as the surgery. The OSA allows patients who have to undergo surgery in a pediatric day surgery to avoid accessing the pre-admission clinic. METHOD: This is a descriptive cohort study. A sample of 106 parents were interviewed directly by means of a questionnaire. The questionnaire builds a hypothetical scenario where the interviewee has a chance to buy the OSA health service with the WTP. The WTP values are distributed in classes and are contingent to the market built in the questionnaire. The Chi Square and Cramer's V tests evaluate the WTP dependence on the parents' place of origin and occupation. RESULTS: The approximate average of the WTP classes is €87.21 per family. The Chi Square test relative to the WTP classes and the places of origin is statistically significant (p < 0.05). The Cramer's V test is 0.347 and points to a positive association between the two demographics. The Cramer's V test of the WTP classes and the types of job is 0.339 and indicates a positive association. CONCLUSION: Nearly 90% of pediatric patients who were screened for timing the preoperative assessment are true positives to OSA. This allows doing away with the pre-hospitalization, with definite advantages for the families. This screening is a health service that families would be hypothetically willing to pay.

Diagnostic accuracy of anesthesiology evaluation timing: the 'One-Stop Anesthesia' in pediatric day-surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Assessing timing efficacy of anesthetic evaluation in pediatric day-surgery by a diagnostic accuracy study. AIM: Lowering hospital visits in patients with negative medical history. BACKGROUND: Pediatric patients scheduled for day-surgery procedures can be categorized, according to their history, in two groups. One, the largest, includes healthy patients and the other includes those with medical conditions that necessitate further evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical data are collected by the pediatric surgeons of our department and reviewed by an anesthetist who then selects the timing of anesthesiology evaluation, which will take place in the same day of the procedure (One-Stop Anesthesia), or some days before it, in a dedicated setting (Pre-Admission Clinic). In 2008, 332 children, older than 12 months, screened by that method, underwent surgical procedures in general anesthesia. RESULTS: Our data were examined using Bayesian Statistical Analysis. In the 'One-Stop Anesthesia' group, true positive were 290 (87.4%) and false positive 4 (1.2%). Of the 38 patients assessed by our Pre-Admission Clinic, true negative were 30 (9%) and false negative 8 (2.4%). Sensibility (97.3%), specificity (88.2%), positive predictive value (98.6%), negative predictive value (78.9%), diagnostic accuracy (96.4%), likelihood positive (8.3), and likelihood negative (0.03) were calculated. CONCLUSIONS: Timing the preoperative anesthesiologist's evaluation avoided 88% of hospital visits, usually to the Pre-Admission Clinic, and thus, it was cost effective, reducing direct and indirect costs of healthcare providers.